Advertisement

Journal of Business Economics

, Volume 88, Issue 7–8, pp 1009–1028 | Cite as

A multiperiod auto-carrier transportation problem with probabilistic future demands

  • Christian Billing
  • Florian Jaehn
  • Thomas Wensing
Original Paper
  • 80 Downloads

Abstract

In this paper we study the problem of delivering finished vehicles from a logistics yard to dealer locations at which they are sold. The requests for cars arrive dynamically and are not announced in advance to the logistics provider who is granted a certain time-span until which a delivery has to be fulfilled. In a real-world setting, the underlying network is relatively stable in time, since it is usually a rare event that a new dealership opens or an existing one terminates its service. Therefore, probabilities for incoming requests can be derived from historical data. The study explores the potential of using such probabilities to improve the day-to-day decision of sending out or postponing cars that are ready for delivery. Apart from the order selection, we elaborate a heuristic to optimize delivery routes for the selected vehicles, whereby special loading constraints are considered to meet the particular constraints of car transportation via road. In a case study, we illustrate the value of introducing probabilistic information to the planning process and compare the quality of different configurations of our approach.

Keywords

Automotive industry Vehicle routing problem Case study 

JEL Classification

C61 L62 L91 R41 

References

  1. Agbegha G, Ballou R, Mathur K (1998) Optimizing auto-carrier loading. Transp Sci 32(2):174–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Albareda-Sambola M, Fernández E, Laporte G (2014) The dynamic multiperiod vehicle routing problem with probabilistic information. Comput Oper Res 48:31–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Angelelli E, Savelsbergh MWP, Speranza MG (2007a) Competitive analysis of a dispatch policy for a dynamic multi-period routing problem. Oper Res Lett 35(6):713–721CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Angelelli E, Speranza MG, Savelsbergh MWP (2007b) Competitive analysis for dynamic multiperiod uncapacitated routing problems. Networks 49(4):308–317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Archetti C, Jabali O, Speranza M (2015) Multi-period vehicle routing problem with due dates. Comput Oper Res 61:122–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Çoban O, Fandel G and Sönmez A (2014) Producitivity in turkish and german automotive industries. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Congress on Entrepreneurship ICE’14, pp. 344–354Google Scholar
  7. Chen H-K (2016a) A heuristic algorithm for the auto-carrier loading problem. Int J Shipp Transp Logist 8(1):21–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chen H-K (2016b) Sequential auto carrier loading problem. Transp Res Rec J Transp Res Board 2548:53–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Clarke G, Wright J (1964) Scheduling of vehicles from a central depot to a number of delivery points. Oper Res 12(4):568–581CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cordeau J-F, Dell’Amico M, Falavigna S, Iori M (2015) A rolling horizon algorithm for auto-carrier transportation. Transp Res Part B 76:68–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dell’Amico M, Falavigna S, Iori M (2014) Optimization of a real-world auto-carrier transportation problem. Transp Sci 49(2):402–419CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hu Z-H, Zhao Y, Tao S, Sheng Z-H (2015) Finished-vehicle transporter routing problem solved by loading pattern discovery. Ann Oper Res 234:37–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kara I, Laporte G, Bektas T (2004) A note on the lifted miller-tucker-zemlin subtour elimination constraints for the capacitated vehicle routing problem. Eur J Oper Res 158:793–795CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Miller C, Tucker A, Zemlin R (1960) Integer programming formulation of traveling salesman problems. J ACM 7(4):326–329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. OICA (2017). Production statistics. http://www.oica.net/category/production-statistics. called on 2017-09-28
  16. Pillac V, Gendreau M, Guéret C, Medaglia A (2013) A review of dynamic vehicle routing problems. Eur J Oper Res 225(1):1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ritzinger U, Puchinger J, Hartl RE (2016) A survey on dynamic and stochastic vehicle routing problems. Int J Prod Res 54(1):215–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Tadei R, Perboli G, Croce FD (2002) A heuristic algorithm for the auto-carrier transportation problem. Transp Sci 36(1):55–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Thompson P, Psaraftis H (1993) Cyclic transfer algorithm for multivehicle routing and scheduling problems. Oper Res 41(5):935–946CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Toth P and Vigo D (eds) (2002) The vehicle routing problem. SIAM, Philadelphia, PAGoogle Scholar
  21. Wen M, Cordeau J-F, Laporte G, Larsen J (2010) The dynamic multi-period vehicle routing problem. Comput Oper Res 37:1615–1623CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Wensing T (2018) Social and environmental impact of advances in economically-driven transport optimization: case study in automobile distribution. In: Brandenburg M, Rebs T (eds) Social and environmental dimensions of organizations and supply chains. Springer, Cham, pp 195–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Augsburg, Sustainable Operations and LogisticsAugsburgGermany
  2. 2.Helmut Schmidt University-University of the Federal Armed Forces Hamburg, Management Science and Operations ResearchHamburgGermany
  3. 3.INFORM GmbHAachenGermany

Personalised recommendations