Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Some properties of the optimal investment strategy in a behavioral portfolio choice model

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Optimization Letters Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this manuscript is to analyze the monotonicity and limit properties of the optimal investment strategy in a behavioral portfolio choice model under cumulative prospect theory over risk aversion coefficient, loss aversion coefficient, and the market opportunity. We show that the optimal investment strategy is nonincreasing of the loss aversion coefficient, and strictly increasing of the Sharpe ratio for normal distributions. The monotonicity properties over risk aversion coefficient depend on the position of the investor and the goodness of the actual and perceived market. The piecewise-linear utility is also discussed. An interesting finding is that when the excess return follows an elliptical distribution, the optimal investment strategy over small mean for piecewise-power and piecewise-linear utility exhibits different limit behavior.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. In Sect. 4 we will consider the piecewise-linear utility, i.e., \(\alpha =1\).

  2. For two functions g and h, \(g(t)=O(h(t))\) represents that \(\limsup _{t\rightarrow \infty }\frac{g(t)}{h(t)}\le M\) for some constant \(M>0\), while \(g(t)=o(h(t))\) represents that \(\lim _{t\rightarrow \infty }\frac{g(t)}{h(t)}=0\).

  3. Corollary 2 in [5] shows that the CPT preference value function \(V(\cdot )\) is nonconcave on either \({\mathbb {R}}^+\) or \({\mathbb {R}}^-\). The nonconcavity of CPT preference value function brings greater difficulty in solving the optimization problem (4) analytically (see the statements in Section 5 in [5]).

  4. Specifically, it shows that if the excess return R has a positive mean and is bounded from above, i.e., \(\mathrm {E}[R]>0\) and \(R\le M\) with probability one for some \(M>0\), then \(|\gamma _-|M>1\).

References

  1. Arrow, K.J.: Aspects of the Theory of Risk-Bearing. Yrjö Jahnssonin Säätiö, Helsinki (1965)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bernard, C., Ghossoub, M.: Static portfolio choice under cumulative prospect theory. Math. Financ. Econ. 2(4), 277–306 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Carassus, L., Rasonyi, M.: On optimal investment for a behavioral investor in multiperiod incomplete market models. Math. Finance 25(1), 115–153 (2015)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Deng, L., Pirvu, T.A.: Multi-period investment strategies under cumulative prospect theory. J. Risk Financ. Manag. 12(2), 83 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. He, X.D., Zhou, X.Y.: Portfolio choice under cumulative prospect theory: an analytical treatment. Manag. Sci. 57(2), 315–331 (2011)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Jin, H., Zhou, X.Y.: Behavioral portfolio selection in continuous time. Math. Finance 18(3), 385–426 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Kahneman, D., Tversky, A.: Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47(2), 263–291 (1979)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Lou, Y.: On the investment direction of a behavioral portfolio choice model. Oper. Res. Lett. 47(4), 270–273 (2019)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Lou, Y., Strub, M., Li, D., Wang, S.: Reference point formation in social networks, wealth growth, and inequality. Working paper. SSRN (2017). http://ssrn.com/abstract=3013124

  10. Minsuk, K., Pirvu, T.A.: Cumulative prospect theory with skewed return distribution. SIAM J. Financ. Math. 9(1), 54–89 (2018)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Pirvu, T.A., Schulze, K.: Multi-stock portfolio optimization under prospect theory. Math. Financ. Econ. 6(4), 337–362 (2012)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Pratt, J.W.: Risk aversion in the small and in the large. Econometrica 32(1–2), 122–136 (1964)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Sharpe, W.F.: The sharpe ratio. J. Portf. Manag. 21(1), 49–58 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Shi, Y., Cui, X., Li, D.: Discrete-time behavioral portfolio selection under cumulative prospect theory. J. Econ. Dyn. Control 61(7), 283–302 (2015)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Shi, Y., Cui, X., Yao, J., Li, D.: Dynamic trading with reference point adaptation and loss aversion. Oper. Res. 63(4), 789–806 (2015)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Strub, M., Li, D.: Failing to foresee the updating of the reference point leads to time-inconsistent investment. Oper. Res. SSRN (2019). http://ssrn.com/abstract=3028089

  17. Tversky, A., Kahneman, D.: Advances in prospect theory: cumulative representation of uncertainty. J. Risk Uncertain. 5(4), 297–323 (1992)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author would like to thank the anonymous referees for improving the quality of the paper. This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant 71971208.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. MDIS, Academy of Mathematics and Systems Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, No. 55 Zhongguancun East Road, Beijing, 100190, China

    Youcheng Lou

Authors
  1. Youcheng Lou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Youcheng Lou.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lou, Y. Some properties of the optimal investment strategy in a behavioral portfolio choice model. Optim Lett 14, 1731–1746 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11590-019-01467-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11590-019-01467-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation