Skip to main content
Log in

The Study of Nerve Conduit with Biocompatibility and Electrical Stimulation Effect

  • Organic Materials
  • Published:
Journal of Wuhan University of Technology-Mater. Sci. Ed. Aims and scope Submit manuscript

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abstract

Conductive polymers show great promise because of their electrical property based on bioelectricity in vivo. In order to search electro-activity materials which insure abduction of tissue, we synthesized conductive nerve conduits with poly-dl-lactic-acid (PDLLA) and tetra-aniline (TA). Preparation technology of TA was optimized, and the properties of the conduit were studied. RSC96 cell were used to investigate the toxicity and electrical stimulation effect. SD rats were used to assess biocompatibility in vivo. The results showed that the reaction ratio of 1:1, the reaction time of 2 h and the HCl concentration of 2 mol/L were the optimum conditions for synthesis of TA. The influence of TA content on the mechanical properties, hydrophilicity, conductivity and microstructure of the nerve conduit was evaluated. Cell and histocompatibility study showed PDLLA/TA possessed good biocompatibility. These results showed it had application values in tissue projects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Alberti KA, Neufeld, CI, Wang J, et al. In vivo Peripheral Nerve Repair Using Tendon–Derived Nerve Guidance Conduits[J]. ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering, 2016, 2(6): 937–945

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Evans GR. Peripheral Nerve Injury: A Review and Approach to Ttissue Engineered Constructs[J]. The Anatomical Record, 2001, 263(4): 396–404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Subramanian A, Krishnan UM, Sethuraman S. Development of Biomaterial Scaffold for Nerve Tissue Engineering: Biomaterial Mediated Neural Regeneration[J]. Journal of Biomedical Science, 2009, 16(1): 108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Pires F, Ferreira Q, Rodrigues, et al. Neural Stem Cell Differentiation by Electrical Stimulation Using a Cross–linked PEDOT Substrate: Expanding the Use of Biocompatible Conjugated Conductive Polymers for Neural Tissue Engineering[J]. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, 2015, 1850(6): 1 158–1 168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ai J, Kiasat–Dolatabadi A, Ebrahimi–Barough S, et al. Polymeric Scaffolds in Neural Tissue Engineering: A Review[J]. Archives of Neuroscience, 2013, 1(1): 15–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ghasemi ML, Prabhakaran MP, Morshed M, et al. Application of Conductive Polymers, Scaffolds and Electrical Stimulation for Nerve Tissue Engineering[J]. Journal of Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine, 2011, 5(4): e17–35

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gomez N, Schmidt CE. Nerve Growth Factor–immobilized Polypyrrole: Bioactive Electrically Conducting Polymer for Enhanced Neurite Extension[J]. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A, 2007, 81(112): 135–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bendrea AD, Cianga L, Cianga I. Review Paper: Progress in the Field of Conducting Polymers for Tissue Engineering Applications[J]. Journal of Biomaterials Applications, 2011, 26(1): 3–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Shirakawa H, Louis EJ, MacDiarmid AG, et al. Synthesis of Electrically Conducting Organic Polymers: Halogen Derivatives of Polyacetylene [J]. Journal of the Chemical Society, Chemical Communications, 1977, 474(16): 578

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. George PM, Lyckman AW, LaVan DA, et al. Fabrication and Biocompatibility of Polypyrrole Implants Suitable for Neural Prosthetics[J]. Biomaterials, 2005, 26(17): 3 511–3 519

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Qazi TH, Rai R, Boccaccini AR. Tissue Engineering of Electrically Responsive Tissues Using Polyaniline Based Polymers: A Review[J]. Biomaterials, 2014, 35(33): 9 068–9 086

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kim DH, Richardson–Burns SM, Hendricks JL, et al. Effect of Immobilized Nerve Growth Factor on Conductive Polymers: Electrical Properties and Cellular Response[J]. Advanced Functional Materials, 2007, 17(1): 79–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Richardson–Burns SM, Hendricks JL, Martin DC. Electrochemical Polymerization of Conducting Polymers in Living Neural Tissue[J]. Journal of neural engineering, 2007, 4(2): L6–L13

    Google Scholar 

  14. Lee JY, Bashur CA, Goldstein AS, et al. Polypyrrole–coated Electrospun PLGA Nanofibers for Neural Tissue Applications[J]. Biomaterials, 2009, 30(26): 4 325–4 335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Xu H, Holzwarth JM, Yan Y, et al. Conductive PPY/PDLLA Conduit for Peripheral Nerve Regeneration[J]. Biomaterials, 2014, 35(1): 225–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Li M, Guo Y, Wei Y, et al. Electrospinning Polyaniline Contained Gelatin Nanofibers for Tissue Engineering Applications[J]. Biomaterials, 2006, 27(5): 2 705–2 715

