Management International Review

, Volume 52, Issue 6, pp 847–877 | Cite as

Political Institutional Change, Obsolescing Legitimacy, and Multinational Corporations

The Case of the Central American Banana Industry
Research Article

Abstract

  • This paper studies the practice of integration of influential host country actors to a multinational corporation as a strategy to decrease problems of legitimacy to the foreign firm before the host country’s society.

  • By developing the concept of obsolescing legitimacy, we argue that this strategy provides legitimacy to the foreign firm only in the absence of institutional changes at the macro-political level in the host country. Once these changes take place, an alliance by the multinational to an elite or a political system no longer ruling the host country will become a liability and will generate problems of legitimacy for the multinational.

  • We illustrate our argument with the case of the US multinational United Fruit Company in Central America.

Keywords

Obsolescing legitimacy Political integration Institutional change Vertical integration Political risk Foreign direct investment Central America 

References

  1. Acemoglu, D., & Robinson, J. (2006). Economic origins of dictatorship and democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Acemoglu, D., & Robinson, J. (2007). On the economic origins of democracy. Daedalus, 136(1), 160–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arthur, H., Houck, J., & Beckford, G. (1968). Tropical agribusiness structures and adjustments: Bananas. Boston: Harvard Business School.Google Scholar
  4. Barahona, M. (2002). Las transformaciones de la economía de Honduras (1920–1932). In R. Paz (Ed.), Honduras: Del enclave bananero a la democracia formal. Tegucigalpa: Universidad Francisco Morazán.Google Scholar
  5. Blackford, M., & Kerr, A. (1996). BF Goodrich: Tradition and transformation, 1870–1995. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Boddewyn, J. J., & Brewer, T. L. (1994). International-business political behavior: New theoretical directions. Academy of Management Review, 19(1), 119–143.Google Scholar
  7. Bond, P., & Sharife, K. (2009). Apartheid reparations and the contestation of corporate power in Africa. Review of African Political Economy, 36(119), 115–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bucheli, M. (2003). United Fruit Company in Latin America. In M. Moberg & S. Striffler (Eds.), Banana wars: Power, production, and history in the Americas (pp. 80–100). Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Bucheli, M. (2005). Bananas and business: The United Fruit Company in Colombia, 1899–2000. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Bucheli, M. (2008). Multinational corporations, totalitarian regimes, and economic nationalism: United fruit company in Central America, 1899–1975. Business History, 50(4), 433–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bucheli, M., & Read, I. (2006). Banana boats and baby food: The banana in US history. In S. Topic, Z. Frank, & C. Marichal (Eds.), From silver to cocaine: Latin America commodity chains and the building of the world economy (pp. 204–227). Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Bucheli, M., Mahoney, J., & Vaaler, P. (2010). Chandler’s living scholarship: The visible hand of vertical integration in nineteenth century America seen under a twentieth first century transaction costs economics lens. Journal of Management Studies, 47(5), 859–883.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bueno de Mesquita, B., & Root, H. (2000). When bad economics is good politics. In B. Bueno de Mesquita & H. Root (Eds.), Governing for prosperity (pp. 1–16). New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Bueno de Mesquita, B., Smith, A., Siverson, R., & Morrow, J. (2003). The logic of political survival. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  15. Bueno de Mesquita, B., Smith, A., Siverson, R., & Morrow, J. (2005). The logic of political survival. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  16. Bulmer-Thomas, V. (1987). The political economy of Central America since the 1920s. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Busey, J. (1961). The presidents of Costa Rica. The Americas, 18, 55–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Center for Research in Security Prices (CRSP). (2009). http://www.crsp.com. Accessed 2009.Google Scholar
  19. Center for Systemic Peace (CSP). (2009). Polity IV. http://www.systemicpeace.org/inscr/inscr.htm. Accessed 25 July 2009.Google Scholar
  20. Chomsky, A. (1996). West Indian workers and the united fruit company in Costa Rica, 1870–1940. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University.Google Scholar
  21. Díaz, F. (1982). Carías: El último caudillo frutero. Tegucigalpa: Guaymuras.Google Scholar
  22. DiMaggio, P. J. (1988). Interest and agency in institutional theory. In L. Zucker (Ed.), Institutional patterns and organizations: culture and environment (pp. 3–21). Cambridge: Ballinger.Google Scholar
