Management International Review

, Volume 52, Issue 3, pp 317–340 | Cite as

Ranking International Business Institutions and Faculty Members Using Research Publication as the Measure

Update and Extension of Prior Research
Research Article

Abstract

  • This study measures and ranks the productivity of academic institutions and faculty members based on the number of publications appearing in the top three core international business journals between 2001 and 2009.

  • This research serves as a useful update and extension of studies by Morrison and Inkpen (1991), Inkpen and Beamish (1994), and Kumar and Kundu (2004), which examined the top three international business journals, namely,Management International Review,Journal of International Business Studies, andJournal of World Business.

  • Copenhagen Business School, University of Miami, and University of Leeds (among institutions), and Yadong Luo, Peter J. Buckley, and Alain Verbeke (among authors) occupy the top three positions.

Keywords

International business Leading journals Publication Ranking Authors 

References

  1. Acedo, F. J., & Casillas, J. C. (2005). Current paradigms in the international management field: An author co-citation analysis.International Business Review, 14(5), 616–639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allison, P. D., & Stewart, J. A. (1974). Productivity differences among scientists: Evidence for accumulative advantage.American Sociological Review, 39(4), 596–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baden-Fuller, C., Ravazzolo, F., & Schweizer, T. (2000). Making and measuring reputations: The research ranking of European business schools.Long Range Planning, 33(5), 621–650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cantwell, J., Glac, K., & Harding, R. (2004). The Internationalization of R&D—the Swiss Case.Management International Review, 44(3), 57–82.Google Scholar
  5. Carter, C. R., Liane, E. P., Vellenga, D. B., & Allen, B. (2009). Affiliation of authors in transportation and logistics academic journals: A reevaluation.Transportation Journal, 48(1), 42–52.Google Scholar
  6. Caruana, A., Pitt, L. F., Berthon, P. R., & Page, M. J. (2009). Differentiation and silver medal winner effects.European Journal of Marketing, 43(11/12), 1365–1377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chan, K. C., Fung, H-G., & Lai, P. (2005). Membership of editorial boards and rankings of schools with international business orientation.Journal of International Business Studies, 36(4), 452–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chan, K. C., Fung, H-G, & Leung, W. K. (2006). International business research: Trends and school rankings.International Business Review, 15(4), 317–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chandy, P. R., & Williams, T. (1994). The impact of journals & authors on international business research: A citation analysis of JIBS articles.Journal of International Business Studies, 25(4), 715–728.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chung, K. H., & Cox, R. A. (1990). Patterns of productivity in the finance literature: A study of the bibliometric distributions.Journal of Finance, 45(1), 301–309.Google Scholar
  11. Contractor, F. J., Hsu, C-C., & Kundu, S. K. (2005). Explaining export performance: A comparative study of international new ventures in Indian and Taiwanese software industry.Management International Review, 45(3), 83–110.Google Scholar
  12. Coudounaris, D., Kvasova, O., Leonidou, L. C., Pitt, L. F., & Nel, D. (2009). Fifteen good years: An analysis of publications in management international review.Management International Review, 49(5), 671–684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Devinney, T., Dowling, G. R., Nidthida Perm-ajchariyawong, N. (2008). The Financial Times business schools ranking: What quality is this signal of quality?European Management Review, 5(4), 195–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. DuBois, F. L., & Reeb, D. M. (2000). Ranking the international business journals.Journal of International Business Studies, 31(4), 689–704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Elsbach, K. D., & Kramer, R. M. (1996). Members’ responses to organizational identity threats: Encountering and countering the business week rankings.Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(3), 442–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Espeland, W. N., & Sauder, M. (2007). Rankings and reactivity: How public measures recreate social worlds.American Journal of Sociology, 113(1), 1–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fu, P., Kennedy, J., Tata, J., Yukl, G., et al. (2004). The impact of societal cultural values and individual social beliefs on the perceived effectiveness of managerial influence strategies: A Meso approach.Journal of International Business Studies, 35(4), 284–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Graves, P. E., Marchand, J. R., & Thompson, R. (1982). Economics departmental rankings: Research incentives, constraints, and efficiency.The American Economic Review, 72(5), 1131–1141.Google Scholar
  19. Griffith, D. A., Cavusgil, S. T., & Xu, S. (2008). Emerging themes in international business research.Journal of International Business Studies, 39(7), 1220–1235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Grove, W. A., & Wu, S. (2007). The search for economics talent: Doctoral completion and research productivity.The American Economic Review, 97(2), 506–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hofstede, G., Van Deusen, C. A., Mueller, C. B., & Charles, T. A. (2002). What goals do business leaders pursue? A study in fifteen countries.Journal of International Business Studies, 33(4), 785–803.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Inkpen, A. C., & Beamish, P. W. (1994). An analysis of twenty-five years of research in the journal.Journal of International Business Studies, 25(4), 703–713.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kogut, B. (2008). Rankings, schools, and final reflections on ideas and taste.European Management Review, 5(4), 191–194.Google Scholar
  24. Kumar, V., & Kundu, S. (2004). Ranking the international business schools: Faculty publication as the measure.Management International Review, 44(2), 213–228.Google Scholar
