Advertisement

Management International Review

, Volume 58, Issue 3, pp 413–447 | Cite as

Global Mindset and Entry Mode Decisions: Moderating Roles of Managers’ Decision-Making Style and Managerial Experience

  • Fuming Jiang
  • Subramaniam Ananthram
  • Jizhong Li
Research Article
  • 356 Downloads

Abstract

From the managerial cognition perspective, we develop a contingency framework that empirically examines the effect of senior managers’ global mindset on their decisions regarding the choice of entry mode for foreign subsidiaries and how their cognitive decision-making style and managerial experience interact with their global mindset and thereby affect their decisions. Data were collected from both headquarters and subsidiary senior managers of 345 Chinese multinational enterprises. The results show that senior managers who exhibit a stronger global mindset tend to choose a lower-level ownership entry mode for their foreign subsidiaries. This tendency is stronger when senior managers possess a ‘thinking’ decision-making style as opposed to a ‘feeling’ decision-making style but weaker when senior managers have more experience in their managerial positions.

Keywords

Entry mode Global mindset Cognitive decision-making style Managerial experience Chinese multinational enterprises 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We are grateful for insightful comments and suggestions received from the Editor-in-Chief Professor Michael-Jörg Oesterle and the two anonymous reviewers of Management International Review.

References

  1. Abrahamson, E., & Hambrick, D. C. (1997). Attentional homogeneity in industries: The effect of discretion. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 18(7), 513–532.Google Scholar
  2. Acquaah, M. (2012). Social networking relationships, firm-specific managerial experience and firm performance in a transition economy: A comparative analysis of family owned and nonfamily firms. Strategic Management Journal, 33(10), 1215–1228.Google Scholar
  3. Adler, N. J., & Bartholomew, S. (1992). Globalization and human resource management. In A. M. Rugman & A. Verbeke (Eds.), Research in global strategic management: Corporate response to change (pp. 179–201). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  4. Agarwal, S., & Ramaswami, S. N. (1992). Choice of foreign market entry mode: Impact of ownership, location and internalization factors. Journal of International Business Studies, 23(1), 1–27.Google Scholar
  5. Aldrich, H. E. (1979). Organizations and environments. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  6. Anderson, E., & Gatignon, H. (1986). Modes of foreign entry: A transaction cost analysis and propositions. Journal of International Business Studies, 17(3), 1–26.Google Scholar
  7. Arora, A., Jaju, A., Kefalas, A. G., & Perenich, T. (2004). An exploratory analysis of global managerial mindsets: A case of U.S. textile and apparel industry. Journal of International Management, 10(3), 393–411.Google Scholar
  8. Bangara, A., Freeman, S., & Schroder, W. (2012). Legitimacy and accelerated internationalisation: An Indian perspective. Journal of World Business, 47(4), 623–634.Google Scholar
  9. Barlett, C. A., & Ghoshal, S. (1990). Matrix management: Not a structure, a frame of mind. Harvard Business Review, 68(4), 138–145.Google Scholar
  10. Barr, P. S., Stimpert, J. L., & Huff, A. S. (1992). Cognitive change, strategic action, and organizational renewal. Strategic Management Journal, 13(S1), 15–36.Google Scholar
  11. Bebchuk, L., & Grinstein, Y. (2005). Firm expansion and CEO pay. Working paper. Harvard University.Google Scholar
  12. Beechler, S., Levy, O., Taylor, S., & Boyacigiller, N. (2004). Does it really matter if Japanese MNCs think globally? In A. Bird & T. Roehl (Eds.), Japanese firms in transition: Responding to the globalization challenge (pp. 265–292). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  13. Bogner, W. C., & Barr, P. S. (2000). Making sense in hypercompetitive environments: A cognitive explanation for the persistence of high velocity competition. Organization Science, 11(2), 212–226.Google Scholar
  14. Bouquet, C. (2005). Building global mindsets: An attention-based perspective. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  15. Brouthers, K. D. (2002). Institutional, cultural and transaction cost influences on entry mode choice and performance. Journal of International Business Studies, 33(2), 203–221.Google Scholar
  16. Brouthers, K. D., & Brouthers, L. E. (2003). Why service and manufacturing entry mode choices differ: The influence of transaction cost factors, risk and trust. Journal of Management Studies, 40(5), 1179–1204.Google Scholar
