Knowledge Acquisition in International Strategic Alliances: The Role of Knowledge Ambiguity

Abstract

Although prior research has emphasized the importance of international strategic alliances, we have incomplete understanding of how and why some firms succeed in acquiring knowledge from foreign partners, but others fail. We advance understanding of this important issue by examining (1) two key antecedents of knowledge ambiguity (the perceived difficulty of understanding the causal effects of partner’s knowledge and the use of such knowledge) and (2) by identifying how firms can partly overcome the negative effects of knowledge ambiguity on knowledge acquisition in international alliances. Drawing on organizational learning theory, our analysis not only shows (and explains how) knowledge ambiguity affects international knowledge acquisition through the interaction with absorptive capacity, but also identifies what alliance partners can do to reduce knowledge ambiguity and overcome some of its negative consequences, such as choosing foreign partners with a similar institutional context and building strong relationships with such partners.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1

References

  1. Ambos, T. C., & Ambos, B. (2009). The impact of distance on knowledge transfer effectiveness in multinational corporations. Journal of International Management, 15(1), 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Andersen, E. S. (2008). Rethinking project management: An organizational learning perspective. Essex: Pearson Education Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Andersson, U., Buckley, P. J., & Dellstrand, H. (2015). In the right place at the right time!: The influence of knowledge governance tools on knowledge transfer and utilization in MNEs. Global Strategy Journal, 5(1), 27–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bou-Llusar, J. C., & Segarra-Cipres, M. (2006). Strategic knowledge transfer and its implications for competitive advantage: An integrative conceptual framework. Journal of Knowledge Management, 10(4), 100–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bresman, H., Birkinshaw, J., & Nobel, R. (2010). Knowledge transfer in international acquisitions. Journal of International Business Studies, 41(1), 5–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Brown, J. S., & Duguid, P. (1998). Organizational knowledge. California Management Review, 40(3), 90–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Buckley, P. J., & Ghauri, P. N. (2004). Globalization, economic geography and the strategy of multinational enterprises. Journal of International Business Studies, 35(2), 81–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Carson, S. J., Wu, T., & Moore, W. L. (2012). Managing the trade-off between ambiguity and volatility in new product development. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 29(6), 1061–1081.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Cavusgil, S. T., Calantone, R. J., & Zhao, Y. (2003). Tacit knowledge transfer and firm innovation capability. Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing, 18(1), 6–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Chao, M. C.-H., & Kumar, V. (2010). The impact of institutional distance on the international diversity-performance relationship. Journal of World Business, 45(1), 93–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Chittoor, R., Aulakh, P. S., & Ray, S. (2015). Accumulative and assimilative learning, institutional infrastructure, and innovation orientation of developing economy firms. Global Strategy Journal, 5(2), 133–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Cousins, P. D., Handfield, R. B., Lawson, B., & Petersen, K. J. (2006). Creating supply chain relational capital: the impact of formal and informal socialization processes. Journal of Operations Management, 24(6), 851–863.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Dahl, A. L., & Lopez-Claros, A. (2006). The impact of information and communication technologies on the economic competitiveness and social development of Taiwan. In S. Dutta, et al. (Eds.), The global information technology report 2005–2006: Leveraging ICT for development (pp. 107–118). INSEAD/World Economic Forum. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Das, T. K. (2005). Deceitful behaviors of alliance partners; potential and prevention. Management Decision, 43(5), 706–719.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Dikova, D., Sahib, P. R., & van Witteleoostuijn, A. (2010). Cross-border acquisition abandonment and completion: The effect of institutional differences and organizational learning in the international business service industry, 1981–2001. Journal of International Business Studies, 41(2), 223–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Dillman, D. A., Eltinge, J. L., Groves, R. M., & Little, R. J. A. (2002). Survey nonresponse in design, data collection, and analysis. In R. M. Groves, et al. (Eds.), Survey nonresponse (pp. 3–26). London: Wiley-Interscience.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Dutta, S., & Mia, I. (2011). The global information technology report 2010–2011. Geneva: World Economic Forum and INSEAD.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Dyer, J. H., & Singh, H. (1998). The relational view: Cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. The Academy of Management Review, 23(4), 660–679.