  25. Lahiri, S. (2011). India-focused publications in leading international business journals.Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 28(2), 427–447.Google Scholar
  26. Linton, J. D. (2004). Research-technology management ranked No. 3 in citation study.Research Technology Management, 47(3), 5–6.Google Scholar
  27. Lu, J. W. (2003). The evolving contributions in international strategic management research.Journal of International Management, 9(2), 193–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Macharzina, K., Wolf, J., & Oesterle, M.-J. (1993). Quantitative evaluation of German research output in business administration.Management International Review, 33(1), 65–83.Google Scholar
  29. Macharzina, K., Wolf, J., & Rohn, A. (2004). Quantitative evaluation of German research output in business administration: 1992–2001.Management International Review, 44(3), 335–359.Google Scholar
  30. Mills, J. H., Weatherbee, T. G., & Colwell, S. R. (2006). Ethnostatistics and sensemaking: Making sense of university and business school rankings.Organizational Research Methods, 9(4), 491–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Mitra, D., & Golder, P. N. (2008). Does academic research help or hurt MBA programs?Journal of Marketing, 72(5), 31–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Morgan, E. J., & Fai, F. M. (2007). Innovation, competition and change in international business: Emergent research trajectories.Management International Review, 47(5), 631–638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Morrison, A., & Inkpen, A. (1991). An analysis of significant contributions to the international business literature.Journal of International Business Studies, 22(1), 143–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Mudambi, R., Peng, M. W., & Weng, D. H. (2008). Research rankings of Asia Pacific business schools: Global versus local knowledge strategies.Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 25(2), 171–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Newburry, W., Gardberg, N. A., & Belkin, L. Y. (2006). Organizational attractiveness is in the eye of the beholder: The interaction of demographic characteristics with foreignness.Journal of International Business Studies, 37(5), 666–686.Google Scholar
  36. Pisani, N. (2009). International management research: Investigating its recent diffusion in top management journals.Journal of Management, 35(2), 199–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Quer, D., Enrique, C., & Rienda, L. (2007). Business and management in China: A review of empirical research in leading international journals.Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 24(3), 359–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Ralston, D. A., Egri, C. P., De La Garza Carranza, M. T., Ramburuth, P., et al. (2009). Ethical preferences for influencing superiors: A 41-society study.Journal of International Business Studies, 40(6), 1022–1045.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Sauder, M., & Espeland, W. N. (2009). The discipline of rankings: Tight coupling and organizational change.American Sociological Review, 74(1), 63–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Starbuck, W. H. (2005). How much better are the most-prestigious journals? The statistics of academic publication.Organization Science, 16(2), 180–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Strange, R., Filatotchev, I., Buck, T., & Wright, M. (2009). Corporate governance and international business.Management International Review, 49(4), 395–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Sweitzer, K., & Volkwein, J. F. (2009). Prestige among graduate and professional schools: Comparing the US News’ graduate school reputation ratings between disciplines.Research in Higher Education, 50(8), 812–836.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Tracy, J., & Waldfogel, J. (1997). The best business schools: A market-based approach.Journal of Business, 70(1), 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Trevino, L. J., Mixon Jr., F. G., Funk, C. A., & Inkpen, A. C. (2010). A perspective on the state of the field: International business publications in the elite journals as a measure of institutional and faculty productivity.International Business Review, 19(4), 378–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Waldman, D. A., de Luque, M. S., Washburn, N., House, R. J., et al. (2006). Cultural and leadership predictors of corporate social responsibility values of top management: A GLOBE study of 15 countries.Journal of International Business Studies, 37(6), 823–837.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Wang, C., Clegg, J., & Kafouros, M. (2009). Country-of-origin effects of foreign direct investment: An industry level analysis.Management International Review, 49(2), 179–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Wedlin, L. (2007). The role of rankings in codifying a business school template: Classifications, diffusion and mediated isomorphism in organizational fields.European Management Review, 4(1), 24–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Werner, S. (2002). Recent developments in international management research: A review of 20 top management journals.Journal of Management, 28(3), 277–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Werner, S., & Brouthers, L. E. (2002). How international is management?Journal of International Business Studies, 33(3), 583–591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Willcocks, L, Whitley, E. A., & Avgerou, C. (2008). The ranking of top IS journals: A perspective from the London School of Economics.European Journal of Information Systems, 17(2), 163–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Xu, S., Yalcinkaya, G., & Seggie, S. (2008). Prolific authors and institutions in leading international business journals.Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 25(2), 189–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Zivney, T. L., & Bertin, W. J. (1992). Publish or perish: What the competition is really doing.The Journal of Finance, 47(1), 295–329.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Gabler Verlag 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Discipline of International Business, School of BusinessUniversity of SydneySydneyAustralia
  2. 2.Department of Management and Quantitative Methods, College of BusinessIllinois State UniversityNormalUSA

Personalised recommendations