  17. Brucks, M. (1985). The effects of product class knowledge on information search behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 12(1), 1–16.Google Scholar
  18. Carpenter, M. A., & Fredrickson, J. W. (2001). Top management teams, global strategic posture, and the moderating role of uncertainty. Academy of Management Journal, 44(3), 533–545.Google Scholar
  19. Chan, C. M., & Makino, S. (2007). Legitimacy and multi-level institutional environments: Implications for foreign subsidiary ownership structure. Journal of International Business Studies, 38(4), 621–638.Google Scholar
  20. Chang, S., van Witteloostuijn, A., & Eden, L. (2010). From the editors: Common method variance in international business research. Journal of International Business Studies, 41(2), 178–184.Google Scholar
  21. Chiesi, H. L., Spilich, G. J., & Voss, J. F. (1979). Acquisition of domain-related information in relation to high and low domain knowledge. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18(3), 257–273.Google Scholar
  22. Child, J., & Rodrigues, S. B. (2005). The internationalization of Chinese firms: A case for theoretical extension? Management and Organization Review, 1(03), 381–410.Google Scholar
  23. Churchill, G. A. (1991). Marketing research: Methodological foundation (5th ed.). Chicago: The Dryden Press.Google Scholar
  24. Cui, L., & Jiang, F. (2009). FDI entry mode choice of Chinese firms: A strategic behavior perspective. Journal of World Business, 44(4), 434–444.Google Scholar
  25. Cui, L., & Jiang, F. (2010). Behind ownership decision of Chinese outward FDI: Resources and institutions. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 27(4), 751–774.Google Scholar
  26. Cui, L., & Jiang, F. (2012). State ownership effect on firms’ FDI ownership decisions under institutional pressure: A study of Chinese outward-investing firms. Journal of International Business Studies, 43(3), 264–284.Google Scholar
  27. Cyert, R. M., & March, J. G. (1963). A behavioral theory of the firm. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  28. Daft, R. L., & Weick, K. E. (1984). Toward a model of organizations as interpretation systems. Academy of Management Review, 9(2), 284–295.Google Scholar
  29. Davis, P. S., Desai, A. B., & Francis, J. D. (2000). Mode of international entry: An isomorphism perspective. Journal of International Business Studies, 31(2), 239–258.Google Scholar
  30. Deng, P. (2004). Outward investment by Chinese MNCs: Motivations and implications. Business Horizons, 47(3), 8–16.Google Scholar
  31. Deng, P. (2009). Why do Chinese firms tend to acquire strategic assets in international expansion? Journal of World Business, 44(1), 74–84.Google Scholar
  32. Denzau, A. T., & North, D. C. (1994). Shared mental models: Ideologies and institutions. Kyklos, 47(1), 3–31.Google Scholar
  33. DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160.Google Scholar
  34. Dobrev, S. D. (2001). Revisiting organizational legitimation: Cognitive diffusion and sociopolitical factors in the evolution of Bulgarian newspaper enterprises, 1846-1992. Organization Studies, 22(3), 419–444.Google Scholar
  35. Dowling, J., & Pfeffer, J. (1975). Organizational legitimacy: Social values and organizational behavior. Pacific Sociological Review, 18(1), 122–136.Google Scholar
  36. Drogendijk, R., & Slangen, A. (2006). Hofstede, Schwartz, or managerial perceptions? The effects of different cultural distance measures on establishment mode choices by multinational enterprises. International Business Review, 15(4), 361–380.Google Scholar
  37. Dunning, J. H. (1980). Toward an eclectic theory of international production: Some empirical tests. Journal of International Business Studies, 11(1), 9–31.Google Scholar
  38. Dunning, J. H. (1988). The eclectic paradigm of international production: A restatement and some possible extensions. Journal of International Business Studies, 19(1), 1–31.Google Scholar
  39. Eden, L., & Miller, S. R. (2004). Distance matters: Liability of foreignness, institutional distance and ownership strategy. Advances in International Management, 16, 187–221.Google Scholar
  40. Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Making fast strategic decisions in high-velocity environments. Academy of Management Journal, 32(3), 543–576.Google Scholar
  41. Erramilli, M. K. (1991). The experience factor in foreign market entry behavior of service firms. Journal of International Business Studies, 22(3), 479–501.Google Scholar
