Skip to main content
Log in

Renal impairment in multiple myeloma: Presenting features in different departments

  • Published:
Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology [Medical Sciences] Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

In order to analyze the cai]ses of delayed diagnosis and raise the level of early diagnosis of atypical multiple myeloma (MM), the differences of presenting features between the patients presented to nephrologists and those presented to hematologists were compared. MM patients in our hospital were studied retrospectively. Those who referred renal impairment were divided into two groups: group I presented to nephrologists prior to MM diagnosis (n=29) and group II presented to hematologists directly (n=62). The age, sex, initial symptoms, haematological and biochemical parameters, the phenotype of paraprotein, bone marrow biopsy and cytology were undertaken and analyzed. The results showed that the median time between the initial symptoms and diagnosis in the patients of group I was longer than that in group II (P<0.001); patients in group I had significantly lower incidence of bone pain (P<0.01) and worse renal function (P<0.05) on presentation. There were lower level of myeloma cells (P<0.05), lower incidence of hypergammaglobulinemia (P<0.05), lower positive rate of monoclonal immunoglobulin (M protein) (P<0.05) and M protein level (P<0.05) in the patients of group I than those in group II. The ratio of monoclonal to lambda monoclonal proteins in a population was 1:3.67 in patients of group I, whereas 1:0.90 in patients of group II (P<0.01). Moreover, patients with λ type had a higher degree of renal insufficiency than those with κ type (P<0.05). It was suggested that the median time between the initial symptoms and diagnosis in the patients presented to nephrologists was longer than that in those presented to hematologists; the patients presented to nephrologists had the lower incidence of bone pain, lower level of myeloma cells and M protein, which made early diagnosis more difficult; more patients presented to nephrologists had the majority of λ light chain type, moreover, patients with λ light chain type had a higher incidence of renal insufficiency.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Huang SY, Yao M, Tang JL, et al. Epidemiology of multiple myeloma in Taiwan: increasing incidence for the past 25 years and higher prevalence of extramedullary myeloma in patients younger than 55 years. Cancer, 2007,110(4):896–905

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kyle RA, Gertz MA, Witzig TE, et al. Review of 1027 patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Mayo Clin Proc, 2003,78(1):21–33

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Blade J, Fernandez-Llama P, Bosch F, et al. Renal failure in multiple myeloma presenting features and predictors of outcome in 94 patients from a single institution. Arch Intern Med, 1998,158(17):1889–1893

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Irish AB, Winearls CG, Littlewood T. Presentation and survival of patients with severe renal failure and myeloma. QJM, 1997,90(12):773–780

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Knudsen LM, Hjorth M, Hippe E. Renal failure in multiple myeloma:reversibility and impact on the prognosis. Eur J Haematol, 2000,65(3):175–181

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. International Myeloma Working Group. Criteria for the classification of monoclonal gammopathies, multiple myeloma and related disorders: a report of the International Myeloma Working Group. Br J Haematol, 2000,121(5):749–757

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Clark AD, Shetty A, Soutar R. Renal failure and multiple myeloma: pathogenesis and treatment of renal failure and management of underlying myeloma. Blood Rev, 1999,13(2):79–90

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Eleutherakis-papaiakovou V, Bamias A, Gika D, et al. Renal failure in multiple myeloma: Incidence, correlations, and prognostic significance. Leuk Lymphoma, 2007,48(2):337–341

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Chan DT, Craig K, Donovan K, et al. Myeloma renal disease: presentation and outcome. Nephron Clin Pract, 2006,104(3):c126–131

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Liu XM, Xu JL, Guan XH, et al. Clinical features of renal insufficiency due to multiple myeloma and related risk factors. Chin German J Clin Oncol, 2005,4(1):47–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Sengul S, Zwizinski C, Batuman V. Role of MAPK pathways in light chain-induced cytokine production in human proximal tubule cells. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, 2003,284(6):1245–1254

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hata H. Bone lesions and macrophage inflammatory protein-1 alpha (MIP-1a) in human multiple myeloma. Leuk Lymphoma, 2005,46(7):967–972

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Zhou ZH, Luo SK, Li J, et al. The relation between Bence-Jones protein gene polymorphism and function of renal tubular-epithelial cell in multiple myeloma. Zhonghua Nei Ke Za Zhi (Chinese), 2005,44(9):677–680

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Leboulleux M, Lelongt B, Mougenot B, et al. Protease resistance and binding of Ig light chains in myeloma-associated tubulopathies. Kidney Int, 1995,48(1): 72–79

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiaofeng He  (何晓峰).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Li, N., Lv, Y., Zeng, H. et al. Renal impairment in multiple myeloma: Presenting features in different departments. J. Huazhong Univ. Sci. Technol. [Med. Sci.] 32, 65–68 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11596-012-0011-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11596-012-0011-0

Key words

Navigation