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Ernst, D., & Bamford, J. (2005). Your alliances are too stable. Harvard Business Review, 83(6), 133–141.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Fisher, F. (2006). Citizens, experts and the environment. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Gaur, A. S., & Lu, J. W. (2007). Ownership strategies and survival of foreign subsidiaries: Impacts of international distance and experience. Journal of Management, 33(1), 84–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Goodall, K., & Robert, J. (2003). Repairing managerial knowledge-ability over distance. Organization Studies, 24(7), 1153–1175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Guzman, G. A. C., & Wilson, J. (2005). The “soft” dimension of organizational knowledge transfer. Journal of Knowledge Management, 9(2), 59–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Hamel, G. (1991). Competition for competence and inter-partner learning within international strategic alliances. Strategic Management Journal, 12(S1), 83–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Harrigan, K. (1985). Strategies for joint venture. Livingston: Livingston Books.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Hayes, N., & Walsham, G. (2005). Knowledge sharing and ICT: A relational perspective. In M. Easterby-Smith & M. A. Lyles (Eds.), Handbook of organizational learning and knowledge management. Malden: Blackwell Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Ho, M. H.-W. (2013). Reconceptualizing cross-border knowledge acquisition: An empirical investigation into antecedents. In G. Cook & J. Jennifer (Eds.), New global developments and the changing geography of international business: Strategy, performance and institutional change (pp. 136–154). Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Ho, M. H.-W., Ghauri, P. N., & Larimo, J. A. (2018). Institutional distance and knowledge acquisition in international buyer-supplier relationships: The moderating role of trust. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 35(2), 427–447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Ho, M. H.-W., & Wang, F. (2015). Unpacking knowledge transfer and learning paradoxes in international strategic alliances: Contextual differences matter. International Business Review, 24(2), 287–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Huber, G. P. (1991). Organizational learning: The contributing processes and the literatures. Organization Science, 2(1), 88–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Ingram, P., & Silverman, B. S. (2002). The new institutionalism in strategic management: Advances in strategic management. Greenwich: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Inkpen, A. C. (1998). Learning and knowledge acquisition through international strategic alliances. Organization Science, 9(4), 454–468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Inkpen, A. C. (2000). Learning through joint ventures: A framework of knowledge acquisition. Journal of Management Studies, 37(7), 1019–1043.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Inkpen, A. C. (2002). Learning, knowledge management, and strategic alliances: So many studies, so many unanswered questions. In F. J. Contractor & P. Lorange (Eds.), Cooperative strategies and alliances. Oxford: Elsevier Science.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Inkpen, A. C., & Beamish, P. W. (1997). Knowledge, bargaining power, and the instability of international joint ventures. The Academy of Management Review, 22(1), 177–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Jean, R.-J., Sinkovics, R. R., & Hiebaum, T. P. (2014). The effects of supplier involvement and knowledge protection on product innovation in customer-supplier relationships: A study of global automotive suppliers in China. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31(1), 98–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Johanson, J., & Vahlne, J.-E. (2009). The Uppsala internationalization process model revisited: From liability of foreignness to liability of outsidership. Journal of International Business Studies, 40(9), 1411–1431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Kachra, A., & White, R. E. (2008). Know-how transfer: The role of social, economic/competitive, and firm boundary factors. Strategic Management Journal, 29(4), 425–445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Kafouros, M., Buckley, P. J., & Clegg, J. (2012). The effects of global knowledge reservoirs on the productivity of multinational enterprises: The role of international depth and breadth. Research Policy, 41(5), 848–861.