Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Markets and Networks in International Trade: On the Role of Distances in Globalization

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Management International Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

  • The enduring importance of geographic distance as an impediment to international trade has recently become recognized as an empirical fact in need of explanation. According to one line of argument—the ‘network view’—the continuing high sensitivity of international trade to geographical distance is associated with a shift in the composition of trade towards goods requiring more extensive information exchange and personal interaction between buyers and sellers. An alternative explanation—‘the market view’—contends that improved availability of information and increasing transparency of markets have facilitated the matching of geographically more proximate buyers and sellers, and that the observed decline in average transportation distances is a reflection of increasingly efficient markets.

  • This paper examines empirically the merits of these two arguments based on a longitudinal analysis of bilateral trade between 25 major trading nations for the period 1962–2008. It compares the development of the relative importance of ‘psychic distance’—a proxy for information related transaction costs—and geographic distance—a proxy for transportation costs—in three categories of goods.

  • The results are broadly in support of the ‘market-view’, showing that the sensitivity of trade to psychic distance has declined dramatically for all categories of goods. The impact of geographic distance has increased markedly for homogenous goods, whereas for more differentiated goods it has decreased mildly.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, J. E. (1979). A theoretical foundation for the gravity equation. American Economic Review, 69(1), 106–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J. E., & van Wincoop, E. (2003). Gravity with gravitas: A solution to the border puzzle. American Economic Review, 93(1), 170–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumgartner, H., & Steenkamp, J.-B. E. M. (2001). Response styles in marketing research: A cross-national investigation. Journal of Marketing Research, 38(2), 143–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beckerman, W. (1956). Distance and the pattern of intra-European trade. Review of Economics and Statistics, 1(1), 31–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berthelon, M., & Freund, C. (2008). On the conservation of distance in international trade. Journal of International Economics, 75(2), 310–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brun, J.-F., Carrère, C., Guillaumont, P., & de Melo, J. (2005). Has distance died? Evidence from a panel gravity model. World Bank Economic Review, 19(1), 99–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cairncross, F. (1997). The death of distance. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carrère, C., & Schiff, M. (2005). On the geography of trade. Distance is alive and well. Revue économique, 56(6), 1249–1274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CEPII. (2007). Centre d’études prospectives et d’informations internationales, http://www.cepii.fr/anglaisgraph/bdd/distances.htm. Accessed 23 June 2007.

  • Chan, C. M. (1998). Functional relations among constructs in the same content domain at different levels of analysis: A typology of composition models. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(2), 234–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coe, D. T., Subramanian, A., & Tamirisa, N. T. (2007). The missing globalization puzzle: Evidence of the declining importance of distance. IMF Staff Papers, 54(1), 34–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deardorff, A. V. (1998). Determinants of bilateral trade: Does gravity work in a neoclassical world? In J. A. Frankel (Ed.), The regionalization of the world economy (pp. 7–28). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deardorff, A. V. (2002). Time and trade: The role of time in determining the structure and effects of international trade, with an application to Japan. In R. M. Stern (Ed.), Analytical studies in U.S.-Japan international economic relations (pp. 63–76). Cheltenham: Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Disdier, A.-C., & Head, K. (2008). The puzzling persistence of the distance effect on bilateral trade. Review of Economics and Statistics, 90(1), 37–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Djankov, S., Freund, C., & Pham, C. (2006). Trading on time. World Bank Policy Research, Working Paper 3909.

  • Dow, D., & Karunaratna, A. (2006). Developing a multidimensional instrument to measure psychic distance stimuli. Journal of International Business Studies, 37(5), 578–602.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duranton, G., & Storper, M. (2008). Rising trade costs? Agglomeration and trade with endogenous transaction costs. Canadian Journal of Economics, 41(1), 292–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, C., & Harrigan, J. (2005). Distance, time and specialization: Lean retailing in general equilibrium. American Economic Review, 95(1), 292–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evenett, S. J., & Keller, W. (2002). On theories explaining the success of the gravity equation. Journal of Political Economy, 110(2), 281–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feenstra, R. C., Markusen, J. R., & Rose, A. K. (2001). Using the gravity equation to differentiate between alternative theories of trade. Canadian Journal of Economics, 34(2), 430–447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feenstra, R. C., Lipsey, R. E., Deng, H., Ma, A. C., & Mo, H. (2005). World trade flows 1962–2000. NBER Working Paper Series, Working Paper 11040.

