Skip to main content
Log in

Crosslinking Mechanism of Soy Protein-based Adhesives based on Glyoxal and a Compound of Protein Model

  • Biomaterials
  • Published:
Journal of Wuhan University of Technology-Mater. Sci. Ed. Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The crosslinking mechanism of glyoxal and asparagine was analyzed, and the relationship between the mechanism and practical performances of soy protein-based adhesives was also discussed. It is shown that when pH=1 and 3, glyoxal reacted with asparagine in the form of major cyclic ether compounds. When pH =5, glyoxal reacted with asparagine in two structural forms of sodium glycollate and cyclic ether compounds. However, amidogens of asparagine were easy to develop protonation under acid conditions. Supplemented by the instability of cyclic ether compounds, the reaction activity and reaction degree between glyoxal and asparagine were relatively small. Under alkaline conditions, glyoxal mainly reacted with asparagine in the form of sodium glycollate. With the increase of pH, the polycondensation was more sufficient and the produced polycondensation products were more stable. The reaction mechanism between glyoxal and asparagine had strong correspondence to the practical performances of the adhesives. Glyoxal solution could develop crosslinking reactions with soy protein under both acid and alkaline conditions. Bonding strength and water resistance of the prepared soy protein-based adhesives were increased significantly. When pH>7, glyoxal had relatively high reaction activity and reaction intensity with soy protein, and the prepared adhesives had high crosslinking density and cohesion strength, showing relatively high bonding strength, water resistance and thermal stability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Liu SC, Yang HX, Ran X, et al. Synthesis, Structure and Performance of Pulp-based Wood Adhesives[J]. Journal of Forestry Engineering, 2022, 7(6): 132–139

    Google Scholar 

  2. Chen S, Liang J, Zhang B, et al. Study on Camellia Oleifera Protein Based Wood Adhesive by Epoxy Resin and Its Crosslinking Mecha-nism[J]. Journal of Wuhan University of Technology-Mater. Sci. Ed., 2021, 36(4): 607–613

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Zhang X, Liu Z, Zhang Y, et al. Study on Synthesis of Epoxy Quercetin and Its Effect on Soyprotein Adhesives’ Properties[J]. Journal of Forestry Engineering, 2022, 7(5): 87–92

    Google Scholar 

  4. Tang WM, Xu YT, Zhao H, et al. Synthesis and Characterization of Catechol-based Polysaccharide Crosslinking Agent and Its Effect on the Properties of Soybean Protein Adhesive[J]. Journal of Forestry Engineering, 2022,7(3): 136–143

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chen N, Zheng P, Zeng Q, et al. Characterization and Performance of Soy-based Adhesives Cured with Epoxy Resin[J]. Polymers, 2017, 9(10): 514

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Li J, Luo J, Li X, et al. Soybean Meal-based Wood Adhesive Enhanced by Ethylene Glycol Diglycidyl Ether and Diethylenetriamine[J]. Ind. Crop. Prod., 2015, 74: 613–618

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Ghahri S, Pizzi A. Improving Soy-based Adhesives for Wood Particle-board by Tannins Addition[J]. Wood Science and Technology, 2018, 52(1): 261–279

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Yang I, Kuo M L, Deland JM. Bond Quality of Soy-based Phenolic Adhesives in Southern Pine Plywood [J]. Journal of the American Oil Chemists’ Society, 2013, 83(3): 213–237

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gao Q, Shi SQ, Zhang SF, et al. Soybean Meal-based Adhesive Enhanced by MUF Resin[J]. J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 2012, 125 (5): 3 676–3 681

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Fan D, Qin T, Chu F. A Soy Flour-based Adhesive Reinforced by Low Addition of MUF Resin[J]. J. Adhes. Sci. Technol., 2011, 25(1–2): 323–333

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Wu Z, Xi X, Lei H, et al. Study on Soy-based Adhesives Enhanced by Phenol Formaldehyde Cross-linker[J]. Polymers, 2019, 11(2): 365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Igwilo Christopher Nnaemeka, Egbuna Samuel O, Onoh Maxwell I, et al. Optimization and Kinetic Studies for Enzymatic Hydrolysis and Fermentation of Colocynthis Vulgaris Shrad Seeds Shell for Bioethanol Production[J]. Journal of Bioresources and Bioproducts, 2021, 6(1): 45–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kreibich R, Steynberg P, Hemingway R. Endjointing Green Lumber with Soy Bond[C]. In: Proceedings of the Wood Residues into Revenue, Residual Wood Conference, Richmond, BC, Canada, 4–5 November 1998

  14. Qi G Y, Li N B, Wang D H, et al. Physicochemical Properties of Soy Protein Adhesives Modified by 2-octen-1-ylsuccinic Anhydride[J]. Ind. Crop. Prod., 2013, 46: 165–172

