Management International Review

, Volume 53, Issue 1, pp 83–107 | Cite as

The Social Influence of Executive Hubris

Cross-cultural Comparison and Indigenous Factors
Research Article


  • Executive hubris—an important psychological bias—affects the strategic decisions of a firm as well as their implementation. Yet executive hubris brought about by social influence in different cultural environments is not well understood.

  • Anchored in the upper echelons theory and the cross-cultural management literature, this study investigated the social influence of executive hubris among peer executives in two different cultural contexts: China and the US.

  • Using a large set of survey data on Chinese firms and a large archive of US firm data, we found that the social influence of executive hubris is stronger in the Chinese context than in the US. The social influence among Chinese executives tends to be moderated by their similarity in categorical factors indigenous to the Chinese context: executives who are managing state-owned firms or were politically appointed are more strongly influenced by each other than by those managing non-state-owned firms or were not politically appointed.

  • We illustrate that cultural contexts give rise to differences in the social influence of executive hubris.


Executive hubris Social influence Cross-cultural comparison Indigenous management Chinese and US firms 


  1. Aiken, L., & West, S. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park: Sage.Google Scholar
  2. Alicke, M., Klotz, M., Breitenbecher, D., & Yurak, T. (1995). Personal contact, individuation, and the better-than-average effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68(5), 804–825.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ahmadjian, C., & Robinson, P. (2001). Safety in numbers: Downsizing and the deinstitutionalization of permanent employment in Japan. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46(4), 622–654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ashforth, B. E., & Mael, F. (1989). Social identity theory and the organization. Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 20–39.Google Scholar
  5. Ashkanasy, N., Wilderom, C., & Peterson, M. (2000). Handbook of organizational culture and climate. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  6. Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  7. Ben-David, I., Graham, J., & Harvey, C. (2006). Managerial overconfidence and corporate policies. NBER Working Paper.Google Scholar
  8. Bhave, D., Kramer, A., & Glomb, T. (2010). Work-family conflict in work groups: Social information processing, support, and demographic dissimilarity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(1), 145–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Billett, M., & Qian, Y. (2008). Are overconfident CEOs born or made? Evidence of self-attribution bias from frequent acquirers. Management Science, 54(6), 1037–1051.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bond, M., Leung, K., & Wan, K. (1982). The social impact of self-effacing attributions: The Chinese case. Journal of Social Psychology, 118(2), 157–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bourgeois, L. (1981). On the measurement of organizational slack. Academy of Management Review, 6(1), 29–39.Google Scholar
  12. Brandt, L., & Li, H. (2003). Bank discrimination in transition economies: Ideology, information or incentives? Journal of Comparative Economics, 31(3), 387–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chang, C., & Wang, Y. (1994). The nature of the township-village enterprise’. Journal of Comparative Economics, 19(3), 434–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chatterjee, A., & Hambrick, D. (2007). It’s all about me: Narcissistic chief executive officers and their effects on company strategy and performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52(3), 351–386.Google Scholar
  15. Chatterjee, A., & Hambrick, D. (2011). Executive personality, capability cues, and risk taking: How narcissistic CEOs react to their successes and stumbles. Administrative Science Quarterly, 56(2), 202–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Chattopadhyay, P., Glick, W., Miller, C., & Huber, G. (1999). Determinants of executive beliefs: Comparing functional conditions and social influence. Strategic Management Journal, 20(8), 763–789.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Chen, C. (1995). New trends in rewards allocation preferences: A Sino-U.S. comparison. Academy of Management Journal, 38(2), 408–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Chinese Business Times (2010). Chinese real estate tycoons on new housing polices. December 31.Google Scholar
  19. Crossland, C., & Hambrick, D. (2007). How national systems differ in their constraints on corporate executives: A study of CEO effects in three countries. Strategic Management Journal, 28(8), 767–789.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dahlin, K., Weingart, L., & Hinds, P. (2005). Team diversity and information use. Academy of Management Journal, 48(6), 1107–1123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Daily Finance (2010). Global economy’s next threat: China’s real estate bubble. Accessed 1 May 2010.Google Scholar