  42. Erramilli, M. K., Agarwal, S., & Dev, C. S. (2002). Choice between non-equity entry modes: An organizational capability perspective. Journal of International Business Studies, 33(2), 223–242.Google Scholar
  43. Finkelstein, S., & Hambrick, D. C. (1996). Strategic leadership: Top executives and their effects on organizations. Minneapolis: West Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  44. Finkelstein, S., Hambrick, D., & Cannella, A. (2009). Strategic leadership: Theory and research on executives, top management teams, and boards. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Foss, N. J., & Lindenberg, S. (2013). Microfoundations for strategy: A goal-framing perspective on the drivers of value creation. Academy of Management Perspectives, 27(2), 85–102.Google Scholar
  46. Gavetti, G. (2012). Toward a behavioral theory of strategy. Organization Science, 23(1), 267–285.Google Scholar
  47. Govindarajan, V., & Gupta, A. K. (2001). The quest for global dominance: Transforming global presence into global competitive advantage. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  48. Greenwood, R., & Hinings, C. R. (1996). Understanding radical organizational change: Bringing together the old and the new institutionalism. Academy of Management Review, 21(4), 1022–1054.Google Scholar
  49. Gupta, A. K., & Govindarajan, V. (2002). Cultivating a global mindset. Academy of Management Executive, 16(1), 116–126.Google Scholar
  50. Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (2006). Multivariate data analysis (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  51. Haley, U. C. V., & Stumpf, S. A. (1989). Cognitive trails in strategic decision-making: Linking theories of personalities and cognitions. Journal of Management Studies, 26(5), 477–497.Google Scholar
  52. Hambrick, D. C., & Fukutomi, G. D. S. (1991). The seasons of a CEO’s tenure. Academy of Management Review. Academy of Management, 16(4), 719–742.Google Scholar
  53. Hambrick, D. C., & Mason, P. A. (1984). Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Review, 9(2), 193–206.Google Scholar
  54. Hambrick, D. C., & Snow, C. C. (1977). A contextual model of strategic decision making in organizations. Academy of Management Proceedings, 1, 109–112.Google Scholar
  55. Harveston, P. D., Kedia, B. L., & Davis, P. S. (2000). Internationalization of born global and gradual globalizing firms: The impact of the manager. Journal of Competitiveness Studies, 8(1), 92–99.Google Scholar
  56. Henderson, J. C., & Nutt, P. C. (1980). The influence of decision style on decision making behavior. Management Science, 26(4), 371–386.Google Scholar
  57. Hennart, J. F., & Slangen, H. L. (2015). Yes, we really do need more entry mode studies! A commentary on Shaver. Journal of International Business Studies, 46(1), 114–122.Google Scholar
  58. Herrmann, P., & Datta, D. K. (2002). CEO successor characteristics and the choice of foreign market entry mode: An empirical study. Journal of International Business Studies, 33(3), 551–569.Google Scholar
  59. Hill, C. W. L., Hwang, P., & Kim, W. C. (1990). An eclectic theory of the choice of international entry mode. Strategic Management Journal, 11(2), 117–128.Google Scholar
  60. Hofstede, G. (2005). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  61. Hogarth, R. M., & Makridakis, S. (1981). The value of decision making in a complex environment: An experimental approach. Management Science, 27(1), 93–107.Google Scholar
  62. Hope, O. K., Thomas, W., & Vyas, D. (2011). The cost of pride: Why do firms from developing countries bid higher? Journal of International Business Studies, 42(1), 128–151.Google Scholar
  63. Hough, J. R., & Ogilvie, D. (2005). An empirical test of cognitive style and strategic decision outcomes. Journal of Management Studies, 42(2), 417–448.Google Scholar
  64. Hunt, R. G., Krzystofiak, F. J., Meindl, J. R., & Yousry, A. M. (1989). Cognitive style and decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 44(3), 436–453.Google Scholar
  65. Jackson, S. E., & Dutton, J. E. (1988). Discerning threats and opportunities. Administrative Science Quarterly, 33(3), 370–387.Google Scholar
  66. Jeannet, J. P. (2000). Managing with a global mindset. London: Financial Times/Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  67. Jensen, M. C., & Murphy, K. J. (1990). Performance pay and top-management incentives. Journal of Political Economy, 98(2), 225–264.Google Scholar
  68. Jiang, F., & Stening, B. W. (2013). Do indigenous firms incur a liability of localness when operating in their home market? The case of China. Journal of World Business, 48(4), 478–489.Google Scholar
