Learning from failures in business model innovation: solving decision-making logic conflicts through intrapreneurial effectuation

Abstract

Established organizations need to adapt their current business models (BMs) to match dynamic changes in their environment. Alternatives to the established BM usually incorporate a different logic of how value is created, offered, and captured. When selecting and implementing the best BM alternative, organizations have to make decisions on several highly uncertain questions: What will the future look like, on what basis should we take action, how do we act under risks and limited resources, and how should we behave in light of unexpected events and towards outsiders. Firms can apply the logic of causation or that of effectuation when making these decisions. In this context, we apply a longitudinal single case study of a manufacturing company encountering a digital transformation journey. In this case study, we investigate the shift from a product-based to a smart service model and the underlying process of decision-making in the context of business model innovation (BMI). From our case study, we identify latent conflicts resulting from two different BM logics: the logic of value offering, creation, and capture of the dominant (established) BM versus that of the new one. We show that logic conflicts become especially visible when actors cannot reduce uncertainty about the new BM effectively. These conflicts finally inhibit the change of the dominant BM to the new one. Sensemaking in the company about the latent logic conflicts within the BMI process reveals the need to change its decision-making logic from managerial causation to intrapreneurial effectuation. The findings from our study contribute to entrepreneurship and institutional theory while highlighting the concept of institutional intrapreneurship for BMI. Our results suggest separating the alternative BM from the existing one. This separation can reduce cognitive uncertainty associated with BMI processes through logic pluralism, i.e., building a new decision-making logic in parallel to the old one. We contribute to the BMI literature by adding logic conflicts of BMI and the decision-making logic of an organization to the list of important contingency factors that influence the execution and outcome of a BMI process.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

References

  1. Amaratunga D, Baldry D (2001) Case study methodology as a means of theory building: performance measurement in facilities management organisations. Work Study 50:95–105

    Google Scholar 

  2. Arend RJ, Sarooghi H, Burkemper A (2015) Effectuation As Ineffectual? Applying the 3E theory-assessment framework to a proposed new theory of entrepreneurship. Acad Manag Rev 40:630–651. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2014.0455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Arnold C, Kiel D, Voigt K-I (2016) How the industrial internet of things changes business models in different manufacturing industries. Int J Innov Manag 20:1640015

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bammens Y, Voordeckers W, van Gils A (2011) Boards of directors in family businesses: a literature review and research agenda. Int J Manag Rev 13:134–152. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2010.00289.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Battilana J (2006) Agency and institutions: the enabling role of individuals’ social position. Organization 13:653–676

    Google Scholar 

  6. Battilana J, Leca B, Boxenbaum E (2009) 2 how actors change institutions: towards a theory of institutional entrepreneurship. Acad Manag Ann 3:65–107

    Google Scholar 

  7. Berends H, Jelinek M, Reymen I, Stultiëns R (2014) Product innovation processes in small firms: combining entrepreneurial effectuation and managerial causation. J Prod Innov Manag 31:616–635. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Berends H, Smits A, Reymen I, Podoynitsyna K (2016) Learning while (re)configuring: business model innovation processes in established firms. Strateg Org 14:181–219. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127016632758

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Berglund H (2015) Between cognition and discourse: phenomenology and the study of entrepreneurship. Int J Entrep Behav Res 21:472–488. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEBR-12-2013-0210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Boyatzis RE (1998) Transforming qualitative information: thematic analysis and code development. Sage, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  11. Brady HE, Collier D (eds) (2010) Rethinking social inquiry: diverse tools, shared standards, 2nd edn. Rowman and Littlefield, Lanham

    Google Scholar 

  12. Brettel M, Mauer R, Engelen A, Küpper D (2012) Corporate effectuation: entrepreneurial action and its impact on R&D project performance. J Bus Ventur 27:167–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2011.01.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Buliga O, Scheiner CW, Voigt K-I (2016) Business model innovation and organizational resilience: towards an integrated conceptual framework. J Bus Econ 86:647–670. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11573-015-0796-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Casadesus-Masanell R, Ricart JE (2010) From strategy to business models and onto tactics. Long Range Plan 43:195–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2010.01.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Casadesus-Masanell R, Zhu F (2013) Business model innovation and competitive imitation: the case of sponsor-based business models. Strateg Manag J 34:464–482. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Clauss T (2017) Measuring business model innovation: conceptualization, scale development, and proof of performance. R&D Manag 47:385–403

