Skip to main content
Log in

An evolutionary stage model of outsourcing and competence destruction: A Triad comparison of the consumer electronics industry

  • Published:
Management International Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Abstract and Key Results

  1. Outsourcing has gained much prominence in managerial practice and academic discussions in the last two decades or so. Yet, we still do not understand the full implications of outsourcing strategy for corporate performance. No general explanation has so far been provided for how outsourcing could lead to deterioration in a firm’s competence base. We longitudinally analyze three cases of major consumer electronics manufacturers, Emerson Radio from the U.S., Japan’s Sony and Philips from the Netherlands to understand the dynamic process related to their sourcing strategies.

  2. We develop an evolutionary stage model that relates outsourcing to competence development inside the firm and shows that a vicious cycle may emerge. The evolutionary stage model helps managers understand for which activities and under which conditions outsourcing across borders is not a viable option.

  3. Results suggest that each of these firms had faced a loss of manufacturing competitiveness in its home country, to which it responded by offshoring and then outsourcing production. When a loss of competences occurred, some outsourcing decisions were reversed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • AFX News (ed.), Sony May Sell More Production Plants after Solectron Deal, AFX News, October 18, 2000.

  • Barney, J. B., How A Firm’s Capabilities Affect Boundary Decisions, Sloan Management Review, 40,3, 1999, pp. 137–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bettis, R., Bradley, S. and Hamel, G., Outsourcing and Industrial Decline, Academy of Management Executive, 6,1, 1991, pp. 7–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandler, A., Inventing the Electronic Century, New York: Free Press 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cusumano, M. A., Manufacturing Innovation: Lessons from the Japanese Auto Industry, Sloan Management Review, 30,1, 1988, pp. 29–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dankbaar, B., Global Sourcing and Innovation: The Consequences of Losing both Organizational and Geographical Proximity, European Planning Studies, 15,2, 2007, pp. 271–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D’Aveni, R. A./ Ravenscraft, D. J., Economies of Integration versus Bureaucracy Costs: Does Vertical Integration Improve Performance?, Academy of Management Journal, 37,5, 1994, pp. 1167–1206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dai, X., Corporate Strategy, Public Policy and New Technologies: Philips and the Consumer Electronics Industry, London: Elsevier Science 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doig, S. J./ Ritter, R. C./ Speckhals, K./ Woolson, D., Has Outsourcing Gone Too Far?, McKinsey Quarterly, 4, 2001, pp. 22–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doz, Y. L./ Hamel, G., Alliance Advantage: The Act of Creating Value through Partnering, Boston, Massachusetts: Harvard Business School Press 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyer, J. H./ Singh, H., The Relational View: Cooperative Strategy and Sources of Interorganizational Competitive Advantage, Academy of Management Review, 23,4, 1998, pp. 660–679.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunning, J. H., The Eclectic Paradigm of International Production: A Restatement and Some Possible Replications, Journal of International Business Studies, 19,1, 1988, pp. 1–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferdows, K., Making the Most of Foreign Factories, Harvard Business Review, 75,2, 1997, pp. 73–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forbes (ed.), In Tune with Emerson, Forbes, June 15, 1954, pp. 22–23.

  • Forbes (ed.), A Dangerous Dream?, Forbes, July 20, 1981, p. 52.

  • Grossman, S. J./ Hart, O. D., The Costs and Benefits of Ownership: A Theory of Vertical and Lateral Integration, Journal of Political Economy, 94,4, 1986, pp. 691–719.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirschman, A. O., Exit, Voice, and Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations, and States, Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobides, M. G./ Winter, S. G., The Co-evolution of Capabilities and Transaction Costs: Explaining the Institutional Structure of Production, Strategic Management Journal, 26,5, 2005, pp. 395–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knickerbocker, F. T., Oligopolistic Reaction and Multinational Enterprise, Boston: Division of Research, Graduate School of Business, Harvard University 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenney, M./ Florida, R. The Transfer of Japanese Management Styles in Two US Transplant Industries: Autos and Electronics, Journal of Management Studies, 32,6, 1995, pp. 789–802.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kotabe, M., Corporate Product Policy and Innovative Behavior of European and Japanese Multinationals: An Empirical Investigation, Journal of Marketing, 54,2, 1990, pp. 19–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kotabe, M., Efficiency vs. Effectiveness Orientation of Global Sourcing Strategy: A Comparison of U.S. and Japanese Multinational Companies, Academy of Management Executive, 12,4, 1998, pp. 107–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leiblein, M. J./ Reuer, J. J./ Dalsace, F., Do Make or Buy Decisions Matter?: The Influence of Organizational Governance on Technological Performance, Strategic Management Journal, 23,9, 2002, pp. 817–833.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leroy, G., Multinational Product Strategy: A Taxonomy for Analysis of Worldwide Product Innovation and Diffusion, New York: Praeger 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehler, M., Every Which Way is Up for Emerson, Financial World, November 14–27, 1984, pp. 86–87.

