Advertisement

Management International Review

, Volume 56, Issue 1, pp 123–148 | Cite as

Governance Structure and the Creation and Protection of Technological Competencies: International R&D Joint Ventures in China

  • Jiatao Li
  • Zhenzhen Xie
Research Paper

Abstract

International research and development (R&D) joint ventures have been widely used by multinational enterprises (MNEs) to enhance knowledge creation in a global network of foreign subsidiaries while at the same time, managing the critical task of protecting the knowledge transferred and created. In emerging economies where institutions for protecting intellectual properties are likely to be weak, equity joint ventures (EJVs) are often used to meet the needs for knowledge protection by aligning the interests of partners in collaboration. However, the advantages of using EJVs come at a price—higher organizational cost and lack of flexibility. This study suggests two key factors that would affect the choice of EJVs as a risk-mitigating mechanism in protecting technological competencies: the scope of R&D activities and the types of joint venture (JV) partners. We propose that MNEs can reduce their use of EJVs when the scope of R&D activities is limited to research-oriented ones or when academic institutions are chosen as local partners. Furthermore, a large cultural distance between the host and home countries of MNEs tends to strengthen these effects. Collecting data from China Business Review, Business China, and the LexisNexis and Proquest databases, the authors conducted an empirical test with data on 319 international R&D JVs established in China during 1995–2002. The results largely support these hypotheses.

