Zusammenfassung
Der vorliegende Artikel reflektiert bestehende und zukünftige Herausforderungen im Bereich „evolutionärer betrieblicher Informationssysteme“, einer Gattung von Systemen, die einen evolutionären Softwareentwicklungsprozess erfordern und die eine „sekundäre Gestaltung (secondary design)“ auf mehreren konzeptionellen Ebenen unterstützen. Wir verorten sowohl bestehende Forschungsbeiträge und zukünftige Herausforderungen innerhalb einer idealisierten, vorläufigen Systemarchitektur. Schließlich betonen wir unsere pluralistische Sichtweise auf den Forschungsgegenstand und die daraus resultierende Notwendigkeit einer methodologischen Flexibilität im Sinne interdisziplinärer Konfigurationen von Forschungsmethoden.
Abstract
This article reflects on existing and emerging future challenges arising in the area of “evolutionary business information systems”, a class of systems that demand an evolutionary software development process and which support secondary design of various conceptual layers. We place both existing contributions and future research opportunities in context by referring to an idealized, preliminary system architecture. Finally, we emphasize our pluralistic perspective on the research object and the resulting need for methodological flexibility in the sense of interdisciplinary configurations of research methods.
Literatur
Abrahamsson P, Oza N, Siponen M (2010) Agile software development methods: a comparative review. In: Dingsøyr T, Dybå T, Moe NB (Hrsg) Agile software development. Springer, Berlin, S 31–59
Alberer G, Alberer P, Enzi T, Ernst G, Mayrhofer K, Neumann G, Rieder R, Simon B (2003) The learn@WU learning environment. In: Proceedings Wirtschaftsinformatik 2003, Dresden
Apel S, Kästner C (2009) An overview of feature-oriented software development. Journal of Object Technology 8(5):49–84
Allen BR, Boynton AC (1991) Information architecture: in search of efficient flexibility. MIS Quarterly 15(4):435–445
Andergassen M, Guerra V, Ledermüller K, Neumann G (2012) Browser-based mobile clickers: implementation and challenges. In: Proceedings IADIS international conference – Mobile learning 2012, Berlin
Bjerknes G, Bratteteig T, Espeseth T (1991) Evolution of finished computer systems. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems 3:25–45
Breu R, Agreiter B, Farwick M, Felderer M, Hafner M, Innerhofer-Oberperfler F (2011) Living models: ten principles for change-driven software engineering. International Journal of Software and Informatics 5(12):267–290
Brynjolfsson E, Hitt LM, Kim HH (2011) Strength in numbers: how does data-driven decision-making affect firm performance? SSRN working paper, Social Science Research Network (SSRN)
Callaù O, Robbes R, Tanter E, Röthlisberger D (2011) How (and why) developers use the dynamic features of programming languages: the case of Smalltalk. Empirical Software Engineering S 1–39
Clements P, Northrop L (2007) Software product lines: practices and patterns. Addison-Wesley, Reading
Fowler M (2010) Domain-specific languages. Pearson Education, Upper Saddle River
Frank U (2006) Towards a pluralistic conception of research methods in information systems research. ICB research reports 7, University Duisburg-Essen, Institute for Computer Science and Business Information Systems
Georgakopoulos D, Hornick M, Sheth A (1995) An overview of workflow management: from process modeling to workflow automation infrastructure. Distributed and parallel Databases 3(2):119–153
Germonprez M, Hovorka D, Collopy F (2007) A theory of tailorable technology design. Journal of the Association for Information System 8(6):351–367
Germonprez M, Hovorka D, Gal U (2011) Secondary design: a case of behavioral design science research. Journal of the Association for Information System 12(10):662–683
Hansen HR, Neumann G (2009) Wirtschaftsinformatik 1: Grundlagen und Anwendungen, Bd 1, 10. Aufl. Lucius & Lucius, Stuttgart
Hevner AR, March ST, Park J, Ram S (2004) Design science in information systems research. MIS Quarterly 28(1):75–105
Hoyer V, Gilles F, Janner T, Stanoevska-Slabeva K (2009) SAP research RoofTop marketplace: putting a face on service-oriented architectures. In: 2009 world conference on services – I, S 107–114
