Advertisement

Earthquake Science

, Volume 23, Issue 4, pp 325–331 | Cite as

Seismicity gap and seismic quiescence before 1999 Jiji (Chi-Chi) MW7.6 earthquake

  • Junguo WangEmail author
  • Wenbing Liu
  • Jieqing Zhang
Article

Abstract

The September 21, 1999, Jiji (Chi-Chi) MW7.6 earthquake is the strongest event occurred since 1900 in Taiwan of China. It is located in the middle segment of the western seismic zone of Taiwan. Based on several versions of China earthquake catalogue this study found that a seismic gap of M≥5 earthquakes appeared, in and around the epicenter region, 24 years before and lasted up to the mainshock occurrence. This study also noticed that there existed a lager seismically quiet region of M≥4 earthquakes, which lasted for about 2.5 years before the mainshock occurrence. The spatial variation pattern of regional seismicity before the mainshock seems to match with its coseismic source rupture process. The mentioned seismicity gap and seismic quiescence might be an indication of the preparation process of the Jiji strong earthquake.

Key words

Taiwan Jiji (Chi-Chi) earthquake seismicity gap seismic quiescence 

CLC number

P315.5 

References

  1. Allen C R, Saint-Amand P, Richter C F and Nordquist J M (1965). Relationship between seismicity on geologic structure in Southern California region. Bull Seism Soc Amer55: 753–797.Google Scholar
  2. Angelier J (1986). Preface. Geodynamics of the Eurasia-Philippine Sea plate boundary. Tectonophysics125: IX–X.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Department of Seismic Hazard Prevention, China Seismological Bureau (1995). China Historical Strong Earthquake Catalogue (23 Century BC-1911). Seismological Press, Beijing, 514pp (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  4. Department of Seismic Hazard Prevention, China Seismological Bureau (1999). China Current Earthquake Catalogue (1912–1990). China Scientific and Technological Press, Beijing, 673pp (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  5. Fedotov S A (1965). Regularities of distribution of strong earthquake in Kamchatka, the Kuril Island and northeast Japan. Tr Inst Fiz ZeMi Acad Nauk SSSR36: 66–93.Google Scholar
  6. Gu G X (1983a). China Earthquake Catalogue (23 Century BC-1969). Science Press, Beijing, 890pp (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  7. Gu G X (1983b). China Earthquake Catalogue (1970–1979). Seismological Press, Beijing, 334pp (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  8. Huang Bor-Shouh (2000). Two-dimensional reconstruction of the surface ground motions of an earthquake: the September 21, 1999, Chi-Chi, Taiwan earthquake. Geophys Res Lett27(18): 3 025–3 028.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kagan Y Y and Jackson D D (1991). Seismic gap hypothesis: Ten years after. J Geophys Res96: 21 419–21 431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kelleher J, Sykes L R and Oliver J (1973). Possible criteria for predicting earthquake locations and their application to major plate boundaries of the Pacific and the Caribbean. J Geophys Res78: 2 547–2 585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Nishenko S P and Sykes L R (1993). Comment on “Seismic gap hypothesis: Ten years after” by Y. Y. Kagan and D. D. Jackson. J Geophys Res98: 9 099–9 916.Google Scholar
  12. Seno T (1977). The instantaneous rotation vector of the Philippine Sea plate relative to the Eurasian plate. Tectonophysics42: 209–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Sykes L R (1971). Aftershock zones of great earthquakes, seismicity gaps, and earthquake prediction for Alaska and the Aleutians. J Geophys Res76: 8 021–8 041.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Wang J G, Wu X Z and Diao G L (1998). Regional seismicity anomaly before M6.2 Zhangbei-Shangyi earthquake of Jan. 10, 1998 and its prediction. Earthquake18(4): 383–390 (in Chinese with English abstract).Google Scholar
  15. Wang J G and Zhao G M (1987). Seismic activity gap before strong earthquakes. North China Earthquake Sciences5(Suppl.): 86–94 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  16. Xu L S, Yang Z X and Chen Y T (1999). Chi-Chi earthquake sequence and preliminary analysis of its focal fracture process. In: Collected Papers of 20th Anniversary of State Seismological Society. Seismological Press, Beijing, 97–110 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  17. Ye Y T and Huang W J (1992). Study on seismic hazard prevention in Taiwan. In: Proceedings of First Across-the-Straits Conference on Earthquake (1st ASCOE). Seismological Press, Beijing, 135–162 (in Chinese).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Seismological Society of China and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Earthquake Administration of Tianjin MunicipalityTianjinChina

Personalised recommendations