    Google Scholar 

  17. Chandler GN, DeTienne DR, McKelvie A, Mumford TV (2011) Causation and effectuation processes: a validation study. J Bus Ventur 26:375–390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2009.10.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Chesbrough H (2007) Business model innovation: it's not just about technology anymore. Strat Leadersh 35:12–17. https://doi.org/10.1108/10878570710833714

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Chesbrough H (2010) Business model innovation: opportunities and barriers. Long Range Plan 43:354–363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2009.07.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Chiles TH, Gupta VK, Bluedorn AC (2008) On Lachmannian and effectual entrepreneurship: a rejoinder to Sarasvathy and Dew (2008). Org Stud 29:247–253. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840607088154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Crossan MM, Lane HW, White RE (1999) An organizational learning framework: from intuition to institution. Acad Manag Rev 24:522–537

    Google Scholar 

  22. Dew N, Read S, Sarasvathy SD, Wiltbank R (2009) Effectual versus predictive logics in entrepreneurial decision-making: differences between experts and novices. J Bus Ventur 24:287–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2008.02.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Duriau VJ, Reger RK, Pfarrer MD (2007) A content analysis of the content analysis literature in organization studies: research themes, data sources, and methodological refinements. Org Res Methods 10:5–34. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428106289252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Fisher G (2012) Effectuation, causation, and bricolage: a behavioral comparison of emerging theories in entrepreneurship research. Entrep Theory Pract 36:1019–1051. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2012.00537.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Foss NJ, Saebi T (2017) Fifteen years of research on business model innovation. J Manag 43:200–227. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206316675927

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Franke T, zu Knyphausen-Aufsess D (2014) On dominant logic: review and synthesis. J Bus Econ 84:27–70. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11573-013-0690-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Frankenberger K, Weiblen T, Csik M, Gassmann O (2013) The 4I-framework of business model innovation: a structured view on process phases and challenges. Int J Prod Dev 18:249. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJPD.2013.055012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Friedland R (2002) Money, sex, and god: the erotic logic of religious nationalism. Sociol Theory 20:381–425. https://doi.org/10.1111/0735-2751.00169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Futterer F, Schmidt J, Heidenreich S (2017) Effectuation or causation as the key to corporate venture success? Investigating effects of entrepreneurial behaviors on business model innovation and venture performance. Long Range Plan. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2017.06.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Garud R, Hardy C, Maguire S (2007) Institutional entrepreneurship as embedded agency: an introduction to the special issue. Org Stud 28:957–969. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840607078958

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Gassmann O, Frankenberger K, Csik M (2014) The business model navigator: 55 models that will revolutionise your business. Pearson, London

    Google Scholar 

  32. Gawer A, Phillips N (2013) Institutional work as logics shift: the case of Intel’s transformation to platform leader. Org Stud 34:1035–1071. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840613492071

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Gioia DA, Chittipeddi K (1991) Sensemaking and sensegiving in strategic change initiation. Strateg Manag J 12:433–448

    Google Scholar 

  34. Gioia DA, Corley KG, Hamilton AL (2013) Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research. Org Res Methods 16:15–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428112452151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Gläser J, Laudel G (2010) Experteninterviews und qualitative Inhaltsanalyse: Als Instrumente rekonstruierender Untersuchungen, 4. VS Verlag für Sozialwiss, Wiesbaden

    Google Scholar 

  36. Glaser BG, Strauss AL (1970) Discovery of substantive theory: a basic strategy underlying qualitative research. Qualitative methodology. Rand McNally, Chicago, pp 288–297

    Google Scholar 

  37. Greenwood R, Suddaby R (2006) Institutional entrepreneurship in mature fields: the big five accounting firms. Acad Manag J 49:27–48

    Google Scholar 

  38. Gupta VK, Chiles TH, McMullen JS (2016) A process perspective on evaluating and conducting effectual entrepreneurship research. Acad Manag Rev 41:540–544