Keywords

R&D internationalization Joint venture Entry mode Partner choice R&D scope China 

References

  1. Amara, N., Landry, R., & Traore, N. (2008). Managing the protection of innovations in knowledge-intensive business services. Research Policy, 37(9), 1530–1547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson, E., & Gatignon, H. (1986). Modes of foreign entry: a transaction cost analysis and proposition. Journal of International Business Studies, 17(1), 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arvanitis, S., & Hollenstein, H. (2011). How do different drivers of R&D investment in foreign locations affect domestic firm performance? An analysis based on Swiss panel micro data. Industrial and Corporate Change, 20(2), 605–640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barnett, W. P., & Carroll, G. R. (1987). Competition and mutualism among early telephone companies. Administrative Science Quarterly, 32(3), 400–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Belderbos, R. (2003). Entry mode, organizational learning, and R&D in foreign affiliates: evidence from Japanese firms. Strategic Management Journal, 24(3), 235–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Belderbos, R., Carree, M., Diederen, B., Lokshin, B., & Veugelers, R. (2004). Heterogeneity in R&D cooperation strategies. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 22(8–9), 1237–1263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Berger, F., Blind, K., & Cuntz, A. (2012). Risk factors and mechanisms of technology and insignia copying-A first empirical research. Research Policy, 41(2), 376–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bruneel, J., D’Este, P., & Salter, A. (2010). Investigating the factors that diminish the barriers to university-industry collaboration. Research Policy, 39(7), 858–868.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bush, V. (1945). Science the endless frontier: a report to the president on a program for postwar scientific research. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  10. Busom, I., & Fernandez-Ribas, A. (2008). The impact of particiation in R&D programs on R&D partnerships. Research Policy, 37(2), 240–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cantwell, J., & Colombo, M. G. (2000). Technological and output complementarities: inter-firm cooperation in information technology ventures. Journal of Management and Governance, 4(1–2), 117–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chand, M., & Katou, A. A. (2012). Strategic determinants for the selection of partner alliances in the Indian tour operator industry: a cross-national study. Journal of World Business, 47(2), 167–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Che, J., & Facchini, G. (2009). Cultural differences, insecure property rights and the mode of entry decision. Economic Theory, 38(3), 465–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chen, G., Firth, M., Gao, D. N., & Rui, O. M. (2006). Ownership structure, corporate governance, and fraud: evidence from China. Journal of Corporate Finance, 12(3), 424–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Chinese Association of University-Run Industries. (2001). Article of Chinese Association of University-Run Industries. Beijing: Chinese Association of University-Run Industries.Google Scholar
  16. Cohen, W. M., Florida, R., & Goe, W. R. (1994). University industry research centers in the United States. Pittsburgh: Carnegie-Mellon University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Cohen, W. M., Nelson, R. R., & Walsh, J. P. (2002). Links and impacts: the influence of public research on industrial R&D. Management Science, 48(1), 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Collinson, S., Kato, H., & Yoshihara, H. (2005). Technology strategy revealed: patterns and influences of patent-licensing behaviour in Japanese firms. International Journal of Technology Management, 30(3–4), 327–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cyert, R. M., & March, J. G. (1963). A behavioral theory of the firm. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  20. Davidson, W. H. (1980). The location of foreign direct investment activity: country characteristics and experience effects. Journal of International Business Studies, 11(1), 9–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. De Fuentes, C., & Dutrenit, G. (2012). Best channels of academia-industry interaction for long-term benefit. Research Policy, 41(9), 1666–1683.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Diericks, I., & Cool, K. (1989). Asset stock accumulation and sustainability of competitive advantage. Management Science, 35(12), 1504–1513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Dunning, J. H. (1994). Multinational enterprises and the globalisation of innovatory capacity. Research Policy, 23(1), 67–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Dussauge, P., & Garette, B. (1999). Cooperative strategy—competing successfully through strategic alliance. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  25. Evangelista, F., & Hau, L. N. (2009). Organizational context and knowledge acquisition in IJVs: an empirical study. Journal of World Business, 44(1), 63–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Fan, G., & Wang, X. (2001). National Economic Research Institute Index of Marketization of China’s Provinces. Beijing: Economic Science.Google Scholar
  27. Feinberg, S. E., & Gupta, A. K. (2004). Knowledge spillovers and the assignment of R&D responsibilities to foreign subsidiaries. Strategic Management Journal, 25(8/9), 823–845.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Frankort, H. T. W., Hagedoorn, J., & Letterie, W. (2012). R&D partnership portfolios and the inflow of technological knowledge. Industrial and Corporate Change, 21(2), 507–537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Freeman, C., & Soete, L. (1997). The Economics of Industrial Innovation. London: Pinter.Google Scholar
