Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of efficacy of different treatments for pulmonary embolism

  • Published:
Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology [Medical Sciences] Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

An optimal therapy for pulmonary embolism (PE) was explored by comparing three different methods in order to alleviate the sufferings of PE patients and reduce the mortality. Eighty patients with PE diagnosed by computed tomography angiography (CTA) were treated with thrombolysis, anticoagulation only, or surgery/intervention. The clinical efficacy of different treatments were compared and analyzed. Twenty-four out of the 26 patients (92%) in anticoagulation only group showed improvement in CTA and clinical presentations, which was significantly higher than that in the thrombolysis group (87%, n=39, P<0.05). However, there was no significant difference in the rate of mortality between thrombolysis group and anticoagulation only group. In the surgery/interventional group (n=15), the success rate was 47%, and the mortality rate was 14%. Both of them were significantly different from those in thrombolysis and anticoagulation only groups (both P<0.05). Log-rank analysis of the data of 5-year follow-up revealed that the survival time in surgery/intervention group was significantly shorter than in the other two groups (P<0.05). It was suggested that it is of importance to choose the appropriate therapeutic regimen for PE patients. Mortality may be reduced and prognosis may be improved with anticoagulation only and thrombolysis therapy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aklog L, Williams CS, Byrne JG, et al. Acute pulmonary embolectomy: a contemporary approach. Circulation, 2002,105(12):1416–1419

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Wolf TR, Allen TL. Syncope as an emergency department presentation of pulmonary embolism. J Emerg Med, 1998,16(1):27–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kasper DL, Braunwald E, Fauci AS, et al. Pulmonary thromboembolism. Harrison’s Principles of Internal Medicine (16th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill, 2005:1561–1565

    Google Scholar 

  4. Adam T, Giancarlo A, Nicolas D, et al. Guidelines on diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism. Eur Heart J, 2014,35:3033–3080

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Liang Y, Yang JH, Liu S, et al. Assessment of treatment regimens in 58 cases of acute pulmonary embolism. Chin J Tuberc Respir Dis (Chinese), 2000,23(4):235–238

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Mosbeck A. Diagnosis of lung embolism. Acta Med Austriaca, 1993, 200(1-2):32–35

    Google Scholar 

  7. Rahimtoola A, Bergin JD. Acute pulmonary embolism: an update on diagnosis and management. Curr Probl Cadiol, 2005,30:61–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Anderson FA Jr, Spencer FA. Risk factors for venous thromboembolism. Circulation, 2003,207(23 suppl 1):9–16

    Google Scholar 

  9. Cheng XS. Pulmonary vascular disease (Chinese). Beijing: Joint Publishing House of Beijing Medical College and Beijing Union Medical College, 1993:179–195.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Zhang HD. Clinical treatment of pulmonary embolism. J Clin Exper Med, 2010,9(12):953–954

    Google Scholar 

  11. Gan LH, Zhang JQ, Zhang ZG, et al. Clinical analysis of surgical treatment of 54 cases of pulmonary embolism. Chin J Surg (Chinese), 2008,46(1):36–38

    Google Scholar 

  12. Wood KE. Major pulmonary embolism—review of a pathophysiologic approach to the golden hour of hemodynamically significant pulmonary embolism. Chest, 2002,121(3):877–905

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Zhang ZG, Gao DF. Late progress in pulmonary embolism diagnosis. Med Recap, 2011,17(11):1684–1686

    Google Scholar 

  14. Masotti L, Righini M, Vuilleumier N, et al. Prognostic stratification of acute pulmonary embolism: focus on clinical aspects, imaging, and biomarkers. Vasc Health Risk Manag, 2009,5(4):567–575

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Vedovati MC, Germini F, Agnelli G, et al. Prognostic role of embolic burden assessed at computed tomography angiography in patients with acute pulmonary embolism: systematic review and meta-analysis. Thromb Haemost, 2013,11(12):2092–2102

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Gong XW, Yuan YD. Meta-analysis of risk factors for all-cause mortality of pulmonary thromboembolism. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi (Chinese), 2013,93:2534–2540

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to He Huang  (黄 鹤).

Additional information

This project was supported by grants from the Key Project of Hubei Science and Technology Support Program, China (No. 2013BCB013), the Key Project of Hubei Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 2013CFA059), and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81270249).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fan, Y., Huang, H., Xiong, J. et al. Comparison of efficacy of different treatments for pulmonary embolism. J. Huazhong Univ. Sci. Technol. [Med. Sci.] 36, 254–258 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11596-016-1576-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11596-016-1576-9

Key words

Navigation