Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Geographic Orientation and Performance

Evidence from British Exporters

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Management International Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

  • The main objectives of the study are to investigate the regional competitive orientation of British exporting SMEs, to explore the relationship between the firm’s level of geographic diversification and its organizational characteristics and to assess the nature of the international (geographic) diversification/export performance nexus.

  • The main contribution of this study is in providing novel empirical evidence on the degree of regional orientation among British exporting SMEs and its implications for their performance.

  • The findings imply that while British exporters are predominantly regional in their geographic spread, they might be more multi-regional and global oriented than previously thought.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Annavarjula, M., & Beldona, S. (2000). Multinationality-performance relationship: A review and reconceptualization. The International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 8(1), 48–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong, J. S., & Overton, T. (1977). Estimating non-response bias in mail surveys. Journal of Marketing Research, 14(3), 396–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Attiyeh, R., & Wenner, D. (1981). Critical mass: Key to export profits. McKinsey Quarterly, 45(11), 73–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Billkey, W. J., & Tesar, G. (1977). The export behaviour of smaller wisconsin manufacturing firms. Journal of International Business Studies, 8(1), 93–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cattell, R. B. (1966). The meaning and strategic use of factor analysis. In R. B. Cattell (Ed.), Handbook of multivariate experimental psychology (pp. 174–244). Chicago: Rand McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavusgil, S. T. (1982). On the nature of decision making for export marketing. In S. D. Hunt & R. Bush (Eds.), Marketing theory: Philosophy of science perspectives (pp. 276–286). Chicago: American Marketing Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Contractor, F. (2007). Is international business good for companies? The evolutionary or multi-stage theory of internationalization vs. the transaction cost perspective. Focused issue on internationalization and firm performance. Management International Review, 47(3), 453–475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, R. G., & Kleinschmidt, E. J. (1985). The impact of export strategy on export sales performance. Journal of International Business Studies, 16(1), 37–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crick, D. (1995). An investigation into the targeting of UK export assistance. European Journal of Marketing, 29(8), 76–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crick, D., Bradshaw, R., & Chaudhry, S. (2002). An investigation into the overseas market servicing strategies of queen’s award for export winners: Revisiting the concentration versus spreading debate. Marketing Intelligence and Planning, 20(6), 370–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Czinkota, M. R. (1982). Export development strategies: US promotion policies. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Day, A. J. (1976). Exporting for profit. London: Graham and Trotman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delios, A., & Beamish, P. W. (2005). Regional and global strategies of japanese firms. Management International Review, 45(1), 19–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denis, D. J., Denis, D. K., & Yost, K. (2002). Global diversification, industrial diversification, and firm value. Journal of Finance, 57, 1951–1979.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dillman, D. A. (2000). Mail and internet surveys: The tailored design method. New York: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enright, M. (2005). Regional management centers in the Asia-Pacific. Management International Review, 45(1), 59–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Filippaios, F., & Rama, R. (2008). Globalisation or regionalisation? The strategies of the world’s largest food and beverage MNEs. European Management Journal, 26(1), 59–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geringer, J. M., Beamish, P. W., & daCosta, R. C. (1989). Diversification strategy and internationalization. Strategic Management Journal, 10(2), 109–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghemawat, P. (2001). Distance still matters: The hard reality of global expansion. Harvard Business Review, 79(September), 137–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghemawat, P. (2003). Semiglobalization and international business strategy. Journal of International Business Studies, 34(2), 138–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghemawat, P. (2005). Regional strategies for global leadership. Harvard Business Review, 83(December), 98–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goerzen, A., & Asmussen, C. (2007). The geographic orientation of multinational enterprises and its implications for performance. In A. M. Rugman (Ed.), Regional aspects of multinationality and performance, Research in Global Strategic Management (13, pp. 65–83). Oxford: Elsevier.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Goerzen, A., & Beamish, P. W. (2003). Geographic scope and multinational enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 24(13), 1289–1306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammermesh, R. G., Anderson, M. J., & Harris, J. E. (1978). Strategies for low market share businesses. Harvard Business Review, 56(May/June), 95–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hennart, J.-F. (2007). The theoretical rationale for a multinationality/performance relationship. Focused issue on internationalization and firm performance. Management International Review, 47(3), 423–452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch, S., & Lev, B. (1973). Foreign marketing strategies. Management International Review, 9(6), 81–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hitt, M. A., Hoskisson, R. E., & Kim, H. (1997). International diversification: Effects on innovation and firm performance. Academy of Management Journal, 40(4), 767–798.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johanson, J., & Vahlne, J. E. (1977). The internationalization process of the firm—A model of knowledge development and increasing foreign market commitments. Journal of International Business Studies, 8(1), 23–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johanson, J., & Vahlne, J. E. (1978). A model for the decision making affecting the pattern and pace of internationalization of the firm. In M. Ghertman & J. Leontiades (Eds.), European Research in International Business (pp. 283–305). New York: Croom Helm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johanson, J., & Vahlne, J. E. (1990). The mechanism of internationalization. International Marketing Review, 7(4), 11–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johanson, J., & Wiedersheim-Paul, F. (1975). The internationalization of the firm—Four Swedish cases. Journal of Management Studies, 12(3), 305–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, W., Hwang, P., & Burgers, W. (1989). Global diversification strategy and corporate profit performance. Strategic Management Journal, 10(1), 45–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, C. S., & Yang, Y. S. (1990). Impact of export market expansion strategy on export performance. International Marketing Review, 7, 41–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, L. (2005). Is regional strategy more effective than global strategy in the US service industries? Management International Review, 45(S1), 37–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, L. (2007). Multinationality and performance: A synthetic review and research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 9(2), 117–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lim, J., Sharkey, T. W., & Kim, K. I. (1991). An empirical test of an export adoption model. Management International Review, 31(1), 51–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, T. L. (2004, July 10–13). A longitudinal review and analysis of past research on international diversification. Paper presented at the Academy of International Business Annual Meeting.

