Management International Review

, Volume 53, Issue 2, pp 169–187 | Cite as

Practicing what We Preach

The Geographic Diversity of Editorial Boards
Research Article

Abstract

  • With the increasing globalisation of knowledge and management education, it is important that we build on our scanty understanding of trends and levels of geographic diversification in editorial board membership of management journals.

  • Our study examines geographic diversity in editorial boards in Management over a 20-year period. It uses secondary data from 57 journals covering approximately 16,000 editorial board members.

  • We found that the geographic diversity of editorial boards (EBs) has increased in the last 20 years, but it is still low for most management journals. Further, two factors partly predict the geographic diversity of EBs of management journals: the editor’s country of residence and the field of research.

  • Continued active management by editors, professional associations and individual academics alike is necessary to ensure that our editorial boards properly reflect the diverse management community.

Keywords

Editorial boards Geographic diversity Management journals Globalisation 

References

  1. Altbach, P. G., & Teichler, U. (2001). Internationalization and exchanges in a globalized university.Journal of Studies in International Education, 5(1), 5–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baruch, Y. (2001). Global or North American?International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, 1(1), 109–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bedeian, A. G. (2004). Peer review and the social construction of knowledge in the management discipline.Academy of Management Learning & Education, 3(2), 198–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bedeian, A. G., Van Fleet, D. D., & Hyman III, H. H. (2009). Scientific achievement and editorial board membership.Organizational Research Methods, 12(2), 211–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Braun, T., & Diospatonyi, I. (2005). The counting of core journal gatekeepers as science indicators really counts.Scientometrics, 62(3), 297–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Burgess, T. F., & Shaw, N. E. (2010). Editorial board membership of management and business journals: A social network analysis study of the financial times 40.British Journal of Management, 21(3), 627–648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cohen, J., & Cohen, P. (1983).Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.Google Scholar
  8. Daft, R. L., & Lewin, A. Y. (2008). Rigor and relevance in organization studies: Idea migration and academic journal evolution.Organization Science, 19(1), 177–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ellis, P. D., & Zhan, G. (2011). How international are the international business journals?International Business Review, 20(1), 100–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Feldman, D. C. (2008). Building and maintaining a strong editorial board and cadre of ad hoc reviewers. In Y. Baruch, A. M. Konrad, H. Aguinins, & W. H. Starbuck (Eds.),Opening the black box of editorship (pp. 68–74). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  11. Hodgson, G. M., & Rothman, H. (1999). The editors and authors in economics journals: A case of institutional oligopoly?The Economics Journal, 109(453), F165–F186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ibarra, H. (1995). Race, opportunity, and diversity of social circles in managerial networks.Academy of Management Journal, 38(3), 673–703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Joshi, A., Liao, H., & Rao, H. (2010). Bridging domains in workplace demography research.Journal of Management published Online First. doi:10.1177/0149206310372969.Google Scholar
  14. Kirkman, B. L., Rosen, B., Gibson, C. B., Tesluk, P. E., & McPherson, S. O. (2002). Five challenges to virtual team success.Academy of Management Executive, 16(3), 67–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Konrad. (2008). Knowledge creation and the journal editor’s role. In Y. Baruch, A. M. Konrad, H. Aguinins, & W. H. Starbuck (Eds.),Opening the black box of editorship (pp. 3–15). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  16. Lukka, K., & Kasanen, E. (1996). Is accounting a global or a local discipline?Accounting Organizations and Society, 21(7), 755–773.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Metz, I., & Harzing, A. W. K. (2009). Women in editorial boards of management journals.Academy of Management Learning & Education, 8(4), 540–557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Miller, C. C. (2006). Peer review in the organizational and management sciences.Academy of Management Journal, 49(3), 425–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Mingers, J., & Harzing, A. W. K. (2007). Ranking journals in business and management: A statistical analysis of the Harzing Dataset.European Journal of Information Systems, 16(4), 303–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Özbilgin, M. (2004). ‘International’ human resource management: Academic parochialism in editorial boards of the ‘top’22 journals on international human resource management.Personnel Review, 33(2), 205–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Pérez-Batres, L. A., Pisani, M. J., & Doh, J. P. (2010). A perspective on international business scholarship: Is it regional or global?Multinational Business Review, 18(1), 73–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Polonsky, M. J., Garma, R., & Mittelstaedt, J. D. (2006). An examination of the globalization of authorship in publishing in 20 leading marketing journals.European Business Review, 18(6), 437–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Portes, A. (1998). Social capital.Annual Review of Sociology, 24(1), 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Raelin, J. A. (2008). Refereeing the game of peer review.Academy of Management Learning & Education, 7(1), 124–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Robinson, G., & Dechant, K. (1997). Building a business case for diversity.Academy of Management Executive, 11(3), 21–31.Google Scholar
  26. Rosentreich, D., & Wooliscroft, B. (2006). How international are the top academic journals? The case of marketing.European Business Review, 18(6), 422–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Smith, A. L. (1991).Innovative employee communication. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  28. Stremersch, S., & Verhoef, P. C. (2005). Globalization of authorship in the marketing discipline: Does it help or hinder the field?Marketing Science, 24(4), 585–594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Svensson, G. (2005). Ethnocentricity in top marketing journals.Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 23(5), 422–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Thomas, A. S., Shenkar, O., & Clarke, L. (1994).The globalization of our mental maps: Evaluating the geographic scope of JIBS coverage. Journal of International Business Studies, 25(4), 675–686.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Tsoukas, H. (2008). Developing a global journal. In Y. Baruch, A. M. Konrad, H. Aguinins, & W. H. Starbuck (Eds.),Opening the black box of editorship (pp. 167–175). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  32. Tung, R. L. (2006). North American research agenda and methodologies: Past imperfect, future—limitless possibilities.Asian Business & Management, 5(1), 23–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Uzun, A. (2004). Assessing internationality of scholarly journals through foreign authorship patterns: The case of major journals in information science, and scientometrics.Scientometrics, 61(3), 457–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Vincent-Lancrin, S. (2006). What is changing in academic research? Trends and futures scenarios.European Journal of Education, 41(2), 169–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Zitt, M., & Bassecoulard, E. (2004). Internationalisation in science in the prism of bibliometric indicators. In H. F. Moed et al. (Eds.),Handbook of quantitative science and technology research (pp. 407–436). Dordrecht (the Netherlands): Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Gabler Verlag 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Management, Faculty of Business & EconomicsUniversity of MelbourneParkvilleAustralia
  2. 2.Melbourne Business SchoolUniversity of MelbourneCarltonAustralia

Personalised recommendations