Management International Review

, Volume 50, Issue 5, pp 559–583 | Cite as

Cultural Accommodation and Language Priming

Competitive versus Cooperative Behavior in a Prisoner’s Dilemma Game
  • Dirk Akkermans
  • Anne-Wil Harzing
  • Arjen van Witteloostuijn
Research Article

Abstract

  • This paper explores three arguments. First, cultural accommodation by living in another culture for a while may have a long-lasting but partially dormant influence on behavior. Second, foreign language is a prime, activating behavior associated with this language. Third, a foreign language is expected to be a particularly forceful prime for those who have lived in a country where this language is spoken. We explore this logic in a prisoner’s dilemma quasi-experiment that focuses on competitive versus cooperative behavior.

  • Testing our predictions with 358 Dutch students, we found that previous exposure to an Anglophone culture with higher values for masculinity, performance orientation and assertiveness negatively influences cooperative behavior in a prisoner’s dilemma game when the game is played in English.

Keywords

National cultures Cultural accommodation Language Competitive and cooperative behavior Prisoner’s dilemma game Quasi-experiment 

References

  1. Ashkanasy, N. M., Trevor-Roberts, E., & Earnshaw, L. (2002). The Anglo Cluster: Legacy of the British empire. Journal of World Business, 37(1), 28–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bachmann, R. M., & Witteloostuijn, A. van. (2009). Analyzing inter-organizational relationships in the context of their national business systems: A conceptual framework for comparative research. European Societies, 11(1), 49–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bello, D., Kwok, L., Radebaugh, L., Tung, R. L., & Witteloostuijn, A. van. (2009). From the editors: Student samples in international business research. Journal of International Business Studies, 40(3), 361–364.Google Scholar
  4. Boone, C., De Brabander, B., & Witteloostuijn, A. van. (1999a). The impact of personality on behavior in five prisoner’s dilemma games. Journal of Economic Psychology, 20(3), 343–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Boone, C., De Brabander, B., & Witteloostuijn, A. van. (1999b). Locus of control and strategic behavior in a prisoner’s dilemma game. Personality and Individual Differences, 27(4), 695–706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bond, M. H., & Yang, K.-S. (1982). Ethnic Affirmation versus cross-cultural accommodation: The variable impact of questionnaire language on chinese bilinguals from Hong Kong. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 13(2), 169–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brossard, M., & Maurice, M. (1976) Is there a universal model of organization structure? International Studies of Management & Organization, 6(1), 11–45.Google Scholar
  8. Camerer, C. F., & Fehr, E. (2006). When does “Economic Man” dominate social behavior? Science, 311(5757), 47–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cavanagh, J., & Mander, J. (Eds.). (2004). Alternatives to economic globalization: A better world is possible. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.Google Scholar
  10. Cook, H., & Chi, C. (1984). Cooperative behavior and locus of control among American and Chinese-American Boys. Journal of Psychology, 118(2), 169–177.Google Scholar
  11. Cook, H., & Sloane, J. (1985). Locus of control and cooperative behavior in 10-year-old children. Journal of Social Psychology, 125(5), 169–177.Google Scholar
  12. Cox, T. H., Lobel, S. A., & McLeod, P. L. (1991). Effects of ethnic group cultural differences on cooperative and competitive behavior on a group task. Academy of Management Journal, 34(4), 827–847.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Crystal, D. (2002). The Cambridge encyclopedia of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Dawes, R. M. (1980). Social dilemmas. Annual Review of Psychology, 31, 169–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Farmer, R. N., & Richman, B. M. (1965). Comparative management and economic progress. Homewood: Irwin.Google Scholar
  16. Feely, A., & Harzing, A. W. K. (2003) Language management in multinational companies. Cross-Cultural Management, 10(2), 37–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fehr, E., & Gaechter, S. (2002). Altruistic punishment in humans. Nature, 415(6868), 137–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Frank, R. H., Gilovich, T., & Regan, D. T. (1993). Does studying economics inhibit cooperation. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 7(2), 159–171.Google Scholar
  19. Fredriksson, R., Barner-Rasmussen, W., & Piekkari, R. (2006). The multinational corporation as a multilingual organization: The notion of a common corporate language. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 11(4), 406–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Friedman, T. L. (2005). The world is flat: A brief history of the twenty-first century. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar