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Qi G Y, Sun X Z. Peel Adhesion Properties of Modified Soy Protein Adhesive on a Glass Panel [J]. Ind. Crop. Prod., 2010, 32 (3): 208–212

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Qu P, Huang H, Wu G, et al. The Effect of Hydrolyzed Soy Protein Isolate on the Structure and Biodegradability of Urea-formaldehyde Adhesives[J]. J. Adhes. Sci. Technol., 2015, 29 (6): 502–517

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Qu P, Huang H, Wu G, et al. Hydrolyzed Soy Protein Isolates Modified Urea-formaldehyde Resins as Adhesives and Its Biodegradability[J]. J. Adhes. Sci. Technol., 2015, 29(21): 2 381–2 398

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Gan WX, Liu JM, Zhang JH, et al. Research Progress on Utilizing Liquefaction of Lignin to Modify Phenolic Resin[J]. Journal of Forestry Engineering, 2022, 7(3): 11–19

    Google Scholar 

  19. Lei H, Wu Z, Du G. Cross-linked Soy-based Wood Adhesives for Plywood[J]. International Journal of Adhesion & Adhesives, 2014, 50: 199–203

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Wu ZG, Lei H, Du GB. Disruption of Soy-based Adhesive Treated by Ca(OH)2 and NaOH[J]. Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology, 2013, 27(20): 1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Wescott JM, Frihart C R, Traska A E. High-soy-containing Water-durable Adhesives[J]. Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology, 2006, 20 (8): 859–873

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Kuo ML, Stokke D. Soybean-based Adhesive Resins for Composite Products[J]. Forest Products Society, 2001:163–165

  23. Gao Z, Gu J. Water Resistant Wood Adhesives Prepared with Phenolated soy Flours[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2011, 47(9): 129–134

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Liang J, Li Q, Wu Z, et al. Competitive Polycondensation of Model Compound Melamine-urea-formaldehyed (MUF) Resin System by 13C NMR[J]. Journal of Bioresources and Bioproducts, 2020, 5(1): 60–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Liang J, Wu Z, Xi X, et al. Investigation of the Reaction between a Soy-based Protein Model Compound and Formaldehyde[J]. Wood Science and Technology, 2019, 53(5): 1061–1077

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Deng S, Du G, Li, X, et al. Performance and Reaction Mechanism of Zero Formaldehyde-emission Urea-glyoxal (UG) Resin[J]. J. Taiwan. Inst. Chem. E., 2014, 45(4): 2 029–2 038

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Ballerini A, Despres A, Pizzi A. Non-toxic, Zero Emission Tannin-glyoxal Adhesives for Wood Panels[J]. Holzals Roh-und Werkstoff, 2005, 63 (6): 477–478

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Li MF, Xu YH. Fractionation of Industrial Lignin: a Review[J]. Journal of Forestry Engineering, 2023, 8(1): 13–20

    Google Scholar 

  29. Zhang N, Li Z, Xiao Y, et al. Lignin-based Phenolic Resin Modified with Whisker Silicon and Its Application[J]. Journal of Bioresources and Bioproducts, 2020, 5(1): 67–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Wu Z, Liang J, Lei H, et al. Study on Soy Protein-based Adhesive Cross-linked by Glyoxal[J]. J. Renew. Mater., 2021, 9(2): 205–218

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Liang J, Wu Z, Lei H, et al. The Reaction between Furfuryl Alcohol and Model Compound of Protein[J]. Polymers, 2017, 9 (12): 711

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Xia Z, Li J, Zhang J, et al. Processing and Valorization of Cellulose, Lignin and Lignocellulose Using Ionic Liquids[J]. Journal of Biore-sources and Bioproducts, 2020, 5(2): 79–95

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Wu Z, Zhang B, Zhou X, et al. Influence of Single/Collective Use of Curing Agents on the Curing Behavior and Bond Strength of Soy Protein-melamine-urea-formaldehyde (SMUF) Resin for Plywood Assem-bly[J]. Polymers, 2019, 11(12): 1995

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the anonymous reviewers for their invaluable comments and suggestions to improve the quality of the paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Zhigang Wu  (吴志刚) or Hong Lei  (雷洪).

Additional information

Conflict of interest

All authors declare that there are no competing interests.

Funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.32160348), the Department Program of Guizhou Province (No. ZK[2021]162), the Guizhou Province Science and Technology Plan Project (No.[2020]1Y128), and the Forestry Department Foundation of Guizhou Province of China (Nos.J[2022]21 and [2020]C14)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cao, L., Liang, J., Zhang, Q. et al. Crosslinking Mechanism of Soy Protein-based Adhesives based on Glyoxal and a Compound of Protein Model. J. Wuhan Univ. Technol.-Mat. Sci. Edit. 38, 942–950 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11595-023-2781-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11595-023-2781-6

Key words

Navigation