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Balint R, Cassidy NJ, Cartmell SH. Conductive Polymers: Towards a Smart Biomaterial for Tissue Engineering[J]. Acta Biomaterialia, 2014, 10(6): 2 341–2 353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Gajendiran M, Choi J, Kim S–J, et al. Conductive Biomaterials for Tissue Engineering Applications[J]. Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, 2017, 51(86): 12–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ji W, Yang F, Seyednejad H, et al. Biocompatibility and Degradation Characteristics of PLGA–based Electrospun Nanofibrous Scaffolds with Nanoapatite Incorporation[J]. Biomaterials, 2012, 33(28):6 604–6 614

    Google Scholar 

  20. Kulszewica–bajer IR, Żalska I, Kurylek M. Synthesis and Spectroscopic Properties of Aniline Tetramers. Comparative studies[J]. New J. Chem., 2004, 28(6): 669–675

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Liu S, Zhu K, Zhang Y, et al. Synthesis and Electrical Conductivity of Poly(methacrylamide) (PMAA) with Fixed Length Oligoaniline as Side Chains[J]. Materials Letters, 2005, 59(28): 3 715–3 719

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Wang Q, He W, Huang J, et al. Synthesis of Water Soluble, Biodegradable, and Electroactive Polysaccharide Crosslinker with Aldehyde and Carboxylic Groups for Biomedical Applications[J]. Macromolecular bioscience, 2011, 11(3): 362 372

    Google Scholar 

  23. Martina M, Hutmacher DW. Biodegradable Polymers Applied in Tissue Engineering Research: a Review[J]. Polymer International, 2007, 56(2): 145–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Zhang Z, Rouabhia M, Wang Z, et al. Electrically Conductive Biodegradable Polymer Composite for Nerve Regeneration: Electricity Stimulated Neurite Outgrowth and Axon Regeneration[J]. Artificial Organs, 2007, 31(1): 13–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Chen L, Yu Y, Mao H, et al. Synthesis of Parent Aniline Tetramer and Pentamer and Redox Properties[J]. Materials Letters, 2005, 59(19–20): 2 446–2 450

    Google Scholar 

  26. Xu H, Yan Y, Li S. PDLLA/chondroitin Sulfate/chitosan/NGF Conduits for Peripheral Nerve Regeneration[J]. Biomaterials, 2011, 32(20): 4 506–4 516

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Xu H, Zhang L, Bao Y, et al. Preparation and Characterization of Injectable Chitosan–hyaluronic Acid Hydrogels for Nerve Growth Factor Sustained Release[J]. Journal of Bioactive and Compatible Polymers, 2016, 32(2): 146–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Abdul RN, Gizdavic–Nikolaidis M, Ray S, et al. Functional Electrospun Nanofibres of Poly(lactic acid) Blends with Polyaniline or Poly(anilineco–benzoic acid)[J]. Synthetic Metals, 2010, 160(17–18): 2 015–2 022

    Google Scholar 

  29. Liu JJ, Wang CY, Wang JG, et al. Peripheral Nerve Regeneration Using Composite Poly(lactic acid–caprolactone)/nerve growth factor Conduits Prepared by Coaxial Electrospinning[J]. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research,Part A, 2011, 96(1): 13–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Cheng M, Deng J, Yang F, et al. Study on Physical Properties and Nerve Cell Affinity of Composite Films from Chitosan and Gelatin Solutions[J]. Biomaterials, 2003, 24(17): 2 871–2 880

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Gómez I, Otazo EM, Hernández H, et al. Thermal Degradation Study of PVA Derivative with Pendant Phenylthione Carbamate Groups by DSC/TGA and GC/MS[J]. Polymer Degradation and Stability, 2015, 112: 132–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Green RA, Baek S, Poole–Warren LA, et al. Conducting Polymer–hydrogels for Medical Electrode Applications[J]. Science and Technology of Advanced Materials. 2010, 11 (1): 014 107

    Google Scholar 

  33. Wang GW, Yang H, Wu WF, et al. Design and Optimization of a Biodegradable Porous Zein Conduit using Microtubes as a Guide for Rat Sciatic Nerve Defect Repair[J]. Biomaterials, 2017, 131: 145–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Rao J, Cheng Y, Liu Y, et al. A Multi–walled Silk Fibroin/silk Sericin Nerve Conduit Coated with Poly(lactic–co–glycolic acid) Sheath for Peripheral Nerve Regeneration[J]. Materials science & engineering C, Materials for Biological Applications, 2017, 73: 319–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Banisadi H, Ramazani S A A, Mashayekhan S. Fabrication and Characterization of Conductive Chitosan/gelatin–based Scaffolds for Nerve Tissue Engineering[J]. Int. J. Biol. Macromol., 2015, 74: 360–366

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Haixing Xu  (徐海星) or Peihu Xu  (许沛虎).

Additional information

Funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos.51473130 and 51572206), and the Wuhan Huanghe Excellence Plan and Entrepreneurship Training Program of Wuhan University of Technology (Nos.20181049715010 and 20181049715018)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Guo, X., Liu, G., He, Q. et al. The Study of Nerve Conduit with Biocompatibility and Electrical Stimulation Effect. J. Wuhan Univ. Technol.-Mat. Sci. Edit. 33, 1530–1539 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11595-018-2002-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11595-018-2002-x

Key words

Navigation