  21. Guiso, L., Sapienza, P., & Zingales, L. (2003). People’s opium? Religion and economic attitudes. Journal of Monetary Economics, 50(1), 225–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hall, P. A., & Soskice, D. W. (2001). Varieties of capitalism: The institutional foundations of comparative advantage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Harzing, A. W. K., Maznevski, M., & Ten country collaborators. (2002). The interaction between language and culture: A test of the cultural accommodation hypothesis in seven countries. Language and Intercultural Communication, 2(2), 120–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Harzing, A. W. K., & 32 country collaborators. (2005). The use of english questionnaires in cross-national research: Does cultural accommodation obscure national differences? International Journal of Cross-Cultural Management, 5(2), 213–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values. London: SAGE.Google Scholar
  26. Hofstede, G. (1998). Masculinity and femininity: The taboo dimension of national cultures. London: SAGE.Google Scholar
  27. Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations. London: SAGE.Google Scholar
  28. Hong, Y. Y., Benet-Martinez, V., Chiu, C.-Y., & Morris, M. W. (2003). Boundaries of Cultural Influence: Construct activation as a mechanism for cultural differences in social perception. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 34(4), 453–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. House, R. J., Hanges, P. J., Javidan, M., Dorfman, P. W., & Gupta, V. (2004). Culture, leadership, and organizations. Thousand Oaks. London, New Delhi: SAGE.Google Scholar
  30. Hulin, C. L., & Mayer, L. J. (1986). Psychometric Equivalence of a Translation of the Job Descriptive Index into Hebrew. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71(1), 83–94.Google Scholar
  31. Iterson, A. van. (2001). Rules of action in dutch work organizations. The Netherlands Journal of Social Sciences, 36(2), 176–187.Google Scholar
  32. Jackson, G., & Deeg, R. (2008). Comparing capitalisms: Understanding institutional diversity and its implications for international business. Journal of International Business Studies, 39(4), 540–561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Janssens, M., Lambert, J., & Steyaert, C. (2004). Developing language strategies for international companies: The contribution of translation studies. Journal of World Business, 39(4), 414–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kemmelmeier, M., & Cheng, B. Y.-M. (2004). Language and self-construal priming: A replication and extension in a Hong Kong sample. Journal of Cross-cultural Psychology, 35(6), 705–712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Klein, N. (2000). No logo, no space, no choice, no jobs: Taking aim at the brand bullies. London: Flamingo.Google Scholar
  36. Lane, H. W., DiStefano, J. J., & Maznevski, M. L. (1997). International management behavior (3rd ed.). Cambridge: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  37. Laurent, A. (1983). The cultural diversity of western concepts of management. International Studies of Management & Organization, 13(1–2), 75–96.Google Scholar
  38. Legrain, P. (2002). Open world: The truth about globalization. London: Abacus.Google Scholar
  39. Lester, D. (1992). Cooperative, competitive strategies and locus of control. Psychological Reports, 71(2), 594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Luo, Y., & Shenkar, O. (2006). The multinational corporation as a multilingual community: Language and organization in a global context. Journal of International Business Studies, 37(3), 321–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Luo, Y., Shenkar, O., & Gurnani, H. (2008). Control-cooperation interfaces in global strategic alliances: A situational typology and strategic responses. Journal of International Business Studies, 39(3), 428–453.Google Scholar
  42. Marschan-Piekkari, R., Welch, D., & Welch, L. (1999). Adopting a common corporate language: IHRM implications. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 10(3), 377–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Mason, C. F., Phillips, O. R., & Clifford, N. (1991). Duopoly behavior in asymmetric markets: An experimental evaluation. Review of Economics and Statistics, 74(4), 662–670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. McSweeney, B. (2002). Hofstede’s model of national cultural differences and their consequences: A triumph of faith—a failure of analysis. Human Relations, 55(1), 89–118.Google Scholar
  45. Oberg, W. (1963). Cross-cultural perspectives on management principles. Academy of Management Journal, 6(2), 129–143.Google Scholar