  30. Fritsch, M., & Franke, G. (2004). Innovation, regional knowledge spillovers and R&D cooperation. Research Policy, 33(2), 245–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Fritsch, M., & Lukas, R. (2001). Who cooperates on R&D? Research Policy, 30(2), 297–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Gao, G. Y., Murray, J. Y., Kotabe, M., & Lu, J. (2010). A “strategy tripod” perspective on export behaviors: evidence from domestic and foreign firms based in an emerging economy. Journal of International Business Studies, 41(3), 377–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Garcia-Canal, E., Valdes-Llaneza, A., & Sanchez-Lorda, P. (2008). Technological flows and choice of joint ventures in technology alliances. Research Policy, 37(1), 97–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Geringer, J. M. (1991). Strategic determinants of partner selection criteria in international joint ventures. Journal of International Business Studies, 22(1), 41–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hagedoorn, J. (1993). Understanding the rationale of strategic technology partnering: inter-organizational modes of cooperation and sectoral differences. Strategic Management Journal, 14(5), 371–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hagedoorn, J. (2002). Inter-firm R&D partnerships: an overview of major trends and patterns since 1960. Research Policy, 31(4), 477–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hansen, M. T., & Lovas, B. (2004). How do multinational companies leverage technological competencies? Moving from single to interdependent explanation. Strategic Management Journal, 25(8/9), 801–822.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Harrigan, K. R. (1988). Joint ventures and competitive strategy. Strategic Management Journal, 9(2), 141–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Hennart, J. F. (1988). A transaction costs theory of equity joint ventures. Strategic Management Journal, 9(4), 361–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Hennart, J. F., & Larimo, J. (1998). The impact of culture on the strategy of multinational enterprises: does national origin affect ownership decisions? Journal of International Business Studies, 29(3), 515–538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Hennart, J. F., & Reddy, S. (1997). The choice between mergers/acquisitions and joint ventures: the case of Japanese investors in the United States. Strategic Management Journal, 18(1), 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Hitt, M. A., Dacin, M. T., Levitas, E., Arregle, J. L., & Borza, A. (2000). Partner selection in emerging and developed market contexts: resource-based and organizational learning perspectives. Academy of Management Journal, 43(3), 449–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Hitt, M. A., Tyler, B. B., Hardee, C., & Park, D. (1995). Understanding strategic intent in the global marketplace. Academy of Management Executive, 9(2), 12–19.Google Scholar
  44. Hoetker, G. (2007). The use of Logit and Probit models in strategic management research: critical issues. Strategic Management Journal, 28(4), 331–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  46. Hu, M. Y., & Chen, H. (1993). Foreign ownership in Chinese joint ventures: a transaction cost analysis. Journal of Business Research, 26(2), 149–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Inkpen, A. C. (2000). A note on the dynamics of learning alliances: competition, cooperation, and relative scope. Strategic Management Journal, 21(7), 775–779.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Jefferson, G., & Rawski, T. (1994). Enterprise reform in Chinese industry. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 8(2), 47–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Jiang, X., & Li, Y. (2009). An empirical investigation of knowledge management and innovative performance: the case of alliances. Research Policy, 38(2), 358–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Kang, H. K., & Kang, J. (2010). Does partner type matter in R&D collaboration for product innovation? Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 22(8), 945–959.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Keupp, M. M., Beckenbauer, A., & Gassmann, O. (2009). How managers protect intellectual property rights in China using de facto strategies. R&D Management, 39(2), 211–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Khoury, T. A., & Peng, M. W. (2011). Does institutional reform of intellectual property rights lead to more inbound FDI? Evidence from Latin America and Caribbean. Journal of World Business, 46(3), 337–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. King, G., Tomz, M., & Wittenberg, J. (2000). Making the most of statistical analyses: improving interpretation and presentation. American Journal of Political Science, 44(2), 347–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Kloyer, M., & Scholderer, J. (2012). Effective incomplete contracts and milestones in market-distant R&D collaboration. Research Policy, 41(2), 346–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Kogut, B. (1988). Joint ventures: theoretical and empirical perspectives. Strategic Management Journal, 9(4), 319–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Kogut, B., & Singh, H. (1988). The effect of national culture on the choice of entry mode. Journal of International Business Studies, 19(3), 411–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Koot, W. T. M. (1988). Underlying dilemmas in the management of international joint ventures. In P. Lorange (Ed.), Cooperative strategies in international business (pp. 347–367). Lexington: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  58. Koza, M. P., Tallman, S., & Ataay, A. (2011). The strategic assembly of global firms: a microstructural analysis of local learning and global adaptation. Global Strategy Journal, 1(1), 27–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Kuittinen, H., Kylaheiko, K., Sandstrom, J., & Jantunen, A. (2009). Cooperation governance mode: an extended transaction cost approach. Journal of Management and Governance, 13(4), 303–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Leiponen, A., & Byma, J. (2009). If you cannot block, you better run: small firms, cooperative innovation, and appropriation strategies. Research Policy, 38(9), 1478–1488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Lhuillery, S., & Pfister, E. (2009). R&D cooperation and failures in innovation projects: empirical evidence from French CIS data. Research Policy, 38(1), 45–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Li, J. T. (2008). Asymmetric interactions between foreign and domestic banks: effects on market entry. Strategic Management Journal, 29(8), 873–893.