Advertisement

Management International Review

, Volume 58, Issue 2, pp 337–357 | Cite as

Economic Inequality, Cultural Orientation and Base-of-Pyramid Employee Performance at the MNC Subsidiary: A Multi-Case Investigation

  • Tim G. Andrews
  • Khin Thi Htun
Research Article

Abstract

Research to date on economic inequality and how it affects organizational employee performance is both sparse and generic in scope. Multinational corporations—in particular—can benefit from an extension of empirical inquiry which looks at economic inequality in conjunction with cultural orientation in order to understand the behavior of their cross-border subsidiary employees. To this end, we report on an exploratory, multi-case study using data drawn from interviews, observation and company information with frontline, base of the organizational pyramid employees at the Thai subsidiaries of Anglo-US MNCs. Our findings detail the manifestations of high economic inequality and low worker status, as well as the adverse implications for subsidiary service delivery (e.g., absenteeism, moonlighting, deficient-communication) and broader corporate reputation concerns. We also detail the specific role of vertical-collectivist cultural norms and values in both exacerbating and mitigating the adverse effects observed. Finally, we discuss the implications for international business managers seeking to address (and prevent) subsidiary performance suppression due to economic inequality, focusing on the development of ‘social embeddedness’ as a key competence in the engagement and nurturing of base-of-pyramid employees in emerging Asia.

Keywords

Economic inequality Cultural orientation Base-of-pyramid employees The corporate subsidiary 

