Abstract
In order to investigate the influence of abutment material on the stress of implant-supported all-ceramic single crown, a 3D finite element model of implant-supported mandibular first premolar was computed by COSMOS/M 2.85 software. Alumina, zirconia, and titanium were used as abutment materials respectively. Vertical 600 N and horizontal 225 N load was applied on the occlusal surface. The results show that the stress distribution of implant-supported single crown was similar for different abutment materials. Maximum stresses within the crown were higher when titanium abutment was used. Maximum stress of titanium abutment was lower than that of ceramic abutment. Within the screw and fixture, maximum stresses had no difference under vertical loading but higher as titanium abutment was used under horizontal loading. There was no difference of maximum stress within the bone when different abutment materials were used. The present findings indicate that the abutment material had no influence on the stress distribution of implant-supported allceramic single crown but maximum stress when the titanium abutment was lower than that of ceramic abutment.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Traini T, Pettinicchio M, Murmura G, et al. Esthetic Outcome of an Immediately Placed Maxillary Anterior Single-tooth Implant Restored with a Custom-made Zirconia-ceramic Abutment and Crown: a Staged Treatment [J]. Quintessence Int., 2011, 42(2):103–108
Tan PL, Dunne JT Jr. An Esthetic Comparison of a Metal Ceramic Crown and Cast Metal Abutment with an All-ceramic Crown and Zirconia Abutment: a Clinical Report [J]. J. Prosthet. Dent., 2004, 91(3): 215–218
Bressan E, Paniz G, Lops D, et al. Influence of Abutment Material on the Gingival Color of Implant-supported All-ceramic Restorations: a Prospective Multicenter Study[J]. Clin. Oral Implants Res., 2011, 22(6): 631–637
Glauser R, Sailer I, Wohlwend A. Experimental Zirconia Abutments for Implant-supported Single-tooth Restorations in Esthetically Demanding Regions: 4-year Results of a Prospective Clinical Study [J]. Int. J. Prosthodont, 2004, 17(3): 285–290
Andersson B, Glauser R, Maglione M. Ceramic Implant Abutments for Short-span FPDs: a Prospective 5-year Multicenter Study [J]. Int. J. Prosthodont., 2003, 16(6): 640–646
Li ZY, Niu W, Fang W, et al. Clinical Evaluation of Ceramic and Titanium Abutment for Implant-supported All-ceramic Single Crown [J]. Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi, 2007, 42(7): 391–394 (in Chinese)
Keenan A V, Levenson D. Are Ceramic and Metal Implant Abutments Performance Similar [J]? Evid. Based Dent., 2010, 11(3): 68–69
Aboushelib M N, Salameh Z. Zirconia Implant Abutment Fracture: Clinical Case Reports and Precautions for Use [J]. Int. J. Prosthodont., 2009, 22(6): 616–619
Sailer I, Philipp A, Zembic A, et al. A Systematic Review of the Performance of Ceramic and Metal Implant Abutments Supporting Fixed Implant Reconstructions [J]. Clin Oral Implants Res., 2009, 20( Suppl 4): 4–31
Aramouni P, Zebouni E, Tashkandi E, et al. Fracture Resistance and Failure Location of Zirconium and Metallic Implant Abutments [J]. J. Contemp. Dent. Pract., 2008, 9(7): 41–48
Vigolo P, Fonzi F, Majzoub Z, et al. An in vitro Evaluation of Titanium, Zirconia, and Alumina Procera Abutments with Hexagonal Connection [J]. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants, 2006, 21(4): 575–580
Van Staden R C, Guan H, Loo Y C. Application of the Finite Element Method in Dental Implant Research [J]. Comput. Methods Biomech. Biomed. Engin., 2006, 9(4): 257–270
Eskitascioglu G, Usumez A, Sevimay M, et al. The Influence of Occlusal Loading Location on Stresses Transferred to Implantsupported Prostheses and Supporting Bone: A Three-dimensional Finite Element Study [J]. J. Prosthet. Dent., 2004, 91(2): 144–150
Proos K A, Swain M V, Ironside J, et al. Influence of Margin Design and Taper Abutment Angle on a Restored Crown of a First Premolar Using Finite Element Analysis [J]. Int. J. Prosthodont., 2003; 16(4): 442–449
Imanishi A, Nakamura T, Ohyama T, et al. 3-D Finite Element Analysis of All-ceramic Posterior Crowns [J]. J. Oral Rehabil., 2003, 30(8): 818–822
Lang L A, Wang R F, Kang B, et al. Validation of Finite Element Analysis in Dental Ceramics Research [J]. J. Prosthet. Dent., 2001, 86(6): 650–654
Yildirim M, Fischer H, Marx R, et al. In vivo Fracture Resistance of Implant-supported All-ceramic Restorations [J]. J. Prosthet. Dent., 2003, 90(4): 325–331
Att W, Kurun S, Gerds T, et al. Fracture Resistance of Single-tooth Implant-supported All-ceramic Restorations after Exposure to the Artificial Mouth [J]. J. Oral. Rehabil., 2006, 33(5): 380–386
Albrecht T, Kirsten A, Kappert H F, et al. Fracture Load of Different Crown Systems on Zirconia Implant Abutments [J]. Dent. Mater., 2011, 27(3): 298–303
Cho H W, Dong J K, Jin T H, et al. A Study on the Fracture Strength of Implant-supported Restorations Using Milled Ceramic Abutments and All-ceramic Crowns [J]. Int. J. Prosthodont., 2002; 15(1): 9–13
Apicella D, Veltri M, Balleri P, et al. Influence of Abutment Material on the Fracture Strength and Failure Modes of Abutment-fixture Assemblies When Loaded in a Bio-faithful Simulation [J]. Clin. Oral. Implants Res., 2011, 22(2): 182–188
Kim S, Kim H I, Brewer J D, et al. Comparison of Fracture Resistance of Pressable Metal Ceramic Custom Implant Abutments with CAD/ CAM Commercially Fabricated Zirconia Implant Abutments [J]. J. Prosthet Dent., 2009, 101(4): 226–230
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.30801312)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gao, S., Duan, H. & Li, Z. Influence of abutment material on the stress of implant-supported all-ceramic single crown. J. Wuhan Univ. Technol.-Mat. Sci. Edit. 27, 96–99 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11595-012-0415-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11595-012-0415-5