Abstract
Hans Peter Duerr’s critique of Norbert Elias’ theory of the civilizing process has brought about a lot of strong, mostly disapproving reactions. This article is an attempt to seriously take up the challenges of Duerr’s work showing the strength of Duerr’s arguments in contradiction to Elias.
To do this it is focused on the phenomenon of human shame. Duerr’s theory of shame is related to the Philosophical Anthropology of Max Scheler and it is argued, that Duerr’s thesis of the universality of shame actually can not be combined with Elias’ thesis of the process of increasing civilization as Elias’s defenders would support.
Similar content being viewed by others
Additional information
Matthias Schloßberger, Philosoph, wissenschaftlicher Mitarbeiter bei Friedrich Wilhelm Graf am Institut für systematische Theologie an der Universität München und Doktorand an der Universität Postdam, Forststraße 46, 12163 Berlin
About this article
Cite this article
Schloßberger, M. Rezeptionsschwierigkeiten. Hans Peter Duerrs Kritik an Norbert Elias’ historischer Anthropologie. Leviathan 28, 109–121 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11578-000-0006-2
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11578-000-0006-2