Skip to main content
Log in

Establishment of a simple and useful way for preimplantation genetic diagnosis of chromosomal diseases

  • Published:
Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

In order to establish a simple and useful way for preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) of chromosomal diseases in general IVF laboratory, the methods that are most commonly used in the embryo biopsy, fixation of blastomere and fluorescence in situ hybridization were compared. The three aspects of PGD were analyzed respectively. There was no significant difference in further development capacity of embryos between mechanical (79.7%) and chemical biopsy group (78.6%) (P>0.05). In this study, more cells were successfully fixed with the Tween/HCL method (93.8%) than with the methanol/acetic acid method (80.5%, P<0.05). There was no significant difference in cytoplasm remains between methanol/acetic acid method and Tween/HCL method (P>0.05). The hybridization efficiency of fluorescence in situ hybridization was 89.5% in successive denaturation method and 90.9% in codenaturation method with the difference being not significant (P>0.05). In conclusion, the mechanical or chemical method, Tween/HCL fixation method and codenaturation fluorescence in situ hybridization method can constitute a simple and useful way for PGD of chromosomal diseases.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Grifo J A, Boyle A, Fischer E et al. Preembryo biopsy and analysis of blastomeres by in situ hybridization. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 1990,163(6 Pt 1):2013–2019

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Takeuchi K, Sandow B A, Morsy M et al. Preclinical models for human pre-embryo biopsy and genetic diagnosis. I. Efficiency and normalcy of mouse pre-embryo development after different biopsy techniques. Fertil Steril, 1992,57(2):425–430

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Munne S, Weier H U, Stein J et al. A fast and efficient method for simultaneous X and Y in situ hybridization of human blastomeres. J Assit Reprod Genet, 1993,10(1):82–89

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Coonen E, Dumoulin J C, Ramaekers F C et al. Optimal preparation of preimplantation embryo interphase nuclei for analysis by fluorescence in-situ hybridization. Hum Reprod, 1994,9(3):533–537

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Liu Q, Zhu G J. Effects of cleavage stage biopsy on in vitro development of human embryos. Chin J Obstet Gynecol (Chinese), 2002,37(5):274–277

    Google Scholar 

  6. Wong B C, Boyd C A, Lanzendorf S E. Randomized controlled study of human zona pellucida dissection using the zona infrared laser optical system: evaluation of blastomere damage, embryo development, and subsequent hatching. Fertil Steril, 2003,80(5):1249–1254

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

LUO Haining, female, born in 1978, M.D., Ph.D.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Luo, H., Zhu, G., Liu, Q. et al. Establishment of a simple and useful way for preimplantation genetic diagnosis of chromosomal diseases. J. Huazhong Univ. Sc. Technol. 27, 315–317 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11596-007-0325-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11596-007-0325-5

Key words

Navigation