References

  1. Alamgir, F., & Cairns, G. (2015). Economic inequality of the badly workers of Bangladesh: Contested entitlements and a ‘perpetually temporary’ life-world. Human Relations, 68(7), 1131–1153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Andrews, T. G., & Chew, W. (2017). Building Brands in Asia: From the Inside-Out. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  3. Andrews, T. G., & Chompusri, N. (2013). Understanding organizational practice adoption at the Thai subsidiary corporation: Antecedents and consequences of kreng jai. Management International Review, 53(1), 61–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bapuji, H. (2015). Individuals, interactions and institutions: How economic inequality affects organizations. Human Relations, 68(7), 1059–1083.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bapuji, H., & Neville, L. (2015). Income inequality ignored: An agenda for business and strategic organization. Strategic Organization, 13(3), 233–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bapuji, H., & Riaz, S. (2013). Special issue call for papers: Economic inequality & management. Human Relations http://www.hum.sagepub.com. Accessed 7 May 2013.
  7. Bhagat, R. S., Kedia, B. L., Harveston, P. D., & Triandis, H. C. (2002). Cultural variations in the cross-border transfer of organizational knowledge: An integrative framework. Academy of Management Review, 27(2), 204–221.Google Scholar
  8. Birkinshaw, J., Brannen, M. Y., & Tung, R. (2011). From a distance and generalizable to up close and personal: Reclaiming a place for qualitative methods in international business research. Journal of International Business Studies, 42(5), 573–581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brewer, P., & Venaik, S. (2011). Individualism-collectivism in Hofstede and GLOBE. Journal of International Business Studies, 42(3), 436–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chatterjee, S. (2016). Articulating globalization: Exploring the bottom of the pyramid (BOP) terrain. Organization Studies, 37(5), 635–653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chen, C. C., Meindl, J. R., & Hunt, R. G. (1997). Testing the effects of vertical and horizontal collectivism: A study of reward allocation preferences in China. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 28(1), 44–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chiang, F. T., & Birch, T. (2007). The transferability of management practices: Examining cross-national differences in reward preference. Human Relations, 60(9), 1293–1330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Christie, A. M., & Barling, J. (2010). Beyond status: Relating status inequality to performance and health in teams. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(5), 920–934.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dabla-Norris, E., Kochhar, K., Suphaphiphat, N., Ricka, F., & Tsounta, E. (2015). Causes and Consequences of Income in Equality: A Global Perspective. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.Google Scholar
  15. Farkas, G. (2003). Cognitive skills and noncognitive traits and behaviors in stratification processes. Annual Review of Sociology, 29, 541–562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ford, M. T., Cerasoli, C. P., Higgins, J. A., & Decesare, A. L. (2011). Relationships between psychological, physical and behavioral health and work performance: A review and meta-analysis. Work and Stress, 25(3), 185–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Giachetti, C. (2016). Competing in emerging markets: Performance implications of competitive aggressiveness. Management International Review, 56(3), 325–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Greene, R. L., & Nowack, K. M. (1995). Hassles, hardiness and absenteeism: Results of a 3-year longitudinal study. Work and Stress, 9(4), 448–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gudic, M., Rosenbloom, A. J., & Parkes, C. (2014). Socially Responsive Organizations and the Challenge of Poverty. Salt Mills: Greenleaf Publishing.Google Scholar
  20. Hall, J., & Matos, S. (2010). Incorporating impoverished communities in sustainable supply chains. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 40(1/2), 124–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hart, S. L., & London, T. (2005). Developing native capability. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 3, 28–33.Google Scholar
  22. Hipsher, S. (2010). Business Practices in Southeast Asia: An Interdisciplinary Analysis of Theravada Buddhist Countries. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  23. Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  24. Holmes, H., & Tangtongtavy, S. (2003). Working with the Thais: A Guide to Managing in Thailand. Bangkok: White Lotus Press.Google Scholar
  25. Holtbrügge, D. (2013). Indigenous management research. Management International Review, 53(1), 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. House, R. J., Hanges, P. J., Javidan, M., Dorfman, P. W., & Gupta, V. (2004). Culture, Leadership, and Organizations: The GLOBE Study of 62 Societies. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  27. Isaksson, R., Johansson, P., & Fischer, K. (2010). Detecting supply chain innovation potential for sustainable development. Journal of Business Ethics, 97(3), 425–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Jaeger, A. M., Kim, S. S., & Butt, A. N. (2016). Leveraging values diversity: The emergence and implications of a global managerial culture in global organizations. Management International Review, 56(2), 227–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Khanna, T. (2015). A case for contextual intelligence. Management International Review, 55(2), 181–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Komin, S. (1990). Culture and work-related values in Thai organizations. International Journal of Psychology, 25(5–6), 681–704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Laovakul, D. (2016). Concentration of land and other wealth in Thailand. In P. Phongpaichit & C. Baker (Eds.), Unequal Thailand: Aspects of Income, Wealth and Power (pp. 32–42). Singapore: NUS Press.Google Scholar
  32. Leana, C. R., Mittal, V., & Stiehl, E. (2012). Organizational behavior and the working poor. Organization Science, 23(3), 888–906.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. London, T. (2016). The Base of the Pyramid Promise: Building Businesses with Impact and Scale. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Mair, J., Marti, I., & Ventresca, M. J. (2012). Building inclusive markets in rural Bangladesh: How intermediaries work institutional voids. Academy of Management Journal, 55(4), 819–850.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. McSweeney, B. (2009). Dynamic diversity: Variety and variation within countries. Organization Studies, 30(9), 933–957.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1984). Qualitative Data Analysis. Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
  37. Moore, M., & Finch, E. (2004). Facilities management in Southeast Asia. Facilities, 22(9/10), 259–270. (MCB University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Nimanandh, K., & Andrews, T. G. (2009). Socio-cultural context. In T. G. Andrews & S. Siengthai (Eds.), The Changing Face of Management in Thailand (pp. 57–91). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  39. Oncer, A. Z. (2013). The relationship between individualism-collectivism and organizations’ espoused values. The Business and Management Review, 3(3), 105–114.Google Scholar
  40. Ota, H., McCann, R. M., & Honeycutt, J. (2012). Inter-Asian variability in intergenerational communication. Human Communication Research, 36(2), 172–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Phongpaichit, P., & Baker, C. (2016). Introduction: Inequality and oligarchy. In P. Phongpaichit & C. Baker (Eds.), Unequal Thailand: Aspects of Income, Wealth and Power (pp. 1–31). Singapore: NUS Press.Google Scholar
  42. Prahalad, C. K., & Hammond, A. (2002). Serving the world’s poor, profitably. Harvard Business Review, 80(9), 48–57.Google Scholar
  43. Riaz, S. (2015). Bringing equality back in: The economic inequality footprint of management and organizational practices. Human Relations, 68(7), 1085–1097.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Rivera-Santos, M., & Rufin, C. (2010). Global village vs. small town: Understanding networks at the base of the pyramid. International Business Review, 19(2), 126–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Rubin, H. J., & Rubin, I. S. (2005). Qualitative Interviewing (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  46. Sackmann, S. A., & Philips, M. E. (2004). Contextual influences on culture research: Shifting assumptions for new workplace realities. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, 4(3), 370–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Schuster, T., & Holtbrügge, D. (2012). Market entry of multinational companies in markets at the bottom of the pyramid: a learning perspective. International Business Review, 21(5), 817–830.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Schwartz, S. H. (1999). A theory of cultural values and some implications for work. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 48(1), 23–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Sen, A. (1997). On Economic Inequality. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  50. Silverman, D. (2006). Interpretive Qualitative Data. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  51. Singelis, T. M., Triandis, H. C., Bhawuk, D. P. S., & Gelfand, M. J. (1995). Horizontal and vertical dimensions of individualism and collectivism: A theoretical and measurement refinement. Cross-Cultural Research, 29(3), 240–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Sivadas, E., Bruvold, N. T., & Nelson, M. R. (2008). A reduced version of the horizontal and vertical individualism and collectivism scale: A four-country assessment. Journal of Business Research, 61(3), 201–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Stiglitz, J. E. (2002). Globalization and Its Discontents. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
  54. Taras, V., Steel, P., & Kirkman, B. L. (2016). Does country equate with culture? Beyond geography in the search for cultural boundaries. Management International Review, 56(4), 455–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Thomas, D. C., Ravlin, E. C., Liao, Y., Morrell, D. L., & Au, K. (2016). Collectivist values, exchange ideology and psychological contract preference. Management International Review, 56(2), 255–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Triandis, H. C., & Gelfand, M. J. (2011). A theory of individualism and collectivism. In E. T. Higgins, A. W. Kruglanski, & P. A. M. Van Lange (Eds.), Handbook of Theories of Social Psychology. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  57. Wild, J. J., & Wild, K. L. (2016). International Business: The Challenges of Globalization. Harlow: Pearson.Google Scholar
  58. Wilkinson, R., & Pickett, K. (2009). The Spirit Level: Why Equality is Better for Everyone. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  59. World Bank. (2015). Thailand Overview. http://www.worldbank.org. Accessed 30 March 2016.
  60. Yukongdi, V. (2010). A study of Thai employees’ preferred leadership style. Asia Pacific Business Review, 16(1–2), 161–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Zander, L., Jonsen, K., & Mockaitis, A. I. (2016). Leveraging values in global organizations: Premises, paradoxes and progress. Management International Review, 56(2), 149–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Thammasat UniversityBangkokThailand
  2. 2.Builder’s International Trading Co. LtdBangkokThailand

Personalised recommendations