Kieser A, Kubicek H (1992) Organisation, 3rd edn. de Gruyter, Berlin
Malone TW, Crowston K (1994) The interdisciplinary study of coordination. ACM Computing Surveys 26(1):87–119
Malone TW, Crowston K, Lee J, Pentland B, Dellarocas C, Wyner G, Quimby J, Osborn CS, Bernstein A, Herman G, Klein M, O’Donnell E (1999) Tools for inventing organizations: toward a handbook of organizational processes. Management Science 45(3):425–443
March ST, Smith GF (1995) Design and natural science research on information technology. Decision Support Systems 15(4):251–266
Mernik M, Heering J, Sloane AM (2005) When and how to develop domain-specific languages. ACM Computing Surveys 37(4):316–344
Mödritscher F, Andergassen M, Neumann G (2013) Dependencies between e-learning usage patterns and learning results. In: Proceedings of 13th international conference on knowledge management and knowledge technologies (i-KNOW), Graz, 2013
Muller MJ, Kuhn S (1993) Participatory design. Commun ACM 36(6):24–28
Neumann G, Erol S (2008) From a social wiki to a social workflow system. In: Ardegna D, Mecella M, Yang J (Hrsg) Business process management workshops 2008, Milan, LNBIP, Bd 17, S 698–708
Orlikowski WJ, Iacono CS (2001) Research commentary: desperately seeking the “IT” in IT research: a call to theorizing the IT artifact. Information Systems Research 12(2):121–134
Österle H, Otto B (2010) Konsortialforschung. Eine Methode für die Zusammenarbeit von Forschung und Praxis in der gestaltungsorientierten Wirtschaftsinformatikforschung. WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK 52(5):273–285
Ousterhout JK (1998) Scripting: higher level programming for the 21st century. IEEE Computer 31(3):23–30
Pahlke I, Beck R, Wolf M (2010) Enterprise-Mashup-Systeme als Plattform für situative Anwendungen. Nutzen und Herausforderungen für Unternehmen. WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK 52(5):299–310
Peffers K, Tuunanen T, Rothenberger MA, Chatterjee S (2007) A design science research methodology for information systems research. Journal of Management Information Systems 24:45–77
Rank S (2002) A reflective architecture to support dynamic software evolution. PhD thesis, University of Durham, UK
Sein MK, Henfridsson O, Purao S, Rossi M, Lindgren R (2011) Action design research. MIS Quarterly 35(1):37–56
Siemens G, Long P (2011) Penetrating the fog: analytics in learning and education. EDUCAUSE Review 46(5):30–32
Stahl T, Voelter M, Czarnecki K (2006) Model-driven software development: technology, engineering, management. Wiley, New York
Strembeck M, Zdun U (2009) An approach for the systematic development of domain-specific languages. Software Practice & Experience 39(15):1253–1292
Vaishnavi VK, Kuechler W (2007) Design science research methods and patterns: innovating information and communication technology. Auerbach Publications, Boston
van der Aalst WMP (2011) Process mining: discovery, conformance and enhancement of business processes. Springer, Berlin
von Hippel E (2009) Democratizing innovation: the evolving phenomenon of user innovation. International Journal of Innovation Science 1(1):29–40
Wulf V (1999) Evolving cooperation when introducing groupware: a self-organization perspective. Cybernetics & Human Knowing 6(2):55–74
Wulf V, Rohde M (1995) Towards an integrated organization and technology development. In: Proceedings of the 1st conference on designing interactive systems: processes, practices, methods, and techniques. ACM, New York, S 55–64
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Angenommen nach zwei Überarbeitungen durch die Herausgeber des Schwerpunktthemas.
This article is also available in English via http://www.springerlink.com and http://www.bise-journal.org: Neumann G, Sobernig S, Aram M (2014) Evolutionary Business Information Systems. Perspectives and Challenges of an Emerging Class of Information Systems. Bus Inf Syst Eng. doi: 10.1007/s12599-013-0305-1.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Neumann, G., Sobernig, S. & Aram, M. Evolutionäre betriebliche Informationssysteme. Wirtschaftsinf 56, 41–47 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11576-013-0397-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11576-013-0397-8