Management International Review

, Volume 46, Issue 3, pp 259–276 | Cite as

The effects of institutional ownership on corporate governance and performance: An empirical assessment in Hong Kong

  • Ji Li
  • Kevin Lam
  • Gongming Qian
  • Yongqing Fang


Using 433 publicly listed companies in Hong Kong, this study analyses how the institutional ownership of firms affects their corporate governance and performance. Our results indicate that institutional ownership exerts a direct and significant influence on corporate governance in such areas as board composition, CEO duality, leadership diversity, and ownership concentration.


Corporate Governance Partial Little Square Firm Performance Institutional Investor Management Journal 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Barkema, H. G./ Gomez-Mejia, L. R., Managerial Compensation and Firm Performance: A General Research Framework, Academy of Management Journal, 41, 2, 1998, pp. 135–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barkema, H. G./ Geroski, P./ Schwalbach, J., Managerial Compensation Strategy and Firm Performance, International Journal of Industrial Organization, 15, 1997, pp. 413–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baysinger, B. D./ Kosnik, R. D./ Turk, T. A., Effects of Board Ownership Structure on Corporate R&D Strategy, Academy of Management Journal, 34, 1991, pp. 205–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baysinger, B./ Hoskisson, R. E., The Composition of Boards of Directors and Strategic Control: Effects on Corporate Strategy, Academy of Management Review, 15, 1, 1990, pp. 72–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Birkinshaw, J./ Morrison, A./ Hulland, J., Structural and Competitive Determinants of a Global Integration Strategy, Strategic Management Journal, 16, 8, 1995, pp. 637–655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Boyd, B. K., CEO Duality and Firm Performance: A Contingency Model, Strategic Management Journal, 16, 1995, pp. 301–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cool, K./ Dierickx I., Business Strategy, Market Structure and Risk-Return Relationships: A Structural Approach, Strategic Management Journal, 10, 1989, pp. 507–522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Daily, C. M./ Dalton, D. R., CEO and Board Chair Roles Held Jointly or Separately: Much Ado about Nothing?, The Academy of Management Executive, 11, 3, 1997, pp. 11–20.Google Scholar
  9. Daily, C. M., The Relationship between Board Composition and Leadership Structure and Bankruptcy Reorganization Outcomes, Journal of Management, 21, 6, 1995, pp. 1041–1056.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Daily, C. M./ Johnson, J. L./ Ellstrand, A. E./ Dalton, D. R., Compensation Committee Composition as a Determinant of CEO Compensation, Academy of Management Journal, 41, 2, 1998, pp. 209–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dalton, D. R./ Daily, C. M./ Ellstrand, A. E./ Johnson, J. L., Meta-analysis Reviews of Board Composition, Leadership Structure, and Financial Performance, Strategic Management Journal, 19, 3, 1998, pp. 269–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. David, P./ Kochhar, R./ Levitas, E., The Effect of Institutional Investors on the Level and Mix of CEO Compensation, Academy of Management Journal, 41, 1998, pp. 200–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Davis, G. F./ Thompson, T. A., A Social Movement Perspective on Corporate Control, Administrative Science Quarterly, 39, 1994, pp. 141–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Delios A./ Beamish P. W., Geographic Scopes, Product Diversification, and the Corporate Performance of Japanese Firms, Strategic Management Journal, 20, 1999, pp. 711–727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Euroweek (Ed.), HK$10bn Tracker Sale Braves the Unknown, 626, 13, 1999.Google Scholar
  16. Fenwick, I., Techniques in Market Measurement: the Jackknife, Journal of Marketing Research, 16, 4, 1979, pp. 410–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Finkelstein, S./ D’Aveni, R.A., CEO Duality as a Double-Edged Sword: How Boards of Directors Balance Entrenchment Avoidance and Unity of Command, Academy of Management Journal, 37, 5, 1994, pp. 1079–1093.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fischel, D./ Bradley, M., The Role of Liability Rules and the Derivative Suit in Corporate Law: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis, Cornell Law Review, 71, 1986, pp. 261–283.Google Scholar
  19. Fornell C./ Bookstein F. L., Two Structural Equation Models: LISREL and PLS Applied to Consumer Exit-Voice Theory, Journal of Marketing Research, 19, 4, 1982, pp. 440–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fromson, B. D., The Big Owners Roar, Fortune, 122, 3, 1990, pp. 66–78.Google Scholar
