Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Acceptability of physical examination by male doctors in medical care: Taking breast palpation as an example

  • Published:
Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology [Medical Sciences] Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

In this study, we conducted an investigation among medical workers, patients and college students concerning their acceptability of breast palpation performed by male doctors (hereinafter referred to as “acceptability”, or “the examination”, respectively, if not otherwise indicated), to get the information about their acceptability and reasons for accepting or declining the examination among the three population. A questionnaire investigation was conducted in 500 patients with breast diseases, 700 students of medical colleges, and 280 medical workers working in hospitals. The subjects were asked to choose between two options: accept or do not accept (the examination). The subjects were asked to fill out the questionnaire forms on free and anonymous basis and the questionnaire forms were collected on spot, immediately after completion. The questionnaires collected were coded, sorted out and checked. Data of the eligible questionnaires were input into Epidata software and analyzed by SPSS. Upon the establishment of the database, the intra-group data were tested by utilizing χ2 test. Among 1480 questionnaires, 1293 (90.41%) questionnaires were retrieved. Our results showed that 56.78% of patients reported that they could accept breast palpation by male doctors. About 59.66% of medical staff expressed their acceptance of the examination, but only 35.03% of students said the examination. On the basis of this study, we were led to conclude that the examination is not well accepted by different populations, and therefore, (1) medical professionals and administrators should pay attention to the gender-related ethics in their practice and the feeling of patients should be respected when medical examinations involve private or sensitive body parts; (2) to this end, related departments should be properly staffed with doctors of both sexes, and this is especially true of the departments involving the examination or treatment of private or sensitive body parts; (3) health education should, among other things, include helping female patients to overcome the fear and anxiety in such examinations. This is of great importance since some women may miss the opportunity to get timely diagnosis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. The Ministry of Health, the State Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine. Opinions on implementing “patient- selecting-doctor” to promote internal reform of medical institutions. Chin Rural Health Manage (Chinese), 2000,20(8):13

  2. LV Y. Present status of “patient-selecting-doctor”. J Psychol Doct (Chinese), 2012,6:416–417

    Google Scholar 

  3. Wang XY. Ethics significance of “patient-selecting- doctor”. Chin Med Ethics (Chinese), 2001,14(2):32–33

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hu SJ. Advantages and disadvantages of “patient- selecting-doctor”. Chin Med Ethics (Chinese), 2002,15(1): 44–45

    Google Scholar 

  5. Yin LY, Fu BE, Li FY. Efficacy of propofol in painless artificial abortion: an analysis of 5600 cases. Guide Chin Med: J Med (Chinese), 2005,3:2–3

    Google Scholar 

  6. He B, Zhou WW. Effects of the anesthetist gender on propofol dosage in painless abortion. Mod Med Health (Chinese), 2012,28(6):855–856

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cui Y. Adverse effects of propofol in painless artificial abortion. Hainan Medical J (Chinese), 2009,20(3):64–65

    Google Scholar 

  8. Alehagen S, Wijma B, Lundberg U, et al. Fear, pain and stress hormones during childbirth. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol, 2005,26(3):153–165

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Tang Y, Nie X, Zhu GQ. Influence of preoperative anxiety on target controlled infusion anesthesia with propofol and fentanyl in patients undergoing painless artificial abortion. J Clin Anesthesiol (Chinese), 2009,25(2):140–141

    Google Scholar 

  10. Zeng M, Hu MN, Li H, et al. Discussion on the application of doctor-patient communication in mammography. Anhui Med J (in Chinese), 2011,32(9):1325

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ding SM, Zhang JE. Pressure during molybdenum target radiography of women after breast augmentation. J Practical Radiol (Chinese), 2007,23(11):1524–1525

    Google Scholar 

  12. Bricker SRW. Hallucinations after propofol. Anaesthesia, 1988,43(2):170–171

    Google Scholar 

  13. Saint-Mauriee C. Propofol in pediatric anesthesia. Cah Anesthesiol, 1991,39(6):411–420

    Google Scholar 

  14. Gong YL. Social medicine (Chinese). Beijing: People’s Medical Publishing House. 2001,11–25

    Google Scholar 

  15. Wang ZY, Xu XH, Zuo CC, et al. How to understand and carry out “patient-selecting-doctor”. Chin Health Serv Manage (Chinese), 2001,(3):147–149