  23. Di Maggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Dosal, P. (1993). Doing business with the dictators: A political history of United Fruit in Guatemala, 1899–1944. Wilmington: Scholarly Resources.Google Scholar
  25. Ellis, F. (1983). Las transnacionales del banano en Centroamérica. San Jose: Editorial Universitaria Centro-Americana.Google Scholar
  26. Euraque, D. (1996). Reinterpreting the banana republic: Region and state in Honduras, 1870–1972. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
  27. Fauriol, G., & Loser, E. (1991). Guatemala’s political puzzle. London: Transaction.Google Scholar
  28. Financial Times. (2006a). Singapore may see worst fallout from Thai coup. www.ft.com/cms/s/0/dd2afa6a-48b3-11db-a996-0000779e2340.html#axzz1bEzsWJe2. Accessed 19 Oct 2011.
  29. Financial Times. (2006b). Temasek to reduce stake in Shin Corp. www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/dcf9ab22-3c3b-11dd-b958-0000779fd2ac.html#axzz1bEzsWJe2. Accessed 19 Oct 2011.
  30. García, E. (1997). Poder politico, interés bananero e identidad nacional en Centro América. Tegucigalpa: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de Honduras.Google Scholar
  31. Gaspar, J. (1979). Limón, 1880–1940: Un estudio de la industria bananera en Costa Rica. San Jose: Editorial Costa Rica.Google Scholar
  32. Gleijeses, P. (1991). Shattered hope: The Guatemalan Revolution and the United States, 1944–1954. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Greenwood, R., Oliver, C., Sahlin, K., & Suddaby, R. (2008). Introduction. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, K. Sahlin, & R. Suddaby (Eds.), The sage handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 1–46). London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Henisz, W. J. (2000). The institutional environment for multinational investment. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 16(12), 334–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hillman, A., & Wan, W. (2005). The determinants of MNE subsidiaries political strategies: Evidence and institutional duality. Journal of International Business Studies, 36(3), 322–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hinings, C. R., Greenwood, R., Reay, T., & Suddaby, R. (2003). The dynamics of change in organizational fields. In M. S. Poole & A. Van de Ven (Eds.), Handbook of organizational change and innovation. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  37. International Railways of Central America (IRCA). (Various years). Annual Report. Boston: IRCA.Google Scholar
  38. Jenkins, V. (2000). Bananas: An American history. Washington: Smithsonian.Google Scholar
  39. Jones, D. (2009). Dow Jones Index. http://www.djindexes.com. Accessed 2009.Google Scholar
  40. Kepner, C., & Soothill, J. H. (1935). The banana empire: A case study of Economic imperialism. New York: Vanguard.Google Scholar
  41. Kostova, T., & Zaheer, S. (1999). Organizational legitimacy under conditions of complexity: The case of the multinational enterprise. Academy of Management Review, 24(1), 64–81.Google Scholar
  42. Kostova, T., Roth, K., & Dacin, T. (2008). Institutional theory in the study of multinational corporations: A critique and new directions. Academy of Management Review, 33(4), 994–1006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Langley, L. (2002). The banana wars: The United States intervention in the Caribbean, 1898–1934. Wilmington: Scholarly Resources.Google Scholar
  44. Leftwich, A. (2006). What are Institutions. IPPG Briefing Paper No. 1.Google Scholar
  45. Lhaopadchan, S. (2010). The politics of sovereign wealth fund investment: The case of Temasek and Shin corp. Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance, 18(1), 15–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. López, J. (1986). La economía del banano en Centroamérica. San Jose: DEI.Google Scholar
  47. MacCameron, R. (1983). Bananas, labor, and politics in Honduras. Syracuse: Syracuse University.Google Scholar
  48. May, S., & Plaza, G. (1958). United fruit company in Latin America. Washington: National Planning Association.Google Scholar
  49. Meyer, J. W., Scott, W. R., Rowan B., & Deal T. E. (1983). Organizational Environments: Ritual and Rationality. Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
  50. Mitchell, B. (1998). International historical statistics: The Americas, 1750–1993. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  51. Mizruchi, M. (1996). What do interlocks do? An analysis, critique, and assessment of research on interlocking directorates. Annual Review of Sociology, 22, 271–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Moody’s Investors Service. (various years). Moody’s Stock Survey. New York: Moody’s.Google Scholar
  53. North, D. (1991). Institutions. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5(1), 95–112.Google Scholar
  54. O’Donnell, G. (1982). El estado burocrático autoritario. Buenos Aires: Belgrano.Google Scholar
  55. Oliver, C. (1991). Strategic responses to institutional processes. Academy of Management Review, 16(1), 145–179.Google Scholar
