The Social Influence of Executive Hubris
- 447 Downloads
Executive hubris—an important psychological bias—affects the strategic decisions of a firm as well as their implementation. Yet executive hubris brought about by social influence in different cultural environments is not well understood.
Anchored in the upper echelons theory and the cross-cultural management literature, this study investigated the social influence of executive hubris among peer executives in two different cultural contexts: China and the US.
Using a large set of survey data on Chinese firms and a large archive of US firm data, we found that the social influence of executive hubris is stronger in the Chinese context than in the US. The social influence among Chinese executives tends to be moderated by their similarity in categorical factors indigenous to the Chinese context: executives who are managing state-owned firms or were politically appointed are more strongly influenced by each other than by those managing non-state-owned firms or were not politically appointed.
We illustrate that cultural contexts give rise to differences in the social influence of executive hubris.
KeywordsExecutive hubris Social influence Cross-cultural comparison Indigenous management Chinese and US firms
- Aiken, L., & West, S. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park: Sage.Google Scholar
- Ashforth, B. E., & Mael, F. (1989). Social identity theory and the organization. Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 20–39.Google Scholar
- Ashkanasy, N., Wilderom, C., & Peterson, M. (2000). Handbook of organizational culture and climate. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
- Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
- Ben-David, I., Graham, J., & Harvey, C. (2006). Managerial overconfidence and corporate policies. NBER Working Paper.Google Scholar
- Bourgeois, L. (1981). On the measurement of organizational slack. Academy of Management Review, 6(1), 29–39.Google Scholar
- Chatterjee, A., & Hambrick, D. (2007). It’s all about me: Narcissistic chief executive officers and their effects on company strategy and performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52(3), 351–386.Google Scholar
- Chinese Business Times (2010). Chinese real estate tycoons on new housing polices. December 31.Google Scholar
- Daily Finance (2010). Global economy’s next threat: China’s real estate bubble. http://www.dailyfinance.com/2010/01/05/global-economys-next-threat-chinas-real-estate-bubble. Accessed 1 May 2010.Google Scholar
- Finkelstein, S., Hambrick, D., & Cannella, A. (2009). Strategic leadership: Theory and research on executives, top management teams, and boards. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- FTChinese (2011). The “10-year” bull market of the China real estate is over? http://www.ftchinese.com/story/001037348/?print=y. Accessed 9 March 2011.
- Hambrick, D., & Mason, P. (1984). Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Review, 9(2), 193–206.Google Scholar
- Hambrick, D., & Brandon, G. (1988). Executive values. In D. C. Hambrick (Ed.), The executive effect: Concepts and methods for studying top managers (pp. 3–34). Greenwich: JAI Press.Google Scholar
- Hayward, M. (2007). Ego check: Why executive hubris is wrecking companies and careers and how to avoid the trap. Washington: Kaplan Business.Google Scholar
- Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture’s consequences. Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
- Hofstede, G. (1991). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
- Judge, T., Locke, E., & Durham, C. (1997). The dispositional causes of job satisfaction: A core evaluations approach. In B. Staw & L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior (pp. 151–188). Greenwich: JAI Press.Google Scholar
- Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1995). Conflict resolution: A cognitive perspective. In K. Arrows et al. (Eds.), Barriers to Conflict Resolution (pp. 44–61). New York: Norton.Google Scholar
- Konai, J. (1980). Economics of shortage. Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar
- McMillan, J. (1997). Markets in transition. In D. M. Kreps & K. F. Wallis (Eds.), Advances in Economics and Econometrics, (pp. 210–239). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Morland, R. L., Argote, L., & Krishnan, R. (1996). Socially-shared cognition at work: Transactive memory and group performance. In J. L. Nye & A. M. Brower (Eds.), What’s social about social cognition? Research on socially shared cognition in small groups (pp. 57–84). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
- Parboteeah, K., Cullen, J., Bart, V., & Sakano, T. (2005). National culture and ethical climates: A comparison of U.S. and Japanese accounting firms. Management International Review, 45(4), 459–481.Google Scholar
- Pfeffer, J. (1983). Organizational demography. Research in Organizational Behavior, 5, 299–357.Google Scholar
- Schneider, S. (1985). Strategy formulations: The impact of national culture. The case of France. Paper presented at the Northeast Regional Meeting of the Academy of International Business, Boston, MA.Google Scholar
- Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1985). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of Intergroup Relations (pp. 7–24). Chicago: Nelson-Hall.Google Scholar
- Tang, Y , Li, J., & Yang, H. (2012). What I see, what I do: How executive hubris affects firm innovation. Journal of Management. Published online before print. doi:10.1177/0149206312441211.Google Scholar
- Triandis, H. (1995). Individualism and Collectivism. Boulder: Westview.Google Scholar
- Weick, K. (1995). Sense making in organizations. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
- Wooldridge, J. (2002). Econometric analysis of cross-section and panel data. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Xinhua (2008). The troubles faced by Chinese entrepreneurs. December 28.Google Scholar
- Xinhua (2010). China’s real estate bubble, a heated debate. January 14.Google Scholar