Abstract
We propose a novel modeling framework for supply chain network design that models a prevailing trend in consumer choice in which demand is impacted by carbon footprint. To date, the literature lacks models that realistically account for and accurately calculate per unit emissions, i.e., carbon footprint. We develop a profit maximizing model that accounts for emissions at the different stages of the supply chain, locates facilities and selects their technology, and decides on the flow between echelons. To calculate the carbon footprint, fixed emissions are averaged over throughput, which results in a nonlinear optimization problem with fractional terms. To solve it, we provide a mixed integer second order cone programming reformulation. We perform extensive testing of the framework on a realistic case study and carry out detailed analysis. The proposed framework succeeds in capturing the trade-off between lost demand due to a high carbon footprint and investing in environmentally-friendly technology. The framework serves as a tool to induce organizations to invest in green technology and to allow regulating authorities to assess the impact of eco-labeling.
References
Altmann, M.: A supply chain design approach considering environmentally sensitive customers: the case of a German manufacturing SME. Int. J. Prod. Res. 53(21), 6534–6550 (2015)
Barradas, S.: The real cost of trucking per mile operating cost of a commercial truck. https://www.thetruckersreport.com/infographics/cost-of-trucking/ (2012)
Benjaafar, S., Yanzhi, L., Daskin, M.: Carbon footprint and the management of supply chains: insights from simple models. IEEE Trans. Autom. Sci. Eng. 10(1), 99–116 (2013)
Borreo, J.S., Gillen, C., Prokopyev, O.A.: A simple technique to improve linearized reformulations of fractional (hyperbolic) 0–1 programming problems. Oper. Res. Lett. 44(4), 479–486 (2016)
Trust, Carbon: Research reveals consumer demand for climate change labelling. Carbon Trust. January 3, 2019. https://www.carbontrust.com/news-and-events/news/research-reveals-consumer-demand-for-climate-change-labelling (2019)
European Environment Agency: Specific CO2 emissions per tonne-km and per mode of transport in Europe, 1995–2011. https://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/figures/specific-co2-emissions-per-tonne-2 (2011)
Guide to PAS (2050), How to assess the carbon footprint of goods and services. 2008. ISBN 978-0-580-64636-2
Kassinis, G., Soteriou, A.: Greening the service profit chain: the impact of environmental management practices. Prod. Oper. Manag. 12(3), 386–403 (2003)
Klassen, R.D., McLaughlin, C.P.: The impact of environmental management on firm performance. Manage. Sci. 42(8), 1199–1214 (1996)
Lu, D., Gzara, F., Elhedhli, S.: Facility location with economies and diseconomies of scale: models and column generation heuristics. IIE Trans. 46(6), 585–600 (2014)
Luthra, S., Garg, D., Haleem, A.: Green supply chain management: implementation and performance a literature review and some issues. J. Adv. Manag. Res. 11(1), 20–46 (2014)
Martin, A.: How green is my orange? The New York Times. January 22, 2009 (2009)
Mehmanchi, E., Gomez, A., Prokopyev, O.A.: Fractional 0–1 programs: links between mixed-integer linear and conic quadratic formulations. J. Glob. Optim. 75(1), 273–339 (2019)
Morrison, H.: Consumer demand for lower-carbon lifestyles is putting pressure on business. Carbon Trust. July 1. https://www.carbontrust.com/news-and-events/insights/consumer-demand-for-lower-carbon-lifestyles-is-putting-pressure-on (2011)
Northern Plains Potato Growers Association: Potato fun facts. http://www.nppga.org/consumers/funfacts.php (2011)
Nouira, I., Hammami, R., Frein, Y., Temponi, C.: Design of forward supply chains: impact of a carbon emissions-sensitive demand. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 173, 80–98 (2016)
Romeijn, H.E., Shu, J., Teo, C.: Designing two-echelon supply networks. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 178(2), 449–462 (2007)
Seuring, S.: A review of modeling approaches for sustainable supply chain management. Decis. Support Syst. 54(4), 1513–1520 (2013)
Stancu-Minasian, I.M.: A eighth bibliography of fractional programming. Optimization 66(3), 439–470 (2017)
Statista: Market share of the leading potato chip brands in the United States in 2017, based on dollar sales. https://www.statista.com/statistics/262117/sales-share-of-the-leading-10-potato-chip-brands-in-the-us/ (2017)
Waltho, C., Elhedhli, S., Gzara, F.: Green supply chain network design: a review focused on policy adoption and emission quantification. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 208, 305–318 (2019)
Yalabik, B., Fairchild, R.J.: Customer, regulatory, and competitive pressure as drivers of environmental innovation. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 131(2), 519–527 (2011)
Acknowledgements
The research was partially supported by an Ontario Graduate Scholarship (CA) and the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, DG#103141.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix A. Trade-off between price and carbon emission elasticity
Appendix A. Trade-off between price and carbon emission elasticity
We investigate the relationship between changes in price to compensate for lost revenue due to increased demand elasticity to carbon footprint. Assume that sensitivity increases from \(\gamma _k\) to \(\gamma _k+\Delta ^\gamma _k\) and we would like to find the increase \(\Delta ^\pi _k\) in price \(\pi ^k\) that maintains the same revenue \(\pi _k D_k\) for every customer zone k. Therefore,
should be equal to
which implies that:
and therefore,
which is a function of the form \(\frac{ax}{b-x}\) that is exponential for \(0\le x<b\). This implies that as emission sensitivity increases linearly, the price has to increase exponentially to maintain the same revenue.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Elhedhli, S., Gzara, F. & Waltho, C. Green supply chain design with emission sensitive demand: second order cone programming formulation and case study. Optim Lett 15, 231–247 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11590-020-01631-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11590-020-01631-x