  • Frankel, J. A. (1997). Regional Trading Blocs in the World Economic System. Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, G. M. (1998). Comment. In J. A. Frankel (Ed.), The Regionalization of the World Economy (pp. 28–32). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guiso, L., Sapienza, P., & Zingales, L. (2009). Cultural biases in economic exchange. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 124(3), 1095–1131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hagen, S. (1993). Languages in European business: A regional survey of small and medium sized companies. London: CILT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J. F. Jr., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1992). Multivariate data analysis (3rd ed.). New York: Macmillan Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Håkanson, L., & Ambos, B. (2010). The antecedents of psychic distance. Journal of International Management, 16(3), 195–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrigan, J. (2003). Specialization and the volume of trade: Do the data obey the laws? In E. K. Choi & J. Harrigan (Eds.), Handbook of international trade (pp. 85–118). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Harzing, A. W., & 22 country collaborators. (2007). Ranking and rating in native-language versus English-language questionnaires: A methodological comparison. Paper presented at the 33rd EIBA Conference in Catania, December 13–15, 2007.

  • Harzing, A. W., & 32 country collaborators. (2005). The use of English questionnaires in cross-national research: Does cultural accommodation obscure national differences? International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, 5(2), 213–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harzing, A. W. (2006). Response styles in cross-national survey research: A 26-country study. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, 6(2), 243–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haveman, J. (2008). Jon Haveman’s international trade data. http://www.macalester.edu/research/economics/page/haveman/trade.resources/tradedata.html. Accessed 15 May 2009.

  • Helpman, E., Melitz, M., & Rubinstein, Y. (2008). Estimating trade flows: Trading partners and trading volumes. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 123(2), 441–487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hömell, E., Vahlne, J.-E., & Wiedersheim-Paul, F. (1973). Export och utlandsetableringar. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hufbauer, G. C., Schott, J. J., Elliot, K. A., & Oegg, B. (2007). Economic sanctions reconsidered (3rd ed.). Washington, DC: Peterson Institute for International Economics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hummels, D. (2001). Time as a trade barrier. GTAP Working Paper No. 18. Center for Global Trade Analysis, Purdue University.

  • Hummels, D. (2006). Transportation costs and trade over time. Transport and international trade. European Conference of Ministers of Transport, Round Table 230. http://internationaltransportforum.org/europe/ecmt/pubpdf/06RT130.pdf. Accessed 5 Nov 2010.

  • Hummels, D. (2007). Transportation costs and international trade in the second era of globalization. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 21(3), 131–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hummels, D., & Levinsohn, J. (1995). Monopolistic competition and international trade: Reconsidering the evidence. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110(3), 799–836.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ivus, O., & Strong, A. (2007). Modeling approaches to the analysis of trade policy: Computable general equilibrium and gravity models? In W. A. Kerr & J. D. Gaisfield (Eds.), Handbook of international trade policy (pp. 44–54). Cheltenham: Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johanson, J., & Vahlne, J.-E. (1977). The internationalization process of the firm: A model of knowledge development and increasing foreign market commitments. Journal of International Business Studies, 8(1), 25–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kogut, B., & Singh, H. (1988). The effect of national culture on the choice of entry mode. Journal of International Business Studies, 19(3), 411–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krugman, P. (1995). Increasing returns, imperfect competition and the positive theory of international trade. In G. M. Grossman & K. Rogoff (Eds.), Handbook of international economics, III (pp. 1243–1277). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leamer, E. E. (1993). The commodity composition of international trade in manufactures: An empirical analysis. Oxford Economic Papers, New Series, 26(3), 350–374.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leamer, E. E. (2007). A flat world, a level playing field, a small world after all, or none of the above? A review of Thomas L. Friedman’s the world is flat. Journal of Economic Literature, 45(1), 83–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leamer, E. E., & Levinson, J. (1995). International trade: The evidence. In G. M. Grossman & K. Rogoff (Eds.), Handbook of international economics, III (pp. 1339–1394). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leamer, E. E., & Storper, M. (2001). The economic geography of the internet age. Journal of International Business Studies, 32(4), 641–665.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linnemann, H. (1966). An econometric study of international trade flows. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCallum, J. (1995). National borders matter: Canada-U.S. regional trade patterns. American Economic Review, 85(3), 615–623.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melitz, J. (2007). North, south and distance in the gravity model. European Economic Review, 51(4), 971–991.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NBER-United Nations Trade Data, 1962–2000. http://cid.econ.ucdavis.edu/data/undata/undata.html. Accessed 16 Sep 2009.