  22. Dewatripont, M., & Maskin, E. (1995). Credit and efficiency in centralized and decentralized economies. Review of Economic Studies, 62(4), 541–555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Dhanaraj, C., & Beamish, P. (2009). Institutional environment and subsidiary survival. Management International Review, 49(3), 291–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Doty, D. H., & Glick, W. (1998). Common methods bias: Does common methods variance really bias results? Organizational Research Methods, 1(4), 374–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Dovidio, J. F., Gaertner, S. L., & Saguy, T. (2009). Commonality and the complexity of "We": Social attitudes and social change. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 13(1), 3–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Durand, R. (2003). Predicting a firm’s forecasting ability: The role of organizational illusion of control and organizational attention. Strategic Management Journal, 24(9), 821–838.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Earley, P. C. (1989). Social loafing and collectivism. Administrative Science Quarterly, 34(4), 565–581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Faccio, M. (2006). Politically connected firms. American Economic Review, 96(1), 369–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Fan, J., Wong, J. T., & Zhang, T. (2007). Politically connected CEOs, corporate governance, and post-IPO performance of China’s newly partially privatized firms. Journal of Financial Economics, 84(2), 330–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7(2), 117–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Finkelstein, S., Hambrick, D., & Cannella, A. (2009). Strategic leadership: Theory and research on executives, top management teams, and boards. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Forbes, D. (2005). Are some entrepreneurs more overconfident than others? Journal of Business Venturing, 20(5), 623–640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. FTChinese (2011). The “10-year” bull market of the China real estate is over? Accessed 9 March 2011.
  34. Geletkanycz, M. (1997). The salience of “culture’s consequences”: The effects of cultural values on top executive commitment to the status quo. Strategic Management Journal, 18(8), 615–634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Griffin, R. W. (1983). Objective and social sources of information in task redesign: A field experiment. Administrative Science Quarterly, 28(2), 184–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hambrick, D., & Mason, P. (1984). Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Review, 9(2), 193–206.Google Scholar
  37. Hambrick, D., & Brandon, G. (1988). Executive values. In D. C. Hambrick (Ed.), The executive effect: Concepts and methods for studying top managers (pp. 3–34). Greenwich: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  38. Hayward, M. (2007). Ego check: Why executive hubris is wrecking companies and careers and how to avoid the trap. Washington: Kaplan Business.Google Scholar
  39. Hayward, M., & Hambrick, D. (1997). Explaining the premiums paid for large acquisitions: Evidence of CEO hubris. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(1), 103–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Hayward, M., Shepherd, D., & Griffin, D. (2006). A hubris theory of entrepreneurship. Management Science, 52(2), 160–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Hilary, G., & Menzly, L. (2006). Does past success lead analysts to become overconfident? Management Science, 52(4), 489–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Hiller, N., & Hambrick, D. (2005). Conceptualizing executive hubris: The role of (hyper-) core self-evaluations in strategic decision-making. Strategic Management Journal, 26(4), 297–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Hillman, A., Zardkoohi, A., & Bierman, L. (1999). Corporate political strategies and firm performance: Indications of firm-specific benefits from personal service in the U.S. government. Strategic Management Journal, 20(1), 67–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Hitt, M., Tihanyi, L., Miller, T., & Connelly, B. (2006). International diversification: Antecedents, outcomes, and moderators. Journal of Management, 32(6), 831–867.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Hmieleski, K., & Baron, R. (2009). Entrepreneurs’ optimism and new venture performance: A social cognitive perspective. Academy of management Journal, 52(3), 473–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture’s consequences. Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