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Li, J. T. (2010). Global R&D alliance in China: collaborations with universities and research institutes. Transactions on Engineering Management, 57(1), 78–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Li, D., Eden, L., Hitt, M. A., & Ireland, R. D. (2008). Friends, acquaintances, or strangers? Partner selection in R&D alliance. Academy of Management Journal, 51(2), 315–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Li, H., Meng, L., & Zhang, J. (2006). Why do entrepreneurs enter politics? Evidence from China. Economic Inquiry, 44(3), 559–578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Li, J. T., & Xie, Z. (2011). Global R&D strategies in an emerging economy: the development and protection of technological competencies. European Management Review, 8(3), 153–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Li, J. T., & Yao, K. (2010). The role of reference groups in international investment decisions by firms from emerging economies. Journal of International Management, 16(2), 143–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Li, J. T., & Yue, D. R. (2008). Market size, legal institutions, and international diversification strategies: implications for the performance of multinational firms. Management International Review, 48(6), 667–688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Li, J. T., & Zhong, J. (2003). Explaining the growth of international R&D alliances in China. Managerial and Decision Economics, 24(2–3), 101–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Lu, J. W. (2002). Intra- and inter-organizational imitative behavior: institutional influences on Japanese firms’ entry mode choice. Journal of International Business Studies, 33(1), 19–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Luo, Y. (2002). Capability exploitation and building in foreign markets: implications for multinational enterprises. Organization Science, 13(1), 48–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Luo, Y. (2006). Autonomy of foreign R&D units in an emerging market: an information processing perspective. Management International Review, 46(3), 349–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Luo, Y. (2007). Are joint venture partners more opportunistic in a more volatile environment?’. Strategic Management Journal, 28(1), 39–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Makino, S., & Neupert, K. E. (2000). National culture, transaction costs, and the choice between joint venture and wholly-owned subsidiary. Journal of International Business Studies, 31(4), 705–713.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Mansfield, E. (1998). Academic research and industrial innovation: an update of empirical findings. Research Policy, 26(7–8), 773–776.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2(1), 71–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Marin, P. L., & Siotis, G. (2008). Public policies towards research joint venture: institutional design and participants’ characteristics. Research Policy, 37(6–7), 1057–1065.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Martinez-Noya, A., Garcia-Canal, E., & Guillen, M. F. (2013). R&D outsourcing and the effectiveness of intangible investments: is proprietary core knowledge walking out of the door? Journal of Management Studies, 50(1), 67–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Mishra, B. P. (2007). Technology innovations in emerging markets: an analysis with special reference to the Indian economy. South Asian Journal of Management, 14(4), 50–65.Google Scholar
  80. Mowery, D. (2011). Learning from one another? International policy “emulation” and university-industry technology transfer. Industrial and Corporate Change, 20(6), 1827–1853.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Nelson, R. R. (Ed.). (1993). National innovation systems: a comparative analysis. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  82. Oxley, J. E., & Sampson, R. C. (2004). The scope and governance of international R&D alliance. Strategic Management Journal, 25(8/9), 723–750.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Pakes, A., & Griliches, Z. (1984). Patents and R&D at the firm level: a first look. In Z. Griliches (Ed.), R&D, patents and productivity. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  84. Pan, Y. G., & Tse, D. K. (1996). Cooperative strategies between foreign firms in an overseas country. Journal of International Business Studies, 27(5), 929–946.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Pan, Y. G., & Tse, D. K. (2000). The hierarchical model of market entry modes. Journal of International Business Studies, 31(4), 535–554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Papanastassiou, M., & Pearce, R. D. (1999). Multinationals, technology and national competitiveness. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  87. Pearce, R. D., & Papanastassiou, M. (1996). The technological competitivenss of Japanes multinationals: the European dimension. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  88. Phene, A., & Tallman, S. (2012). Complexity, context and governance in biotechnology alliances. Journal of International Business Studies, 43(1), 61–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Pisano, G. P. (1989). Using equity participation to support exchange: evidence from the biotechnology industry. Journal of Law Economics and Organization, 5(1), 109–126.Google Scholar