  • Mol, M. J./ van Tulder, R. J. M./ Beije, P. R., The Antecedents and Performance Consequences of International Outsourcing, International Business Review, 14,5, 2005, pp. 599–617.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nikkei News (ed.), Sony’s Technological Leadership in Jeopardy, Nikkei News, October 7, 2006.

  • Nikkei Weekly (ed.), Maverick on Board to Revive Sony, Nikkei Weekly, September 16, 2003.

  • Nooteboom, B., Innovation and Inter-firm Linkages: New Implications for Policy, Research Policy, 28,8, 1999, pp. 793–805.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Partner, S., Assembled in Japan: Electrical Goods and the Making of the Japanese Consumer, University of California Press 1999.

  • Pilling, D., DVDs Made in Japan. The Financial Times, London, September 9, 2002, p. 30.

  • Porter, M. E., Competitive Strategy, New York: Free Press 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, J. B., Strategic Outsourcing: Leveraging Knowledge Capabilities, Sloan Management Review, 40,3, 1999, pp. 9–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Re, R., Playstation2 Detonation, Harvard International Review, 25,3, 2003, pp. 46–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • SinoCast China IT Watch, Sony to Reform Production Management Model in China, October 6, 2003.

  • Teece, D. J., Profiting from Technological Innovation: Implications for Integration, Collaboration, Licensing, and Public Policy, Research Policy, 15,6, 1986, pp. 285–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teece, D. J., Managing Intellectual Capital: Organizational, Strategic, and Policy Dimensions, Oxford: Oxford University Press 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teece, D. J./ Pisano, G./ Shuen, A., Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management, Strategic Management Journal, 18,7, 1997, pp. 509–533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The Economist (ed.), War Games, The Economist, April 22, 2000.

  • The Economist (ed.), Parked, The Economist, April 9, 2005.

  • The Financial Times (ed.), Sony Sells Factories in Streamlining Move, The Financial Times, October 19, 2000.

  • The New York Times (ed.), Emerson Perseveres with Heart Device, The New York Times, October 19, 1981.

  • TV Digest, Grundig Charges Push Philips Back Into Red, February 17, 1997a, pp. 12–13.

  • TV Digest, Philips Plans 2 DVD Players for Europe, June 30, 1997b, pp.14–15.

  • TV Digest, Weekly News, March–December 1988, September 21, 1998.

  • Vernon, R., The Location of Economic Activity, in Dunning, J. H. (ed.), Economic Analysis and the Multinational Enterprise, London: George Allen & Unwin 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wernerfelt, B., A Resource-based View of the Firm, Strategic Management Journal, 5,2, 1984, pp. 272–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O. E., The Economic Institutions of Capitalism, New York: Free Press 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, D., Ready to Turn the Key: Asia’s Contract Manufacturers are Poised for Japanese hand-offs, Electronic Business Asia, May 2001, http://www.eb-asia.com/EBA/issues/0105/0105c-story.htm.

  • Yu, S./ Teng, W., www.DigiTimes.com, July 2, 2001.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kotabe, M., Mol, M.J. & Ketkar, S. An evolutionary stage model of outsourcing and competence destruction: A Triad comparison of the consumer electronics industry. MANAGE. INT. REV. 48, 65–94 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11575-008-0004-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11575-008-0004-1

Key Words

Navigation