Skip to main content
Log in

Follow-up study on the motion range after treatment of degenerative disc disease with the Bryan cervical disc prosthesis

  • Published:
Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

This study examined effect of a new intervertebral cervical disc prosthesis in relieving the neurological symptoms and signs, improving the patients’ ability to perform daily activities, reducing pain, and maintaining the stability and segmental motion. From December 2003 to October 2004, 12 patients, who had received 14 replacements of cervical artificial discs, were followed-up for 2 to 8 months (with a mean of 5.2 months). Of them 5 had cervical spondylotic myelopathy and 7 had cervical disc herniation. The patients included 7 males and 5 females, with their age ranging from 35 to 62 y and a mean of 50.3 y. Single-level replacements were performed in 10 cases and 2 cases received two-level replacement. Operation time of the single-level surgery averaged 130±50 min and the time of two-level surgery was 165±53 min on average (from skin incision to skin suturing). Neurological or vascular complications during or after surgery was not observed. Japanese Orthopedic Association scores (JOA scores) increased from 8.6 to 15.8 on average. There was no prothesis subsidence or excursion. Replaced segments were stable and the range of motion was partially restored, being 4.68° (3.6°–6.1°) in flexion and extension position and 3.51° (2.5°–4.6°), 3.42° (2.6°–4.3°) in left and right bending position. No obvious loss of physiological curvature was noted. CT or MRI follow-up showed that excursion was less than 1.5 mm) in 2 of 14 levels and between 1.5 mm and 3 mm) in 1 of 14 levels. No ossification in the replaced levels was observed. It is concluded that satisfactory short-term results were achieved in the 12 cases of artificial disc replacements. Different from anterior cervical discectomy and fusion, the replacement could achieve quick functional recovery and did not lead to the movement limitation of cervical vertebrae. At least a 5-years follow-up was needed to assess the long-term effect of the prosthesis on its neighboring segments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Reference

  1. Goffin J, Calenbergh F V, Loon J V et al. Intermediate Fellow-up After Treatment of Degenerative Disc Disease With the Bryan Cervical Disc Prosthesis:Single-level and bi-level. Eur Spine J, 2003,28(4):2673–2678

    Google Scholar 

  2. Matsunaga S, Kabayama S, Yamamoto T et al. Strain on intervertebral discs after anterior cervical decompression and fusion. Spine, 1999,24(7):670–675

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Pospiech J, Stolke D, Wilke H et al. Intradisc pressure recordings in the cervical spine. Neurosurgery, 1999, 44(2);379–384

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Hilibrand A S, Carlson G D, Palumbo M A et al. Radiculopathy and myelopathy at segments adjacent to the site of a previous anterior cervical arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg (AM), 1999,81(4):519–528

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Mayer H M, Wiechert K, Korge A et al. Minimally invasive total disc replacement: Surgical technique and preliminary clinical results. Eur Spine J, 2002,11(suppl 2):124–130

    Google Scholar 

  6. Goffin J, Casey A, Kehr P et al. Preliminary clinical experience with the Bryan Cervical Disc Prosthesis. Neurosurgery, 2002,51(3):840–845

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Sekhon L H. Cervical arthroplasty in the management of spondylotic myelopathy. J Spinal Disord Tech, 2003,16(5):441–449

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bryan V E. Cervical motion segment replacement. Eur Spine J, 2002,11(Suppl 2):92–97

    Google Scholar 

  9. Wiffield C C, Skrzypiec D, Jackowski A et al. Internal stress distribution in cervical intervertebral discs: the influence of an artificial cervical joint and simulated anterior interbody fusion. J Spinal Disord Tech, 2003, 16(5):441–449

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. DiAngelo D J, Roberston J T, Metcalf N H et al. Biomechanical testing of an artificial cervical joint and an anterior cervical plate. J Spinal Disord Tech, 2003,16(4):314–323

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Wigfield C C, Giu S S, Nelson R J et al. The new Frenchay artificial cervical joint:results from a two-year pilot study. Spine, 2002,27(22):2446–2452

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Cummings B H, Robertson J T, Gill S S. Surgical experience with an implanted artificial cervical joint. J Neurosurg, 1998,88(6):943–948

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Pointillart V. Cervical disc prosthesis in humans: Frist failures. Spine, 2001,26(5):90–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

YANG Shuhua, male, born in 1954, Professor

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yang, S., Hu, Y., Zhao, J. et al. Follow-up study on the motion range after treatment of degenerative disc disease with the Bryan cervical disc prosthesis. J. Huazhong Univ. Sc. Technol. 27, 176–178 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11596-007-0218-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11596-007-0218-7

Key words

Navigation