Skip to main content
Log in

Tissue response of an osteoinductive bioceramic in bone defect rabbit model

  • Published:
Journal of Wuhan University of Technology-Mater. Sci. Ed. Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

HA/TCP and HA rods (ϕ5 mm×10 mm) were made for implantation in New Zealand white rabbit with different condition. Sixty three rabbit were divided into three groups: group 1 (n=18), group 2 (n=27) and group 3 (n=18). In group 1, 10 mm radius was defected, and one HA/TCP rod was implanted in the muscle a distant away from the bone defect area. In group 2, also, 10 mm radius was defected, one HA rod was implanted in the muscle a distant away from the bone defect area. In group 3, two HA/TCP rods were implanted in the dorsal muscle of the rabbit with bone intact. Histological observation showed that in group 1, some new bone was found only two months after implantation (n=2), and obvious immature woven bone could be observed in these bioceramics from the 3rd month on. However, in group 3, bone began to be found 6 months after implantation (n=2). In group 2, we could not find any bone tissue up to 9 month’s observation. These results suggest that, first, the bone defect model could significantly accelerate bone formation at non-osseous sites in rabbits; second,. HA/TCP bioceramics were confirmed with osteoinductive property while HA bioceramics without osteoinductive property nearly. Thus, bone defect might be a good animal model for further researches for osteoinductive bioceramics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Yamasaki H. Heterotopic Bone Formation around Porous Hydroxyapatite Ceramics in the Subcutis of Dogs[J]. J. Oral. Biol. (Japan), 1990, 32: 190–192

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Zhang XD, Zou P, Wu C, et al. A Study of Porous Block HA Ceramics and its Osteogeneses[J]. In: Bioceramics and the Human Body. ED by Ravaglioli and Krajewski.Elsevier Applied Science, 1991, 408–415

  3. Ripamonti U. The Morphogenesis of Bone in Replicas of Porous Hydroxyapatite Obtained from Conversion of Calcium Carbonate Exoskeletons of Coral[J]. J. Bone Joint Surg., 1991, 73: 692–703

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ripamonti U. Osteoinduction in Porous Hydroxyapatite Implanted in Heterotopic Sites of Different Animal Models[J]. Biomaterials, 1996; 17: 31–35

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. XD Zhang, HP Yuan, K de Groot. Calcium Phosphate Biomaterials with Intrinsic Osteoinductivity[C]. The 6 th World Biomater Congress, 2000

  6. HP Yuan, ZJ Yang, P Zou, et al. An Investigation of the Osteoinduction of Synthetic Porous Phase-Pure Hydroxyapatite Ceramic[J]. Biomed. Eng. Appl. Basis Comm., 1997, 9: 268–273

    Google Scholar 

  7. HP Yuan, ZJ Yang, YB Li, et al. Osteoinduction by Calcium Phosphate Biomaterials[J]. J. Mater. Sci: Mater. Med., 1998, 9: 723–726

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Kurashina K, Kurita H, Wu Q, et al. Ectopic Osteogenesis with Biphasic Ceramics of Hydroxyapatite and Tricalcium Phosphate in Rabbits[J]. Biomaterials, 2002, 23: 407–412

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. HP Yuan, M Van De Doel, SH Li, et al. A Comparison of the Osteoinductive Potential of Two Calcium Phosphate Ceramics Implanted Intramuscularly in Goats[J]. J. Mater. Sci: Mater. Med., 2002, 13: 1 271–1 275

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. R Dimitriou, E Tsiridis, PV Giannoudis. Current Concepts of Molecular Aspects of Bone Healing[J]. Injury, 2005, 36: 1 392–1 404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. GS Themistocleous, SE Kontou, P Lembessis, et al. Skeletal Growth Factor Involvement in the Regulation of Fracture Healing Process[J]. In vivo, 2003, 17: 489–503

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Cho TJ, Gerstenfeld LC, Einhorn TA. Differential Temporal Expression of Members of the Transforming Growth Factor Beta Superfamily during Murine Fracture Healing[J]. J. Bone Miner. Res., 2002, 17: 513–520

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. AH Reddi. Bone Morphogenetic Proteins: From Basic Science to Clinical Applications[J]. J. Bone Joint Surg.[Am], 2001, 83: S1–S6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. T Sakou. Bone Morphogenetic Proteins: From Basic Studi — esto Clinical Approaches[J]. Bone, 1998, 22(6): 591–603

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. H Cheng, W Jiang, FM Philips, et al. Osteogenic Activity of the Fourteen Types of Human Bone Morphogenetic Proteins (BMPs)[J]. J. Bone Joint Surg.[Am], 2003, 85-A: 1 544–1 552

    Google Scholar 

  16. MP Bostrom. Expression of Bone Morphogenetic Proteins in Fracture Healing[J]. Clin. Orthop., 1998, 355S: 116–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Mundy GR. Regulation of Bone Formation by Bone Morphogenetic Proteins and other Growth Factors[J]. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res., 1996, 324: 24–28

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hong Bu  (步红).

Additional information

Funded by the National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program) (No. 2005CB623900-G)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cheng, L., Ye, F., Lu, X. et al. Tissue response of an osteoinductive bioceramic in bone defect rabbit model. J. Wuhan Univ. Technol.-Mat. Sci. Edit. 25, 28–31 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11595-010-1028-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11595-010-1028-5

Key words

Navigation