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Kafouros, M., Wang, C., Hong, J., Mavroudi, E., & Katsikeas, C. (2018). Geographic dispersion and co-location in global R&D portfolios: Consequences for firm performance. Research Policy, 47(7), 1243–1255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Kale, P., Singh, H., & Perlmutter, H. (2000). Learning and protection of proprietary assets in strategic alliances: Building relational capital. Strategic Management Journal, 21(3), 217–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Katila, R., Rosenberger, J. D., & Eisenhardt, K. M. (2008). Swimming with sharks: Technology ventures, defense mechanisms and corporate relationships. Administrative Science Quarterly, 53(2), 295–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Kim, L. (1998). Crisis construction and organizational learning: Capability building in catching-up at Hyundai Motor. Organization Science, 9(4), 506–521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Kogut, B., & Singh, H. (1988). The effect of national culture on the choice of entry mode. Journal of International Business Studies, 19(3), 411–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Kostova, T., & Roth, K. (2002). Adoption of organizational practice by subsidiaries of multinational corporations: Institutional and relational effects. Academy of Management Journal, 45(1), 215–233.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Kranenburg, H. V., Hagedoornm, J., & Lorenz-Orlean, S. (2014). Distance costs and the degree of inter-partner involvement in international relational-based technology alliances. Global Strategy Journal, 4(4), 280–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Lane, P. J., Koka, B. R., & Pathak, S. (2006). The reification of absorptive capacity: A critical review and rejuvenation of the construct. Academy of Management Review, 31(4), 833–863.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Law, K. K. (2014). The problem with knowledge ambiguity. European Management Journal, 32(3), 444–450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Li, J., Karakowsky, L., & Lam, K. (2002). East meets east and east meets west: The case of Sino-Japanese and Sino-West joint ventures in China. Journal of Management Studies, 39(6), 841–863.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Lichtenthaler, U. (2009). Absorptive capacity, environmental turbulence, and the complementarity of organizational learning processes. Academy of Management Journal, 52(4), 822–846.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Lippman, S. A., & Rumelt, R. P. (1982). Uncertain imitability: An analysis of interfirm differences in efficiency under competition. The Bell Journal of Economics, 13(2), 418–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Liu, C.-L., Ghauri, P. N., & Sinkovics, R. R. (2010). Understanding the impact of relational capital and organizational learning on alliance outcomes. Journal of World Business, 45(3), 237–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Lyles, M. A., & Salk, J. E. (1996). Knowledge acquisition from foreign parents in international joint ventures. Journal of International Business Studies, 27(5), 905–927.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. MacKenzie, S. B., Podsakoff, P. M., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2011). Construct measurement and validation procedures in MIS and behavioral research: Integrating new and existing techniques. MIS Quarterly, 35(2), 293–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. McEvily, S. K., Das, S., & McCabe, K. (2000). Avoiding competence substitution through knowledge sharing. The Academy of Management Review, 25(2), 294–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. McEvily, S. K., & Chakravarthy, B. (2002). The persistence of knowledge-based advantage: An empirical test for product performance and technological knowledge. Strategic Management Journal, 23(4), 285–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Minbaeva, D., Pedersen, T., Bjorkman, I., Fey, C. F., & Park, H. J. (2003). MNC knowledge transfer, subsidiary absorptive capacity, and HRM. Journal of International Business Studies, 34(6), 586–599.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Morosini, P., Shane, S., & Singh, H. (1998). National cultural distance and cross-border acquisition performance. Journal of International Business Studies, 29(1), 137–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Nielsen, B. B., & Nielsen, S. (2009). Learning and innovation in international strategic alliances: An empirical test of the role of trust and tacitness. Journal of Management Studies, 46(6), 1031–1056.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Nonaka, I. (1994). A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organization Science, 5(1), 14–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge-creating company. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Norman, P. M. (2004). Knowledge acquisition, knowledge loss, and satisfaction in high technology alliances. Journal of Business Research, 57(6), 610–619.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  65. Olk, P. (1997). The effect of partner differences on the performance of R&D consortia. In P. Beamish & J. Killings (Eds.), Cooperative strategies: American perspectives (pp. 133–159). San Francisco: New Lexington Press.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Parkhe, A. (1993). Partner nationality and the structure-performance relationship in strategic alliances. Organization Science, 4(2), 301–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Peng, M. W., Sun, S. L., Pinkham, B., & Chen, H. (2009). The institution-based view as a third leg for a strategy tripod. Academy of Management Perspectives, 23(3), 63–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Phene, A., & Tallman, S. (2014). Knowledge spillovers and alliance formation. Journal of Management Studies, 51(7), 1058–1090.