  69. Johanson, J., & Vahlne, J. (1977). The internationalization process of the firm-a model of knowledge development and increasing foreign market commitments. Journal of International Business Studies, 8(1), 23–32.Google Scholar
  70. Johnson, P. O., & Neyman, J. (1936). Tests of certain linear hypotheses and their application to some educational problems. Statistical Research Memoirs, 1, 57–93.Google Scholar
  71. Jung, C. G. (1971). Psychological types. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  72. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1984). Choices, values, and frames. American Psychologist, 39(4), 341–350.Google Scholar
  73. Kaplan, S. (2008). Cognition, capabilities, and incentives: Assessing firm response to the fiber-optic revolution. Academy of Management Journal, 51(4), 672–695.Google Scholar
  74. Kaplan, S. (2011). Cognition and strategy: Reflections on two decades of progress and a look to the future. Journal of Management Studies, 48(3), 665–695.Google Scholar
  75. Kedia, B. L., & Mukherji, A. (1999). Global managers: Developing a mindset for global competitiveness. Journal of World Business, 34(3), 230–251.Google Scholar
  76. Kefalas, A. G. (1998). Think globally, act locally. Thunderbird International Business Review, 40(6), 547–562.Google Scholar
  77. Khanna, T., & Palepu, K. G. (1997). Why focused strategies may be wrong for emerging markets. Harvard Business Review, 75(4), 41–51.Google Scholar
  78. Kiesler, S., & Sproull, L. (1982). Managerial response to changing environments: Perspectives on problem sensing from social cognition. Administrative Science Quarterly, 27(4), 548–570.Google Scholar
  79. Kim, W. C., & Hwang, P. (1992). Global strategy and multinationals’ entry mode choice. Journal of International Business Studies, 23(1), 29–53.Google Scholar
  80. Knight, K., & McDaniel, R. (1979). Organizations: An information systems perspective. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  81. Kobrin, S. J. (1994). Is there a relationship between a geocentric mindset and multinational strategy? Journal of International Business Studies, 25(3), 493–511.Google Scholar
  82. Kor, Y. Y., & Mahoney, J. T. (2005). How dynamics, management, and governance of resource deployments influence firm-level performance. Strategic Management Journal, 26(5), 489–496.Google Scholar
  83. Kostova, T. (1999). Transnational transfer of strategic organizational practices: A contextual perspective. Academy of Management Review, 24(2), 308–324.Google Scholar
  84. Kostova, T., & Zaheer, S. (1999). Organizational legitimacy under conditions of complexity: The case of the multinational enterprise. Academy of Management Review, 24(1), 64–81.Google Scholar
  85. Levy, O. (2005). The influence of top management team attention patterns on global strategic posture of firms. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26(7), 797–819.Google Scholar
  86. Levy, O., Beechler, S., Taylor, S., & Boyacigiller, N. A. (2007). What we talk about when we talk about ‘global mindset’: Managerial cognition in multinational corporations. Journal of International Business Studies, 38(2), 231–258.Google Scholar
  87. Li, J. (2015). Determinants of quality of headquarters-subsidiary relationship: A study of Chinese multinational enterprises. Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis. Bentley: Curtin University.Google Scholar
  88. Li, J., Jiang, F., & Shen, J. (2016). Institutional distance and the quality of the headquarters–subsidiary relationship: The moderating role of the institutionalization of headquarters’ practices in subsidiaries. International Business Review, 25(2), 589–603.Google Scholar
  89. Lounsbury, M. (2001). Institutional sources of practice variation: Staffing college and university recycling programs. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46(1), 29–56.Google Scholar
  90. Luo, Y., & Tung, R. L. (2007). International expansion of emerging market enterprises: A springboard perspective. Journal of International Business Studies, 38(4), 481–498.Google Scholar
  91. Luo, Y., Xue, Q., & Han, B. (2010). How emerging market governments promote outward FDI: Experience from China. Journal of World Business, 45(1), 68–79.Google Scholar
  92. Lyness, K. S., & Heilman, M. E. (2006). When fit is fundamental: Performance evaluations and promotions of upper-level female and male managers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(4), 777–785.Google Scholar
  93. Maitland, E., & Sammartino, A. (2012). Flexible footprints: Reconfiguring MNCs for new value opportunities. Carlifornia Management Review, 54(2), 92–117.Google Scholar