    Google Scholar 

  39. Hacklin F, Björkdahl J, Wallin MW (2018) Strategies for business model innovation: how firms reel in migrating value. Long Range Plan 51:82–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2017.06.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Hankammer S, Brenk S, Fabry H, Nordemann A, Piller FT (2019) Towards circular business models: identifying consumer needs based on the jobs-to-be-done theory. J Clean Prod 231:341–358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Harms R, Schiele H (2012) Antecedents and consequences of effectuation and causation in the international new venture creation process. J Int Entrep 10:95–116. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10843-012-0089-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Heidenreich S, Kraemer T (2016) Innovations-doomed to fail? Investigating strategies to overcome passive innovation resistance. J Prod Innov Manag 33:277–297. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Heidenreich S, Spieth P (2013) Why innovations fail—the case of passive and active innovation resistance. Int J Innov Manag 17:1350021. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363919613500217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Heinze KL, Weber K (2015) Toward organizational pluralism: institutional intrapreneurship in integrative medicine. Organ Sci. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2015.1028

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Hock M, Clauss T, Schulz E (2016) The impact of organizational culture on a firm’s capability to innovate the business model. R&D Manag 46:433–450. https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Holm P (1995) The dynamics of institutionalization: transformation processes in Norwegian fisheries. Admin Sci Q 40:398–422

    Google Scholar 

  47. Howard-Grenville J, Golden-Biddle K, Irwin J, Mao J (2011) Liminality as cultural process for cultural change. Organ Sci 22:522–539

    Google Scholar 

  48. Jansen JJP, Van Den Bosch FAJ, Volberda HW (2006) Exploratory innovation, exploitative innovation, and performance: effects of organizational antecedents and environmental moderators. Manag Sci 52:1661–1674. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1060.0576

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Johnson MW, Christensen CM, Kagermann H (2008) Reinventing Your Business Model. Harv Bus Rev 86:50–59

    Google Scholar 

  50. Jay J (2013) Navigating paradox as a mechanism of change and innovation in hybrid organizations. Acad Manag J 56:137–159. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.0772

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Khanagha S, Volberda Henk, Oshri Ilan (2014) Business model renewal and ambidexterity structural alteration and strategy formation process during transition to a Cloud business model. R&D Manag 44:322–340

    Google Scholar 

  52. Kim WC, Mauborgne RA (2014) Blue ocean strategy, expanded edition: how to create uncontested market space and make the competition irrelevant. Harvard Business Review Press, Brighton

    Google Scholar 

  53. Kotter JP (2012) Leading change. Harvard Business Press, Brighton

    Google Scholar 

  54. Laasch O (2018) Beyond the purely commercial business model: organizational value logics and the heterogeneity of sustainability business models. Long Range Plan 51:158–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2017.09.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Langley A (1999) Strategies for theorizing from process data. Acad Manag Rev 24:691–710

    Google Scholar 

  56. Langley A, Smallman C, Tsoukas H, van de Ven AH (2013) Process studies of change in organization and management: unveiling temporality, activity, and flow. Acad Manag J 56:1–13. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2013.4001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Laudien SM, Daxböck B (2016) Path dependence as a barrier to business model change in manufacturing firms: insights from a multiple-case study. J Bus Econ 86:611–645. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11573-015-0793-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Lounsbury M (2002) Institutional transformation and status mobility: the professionalization of the field of finance. Acad Manag J 45:255–266

    Google Scholar 

  59. Mair J, Battilana J, Cardenas J (2012) Organizing for society: a typology of social entrepreneuring models. J Bus Ethics 111:353–373. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1414-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Martins LL, Rindova VP, Greenbaum BE (2015) Unlocking the hidden value of concepts: a cognitive approach to business model innovation. Strateg Entrep J 9:99–117. https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.1191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Mason J (2017) Qualitative researching. Sage, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  62. Massa L, Tucci CL, Afuah A (2017) A critical assessment of business model research. Acad Manag Ann 11:73–104. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2014.0072

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Micelotta E, Lounsbury M, Greenwood R (2017) Pathways of institutional change: an integrative review and research agenda. J Manag 43:1885–1910. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206317699522