    Google Scholar 

  16. Liu J. Face-to-face interaction between female patients and male doctors. Health Horizon, 2005,2:36–37

    Google Scholar 

  17. Gao H, He ZZ. “Patient-selecting-doctor” mode is important for the development of hospitals. Chin Health Serv Manage, 2001,22(3):l6–l7

    Google Scholar 

  18. Tao J, Cai QH. Thinking “patient-selecting-doctor” under new circumstances. Chin Hosp Manage (Chinese), 2011, 31(5):11–12

    Google Scholar 

  19. Yu J, Zhang MX, Jin JG, et al. Deepening and perfecting the “patient-selecting-doctor” mode. Chin Health Serv Manage (Chinese), 2002,18(6):340–342

    Google Scholar 

  20. Wu YM. Analysis of “patient-selecting-doctor”. Mod J Integr Tradit Chin West Med, 2002,11(15):1526–1527

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Han J, Zheng PY. Analysis of patient mindset after “patient- selecting-doctor” and triage skills. J Qilu Nursing (Chinese), 2001,7(6):474–475.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Ou YX. Rational thinking in “doctor-selecting-patient”. Chin Lawyer (Chinese), 2002(4):63–64

  23. Chen XL, Zhang SC. Some problems in implementation of “doctor-selecting-patient”. Chin Health Serv Manage (Chinese), 2001,17(2):82–83

    Google Scholar 

  24. Xu YH. Analysis of the pros and cons of “patient- selecting-doctor” and the countermeasures. Chin J Hosp Adm (Chinese), 2001,17(6):337–338

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Yao W. Analysis of the disadvantages of “patient-selecting- doctor” and the countermeasures. Soft Sci Health (Chinese), 2000,14(6):292–293

    Google Scholar 

  26. Shen K, Yao W. Disadvantages of “patient-selecting-doctor” and the coping strategies. Chin Health Serv Manage (Chinese), 2001,17(11):660–661

    Google Scholar 

  27. Wang QG. Ethics about “patient-selecting-doctor”. Chin Med Ethics (Chinese), 2002,15(5):18

    Google Scholar 

  28. Zhang T. Informed consent right of patients and particular intervention of doctors. Chin Med Ethics (Chinese), 2001,(2):8–10

    Google Scholar 

  29. Fu J. Relationship between informed consent right of patients and leading decision-making power of physicians. Med Philos (Chinese), 2003,24(6):43–45

    Google Scholar 

  30. Xia YY. Misunderstanding of informed consent right from the perspective of the history of informed consent right. Soft Sci Health, 2007,21(2): 155–157

    Google Scholar 

  31. Luo JY, Zeng R. “Doctor-selecting-patient” and role conversion of doctors. J Chin Physician (Chinese), 2004,6(10): 1

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Medicine and Health Management, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430030, China

    Yan-jie Wang  (王彦杰) & Zhan-chun Feng  (冯占春)

  2. Sanquan Medical College of Xinxiang Medical University, Xinxiang, 453003, China

    Yan-jie Wang  (王彦杰), Jie Yang  (杨 捷), Zhen Jia  (贾 臻), Dong-ming Chen  (陈东明) & Ping Zhang  (张 苹)

  3. The Third Affiliated Hospital of Xinxiang Medical University, Xinxiang, 453003, China

    Li-xia Kang  (康丽霞)

Authors
  1. Yan-jie Wang  (王彦杰)
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jie Yang  (杨 捷)
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Li-xia Kang  (康丽霞)
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Zhen Jia  (贾 臻)
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Dong-ming Chen  (陈东明)
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Ping Zhang  (张 苹)
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Zhan-chun Feng  (冯占春)
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhan-chun Feng  (冯占春).

Additional information

This project was supported by a grant from the National High-tech R&D Program (Program 863) (No. 2011AA030101).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, Yj., Yang, J., Kang, Lx. et al. Acceptability of physical examination by male doctors in medical care: Taking breast palpation as an example. J. Huazhong Univ. Sci. Technol. [Med. Sci.] 35, 781–784 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11596-015-1507-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11596-015-1507-1

Key words

Search

Navigation