  21. Graves, S. B., Institutional Ownership and Corporate R&D in the Computer Industry, Academy of Management Journal, 31, 1988, pp. 417–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hamlin K., Pension Bonanza, Institutional Investor, 34, 2, 2000, pp. 75–79.Google Scholar
  23. Hill, C. W. L./ Hansen, G. S., A Longitudinal Study of the Cause and Consequence of Changes in Diversification in the U. S. Pharmaceutical Industry 1977–1986, Strategic Management Journal, 12, 1991, pp. 187–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hill, C. W. L./ Snell, S. A., External Control, Corporate Strategy, and Firm Performance in Research Intensive Industries, Strategic Management Journal, 9, 1988, pp. 577–590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hoskisson, R. E./ Hitt, M. A., Strategic Control Systems and Relative R & D Investment in Large Multiproduct Firms, Strategic Management Journal, 9, 1988, pp. 605–621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hoskisson, R. E./ Johnson, R. A./ Moesel, D.D. Corporate Divestiture Intensity in Restructuring Firms: Effects of Governance, Strategy, and Performance, Academy of Management Journal, 37, 5, 1994, pp. 1207–1251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hulland, J., Use of Partial Least Squares (PLS) in Strategic Management Research: A Review of Four Recent Studies, Strategic Management Journal, 20, 2, 1999, pp. 195–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kesner, I. F., Directors’ Characteristics and Committee Membership: An Investigation of Type, Occupation, Tenure, and Gender, Academy of Management Journal, 31, 1988, pp. 66–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Li, J. T., Ownership Structure and board Composition: A Multi-Country Test of Agency Theory Predictions, Managerial and Decision Economics, 15, 4, 1994, pp. 359–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Li, J./ Qian, G../ Lam, K./ Wang, D., Breaking into China: Strategic Issues in the Chinese Market, Long Range Planning, 33, 5, 2000, pp. 675–689.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Li, J./ Lam, K./ Qian, G., Does Culture affect Behaviour and Performance of Firms: The Case of Joint Venture in China, Journal of International Business Studies, 32, 1, 2001, pp. 115–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Luoma, P./ Goodstein, J., Stakeholders and Corporate Boards: Institutional Influences on Board Composition, Academy of Management Journal, 42, 5, 1999, pp. 553–563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Mallette, P./ Fowler, K. L., Effects of Board Composition and Stock Ownership on the Adoption of “Poison Pills”, Academy of Management Journal, 35, 5, 1992.Google Scholar
  34. O’Loughlin, C./ Coenders, G., Estimation of the European Customer Satisfaction Index: Maximum Likelihood versus Partial Least Squares: Application to Postal Services, Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 9, 10, 2004, pp. 1231–1252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Pfeffer, J./ Salancik, G. R., The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective, New York: Harper & Row Publishers 1978.Google Scholar
  36. Stewart, T. A., The King is Dead, Fortune, 127, 1, 1993, pp. 34–38.Google Scholar
  37. Sundaramurthy, C./ Rechner, P. L., Conflicting Shareholder Interests: An Empirical Analysis of Fair Price Provisions, Business and Society, 36, 1, 1997, pp. 73–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Tsui, A. S./ Egan, T. D./ O’Reilly III, C. A., Being Different: Relational Demography and Organizational Attachment, Administrative Science Quarterly, 37, 3, 1992, pp. 549–579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Waddock, S. A./ Graves, S. B., The Corporate Social Performance-Financial Performance Link, Strategic Management Journal, 18, 1997, pp. 303–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Whidbee, D. A., Board Composition and Control of Shareholder Voting Rights in the Banking Industry, Financial Management, 26, 4, 1997, pp. 27–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Gabler Verlag 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ji Li
    • 1
  • Kevin Lam
    • 2
  • Gongming Qian
    • 3
  • Yongqing Fang
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Management, School of BusinessHong Kong Baptist UniversityKowloon TongHong Kong, China
  2. 2.School of AccountancyThe Chinese University of Hong KongShatinHong Kong, China
  3. 3.Department of ManagementThe Chinese University of Hong KongShatinHong Kong, China
  4. 4.Nanyang Business SchoolNanyang Technological UniversitySingapore

Personalised recommendations