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Miles MB, Huberman AM (1994) Qualitative data analysis an expanded sourcebook, 2nd edn. Sage, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  65. Müller JM, Buliga O, Voigt K-I (2018) Fortune favors the prepared: how SMEs approach business model innovations in Industry 4.0. Technol Forecast Soc Change. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.12.019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Nambisan S, Lyytinen K, Majchrzak A, Song M (2017) Digital innovation management: reinventing innovation management research in a digital world. MIS Q 41:223–238. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2017/41:1.03

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Ocasio W (2011) Attention to attention. Organ Sci 22:1286–1296. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1100.0602

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Ocasio W, Radoynovska N (2016) Strategy and commitments to institutional logics: organizational heterogeneity in business models and governance. Strateg Organ 14:287–309. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127015625040

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Osterwalder A, Pigneur Y, Clark T (eds) (2010) Business model generation: a handbook for visionaries, game changers, and challengers. Wiley, Hoboken

    Google Scholar 

  70. Osterwalder A, Pigneur Y, Bernarda G, Smith A (eds) (2014) Value proposition design: how to create products and services customers want. Strategyzer series. Wiley, Hoboken

    Google Scholar 

  71. Pache A-C, Santos F (2010) When worlds collide: the internal dynamics of organizational responses to conflicting institutional demands. Acad Manag Rev 35:455–476

    Google Scholar 

  72. Pettigrew AM (1990) Longitudinal field research on change theory and practice. Organ Sci 1:267–292

    Google Scholar 

  73. Pratt MG, Rockmann KW, Kaufmann JB (2006) Constructing professional identity: the role of work and identity learning cycles in the customization of identity among medical residents. Acad Manag J 49:235–262

    Google Scholar 

  74. Read S, Dew N, Sarasvathy SD, Song M, Wiltbank R (2009) Marketing under uncertainty: the logic of an effectual approach. J Mark 73:1–18

    Google Scholar 

  75. Reimann M, Schilke O, Thomas JS (2010) Toward an understanding of industry commoditization: its nature and role in evolving marketing competition. Int J Res Mark 27:188–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2009.10.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Reymen IMMJ, Andries P, Berends H, Mauer R, Stephan U, van Burg E (2015) Understanding dynamics of strategic decision making in venture creation: a process study of effectuation and causation. Strateg Entrep J 9:351–379. https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.1201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Reymen I, Berends H, Oudehand R, Stultiëns R (2017) Decision making for business model development: a process study of effectuation and causation in new technology-based ventures. R&D Manag 47:595–606. https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Saebi T, Lien L, Foss NJ (2017) What drives business model adaptation? The impact of opportunities, threats and strategic orientation. Long Range Plan 50:567–581. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2016.06.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Sarasvathy SD (2001) Causation and effectuation: toward a theoretical shift from economic inevitability to entrepreneurial contingency. Acad Manag Rev 26:243–263

    Google Scholar 

  80. Sarasvathy SD (2009) Effectuation: elements of entrepreneurial expertise, Paperback ed. New horizons in entrepreneurship, edn. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham

    Google Scholar 

  81. Sarasvathy SD, Dew N (2008) Is effectuation Lachmannian? A response to Chiles, Bluedorn, and Gupta (2007). Organ Stud 29:239–245. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840607088153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  82. Schallmo D, Williams CA, Boarman L (2017) Digital transformation of business models—best practice, enablers, and roadmap. Int J Innov Manag 21:1740014

    Google Scholar 

  83. Schildt H, Perkmann M (2017) Organizational settlements. J Manag Inq 26:139–145. https://doi.org/10.1177/1056492616670756

    Article  Google Scholar 

  84. Schneckenberg D, Velamuri VK, Comberg C, Spieth P (2017) Business model innovation and decision making: uncovering mechanisms for coping with uncertainty. R&D Manag 47:404–419

    Google Scholar 

  85. Sharma P, Chrisman JJ, Chua JH (1997) Strategic management of the family business: past research and future challenges. Family Bus Rev 10:1–35