  56. Ortner, R. (1964). The concept of yield on common stock. Journal of Finance, 19(2), 186–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Podolny, J. (2001). Networks as the pipes and prisms of the market. American Journal of Sociology, 107(1), 33–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Posas, M. (1993). La plantación bananera en Centroamérica (1870–1929). In V. Acuña (Ed.), Historia general de Centroamérica 4 (pp. 111–165). Madrid: FLACSO.Google Scholar
  59. Posas, M., & Del Cid, R. (1981). La construcción del sector público y del estado nacional en Honduras, 1876–1979. San Jose: Universidad Centroamericana.Google Scholar
  60. Posas, M., & Fontaine, R. (1980). Honduras at the crossroads. Latin American Perspectives, 7(2–3), 45–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Read, R. (1983). The growth and structure of multinationals in the banana export trade. In M. Casson (Ed.), The growth of international business (pp. 180–213). London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  62. Reid, R. (2007). Forgotten continent: The battle for Latin America’s soul. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  63. Ruef, M., & Scott, W. R. (1998). A multidimensional model of organizational legitimacy: Hospital survival in changing institutional environments. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43(4), 877–904.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Schlesinger, S., & Kinzer, S. (1990). Bitter fruit: The untold story of the American coup in Guatemala. New York: Anchor.Google Scholar
  65. Schulz, D., & Schulz, D. (1994). The United States, Honduras, and the crisis in Central America. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  66. Scott, W. R. (2008). Institutions and organizations: Ideas and interests. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  67. Scott, W. R., Ruef, M., Caronna, C., & Mendel, P. (2000). Institutional change and healthcare organizations: From professional dominance to managed care. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  68. Suchman, M. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571–610.Google Scholar
  69. Taracena, A. (1993). Liberalismo y poder político en Centroamérica (1870–1929). In V. Acuña (Ed.), Historia general de Centroamérica 4 (pp. 167–253). Madrid: FLACSO.Google Scholar
  70. The Economist. (2011a). Your mine is mine. September 3. www.economist.com/node/21528303. Accessed 19 Oct 2011.Google Scholar
  71. The Economist. (2011b). Now you own it, now you don’t. October 1. www.economist.com/node/21531017. Accessed 19 Oct 2011.Google Scholar
  72. The Economist. (2011c). Geology of geography? www.economist.com/node/21526924. Accessed 19 Oct 2011.Google Scholar
  73. The Economist. (2011d). Oil pressure rising. February 26, 79–80.Google Scholar
  74. United Brands Company. (various years). Annual report. Boston: United Brands.Google Scholar
  75. United Fruit Company. (various years). Annual report. Boston: United Fruit.Google Scholar
  76. United Kingdom, Department of Overseas Trade. (1938). Report on economic and commercial conditions in the Republic of Panama and the Republic of Costa Rica. London: His Majesty’s Stationary Office.Google Scholar
  77. United Nations Organization, Food & Agriculture Organisation. (1986). La economía mundial del banano. Rome: United Nations.Google Scholar
  78. University of Oxford. (2009). The Montevideo-Oxford Latin American Economic History Database. http://oxlad.qeh.ox.ac.uk/. Accessed 30 July 2009.Google Scholar
  79. Wall Street Journal. (2011). Temasek arm reduces Shin stake. www.online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424053111903639404576515312179554714.html. Accessed 19 Oct 2011.
  80. Weingast, B. (1995). The economic role of political institutions: Market preserving federalism and economic development. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 11, 1–31.Google Scholar
  81. Wilkins, M. (1970). The emergence of multinational enterprise: American business abroad from the Colonial Era to 1914. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  82. Wilkins, M. (1974). The maturing of multinational enterprise: American business abroad from 1914 to 1970. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  83. Witt, M. A., & Lewin, A. Y. (2007). Outward Foreign Direct Investment as Escape Response to Home Country Institutional Constraints. Journal of International Business Studies, 38(4), 579–594.Google Scholar
  84. Zaheer, S. (1995). Overcoming the liability of foreignness. Academy of Management Journal, 38(2), 341–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Zanetti, O., & García, A. (1976). United Fruit Company: Un caso de dominio imperialista en Cuba. Havana: Editorial de Ciencias Sociales.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Gabler Verlag 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Business Administration, College of BusinessUniversity of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignChampaignUSA
  2. 2.School of BusinessUniversity of KansasLawrenceUSA

Personalised recommendations