Skip to main content
Log in

A requirement for the mutation operator in continuous optimization

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Optimization Letters Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

During the recent decades, much effort has been dedicated to revise and improve the evolution operators of evolutionary algorithms. This article aims at minimums of an efficient mutation operator in continuous problems for which reachability, scalability, unbiasedness and isotropy have already been considered necessary. A new requirement, called robust exploration and exploitation trade-off, is introduced which is usually satisfied for common univariate density functions in 1D space, while for higher dimensions, these density functions should be revised, otherwise the exploration or exploitation abilities of sampling turns highly limited. Empirical simulation is carried out to check the validity of the drawn conclusions, which verifies that if modification of the density function is ignored, dramatic performance deterioration can be concluded.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Akay, A., Karaboga, D.: A modified Artificial Bee Colony algorithm for real-parameter optimization. Inform. Sci. (2010, in press)

  2. Auger, A., Hansen, N.: A restart CMA evolution strategy with increasing population size. In: Proceedings of Congress on Evolutionary Computation, 1769–1776 (2005)

  3. Back T., Hammel U., Schwefel H-P.: Evolutionary computation: comments on the history and current state. IEEE. Trans. Evol. Comput. 1(1), 3–17 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Beyer H.-G., Schwefel H-P.: Evolution strategies—a comprehensive introduction. Nat. Comput. 1, 3–52 (2002)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. COmparing Continuous Optimisers. http://coco.gforge.inria.fr/doku.php?id=bbob-2009-results

  6. Garcia S., Molina D., Lozano M., Herrera F.: A study on the use of non-parametric tests for analyzing the evolutionary algorithms’ behaviour: a case study on the CEC’2005 special session on real parameter optimization. J. Heuristics 15, 617–644 (2009)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Hansen, N., Gemperle, F., Auger, A., Koumoutsakos, P.: When do heavy-tail distributions help? In: Proceedings of PPSN’2006, pp. 62–71 (2006)

  8. Meyer-Nieberg1, S., Beyer, H-G.: Self-adaptation in evolutionary algorithms. In: Parameter Setting in Evolutionary Algorithms, pp. 47–75. Springer, Berlin (2007)

  9. Ohkura K.: Robust evolution strategy. Appl. Intell. 15, 153–169 (2001)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Schwefel, H-P., Rudolph, G., Back, T.: Contemporary evolution strategies. In: Technical Report of the Systems Analysis Research Group SYS-6/95. Department of Computer Science, University of Dortmund, Dortmund (1995).

  11. Schwefel H-P., Schwefel H-P.: Evolution and Optimum Seeking. Wiley, New York (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Seredynski F.: Evolutionary paradigms. In: Zomaya, A.Y. (ed.) Handbook of Nature—Inspired and Innovative Computing: Integrating Classical Models with Emerging Technologies., pp. 111–146. Springer, New Jersey (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ali Ahrari.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ahrari, A. A requirement for the mutation operator in continuous optimization. Optim Lett 7, 1681–1690 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11590-012-0514-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11590-012-0514-4

Keywords

Navigation