  94. Maitland, E., & Sammartino, A. (2015). Managerial cognition and internationalization. Journal of International Business Studies, 46(7), 733–760.Google Scholar
  95. Mason, R. O., & Mitroff, I. I. (1973). A program for research on management information systems. Management Science, 19(5), 475–487.Google Scholar
  96. McGuiness, M. (2004). You’ve got personality: An introduction to the personality types described by Carl Jung and Isabel Myers. Epping NSW: MaryMacBooks.Google Scholar
  97. MOFCOM (2013). 2012 Statistical bulletin of China’s outward foreign direct investment. Beijing: Ministry of Commerce of People’s Republic of China, National Bureau of Statistics of People’s Republic of China, State Administration of Foreign Exchange.Google Scholar
  98. Murtha, T. P., Lenway, S. A., & Bagozzi, R. P. (1998). Global mind-sets and cognitive shift in a complex multinational corporation. Strategic Management Journal, 19(2), 97–114.Google Scholar
  99. Myers, I. B. (1998). Introduction to type: A guide to understanding your results on the Myers–Briggs Type Indicator (6th ed.). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
  100. Nadkarni, S., Herrmann, P., & Perez, P. D. (2011). Domestic mindsets and early international performance: The moderating effect of global industry conditions. Strategic Management Journal, 32(5), 510–531.Google Scholar
  101. Nadkarni, S., & Narayanan, V. K. (2007). Strategic schemas, strategic flexibility, and firm performance: The moderating role of industry clockspeed. Strategic Management Journal, 28(3), 243–270.Google Scholar
  102. Nadkarni, S., & Perez, P. D. (2007). Prior conditions and early international commitment: The mediating role of domestic mindset. Journal of International Business Studies, 38(1), 160–176.Google Scholar
  103. Nummela, N., Saarenketo, S., & Puumalainen, K. (2004). A global mindset: A prerequisite for successful internationalization? Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 21(1), 51–64.Google Scholar
  104. Oliver, C. (1991). Strategic responses to institutional processes. Academy of Management Review, 16(1), 145–179.Google Scholar
  105. Paul, H. (2000). Creating a mindset. Thunderbird International Business Review, 42(2), 187–200.Google Scholar
  106. Peng, M. W. (2009). Global strategy (2nd ed.). Cincinnati, OH: South-Western Cengage Learning.Google Scholar
  107. Peng, M. W., Sun, S. L., Pinkham, B., & Chen, H. (2009). The institution-based view as a third leg for a strategy tripod. Academy of Management Perspectives, 23(3), 63–81.Google Scholar
  108. Peng, M. W., Wang, D. Y. L., & Jiang, Y. (2008). An institution-based view of international business strategy: A focus on emerging economies. Journal of International Business Studies, 39(5), 920–936.Google Scholar
  109. Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (1978). The external control of organizations. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  110. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903.Google Scholar
  111. Porac, J. F., & Thomas, H. (1990). Taxonomic mental models in competitor definition. Academy of Management Review, 15(2), 224–240.Google Scholar
  112. Powell, T. C., Lovallo, D., & Fox, C. R. (2011). Behavioral strategy. Strategic Management Journal, 32(13), 1369–1386.Google Scholar
  113. Ramaprasad, A., & Mitroff, I. I. (1984). On formulating strategic problems. Academy of Management Review, 9(4), 597–605.Google Scholar
  114. Rhinesmith, S. H. (1992). Global mindsets for global managers. Training and Development, 46(10), 63–68.Google Scholar
  115. Rhinesmith, S. H. (1996). A manager’s guide to globalization: Six skills for success in a changing world (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  116. Rose, N. L., & Shepard, A. (1997). Firm diversification and CEO compensation: Managerial ability or executive entrenchment? RAND Journal of Economics, 28(3), 489–514.Google Scholar
  117. Ruble, T. L., & Cosier, R. A. (1990). Effects of cognitive styles and decision setting on performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 46(2), 283–295.Google Scholar
  118. Rugman, A. M., & Verbeke, A. (2003). Extending the theory of the multinational enterprise: Internalization and strategic management perspectives. Journal of International Business Studies, 34(2), 125–137.Google Scholar
