Role of ICSI in Non-male Factor Cycles as the Number of Oocytes Retrieved Decreases from Four to One

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate whether intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) shows an advantage over in vitro fertilization (IVF) in non-male factor cycles as the number of oocytes retrieved decreases from four to one. We undertook a retrospective analysis of 1305 IVF/ICSI cycles of non-male factor in which four or fewer oocytes were retrieved. Comparisons were made between conventional IVF (CI) and ICSI when one, two, three or four oocyte(s) were retrieved. Primary outcomes including normal fertilization rate, proportion of embryos per obtained oocyte, cycle cancellation rate, implantation rate, clinical pregnancy rate (PR), live birth rate (LBR), cumulative PR and cumulative LBR were evaluated. The results showed that the normal fertilization rate (72.5% vs. 50.0%) and the proportion of embryos per obtained oocyte (72.5% vs. 55.0%) were significantly increased in one oocyte retrieved cycles in ICSI group as compared with CI group. However, the proportion of embryos per obtained oocyte was markedly decreased in ICSI group when three (52.3% vs. 61.3%) or four (56.9% vs. 64.0%) oocytes were retrieved. The implantation rates, clinical PRs, LBRs, cumulative PRs and cumulative LBRs in CI group were comparable to those in ICSI group when one, two, three or four oocyte(s) were retrieved. In conclusion, ICSI doesn't show advantages over IVF in low oocyte yield cycles of non-male factors, even when only one oocyte was retrieved.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. 1

    Faddy MJ, Gosden RG, Gougeon A, etal. Accelerated disappearance of ovarian follicles in mid-life: implications for forecasting menopause. Hum Reprod, 1992,1(10): 1342–1346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2

    Van Steirteghem AC, Nagy Z, Joris H, etal. High fertilization and implantation rates after intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Hum Reprod, 1993,8(7): 1061–1066

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. 3

    Boulet SL, Mehta A, Kissin DM, etal. Trends in use of and reproductive outcomes associated with intracytoplasmic sperm injection. JAMA, 2015, 313(3): 255–263

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4

    American Society for Reproductive Medicine B, Alabama: Intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) for non-male factor infertility: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril, 2012, 98(6): 1395–1399

    Google Scholar 

  5. 5

    Kim JY, Kim JH, Jee BC, etal. Can intracytoplasmic sperm injection prevent total fertilization failure and enhance embryo quality in patients with non-male factor infertility? Eur JObstet Gyn R B, 2014, 178:188–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6

    Ferraretti AP, La Marca A, Fauser BC, etal. ESHRE consensus on the definition of 'poor response' to ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization: the Bologna criteria. Hum Reprod, 2011, 26(7): 1616–1624

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. 7

    Giovanale V, Pulcinelli FM, Ralli E, etal. Poor responders in IVF: an update in therapy. Gynecol Endocrinol, 2015,31 (4): 253–257

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. 8

    Balasch J, Gratacos E. Delayed childbearing: effects on fertility and the outcome of pregnancy. Fetal Diagn Ther, 2011, 29(4): 263–273

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. 9

    Baker VL, Brown MB, Luke B, etal. Association of number of retrieved oocytes with live birth rate and birth weight: an analysis of 231,815 cycles of in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril, 2015, 103(4): 931–938 e932

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. 10

    Steward RG, Lan L, Shah AA, etal. Oocyte number as a predictor for ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome and live birth: an analysis of256,381 in vitro fertilization cycles. Fertil Steril, 2014, 101(4): 967–973

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. 11

    Sunkara SK, Rittenberg V, Raine-Fenning N, etal. Association between the number of eggs and live birth in IVF treatment: an analysis of 400 135 treatment cycles. Hum Reprod, 2011, 26(7): 1768–1774

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. 12

    Luna M, Bigelow C, Duke M, etal. Should ICSI be recommended routinely in patients with four or fewer oocytes retrieved? J Assist Reprod Genet, 2011, 28(10): 911–915

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. 13

    Ou YC, Lan KC, Huang FJ, etal. Comparison of in vitro fertilization versus intracytoplasmic sperm injection in extremely low oocyte retrieval cycles. Fertil Steril, 2010, 93(1): 96–100

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. 14

    Gozlan I, Dor A, Farber B, etal. Comparing intracytoplasmic sperm injection and in vitro fertilization in patients with single oocyte retrieval. FertilSteril, 2007, 87(3): 515–518

    Google Scholar 

  15. 15

    Sfontouris IA, Kolibianakis EM, Lainas GT, etal. Live birth rates using conventional in vitro fertilization compared to intracytoplasmic sperm injection in Bologna poor responders with a single oocyte retrieved. J Assist Reprod Genet, 2015, 32(5): 691–697

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. 16

    Alpha Scientists in Reproductive M, Embryology ESIGo. The Istanbul consensus workshop on embryo assessment: proceedings of an expert meeting. Hum Reprod, 2011, 26(6): 1270–1283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17

    Chow SC, Shao J, Wang HS. Sample size calculations in clinical research. 2nd Ed. Chapman &Hall/CRC Biostatistics Series, New York, 2008,243–244

    Google Scholar 

  18. 18

    Moreno C, Ruiz A, Simon C, etal. Intracytoplasmic sperm injection as a routine indication in low responder patients. Hum Reprod, 1998, 13(8): 2126–2129

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. 19

    Fang C, Tang J, Huang R, et dl. Comparison of IVF outcomes using conventional insemination and ICSI in ovarian cycles in which only one or two oocytes are obtained. J Obstet Gyn R B, 2012,41 (7): 650–656

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. 20

    Maryam E, Farnaz M, Fariba Y, etal. Comparison of conventional IVF versus ICSI in non-male factor, normoresponder patients. Iran J Reprod Med, 2012, 10(2): 131–136

    Google Scholar 

  21. 21

    Thomas MR, Sparks AE, Ryan GL, etal. Clinical predictors of human blastocyst formation and pregnancy after extended embryo culture and transfer. Fertil Steril, 2010, 94(2): 543–548

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. 22

    Dessolle L, Freour T, Barriere P, etal. A cycle-based model to predict blastocyst transfer cancellation. Hum Reprod, 2010, 25(3): 598–604

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Na Guo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Guo, N., Hua, X., Li, Yf. et al. Role of ICSI in Non-male Factor Cycles as the Number of Oocytes Retrieved Decreases from Four to One. CURR MED SCI 38, 131–136 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11596-018-1856-7

Download citation

Key words

  • low oocyte yield
  • intracytoplasmic sperm injection
  • in vitro fertilization
  • oocyte number
  • cumulative live birth rate