Skip to main content
Log in

Patients 60 years of age and older should have the same chance for heart transplantation or not?

  • Published:
Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology [Medical Sciences] Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Heart transplantation is considered the best treatment modality for advanced heart disease. While old age has conventionally been considered a contraindication for heart transplantation due to the reported adverse effect of advanced age, however donor hearts’ shortage continues to stimulate the discussion about the recipient’s upper age limit. Our study was based on a retrospective analysis for the results of 52 (18%) patients aged 60 years and older undergoing heart transplantation between May 2008 and December 2015, and these patients were compared with 236 (82%) adult recipients who were younger than 60 years at the time of transplantation and during the same period. In older group, 71% were males with the mean age of 63.38±3.55 years, and in younger group, 83.4% were males with a mean age of 43.72±11.41 years (P=0.27). Dilated cardiomyopathy was the most common indication for transplantation among patients in both groups (P=0.147). In older group, the 3-month survival rate was higher than that in younger group (P=0.587), however the 6-month survival rate showed no significant difference (P=0.225). Although the 1-year survival rate was higher in older group (P=0.56), yet the 3-year survival rate between the two groups showed no statistically significant difference (P=0.48). According to our experience among older heart transplant candidates who were 60 years and older, we believe that advanced age should not be an excluding criterion to cardiac transplantation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Zuckermann A, Dunkler D, Deviatko E, et al. Long-term survival (>10 years) of patients >60 years with induction therapy after cardiac transplantation. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, 2003,24(2): 283–291

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. John R, Rajasinghe HA, Chen JM, et al. Long-term outcomes after cardiac transplantation: an experience based on different eras of immunosuppressive therapy. Ann Thorac Surg, 2001,72(2): 440–449

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Robbins RC, Barlow CW, Oyer PE, et al. Thirty years of cardiac transplantation at Stanford University. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 1999,117(5): 939–951

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Stehlik J, Edwards LB, Kucheryavaya AY, et al. The registry of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation: twenty-eighth adult heart transplant report 2011. J Heart Lung Transplant, 2011,30(10): 1078–1094

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Blanche C, Blanche DA, Kearney B, et al. Heart transplantation in patients seventy years of age and older: a comparative analysis of outcome. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2001,121(3): 532–541

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kilic A, Conte J, Baumgartner W, et al. Does recipient age impact functional outcomes of orthotopic heart transplantation. Ann Thorac Surg, 2014,97(5): 1636–1642

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Young JB, Naftel DC, Bourge RC, et al. Matching the heart donor and heart transplant recipient. Clues for successful expansion of the donor pool: a multivariable, multiinstitutional report. J Heart Transplant, 1994,13(3): 353–363

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Yeom S, Hwang H, Oh S, et al. Heart transplantation in the elderly patients: midterm results. Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2013,46(2): 111–116

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Hosenpud JD, Bennett LE, Keck BM, et al. The registry of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation: seventeenth official report. J Heart Lung Transplant, 2000,19(10): 909–931

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Bull DA, Karwande SV, Hawkins JA, et al. Long-term results of cardiac transplantation in patients older than sixty years: UTAH Cardiac Transplant Program. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 1996,111(2): 423–427

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Borkon AM, Muehlebach GF, Jones PG, et al. An analysis of the effect of age on survival after heart transplant. J Heart Lung Transplant, 1999,18(7): 668–674

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Marelli D, Kobashigawa J, Hamilton MA, et al. Long-term outcomes of heart transplantation in older recipients. J Heart Lung Transplant, 2008,27(8): 830–834

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Morgan JA, John R, Mancini DM, et al. Should heart transplantation considered as a treatment option for patients aged 70 years of older? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2004,127(6): 1817–1819

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Weiss ES, Nwakanma LU, Patel ND, et al. Outcomes in patients older than 60 years of age undergoing orthotopic heart transplantation: An analysis of the UNOS database. J Heart Lung Transplant, 2008,27(2): 184–191

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Prieto D, Correia P, Batista M, et al. Heart transplantation in patients older than 65 years: worthwhile or wastage of organs. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2015,63(8): 684–692

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Nian-guo Dong  (董念国) or Si Chen  (陈 思).

Additional information

The authors contributed equally to this work.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Alshirbini, M.H., Xie, F., Dong, Ng. et al. Patients 60 years of age and older should have the same chance for heart transplantation or not?. J. Huazhong Univ. Sci. Technol. [Med. Sci.] 37, 57–62 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11596-017-1694-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11596-017-1694-z

Key words

Navigation