  46. Olivas-Luján, M. R., Harzing, A. W. K., & McCoy, S. (2004) September 11, 2001: Two quasi-experiments on the influence of threats on cultural values and cosmopolitanism. International Journal of Cross-Cultural Management, 4(2), 211–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Ostrom, E. (2007). A diagnostic approach for going beyond panaceas. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104(39), 15181–15187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Oyserman, D., Coon, H. M., & Kemmelmeier, M. (2002). Rethinking individualism and collectivism: Evolution of theoretical assumptions and meta-analyses. Psychological Bulletin, 128(1), 3–72.Google Scholar
  49. Pennycook, A. (1994). The cultural politics of english as an international language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
  50. Pudelko, M., & Harzing, A. W. K. (2007). Country-of-origin, localization or dominance effect? An empirical investigation of HRM practices in foreign subsidiaries. Human Resource Management, 46(4), 535–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Pruitt, D., & Kimmel, M. (1977). Twenty years of experimental gaming: Critique, synthesis, and suggestions for the future. Annual Review of Psychology, 28, 363–392.Google Scholar
  52. Raiffa, H. (1982). The art and science of negotiation. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  53. Ralston, D. A., Cunniff, M. K., & Gustafson, D. J. (1995). Cultural accommodation: The effect of language on the response of bilingual HongKong Chinese managers. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 26(6), 714–727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Rapoport, A., Guyer, M., & Gordon, D. (1976). The 2 ´ 2 game. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  55. Rasmusen, E. (1990). Games and information: An introduction to game theory (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  56. Ronen, S., & Shenkar, O. (1985). Clustering countries on attitudinal dimensions: A review and synthesis. Academy of Management Review, 10(3), 435–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Rotter, J. B. (1966). Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 80(609), (whole issue).Google Scholar
  58. Schwartz, S. H. (1999). A theory of cultural values and some implications for work. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 48(1), 23–47.Google Scholar
  59. Smith, C., & Meiksins, P. (1995). System, society and dominance effects in cross-national organisational analysis. Work, Employment and Society, 9(2), 241–267.Google Scholar
  60. Tadmor, C. T., & Tetlock, P. E. (2006). Biculturalism: A model of the effects of second-culture exposure on acculturation and integrative complexity. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 37(2), 173–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Tayeb, M. H. (1988). Organizations and national culture. London: SAGE.Google Scholar
  62. Trafimow, D., Silverman, E. S., Fan, R. M.-T., & Law, J. S. F. (1997). The effects of language and priming on the relative accessibility of the private self and the collective self. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 28(1), 107–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Trompenaars, A. (1993). Riding the waves of culture: Understanding cultural diversity in business. London: Nicholas Brealey Publishing.Google Scholar
  64. Tsuda, Y. (2002). The Hegemony of English: Problems, opposing views and communication rights. In G. Mazzaferro (Ed.), The English language and power. Alessandria: Edizioni dell’Orso.Google Scholar
  65. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (2000). Loss aversion in riskless choice: A reference-dependent model. In D. Kahneman & A. Tversky (Eds.), Choices, values, and frames. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  66. Usunier, J.-C. (1998). International and cross-cultural management research. London: SAGE.Google Scholar
  67. Vunderink, M., & Hofstede, G. (1998). Femininity shock. American students in the Netherlands. In G. H. Hofstede (Ed.), Masculinity and femininity: The taboo dimension of national cultures. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  68. Webber, R. A. (1969). Culture and management: Text and readings in comparative management. Homewood: Irwin.Google Scholar
  69. Whitley, R. (1999). Divergent capitalisms: The social structuring and change of business systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  70. Yang, K. S., & Bond, M. H. (1980). Ethnic affirmation by chinese bilinguals. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 11(4), 411–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Zorn, C. J. W. (2001). Generalized estimating equation models for correlated data: A review with applications. American Journal of Political Science, 45(2), 470–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Gabler Verlag 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dirk Akkermans
    • 1
  • Anne-Wil Harzing
    • 2
  • Arjen van Witteloostuijn
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of International Economics & BusinessUniversity of GroningenGroningenThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Department of Management and MarketingUniversity of MelbourneParkvilleAustralia
  3. 3.Department of ManagementUniversity of AntwerpAntwerpBelgium

Personalised recommendations