    Google Scholar 

  86. Silverman BS, Baden FC, Mangematin V (eds) (2015) Business models and organizations. Advances in strategic management. Emerald Publishing, Brighton

    Google Scholar 

  87. Spieth P, Schneider S (2016) Business model innovativeness: designing a formative measure for business model innovation. J Bus Econ 86:671–696. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11573-015-0794-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  88. Spieth P, Schneckenberg D, Ricart JE (2014) Business model innovation—state of the art and future challenges for the field. R&D Manag 44:237–247. https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12071

    Article  Google Scholar 

  89. Spieth P, Schneckenberg D, Matzler K (2016) Exploring the linkage between business model (&) innovation and the strategy of the firm. R&D Manag 46:403–413. https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  90. Spieth P, Schneider S, Clauß T, Eichenberg D (2018) Value drivers of social businesses: a business model perspective. Long Range Plan. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2018.04.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  91. Spradley JP (2016) The ethnographic interview. Waveland Press, Long Grove

    Google Scholar 

  92. Stake RE (2000) Case studies. In: Denzin N, Lincoln Y (eds) Handbook of qualitative research. Sage, Thousand Oaks, pp 435–455

    Google Scholar 

  93. Strauss AL (1987) Qualitative analysis for social scientists. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  94. Takeda H, Veerkamp Paul, Yoshikawa H (1990) Modeling design process. AI Mag 11:37

    Google Scholar 

  95. Teece DJ (2010) Business models, business strategy and innovation. Long Range Plan 43:172–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2009.07.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  96. Thornton PH (2002) The rise of the corporation in a craft industry: conflict and conformity in institutional logics. Acad Manag J 45:81–101

    Google Scholar 

  97. Thornton PH, Ocasio W, Lounsbury M (2012) The institutional logics perspective: a new approach to culture, structure, and process. Oxford University Press on Demand, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  98. Townsend DM, Hart TA (2008) Perceived institutional ambiguity and the choice of organizational form in social entrepreneurial ventures. Entrep Theory Pract 32:685–700

    Google Scholar 

  99. Töytäri P, Turunen T, Klein M, Eloranta V, Biehl S, Rajala R (2018) Aligning the mindset and capabilities within a business network for successful adoption of smart services. J Prod Innov Manag 35:763–779. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12462

    Article  Google Scholar 

  100. Tracey P, Phillips N, Jarvis O (2011) Bridging institutional entrepreneurship and the creation of new organizational forms: a multilevel model. Organ Sci 22:60–80

    Google Scholar 

  101. Vaskelainen T, Münzel K (2018) The effect of institutional logics on business model development in the sharing economy: the case of German carsharing services. Acad Manag Discov 4:273–293. https://doi.org/10.5465/amd.2016.0149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  102. Visnjic I, Wiengarten F, Neely A (2016) Only the brave: product innovation, service business model innovation, and their impact on performance. J Prod Innov Manag 33:36–52. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  103. Wei Z, Yang D, Sun B, Gu M (2014) The fit between technological innovation and business model design for firm growth: evidence from China. R&D Manag 44:288–305. https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12069

    Article  Google Scholar 

  104. Wirtz BW (2013) Business model management: design, Instrumente, Erfolgsfaktoren von Geschäftsmodellen, 3, aktuelle u. überarb. Aufl. Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden

    Google Scholar 

  105. Yin RK (2017) Case study research and applications: design and methods. Sage, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the German Research Council (DFG) for their support within the Cluster "Internet of Production", Project ID 390 621 612.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sebastian Brenk.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Brenk, S., Lüttgens, D., Diener, K. et al. Learning from failures in business model innovation: solving decision-making logic conflicts through intrapreneurial effectuation. J Bus Econ 89, 1097–1147 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11573-019-00954-1

Download citation

Keywords

  • Business model innovation
  • Digital transformation/Digitization
  • Institutional theory
  • Effectuation
  • Causation
  • Sensemaking
  • Institutional entrepreneurship
  • Institutional logic
  • Family business
  • Value migration
  • Pivoting
  • Longitudinal single case study
  • Mixed-method
  • Logic pluralism

JEL Classification

  • M13
  • M15
  • O32
  • O33