  90. Pisano, G. P. (1990). The R&D boundaries of the firm: an empirical analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 153–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Plasschaert, S. R. (1993). The foreign exchange balancing rule in the People’s Republic of China. In L. Kelly & O. Shenkar (Eds.), International business in China (pp. 88–108). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  92. Porter, M. E. (1987). From competitive advantage to corporate strategy. Harvard Business Review, 65(3), 43–59.Google Scholar
  93. Pothukuchi, V., Damanpour, F., Choi, J., Chen, C. C., & Park, S. H. (2002). National and organizational culture difference and international joint venture performance. Journal of International Business Studies, 33(2), 243–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Rindfleisch, A., & Heide, J. (1997). Transaction costs analysis: past, present, and future applications. Journal of Marketing, 6(1), 30–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Rivkin, J. W. (2001). Replication without imitation at moderate complexity. Organization Science, 12(3), 274–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Ronstadt, R. C. (1978). International R&D: the establishment and evolution of research and development abroad by seven US multinationals. Journal of International Business Studies, 9(1), 7–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Ryan, T. Y. (1997). Modern regression analysis. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  98. Schmoch, U. (1999). Interaction of universities and industrial enterprises in Germany and the United States—a comparison. Industry and Innovation, 6(1), 51–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Shapira, P., & Wang, J. (2009). From lab to market? Strategies and issues in the commercialization of nanotechnology in China. Asian Business and Management, 8(4), 461–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Sun, J., Debo, L. G., Kekre, S., & Xie, J. (2010). Component-based technology transfer in the presence of potential imitators. Management Science, 56(3), 536–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Teece, D. J. (1976). The multinational corporation and the resource cost of international technology transfer. Cambridge: Ballinger.Google Scholar
  102. Teece, D. J. (1986). Profiting from technological innovation: implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy. Research Policy, 15(6), 285–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Terpstra, V. (1977). International product policy: the role of foreign R&D’. Colombia Journal of World Business, 12(4), 34–42.Google Scholar
  104. Tether, B. S. (2002). Who co-operates for innovation, and why: an empirical analysis. Research Policy, 31(6), 947–967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Thoma, J., & Bizer, K. (2013). To protect or not to protect? Modes of appropriability in the small enterprise sector. Research Policy, 42(1), 35–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. van Beers, C., Berghall, E., & Poot, T. (2008). R&D internationalization, R&D collaboration and public knowledge institutions in small economies: evidence from Finland and The Netherlands. Research Policy, 37(2), 294–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. von Zedtwitz, M., & Gassman, O. (2002). Market versus technology drive in R&D internationalization: four different patterns of managing research and development. Research Policy, 31(4), 569–588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Wang, Y. (2007). Managerial choice between equity joint ventures and contractual joint ventures in China: a critical test of transaction cost economics and resource-based view. Asian Business & Management, 6(4), 355–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Williamson, O. E. (1996). The mechanisms of governance. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  110. Yan, A., & Gray, B. (1994). Bargaining power, management control, and performance in United States-China joint ventures: a comparative case study. Academy of Management Journal, 37(6), 1478–1517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Zander, U., & Kogut, B. (1995). Knowledge and the speed of the transfer and imitation of organizational capabilities: an empirical test. Organization Science, 6(1), 76–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Zelner, B. A. (2009). Using simulation to interpret results from logit, probit, and other nonlinear models. Strategic Management Journal, 30(12), 1335–1348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Zhang, S. (2011). Multinational’s R&D in China and its implications for China’s national system of innovation. In R. Pearce (Ed.), China and the multinationals: international business and the entry of China into the global economy (pp. 42–58). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. Zhao, M. (2006). Conducting R&D in countries with weak intellectual property rights protection. Management Science, 52(8), 1185–1199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. Zhao, H., Luo, Y., & Suh, T. (2004). Transaction cost determinants and ownership-based entry mode choice: a meta-analytical review. Journal of International Business Studies, 35(6), 524–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Management, School of Business and ManagementHong Kong University of Science and TechnologyKowloonHong Kong SAR
  2. 2.Department of Innovation, Entrepreneurship and Strategy, School of Economics and ManagementTsinghua UniversityBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations