# Chisini means and rational decision making: equivalence of investment criteria

- 47 Downloads

## Abstract

A plethora of tools are used for investment decisions and performance measurement, including net present value, internal rate of return, profitability index, modified internal rate of return, average accounting rate of return. All these and other known metrics are generally considered non-equivalent and some of them are regarded as unreliable or even naïve. Building upon Magni (Eng Econ 55(2):150–180, 2010a, Eng Econ 58(2):73–111, 2013)’s average internal rate of return, we show that the notion of *Chisini mean* enables these tools to be used as rational decision criteria. Specifically, we focus on 11 metrics and show that, if properly used, they all provide equivalent accept–reject decisions and equivalent project rankings. Therefore, the intuitive notion of mean is the founding basis of investment decision criteria.

### Keywords

Value creation Accept–reject decisions Project ranking Equivalence class Net present value Average internal rate of return### JEL Classification

B41 C02 D53 G31 H43 M41## Notes

### Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank an anonymous reviewer, who supplied invaluable remarks for revising the paper.

### References

- 1.Athanasopoulos, P.J.: A note on the modified internal rate of return and investment criterion. Eng. Econ.
**23**(2), 131–133 (1977)Google Scholar - 2.Barry, P.J., Robison, L.J.: Technical note: economic rates of return and investment analysis. Eng. Econ.
**59**(3), 231–256 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 3.Ben-Horin M., Kroll Y.: A simple intuitive NPV-IRR consistent ranking. Q. J. Econ. Finance (2017). doi: 10.1016/j.qref.2017.01.004
- 4.Berk, J., DeMarzo, P.: Corporate Finance. Global Edition, 3rd edn. Pearson, Harlow (2014)Google Scholar
- 5.Borgonovo, E., Gatti, S., Peccati, L.: What drives value creation in investment projects? An application of sensitivity analysis to project finance transactions. Eur. J. Oper. Res.
**205**(1), 227–236 (2010)Google Scholar - 6.Brealey, R.A., Myers, S., Allen, F.: Principles of Corporate Finance. Global Edition. McGraw-Hill Irwin, Pennsylvania (2011)Google Scholar
- 7.Brounen, D., de Jong, A., Koedijk, K.: Corporate finance in Europe: confronting theory with practice. Financ. Manag.
**33**(4), 71–101 (2004)Google Scholar - 8.Chisini, O.: Sul concetto di media on the concept of mean. Periodico di Matematiche
**9**(4), 106–116 (1929)MATHGoogle Scholar - 9.de Finetti, B.: Sul concetto di media on the concept of mean. Giornale dell’Istituto Italiano degli Attuari
**2**(3), 369–396 (1931)MATHGoogle Scholar - 10.Evans, D.A., Forbes, S.M.: Decision making and display methods: the case of prescription and practice in capital budgeting. Eng. Econ.
**39**(1), 87–92 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 11.Fabozzi, F.J., Peterson, P.P.: Financial Management and Analysis, 2nd edn. Wiley, Hoboken (2003)Google Scholar
- 12.Fischer, B.R., Wermers, R.: Performance Evaluation and Attribution of Security Portolios. Academic Press, Waltham (2013)Google Scholar
- 13.Fisher, F.M., McGowan, J.J.: On the misuse of accounting rates of return to infer monopoly profits. Am. Econ. Rev.
**73**(1), 82–97 (1983)Google Scholar - 14.Graham, J., Harvey, C.: The theory and practice of corporate finance: evidence from the field. J. Financ. Econ.
**60**(2–3), 187–243 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 15.Gray, K.B., Dewar, R.B.K.: Axiomatic characterization of the time-weighted rate of return. Manag. Sci.
**18**(2), 32–35 (1971)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar - 16.Graziani, R., Veronese, P.: How to compute a mean? The Chisini approach and its applications. Am. Stat.
**63**(1), 33–36 (2009)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 17.Hazen, G.B.: A new perspective on multiple internal rates of return. Eng. Econ.
**48**(1), 31–51 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 18.Herroelen, W.S., Van Dommelen, P., Demeulemeester, E.L.: Project network models with discounted cash flows a guided tour through recent developments. Eur. J. Oper. Res.
**100**(1), 97–121 (1997)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar - 19.Kay, A.: Accountants, too, could be happy in the golden age: the accountants rate of profit and the internal rate of return. Oxf. Econ. Pap.
**28**(3), 447–460 (1976)CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 20.Kierulff, H.: MIRR: a better measure. Bus. Horizons
**51**(4), 321–329 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 21.Lima e Silva J., Sobreiro V.A., Kimura H.: Pre-purchase financing pool: Revealing the IRR problem. Eng. Econ. (2017). doi: 10.1080/0013791X.2017.1333662
- 22.Lin, A.Y.S.: The modified internal rate of return and investment criterion. Eng. Econ.