  • Oh, C. H., & Rugman, A. (2006). Regional sales of multinationals in the world cosmetics industry. European Management Journal, 24(2), 163–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piercy, N. F. (1981). Export strategy: Concentration on key markets versus market spreading. Journal of International Marketing (UK), 1(1), 56–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rugman, A. M. (2000). The end of globalization. London: Random House Business Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rugman, A. M. (2005). The regional multinationals: MNEs and global strategic management. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rugman, A. M., & D’Cruz, J. (2000). Multinationals as flagship firms: Regional business networks. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rugman, A. M., & Girod, S. (2003). Retail multinationals and globalization: The evidence is regional. European Management Journal, 21(1), 24–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rugman, A. M., & Verbeke, A. (2004). A perspective on regional and global strategies of multinational enterprises. Journal of International Business Studies, 35(1), 3–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rugman, A. M., & Verbeke, A. (2007). Liabilities of regional foreignness and the use of firm-level versus country-level data: A response to Dunning et al. (2007). Journal of International Business Studies, 38(1), 200–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rugman, A. M., Kudina, A., & Yip, G. S. (2007). The regional dimension of UK multinationals. In A. M. Rugman (Ed.), Regional aspects of multinationality and performance, research in global strategic management (13, pp. 297–315). Oxford: Elsevier.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ruigrok, W., Amann, W., & Wagner, H. (2007). The internationalization-performance relationship at Swiss firms: A test of the S-Shape and extreme degrees of internationalization. Management International Review, 47(3), 349–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schlie, E., & Yip, G. S. (2000). Regional follows global: Strategy mixes in the world automotive industry. European Management Journal, 18(4), 343–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, D. (1994). Measuring the degree of internationalization of a firm. Journal of International Business Studies, 25(2), 325–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tallman, S., & Li, J. (1996). Effects of international diversity and product diversity on the performance of multinational firms. Academy of Management Journal, 39(1), 179–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tessler, A. (1977). Alternative strategies and the key market principle. Conference sponsored by the London Chamber of Commerce and Industry and the Institute of Export, Graham and Trotman Ltd., pp. 6–17.

  • Tookey, D. (1975). Export marketing decisions. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vachani, S. (1991). Distinguishing between related and international geographic diversification: A competitive measure of global diversification. Journal of International Business Studies, 22(2), 307–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vermeulen, F., & Barkema, H. (2002). Pace, rhythm, and scope: Process dependence in building a profitable multinational corporation. Strategic Management Journal, 23(7), 637–653.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, H., & Ruigrok, W. (2004). Internationalization and firm performance: Meta-analytic review and future directions. Paper presented at the Academy of International Business 46th Annual Meeting, Stockholm, Sweden.

  • Yin, E., & Choi, C. J. (2005). The globalization myth: The case of China. Management International Review, 45(Special Issue 1), 103–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zou, S., Taylor, C. R., & Osland, G. E. (1998). The EXPERF scale: A cross-national generalised export performance measure. Journal of International Marketing, 6(3), 37–58.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Management, Henley Business School, University of Reading, Reading, UK

    Elena Beleska-Spasova

  2. Management School, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK

    Keith W. Glaister

Authors
  1. Elena Beleska-Spasova
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Keith W. Glaister
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elena Beleska-Spasova.

Appendix A: Composite Measure of Export Performance

Appendix A: Composite Measure of Export Performance

Please indicate the extent to which you agree with each of the following statements, on a scale of 1 (Strongly disagree) to 5 (Strongly agree)

Table 8
Full size table

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Beleska-Spasova, E., Glaister, K.W. Geographic Orientation and Performance. Manag Int Rev 50, 533–557 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11575-010-0052-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11575-010-0052-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation