Skip to main content
Log in

Molecular genetic analysis of autosomal dominant late-onset cataract in a Chinese Family

  • Published:
Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology [Medical Sciences] Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Congenital cataract is a highly heterogeneous disorder at both the genetic and the clinical-phenotypic levels. A unique cataract was observed in a 4-generation Chinese family, which was characterized by autosomal dominant inheritance and late-onset. Mutations in the 13 known genes (CRYAA, CRYAB, CRYBB1, CRYBB2, CRYGC, CRYBA1/A3, CRYGD, Connexin50, Connexin46, intrinsic membrane protein LIM2, cytoskeletal protein BFSP2, the major intrinsic protein-MIP and the heat shock factor HSF4) have previously been demonstrated to be the frequent reason for isolated congenital cataracts, but the exact molecular basis and underlying mechanisms of congenital cataract still remain unclear. This study was designed to find whether these 13 genes developed any mutation in the family members and to identify the disease-causing gene. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and direct DNA sequence analysis were carried out to detect the 13 genes. The results showed that no mutation causing amino acid alternations was found in these potential candidate genes among all patients in the family, and only several single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were identified. A transitional mutation in the fourth intron of CRYBB2 and some silent mutations in the first exon of BFSP2 and CRYGD were found in the cataract family, but further study showed that these mutations could also be found in normal controls. It was concluded that some unidentified genes may underlie the occurrence of late-onset cataract in this family. A genome-wide screening will be carried out in the next study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lim AS. Vision for the world. Eur J Ophthalmol, 1996,6(1):95

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. McCarty A, Taylor HR. The genetics of cataract. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2001,42(8):1677–1678

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hejtmancik JF. The genetics of cataract: our vision becomes clearer (editorial). Am J Hum Genet, 1998,62(3):520–525

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Delcourt C, Carriere I, Delage M, et al. Associations of cataract with antioxidant enzymes and other risk factors: the French Age-Related Eye Diseases (POLA) Prospective Study. Ophthalmology, 2003,110(12):2318–2326

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Tsai SY, Hsu WM, Cheng CY, et al. Epidemiologic study of age-related cataracts among an elderly Chinese population in Shih-Pai, Taiwan. Ophthalmology, 2003,110(6):1089–1095

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hammond CJ, Duncan DD, Snieder H, et al. The heritability of age-related cortical cataract: the twin eye study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2001,42(3):601–605

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hammond CJ, Snieder H, Spector TD, et al. Genetic and environmental factors in age related nuclear cataracts in monozygotic and dizygotic twins. N Engl J Med, 2000,342(24):1786–1790

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Pras E, Frydman M, Levy-Nissenbaum E, et al. A nonsense mutation (W9X) in CRYAA causes autosomal recessive cataract in an inbred Jewish Persian family. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2000,41(11):3511–3515

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Berry V, Francis P, Reddy MA, et al. Alpha-B crystalline gene (CRYAB) mutation causes dominant congenital posterior polar cataract in humans. Am J Hum Genet, 2001,69(5):1141–1145

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Mackay DS, Boskovska OB, Knopf HL, et al. A nonsense mutation in CRYBB1 associated with autosomal dominant cataract linked to human chromosome 22q. Am J Hum Genet, 2002,71(5):1216–1221

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Litt M, Carrero-Valenzuela R, LaMorticella DM, et al. Autosomal dominant cerulean cataract is associated with a chain termination mutation in the human beta-crystallin gene CRYBB2. Human Molecular Genetics, 1997,6(5):665–668

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Bateman JB, Geyer DD, Flodman P, et al. A new betaA1-crystallin splice junction mutation in autosomal dominant cataract. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2000,41(11):3278–3285

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Heon E, Priston M, Schorderet DF, et al. The gamma-crystallins and human cataracts: a puzzle made clearer. Am J Hum Genet, 1999,65(5):1261–1267

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Stephan DA, Gillanders E, Vanderveen D, et al. Progressive juvenile-onset punctuate cataracts caused by mutation of the γD-crystallin gene. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 1999,96(3):1008–1012

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Berry V, Mackay D, Khaliq S, et al. Connexin50 mutation in a family with congenital “zonular nuclear” pulverulent cataract of Pakistani origin. Hum Genet, 1999,105(1–2):168–170

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Polyakov AV, Shagina IA, Khlebnikova OV, et al. Mutation in the connexin 50 gene (GJA8) in a Russian family with zonular pulverulent cataract. Clin Genet, 2001,60(6):476–478

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Pal JD, Liu X, Mackay D, et al. Connexin46 mutations linked to congenital cataract show loss of gap junction channel function. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, 2000,279(3):C596–C602

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Pras E, Levy-Nissenbaum E, Bakhan T, et al. A missense mutation in the LIM2 gene is associated with autosomal recessive presenile cataract in an inbred Iraqi Jewish family. Am J Hum Genet, 2002,70(5):1363–1367

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Conley YP, Erturk D, Keverline A, et al. A juvenile-onset, progressive cataract locus on chromosome 3q21–q22 is associated with a missense mutation in the beaded filament structural protein-2. Am J Hum Genet, 2000,66(4):1426–1431

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Berry V, Francis P, Kaushal S, et al. Missense mutations in MIP underlie autosomal dominant “polymorphic” and lamellar cataracts linked to 12q. Nat Genet, 2000,25(1):15–17

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Bu L, Jin Y, Shi Y, et al. Mutant DNA-binding domain of HSF4 is associated with autosomal dominant lamellar and Marner cataract. Nat Genet, 2002,31(3):276–278

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Antonarakis SE. Recommendations for a nomenclature system for human gene mutations. The nomenclature working group. Hum Mutat, 1998,11(1):1–3

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Graw J, Loster J, Soewarto D, et al. Characterization of a mutation in the lens-specific MP70 encoding gene of the mouse leading to a dominant cataract. Exp Eye Res, 2001,73(6):867–876

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Heon E, Paterson AD, Fraser M, et al. A progressive autosomal recessive cataract locus maps to chromosome 9q13–q22. Am J Hum Genet, 2001,68(3):772–777

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Zhang S, Liu M, Dong JM, et al. Identification of a genetic locus for autosomal dominant infantile cataract on chromosome 20p12.1–p11.23 in a Chinese family. Mol Vis, 2008,14:1893–1899

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Hejtmancik JF, Smaoui N. Molecular genetics of cataract. Dev Ophthalmol, 2003,37:67–82

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hua Xu  (徐 华).

Additional information

Both authors contributed equally to this work.

This study was supported by a grant from the National Natural Sciences Foundation of China (No. 30700455).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yang, G., Zhong, S., Zhang, X. et al. Molecular genetic analysis of autosomal dominant late-onset cataract in a Chinese Family. J. Huazhong Univ. Sci. Technol. [Med. Sci.] 30, 792–797 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11596-010-0660-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11596-010-0660-9

Key words

Navigation