    Google Scholar 

  69. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Potter, A., & Lawson, B. (2013). Help or hindrance? Causal ambiguity and supplier involvement in new product development teams. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 30(4), 794–808.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Quintas, P., Lefrere, P., & Jones, G. (1997). Knowledge management: A strategic agenda. Long Range Planning, 30(3), 385–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Reed, R., & DeFilippi, R. J. (1990). Causal ambiguity, barriers to imitation, and sustainable competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review, 15(1), 88–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Roberts, N., Galluch, P. S., Dinger, M., & Grover, V. (2012). Absorptive capacity and information systems research: Review, synthesis, and directions for future research. MIS Quarterly, 36(2), 625–648.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Samieh, H. M., & Wahba, K. (2007). Knowledge sharing behavior from game theory and socio-psychology perspectives. In: Proceedings of the 40th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

  75. Scott, W. R. (1995). Institutions and organizations. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  76. Simonin, B. L. (1999a). Ambiguity and the process of knowledge transfer in strategic alliances. Strategic Management Journal, 20(7), 595–623.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Simonin, B. L. (1999b). Transfer of marketing know-how in international strategic alliances: An empirical investigation of the role and antecedents of knowledge ambiguity. Journal of International Business Studies, 30(3), 463–490.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Simonin, B. L. (2004). An empirical investigation of the process of knowledge transfer in international strategic alliances. Journal of International Business Studies, 35(5), 401–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Squire, B., Cousins, P. D., & Brown, S. (2009). Cooperation and knowledge transfer within buyer-supplier relationships: The moderating properties of trust, relationship duration and supplier performance. British Journal of Management, 20(4), 461–477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  80. Szulanski, G. (1996). Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practices within the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17(S2), 27–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  81. Tsai, W. (2001). Knowledge transfer in interorganizational networks: Effects of network position and absorptive capacity on business unit innovation and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 44(5), 996–1004.

    Google Scholar 

  82. Tsang, E. W. K. (1999). A preliminary typology of learning in international strategic alliances. Journal of World Business, 34(3), 211–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  83. Tsang, E. W. K., Nguyen, D. T., & Erramilli, M. K. (2004). Knowledge acquisition and performance of international joint ventures in the transition economy of Vietnam. Journal of International Marketing, 12(2), 82–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  84. Tzeng, C.-H. (2018). How foreign knowledge spillovers by returnee managers occur at domestic firms: An institutional theory perspective. International Business Review, 27(3), 625–641.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  85. Van Wijk, R., Jansen, J. J. P., & Lyles, M. A. (2008). Inter- and intra-organizational knowledge transfer: a meta-analytic review and assessment of its antecedents and consequences. Journal of Management Studies, 45(4), 830–853.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  86. Williams, L. J., Edwards, J. R., & Vandenberg, R. J. (2003). Recent advances in causal modeling methods for organizational and management research. Journal of Management, 29(6), 903–936.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  87. Yli-Renko, H., Autio, E., & Sapienza, H. J. (2001). Social capital, knowledge acquisitions, and knowledge exploitation in young technology-based firms. Strategic Management Journal, 22(6–7), 587–613.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  88. Zahra, S. A., & George, G. (2002). Absorptive capacity: A review, reconceptualization, and extension. The Academy of Management Review, 27(2), 185–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  89. Zhao, Z. J., & Anand, J. (2009). A multilevel perspective on knowledge transfer: Evidence from the Chinese automotive industry. Strategic Management Journal, 30(9), 959–983.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mia Hsiao-Wen Ho.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ho, MW., Ghauri, P.N. & Kafouros, M. Knowledge Acquisition in International Strategic Alliances: The Role of Knowledge Ambiguity. Manag Int Rev 59, 439–463 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11575-019-00383-w

Download citation

Keywords

  • Knowledge ambiguity
  • Absorptive capacity
  • Knowledge acquisition
  • Institutional distance
  • International strategic alliances
  • Relational capital