  119. Schoham, A., Kropp, F., & Rose, G. M. (2015). Personal values and their impact on telic dominance. In A. K. Manrai & H. L. Meadow (Eds.), Global perspectives of marketing for the 21st century (pp. 81–86). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  120. Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology, Vol. 25, (pp. 1–65). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  121. Schwenk, C. R. (1984). Cognitive simplification processes in strategic decision-making. Strategic Management Journal, 5(2), 111–128.Google Scholar
  122. Scott, W. R. (1995). Institutions and organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  123. Sharp, D. (1987). Personality types: Jung’s model of typology. Toronto: Inner City Books.Google Scholar
  124. Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1989). Management entrenchment. Journal of Financial Economics, 25(1), 123–139.Google Scholar
  125. Simon, H. A. (1987). Making management decisions: The role of intuition and emotion. Academy of Management Executive, 1(1), 57–64.Google Scholar
  126. Smart, C., & Vertinsky, I. (1984). Strategy and the environment: A study of corporate responses to crises. Strategic Management Journal, 5(3), 199–213.Google Scholar
  127. Smircich, L., & Stubbart, C. (1985). Strategic management in an enacted world. Academy of Management Review, 10(4), 724–736.Google Scholar
  128. Spiller, S. A., Fitzsimons, G. J., Lynch, J. G., Jr., & McClelland, G. H. (2013). Spotlights, floodlights, and the magic number zero: Simple effects tests in moderated regression. Journal of Marketing Research, 50(2), 277–288.Google Scholar
  129. Stubbart, C. I. (1989). Managerial cognition: A missing link in strategic management research. Journal of Management Studies, 26(4), 325–347.Google Scholar
  130. Szalay, L. B., & Kelly, R. M. (1982). Political ideology and subjective culture: Conceptualization and empirical assessment. American Political Science Review, 76(03), 585–602.Google Scholar
  131. Taylor, R. N. (1975). Age and experience as determinants of managerial information processing and decision making performance. Academy of Management Journal, 18(1), 74–81.Google Scholar
  132. Taylor, R. N. (1984). Behavioral decision making. Glenview, IL: Scott Foresman.Google Scholar
  133. Thomas, J. B., Clark, S. M., & Gioia, D. A. (1993). Strategic sensemaking and organizational performance: Linkages among scanning, interpretation, action, and outcomes. Academy of Management Journal, 36(2), 239–270.Google Scholar
  134. Thomas, J. A., & McDaniel, R. R. (1990). Interpreting strategic issues: Effects of strategy and the information-processing structure of top management teams. Academy of Management Journal, 33(2), 286–306.Google Scholar
  135. Thompson, J. D. (1967). Organizations in action. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  136. Tracy, J. L., & Robins, R. W. (2004). Show your pride: Evidence for a discrete emotion expression. Psychological Science, 15(3), 194–197.Google Scholar
  137. Tsui, A. S., Schoonhoven, C. B., Meyer, M. W., Lau, C., & Milkovich, G. T. (2004). Organization and management in the midst of societal transformation: The People’s Republic of China. Organization Science, 15(2), 133–144.Google Scholar
  138. Weick, K. E. (1995). Sensemaking in organizations. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  139. Westney, D. E. (1993). Institutional theory and the multinational corporation. In S. Ghoshal & D. E. Westney (Eds.), Organization theory and the multinational corporation (pp. 53–76). New York: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
  140. White, S. E., Dittrich, J. E., & Lang, J. R. (1980). The effects of group decision-making process and problem-situation complexity on implementation attempts. Administrative Science Quarterly, 25(3), 428–440.Google Scholar
  141. Witkin, H. A., Moore, C. A., Goodenough, D. R., & Cox, P. W. (1977). Field-dependent and field-independent cognitive styles and their educational implications. Review of Educational Research, 47(1), 1–64.Google Scholar
  142. Xu, D., & Shenkar, O. (2002). Institutional distance and the multinational enterprise. Academy of Management Review, 27(4), 608–618.Google Scholar
  143. Yang, X., Jiang, Y., Kang, R., & Ke, Y. (2009). A comparative analysis of the internationalization of Chinese and Japanese firms. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 26(1), 141–162.Google Scholar
  144. Yiu, D., & Makino, S. (2002). The choice between joint venture and wholly owned subsidiary: An institutional perspective. Organization Science, 13(6), 667–683.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Fuming Jiang
    • 1
  • Subramaniam Ananthram
    • 1
  • Jizhong Li
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Management, Faculty of Business and LawCurtin UniversityBentleyAustralia

Personalised recommendations