Skip to main content
Log in

Rezeptionsschwierigkeiten. Hans Peter Duerrs Kritik an Norbert Elias’ historischer Anthropologie

Difficulties in reception. Hans Peter Duerr’s critique of norbert elias’ historical anthropology

  • Aufsätze
  • Published:
Leviathan

Abstract

Hans Peter Duerr’s critique of Norbert Elias’ theory of the civilizing process has brought about a lot of strong, mostly disapproving reactions. This article is an attempt to seriously take up the challenges of Duerr’s work showing the strength of Duerr’s arguments in contradiction to Elias.

To do this it is focused on the phenomenon of human shame. Duerr’s theory of shame is related to the Philosophical Anthropology of Max Scheler and it is argued, that Duerr’s thesis of the universality of shame actually can not be combined with Elias’ thesis of the process of increasing civilization as Elias’s defenders would support.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Authors

Additional information

Matthias Schloßberger, Philosoph, wissenschaftlicher Mitarbeiter bei Friedrich Wilhelm Graf am Institut für systematische Theologie an der Universität München und Doktorand an der Universität Postdam, Forststraße 46, 12163 Berlin

About this article

Cite this article

Schloßberger, M. Rezeptionsschwierigkeiten. Hans Peter Duerrs Kritik an Norbert Elias’ historischer Anthropologie. Leviathan 28, 109–121 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11578-000-0006-2

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11578-000-0006-2

Navigation