  47. Hofstede, G. (1991). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  48. Howard, J., & Rothbart, M. (1980). Social categorization and memory for in-group and out-group behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38(2), 301–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Ilies, R., Wagner, D., & Morgeson, F. (2007). Explaining affective linkages in teams: Individual differences in susceptibility to contagion and individualism–collectivism. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(4), 1140–1148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Judge, T., Erez, A., Bono, J., & Thoresen, C. (2002). Are measures of self-esteem, neuroticism, locus of control, and generalized self-efficacy indicators of a common core construct? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(3), 693–710.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Judge, T., Locke, E., & Durham, C. (1997). The dispositional causes of job satisfaction: A core evaluations approach. In B. Staw & L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior (pp. 151–188). Greenwich: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  52. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1995). Conflict resolution: A cognitive perspective. In K. Arrows et al. (Eds.), Barriers to Conflict Resolution (pp. 44–61). New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  53. Klayman, J., Soll, J., Gonzalez-Vallejo, C., & Barlas, S. (1999). Overconfidence: It depends on how, what, and whom you ask. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 79(3), 216–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Konai, J. (1980). Economics of shortage. Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar
  55. Li, J., & Tang, Y. (2010). CEO hubris and firm risk taking in China: The moderating role of managerial discretion. Academy of Management Journal, 52(1), 45–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Li, P., Leung, K., Chen, C., & Luo, J. (2012). Indigenous research on Chinese management: What and how. Management and Organization Review, 8(1), 7–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Li, H., & Zhang, Y. (2007). The role of managers’ political networking and functional experience in new venture performance: Evidence from China’s transition economy. Strategic Management Journal, 28(8), 791–804.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Liu, Q. (2006). Corporate governance in China: Current practices, economic effects and institutional determinants. CESifo Economic Studies, 52(2), 415–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Lowe, R., & Ziedonis, A. (2006). Over optimism and the performance of entrepreneurial firms. Management Science, 52(2), 173–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Luo, Y., Shenkar, O., & Nyaw, M. (2001). A dual parent perspective on control and performance in international joint ventures: Lessons from a developing economy. Journal of International Business Studies, 32(1), 41–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Luthans, F., & Youssef, C. A. (2007). Emerging positive organizational behavior. Journal of Management, 33(3), 321–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Malmendier, U., & Tate, G. (2005). CEO overconfidence and corporate investment. Journal of Finance, 60(6), 2661–2700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Malmendier, U., & Tate, G. (2008). Who makes acquisitions? CEO overconfidence and the market’s reaction. Journal of Financial Economics, 89(1), 20–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. McMillan, J. (1997). Markets in transition. In D. M. Kreps & K. F. Wallis (Eds.), Advances in Economics and Econometrics, (pp. 210–239). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  65. Moore, D., & Healy, P. (2008). The trouble with overconfidence. Psychological Review, 115(2), 502–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Morland, R. L., Argote, L., & Krishnan, R. (1996). Socially-shared cognition at work: Transactive memory and group performance. In J. L. Nye & A. M. Brower (Eds.), What’s social about social cognition? Research on socially shared cognition in small groups (pp. 57–84). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  67. O’Reilly, C. A., III., & Caldwell, D. F. (1985). The impact of normative social influence and cohesiveness on task perceptions and attitudes: A social processing approach. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 58(3), 207–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Parboteeah, K., Cullen, J., Bart, V., & Sakano, T. (2005). National culture and ethical climates: A comparison of U.S. and Japanese accounting firms. Management International Review, 45(4), 459–481.Google Scholar
  69. Peteraf, M., & Shanley, M. (1997). Getting to know you: A theory of strategic group identity. Strategic Management Journal, 18(Summer Special Issue), 165–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Pfeffer, J. (1983). Organizational demography. Research in Organizational Behavior, 5, 299–357.Google Scholar