**21**(4), 237–247 (1976)CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 23.Lindblom, T., Sjögren, S.: Increasing goal congruence in project evaluation by introducing a strict market depreciation schedule. Int. J. Prod. Econ.
**121**(2), 519–532 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 24.Magni C.A.: Accounting and economic measures: an integrated theory of capital budgeting. SSRN Working paper. http://ssrn.com/abstract=1498106 (2009)
- 25.Magni, C.A.: Average internal rate of return and investment decisions: a new perspective. Eng. Econ.
**55**(2), 150–180 (2010a)CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 26.Magni C.A.: Depreciation classes, return on investment and economic profitability. SSRN Working paper. http://ssrn.com/abstract=1718525 (2010b)
- 27.Magni, C.A.: Aggregate return on investment and investment decisions: a cash-flow perspective. Eng. Econ.
**56**(2), 181–182 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 28.Magni, C.A.: The internal-rate-of-return approach and the AIRR paradigm: a refutation and a corroboration. Eng. Econ.
**58**(2), 73–111 (2013)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 29.Magni, C.A.: Investment, financing and the role of ROA and WACC in value creation. Eur. J. Oper. Res.
**244**(3), 855–866 (2015)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar - 30.Magni, C.A.: Capital depreciation and the underdetermination of rate of return: a unifying perspective. J. Math. Econ.
**67**, 54–79 (2016)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar - 31.Mørch, O., Fagerholta, K., Pantuso, G., Rakkec, J.: Maximizing the rate of return on the capital employed in shipping capacity renewal. Omega
**67**, 42–53 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 32.Park, C.: Fundamentals of Engineering Economics. International Edition. Pearson, Harlow (2013)Google Scholar
- 33.Pasqual, J., Padilla, E., Jadotte, E.: Technical note: equivalence of different profitability criteria with the net present value. Int. J. Prod. Econ.
**142**(1), 205–210 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 34.Peasnell, K.V.: Some formal connections between economic values and yields and accounting numbers. J. Bus. Finance Account.
**9**(3), 361–381 (1982)CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 35.Rao, R.: Financial Management. MacMillan Publishing Company, Basingstoke (1992)Google Scholar
- 36.Remer, D.S., Nieto, A.P.: A compendium and comparison of 25 project evaluation techniques. Part 1: net present value and rate of return methods. Int. J. Prod. Econ.
**42**(1), 79–96 (1995a)CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 37.Remer, D.S., Nieto, A.P.: A compendium and comparison of 25 project evaluation techniques. Part 2: ratio, payback, and accounting methods. Int. J. Prod. Econ.
**42**(2), 101–129 (1995b)CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 38.Remer, D.S., Stokdyk, S.B., Van Driel, M.: Survey of project evaluation techniques currently used in industry. Int. J. Prod. Econ.
**32**(1), 103–115 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 39.Robichek, A.A., Myers, S.C.: Optimal Financing Decisions. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1965)Google Scholar
- 40.Ross, S.A., Westerfield, R.W., Jordan, B.D.: Essentials of Corporate Finance, 7th edn. McGraw-Hill Irwin, New York (2011)Google Scholar
- 41.Sandahl, G., Sjögren, S.: Capital budgeting methods among Swedens largest groups of companies. The state of the art and a comparison with earlier studies. Int. J. Prod. Econ.
**84**(1), 51–69 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 42.Spaulding, D.: The Handbook of Investment Performance: A User’s Guide, 2nd edn. TSG Publishing Inc, Somerset (2011)Google Scholar
- 43.Wiesemann, D., Kuhn, D., Rustem, B.: Maximizing the net present value of a project under uncertainty. Eur. J. Oper. Res.
**202**(2), 356–367 (2010)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar