Skip to main content
Log in

Pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms: Correlation between MR features and pathological tumor grades

  • Published:
Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology [Medical Sciences] Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

This study investigated the accuracy of MRI features in differentiating the pathological grades of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (PNENs). A total of 31 PNENs patients were retrospectively evaluated, including 19 cases in grade 1, 5 in grade 2, and 7 in grade 3. Plain and contrastenhanced MRI was performed on all patients. MRI features including tumor size, margin, signal intensity, enhancement patterns, degenerative changes, duct dilatation and metastasis were analyzed. Chi square tests, Fisher’s exact tests, one-way ANOVA and ROC analysis were conducted to assess the associations between MRI features and different tumor grades. It was found that patients with older age, tumors with higher TNM stage and without hormonal syndrome had higher grade of PNETs (all P<0.05). Tumor size, shape, margin and growth pattern, tumor pattern, pancreatic and bile duct dilatation and presence of lymphatic and distant metastasis as well as MR enhancement pattern and tumor-topancreas contrast during arterial phase were the key features differentiating tumors of all grades (all P<0.05). ROC analysis revealed that the tumor size with threshold of 2.8 cm, irregular shape, pancreatic duct dilatation and lymphadenopathy showed satisfactory sensitivity and specificity in distinguishing grade 3 from grade 1 and grade 2 tumors. Features of peripancreatic tissue or vascular invasion, and distant metastasis showed high specificity but relatively low sensitivity. In conclusion, larger size, poorlydefined margin, heterogeneous enhanced pattern during arterial phase, duct dilatation and the presence of metastases are common features of higher grade PNENs. Plain and contrast-enhanced MRI provides the ability to differentiate tumors with different pathological grades.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Halfdanarson TR, Rabe KG, Rubin J, et al. Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs): incidence, prognosis and recent trend toward improved survival. Ann Oncol, 2008,19(10):1727–1733

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Zhou C, Zhang J, Zheng Y, et al. Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: a comprehensive review. Int J Cancer, 2012,131(5):1013–1022

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Milan SA, Yeo CJ. Neuroendocrine tumors of the pancreas. Curr Opin Oncol, 2012,24(1):46–55

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bosman FT, Carneiro F, Hruban RH, et al. WHO classification of tumours of the digestive system. Lyon: IARC Press,2010,322–326

    Google Scholar 

  5. Rindi G, Kloppel G, Alhman H, et al. TNM staging of foregut (neuro) endocrine tumors: a consensus proposal including a grading system. Virchows Arch, 2006,449(4):395–401

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Gunther RW, Klose KJ, Ruckert K, et al. Islet-cell tumors: detection of small lesions with computed tomography and ultrasound. Radiology, 1983,148(2):485–488

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ichikawa T, Peterson MS, Federle MP, et al. Islet cell tumor of the pancreas: biphasic CT versus MR imaging in tumor detection. Radiology, 2000,216(1):163–171

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Semelka RC, Custodio CM, Cem Balci N, et al. Neuroendocrine tumors of the pancreas: spectrum of appearances on MRI. JMRI, 2000,11(2):141–148

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. de Herder WW, Kwekkeboom DJ, Valkema R, et al. Neuroendocrine tumors and somatostatin: imaging techniques. J EndocrinolI nvest, 2005,28(11 Suppl):132–136

    Google Scholar 

  10. Manfredi R, Bonatti M, Mantovani W, et al. Nonhyperfunctioning neuroendocrine tumours of the pancreas: MR imaging appearance and correlation with their biological behaviour. Eur Radiol, 2013,23(11):3029–3039

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kim DW, Kim HJ, Kim KW, et al. Neuroendocrine neoplasms of the pancreas at dynamic enhanced CT: comparison between grade 3 neuroendocrine carcinoma and grade 1/2 neuroendocrine tumour. Eur Radiol, 2015,25(5):1375–1383

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Takumi K, Fukukura Y, Higashi M, et al. Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: Correlation between the contrastenhanced computed tomography features and the pathological tumor grade. Eur J Radiol, 2015,84(8):1436–1443

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Bushnell DL, Baum RP. Standard imaging techniques for neuroendocrine tumors. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am, 2011,40(1):153–162

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Caramella C, Dromain C, de Baere T, et al. Endocrine pancreatic tumours: which are the most useful MRI sequences? Euro Radiol, 2010,20(11):2618–2627

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Herwick S, Miller FH, Keppke AL. MRI of islet cell tumors of the pancreas. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2006, 187(5):W472–W480

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Panzuto F, Falconi M, Nasoni S, et al. Staging of digestive endocrine tumours using helical computed tomography and somatostatin receptor scintigraphy. Ann Oncol, 2003,14(4):586–591

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Dromain C, Deandreis D, Scoazec JY, et al. Imaging of neuroendocrine tumors of the pancreas. Diagn Interv Imaging, 2016,97(12):1241–1257

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Gallotti A, Johnston RP, Bonaffini PA, et al. Incidental neuroendocrine tumors of the pancreas: MDCT findings and features of malignancy. AJR, 2013,200(2):355–362

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Marion-Audibert AM, Barel C, Gouysse G, et al. Low microvessel density is an unfavorable histoprognostic factor in pancreatic endocrine tumors. Gastroenterology, 2003,125(4):1094–1104

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Zhang J, Jia Z, Li Q, et al. Elevated expression of vascular endothelial growth factor correlates with increased angiogenesis and decreased progression-free survival among patients with low-grade neuroendocrine tumors. Cancer, 2007,109(8):1478–1486

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kim JH, Eun HW, Kim YJ, et al. Staging accuracy of MR for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor and imaging findings according to the tumor grade. Abdom Imaging, 2013,38(5):1106–1114

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Rodallec M, Vilgrain V, Couvelard A, et al. Endocrine pancreatic tumours and helical CT: contrast enhancement is correlated with microvascular density, histoprognostic factors and survival. Pancreatology, 2006,6(1-2): 77–85

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Xu LN, Xu YY, Gao DW. Impact of operative and perioperative factors on the long-term prognosis of primary liver cancer patients undergoing epatectomy. J Huazhong Univ Sci Technol Med Sci, 2016,36(4):523–528

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ping Han  (韩 萍).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jin, F., Wang, K., Qin, Tt. et al. Pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms: Correlation between MR features and pathological tumor grades. J. Huazhong Univ. Sci. Technol. [Med. Sci.] 37, 587–595 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11596-017-1777-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11596-017-1777-x

Key words

Navigation