  • Nordström, K. A. (1991). The internationalization process of the firm: Searching for new patterns and explanations. Ph.D. dissertation, Stockholm: Institute of International Business, Stockholm School of Economics.

  • Nordström, K. A., & Vahlne, J.-E. (1994). Is the globe shrinking? Psychic distance and the establishment of Swedish sales subsidiaries during the last 100 years. In M. Landeck (Ed.), International trade: Regional and global issues (pp. 41–56). New York: St Martin’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Portes, R., & Rey, H. (2005). The determinants of cross-border equity flows. Journal of International Economics, 65(2), 269–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ralston, D. A., Cunniff, M. K., & Gustafson, D. J. (1995). Cultural accommodation: The effect of language on the response of bilingual Hong Kong Chinese managers. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 26(6), 714–727.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rangan, S. (2000). Search and deliberation in international exchange: Microfoundations to some macro patterns. Journal of International Business Studies, 13(2), 205–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rauch, J. E. (1999). Networks versus markets in international trade. Journal of International Economics, 48(1), 7–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rauch, J. E. (2001). Business and social networks in international trade. Journal of Economic Literature, 39(4), 1177–1203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, W. S. (1950). Ecological correlations and the behavior of individuals. American Sociological Review, 15(3), 351–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Selvin, H. C. (1958). Durkheim’s suicide and problems of empirical research. American Journal of Sociology, 63(6), 607–619.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silva, J. M. C. S., & Tenreyro, S. (2006). The log of gravity. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 88(4), 641–658.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh, J. (1995). Measurement issues in cross-national research. Journal of International Business Studies, 26(3), 597–620.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smarzynska, B. (2001). Does relative location matter for bilateral trade flows? An extension of the gravity model. Journal of Economic Integration, 16(3), 379–398.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soloaga, I., & Winters, L. A. (2001). Regionalism in the nineties: What effect on trade? North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 12(1), 1–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tinbergen, J. (1962). Shaping the world economy. New York: Twentieth Century Fund.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turnbull, P. W., & Welham, G. F. (1985). The characteristics of European export marketing staff. European Journal of Marketing, 19(2), 31–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UN Comtrade. (2009). United Nations Commodity Trade Statistics Database. http://comtrade.un.org/db/. Accessed 16 Dec 2009.

  • Wei, S. J. (1996). Intra-national vs. international trade: How stubborn are nations in global integration? NBER Working Paper Series, Working Paper 5531. Cambridge: National Bureau of Economic Research.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of International Economics and Management, Copenhagen Business School & University of Queensland, Frederiksberg, Denmark and Brisbane, Australia

    Lars Håkanson

  2. Centre for the Practice of International Trade, Melbourne Business School, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia

    Douglas Dow Ph.D.

Authors
  1. Lars Håkanson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Douglas Dow Ph.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lars Håkanson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Håkanson, L., Dow, D. Markets and Networks in International Trade: On the Role of Distances in Globalization. Manag Int Rev 52, 761–789 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11575-012-0142-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11575-012-0142-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation