Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison between earthquake magnitudes determined by China seismograph network and US seismograph networks (I): Body wave magnitude

  • Published:
Acta Seismologica Sinica

Abstract

By using orthogonal regression method, a systematic comparison is made between body wave magnitudes determined by Institute of Geophysics of China Earthquake Administration (IGCEA) and National Earthquake Information Center of US Geological Survey (USGS/NEIC) on the basis of observation data from China and US seismograph networks between 1983 and 2004. The result of orthogonal regression shows no systematic error between body wave magnitude m b determined by IGCEA and m b (NEIC). Provided that m b (NEIC) is taken as the benchmark, body wave magnitude determined by IGCEA is greater by 0.2–0.1 than the magnitude determined by NEIC for M=3.5–4.5 earthquakes; for M=5.0–5.5 earthquakes, there is no difference; and for M≥6.0 earthquakes, it is smaller by no more than 0.2. This is consistent with the result of comparison by IDC (International Data Center).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bormann P ed. 2002. New Manual of Seismological Observatory Practice [M]. Potsdam: GeoForschungsZentrum, 2–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geller R J. 1976. Scaling relations for earthquake source parameters and magnitudes [J]. Bull Seism Soc Amer, 66: 1 501–1 523.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon D W. 1971. Surface-wave versus body-wave magnitude [J]. Earthquake Notes, 42(3/4): 20–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutenberg B. 1945a. Amplitude of surface waves and magnitudes of shallow earthquakes [J]. Bull Seism Soc Amer, 35: 3–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutenberg B. 1945b. Amplitudes of P, PP and S magnitude of shallow earthquakes [J]. Bull Seism Soc Amer, 35: 57–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutenberg B and Richter C F. 1956a. Earthquake magnitude, intensity, energy and acceleration (second paper) [J]. Bull Seism Soc Amer, 46: 105–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutenberg B and Richter C F. 1956b. Magnitude and energy of earthquakes [J]. Annali di Geofisica, 9: 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • HE Xiao-qun and LIU Wen-qing. 2001. The Applications of Regression Analysis [M]. Beijing: China Renmin University Press, 31–39 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • State Seismological Bureau. 1978. Observation Standardization for Seismic Stations [M]. Beijing: Seismological Press, 1–12 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Utsu T. 1982. Relationships between magnitude scales [J]. Bull Earthq Res Inst, Tokyo Univ, 57: 465–497.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Foundation item: Project "Seismic Data Share" from China Ministry of Science and Technology.

Contribution No. 05FE3024, Institute of Geophysics, China Earthquake Administration.

About this article

Cite this article

Liu, Rf., Chen, Yt., Peter, B. et al. Comparison between earthquake magnitudes determined by China seismograph network and US seismograph networks (I): Body wave magnitude. Acta Seimol. Sin. 18, 627–631 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11589-005-0089-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11589-005-0089-6

Key words

CLC number

Navigation