  71. Rao, H., Greve, H., & Davis, G. (2001). Fool’s gold: Social proof in the initiation and abandonment of coverage by Wall Street analysts. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46(3), 502–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Robbins, J., & Krueger, J. (2005). Social projection to ingroups and outgroups: A review and meta-analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 9(1), 32–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Robinson, S. L., & O’Leary-Kelly, A. M. (1998). Monkey see, monkey do: The influence of work groups on the antisocial behavior of employees. Academy of Management Journal, 41(6), 658–672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Romanelli, E., & Khessina, O. (2005). Regional industrial identity: Cluster configurations and economic development. Organization Science, 16(4), 344–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Salancik, G., & Pfeffer, J. (1978). A social information processing approach to job attitudes and task design. Administrative Science Quarterly, 23(2), 224–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Schneider, S. (1985). Strategy formulations: The impact of national culture. The case of France. Paper presented at the Northeast Regional Meeting of the Academy of International Business, Boston, MA.Google Scholar
  77. Simon, M., & Houghton, S. (2003). The relationship between overconfidence and the introduction of risky products: Evidence from a field study. Academy of Management Journal, 46(2), 139–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Singh, J. (1986). Performance, slack, and risk taking in organizational decision making. Academy of Management Journal, 29(3), 562–585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Smith, P., Dugan, S., & Trompenaars, F. (1996). National culture and the values of organizational employees: A dimensional analysis across 43 nations. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 27(2), 231–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Stotz, O., & von Nitzsch, R. (2005). The perception of control and the level of overconfidence: Evidence from analyst earnings estimates and price targets. Journal of Behavioral Finance, 6(3), 121–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Strange, R., Filatotchev, I., Buck, T., & Wright, M. (2009). Corporate governance and international business. Management International Review, 49(4), 395–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1985). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of Intergroup Relations (pp. 7–24). Chicago: Nelson-Hall.Google Scholar
  83. Tang, Y , Li, J., & Yang, H. (2012). What I see, what I do: How executive hubris affects firm innovation. Journal of Management. Published online before print. doi:10.1177/0149206312441211.Google Scholar
  84. Triandis, H. (1995). Individualism and Collectivism. Boulder: Westview.Google Scholar
  85. Tsui, A. (2007). From homogenization to pluralism: International management research in the academy and beyond. Academy of Management Journal, 50(6), 1353–1364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Turner, J. C. (1975). Social comparison and social identity: Some prospects for intergroup behavior. European Journal of Social Psychology, 5(1), 1–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Wagner, J. (1995). Studies of individualism–collectivism: Effects on cooperation in groups. Academy of Management Journal, 38(1), 152–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Wagner, J., & Moch, M. (1986). Individualism–collectivism: Concept and measure. Group and Organization Studies, 11(3), 280–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Walder, A. G. (1995). Local governments as industrial firms: An organizational analysis of China’s transitional economy. American Journal of Sociology, 101(2), 263–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Wang, Q., Wong, T., & Xia, L. (2008). State ownership, the institutional environment, and auditor choice: Evidence from China. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 46(1), 112–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Weick, K. (1995). Sense making in organizations. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  92. Weinstein, N. (1980). Unrealistic optimism about future life events. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39(5), 806–820.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. White, W., & Chan, E. (1983). A comparison of self-concept scores of Chinese and white graduate students and professionals. Journal of Non-White Concerns, 11 (4), 138–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Wooldridge, J. (2002). Econometric analysis of cross-section and panel data. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  95. Xinhua (2008). The troubles faced by Chinese entrepreneurs. December 28.Google Scholar
  96. Xinhua (2010). China’s real estate bubble, a heated debate. January 14.Google Scholar
  97. Zalesny, M. D., & Ford, J. K. (1990). Extending the social information processing perspective: New links to attitudes, behaviors, and perceptions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 47(2), 205–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of ManagementThe Hong Kong University of Science and TechnologyHong KongChina
  2. 2.Department of Management and MarketingThe Hong Kong Polytechnic UniversityHong KongChina

Personalised recommendations