Advertisement

Journal of Business Economics

, Volume 88, Issue 3–4, pp 503–529 | Cite as

On private equity exits of family firms in the German Mittelstand

  • Florian Kreer
  • René Mauer
  • Steffen Strese
  • Malte Brettel
Original Paper
  • 267 Downloads

Abstract

There is limited existing research on factors influencing the preferences of family firms’ owner-managers for specific modes of external transitions of ownership such as private equity. In a multi-method approach, this study qualitatively gathers the attitudinal beliefs of family firms’ owner-managers about pursuing the private equity succession route. Four classes of beliefs are identified: perceptions of (1) firm continuance; (2) opportunities for firm development; (3) loss of firm ethos; and (4) commercial firm risks. These classes are then tested quantitatively with a sample of 195 family firm owner-managers among the German Mittelstand. Our results partially confirm the qualitative findings: the perception of positive development opportunities and the perception of commercial firm risks explain owner-managers’ intention to pursue a private equity succession, mediated through attitude. Overall, attitude emerges as the cornerstone in this context-specific intention model.

Keywords

Family firm succession Managerial decisions Private equity Mittelstand Theory of planned behavior 

JEL Classification

G32 M14 D10 

References

  1. Achleitner A-K, Schraml S, Tappeiner F (2008) Private equity minority investments in large family firms: what influences the attitude of family firm owners? SSRN: http://ssrn.Com/abstract=1299573. Retrieved (2010)-11-18
  2. Achleitner A-K, Herman K, Lerner J, Lutz E (2010) Family business and private equity: conflict or collaboration? The case of Messer Griesheim. J Priv Equity 13(3):7–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ahlers O, Hack A, Kellermanns F, Wright M (2016) Opening the black box: power in buyout negotiations and the moderating role of private equity specialization. J Small Bus Manag 54(4):1171–1192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ajzen I (1988) Attitudes, personality and behavior. Open University Press, Milton KeynesGoogle Scholar
  5. Ajzen I (1991) The Theory of Planned Behavior. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 50(2):179–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ajzen I (2001) Nature and operation of attitudes. Annu Rev Psychol 52(1):27–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ajzen I (2002a) Perceived behavioral control, self-efficacy, locus of control, and the theory of planned behavior. J Appl Soc Psychol 32(4):665–683CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ajzen I (2002b) Constructing a TPB-Questionnaire: conceptual and methodological considerations. http://chuang.epage.au.edu.tw/ezfiles/168/1168/attach/20/pta_41176_7688352_57138.pdf. Pdf retrieved 2017-04-27
  9. Ajzen I, Fishbein M (1980) Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Prentice-Hall, Englewood CliffsGoogle Scholar
  10. Ajzen I, Fishbein M (2008) Scaling and testing multiplicative combinations in the expectancy-value model of attitudes. J Appl Soc Psychol 38(9):2222–2247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Armitage CJ, Christian J (2003) From attitudes to behavior: basic and applied research on the theory of planned behavior. Curr Psychol Dev Learn Personal Soc 22(3):187–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Armitage CJ, Conner M (2001) Efficacy of the theory of planned behaviour: a meta-analytic review. Br J Soc Psychol 40(4):471–499CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Armstrong JS, Overton TS (1977) Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. J Mark Res 14(3):396–402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Astrachan JH, Allen E, Spinelli S, Wittmeyer C, Glucksman S (2003) American family business survey 2002. George and Robin Raymond Family Business Institute, Alfred, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  15. Bagozzi RP (1981) Attitudes, intentions, and behavior: a test of some key hypotheses. J Personal Soc Psychol 41(4):607–627CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Barnes LB, Hershon SA (1976) Transferring power in the family business. Har Bus Rev 54(4):105–114Google Scholar
  17. Baron RM, Kenny DA (1986) The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J Pers Soc Psychol 51(6):1173–1182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Bartz W, Winkler A (2016) Flexible or fragile? The growth performance of small and young businesses during the global financial crisis—evidence from Germany. J Bus Ventur 31(2):196–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Baskerville RF (2003) Hofstede never studied culture. Acc Organ Soc 28(1):1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Birley S, Westhead P (1990) Private business sales environments in the United Kingdom. J Bus Ventur 5(2):349–373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Birley S, Ng D, Godfrey A (1999) The family and the business. Long Range Plan 32(6):598–608CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Bleackley M, Hay M, Robbie K, Wright M (1996) Entrepreneurial attitudes to venture capital investment realization: evidence from the UK and France. Entrep Reg Dev 8(1):37–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Brockhaus RH (2004) Family business succession: suggestions for future research. Fam Bus Rev 17(2):165–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Butler JE, Phan PH, Saxberg BO, Lee SH (2001) Entrepreneurial succession, firm growth, and performance. J Enterp Cult 9(4):407–436CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Cabrera-Suárez K, De Saá-Perez P, Garcia-Almeida D (2001) The succession process from a resource- and knowledge-based view of the firm. Fam Bus Rev 14(1):37–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Carr JC, Sequeira JM (2007) Prior family business exposure as intergenerational influence and entrepreneurial intent: a theory of planned behavior approach. J Bus Res 60(10):1090–1098CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Chrisman JJ, Chua JH, Sharma P (1998) Important attributes of successors in family businesses: an exploratory study. Fam Bus Rev 11(1):19–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Chua JH, Chrisman JJ, Sharma P (1999) Defining the family business by behavior. Entrep Theory Pract 23(4):19–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Claver E, Rienda L, Quer D (2008) Family firms’ risk perception: empirical evidence on the internationalization process. J Small Bus Enterp Dev 15(3):457–471CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Conner M, Armitage CJ (1998) Extending the theory of planned behavior: a review and avenues for further research. J Appl Soc Psychol 28(15):1429–1464CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Dawson A (2011) Private equity investment decisions in family firms: the role of human resources and agency costs. J Bus Ventur 26(2):189–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Debicki BJ, Matherne CF III, Kellermanns FW, Chrisman JJ (2009) Family business researching the new millennium: an overview of the who, the where, the what, and the why. Fam Bus Rev 22(2):151–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Dehlen T, Zellweger T, Kammerlander N, Halter F (2014) The role of information asymmetry in the choice of entrepreneurial exit routes. J Bus Ventur 29(2):193–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. DeTienne DR (2010) Entrepreneurial exit as a critical component of the entrepreneurial process: Theoretical development. J Bus Ventur 25(2):203–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. DeTienne DR, Cardon MS (2008) The impact of new venture design on entrepreneurial exit. Front Entrep Res 28(1):1–31Google Scholar
  36. DeTienne DR, Cardon MS (2012) Impact of founder experience on exit intentions. Small Bus Econ 38(4):351–374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. DeTienne DR, McKelvie A, Chandler GN (2015) Making sense of entrepreneurial exit strategies: A typology and test. J Bus Ventur 30(2):255–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Diamantopoulos A, Winklhofer HM (2001) Index construction with formative indicators: an alternative to scale development. J Mark Res 38(2):269–277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Dreux DR IV (1990) Financing family business: alternatives to selling out or going public. Fam Bus Rev 3(3):225–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Eagly AH, Chaiken S (1993) The psychology of attitudes. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College Publishers, Fort WorthGoogle Scholar
  41. European Commission (2003) Recommendation 2003/361/EC: SME Definition: http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/enterprise_policy/sme_definition/index_en.htm. Retrieved 2010-12-12
  42. European Commission (2006) Markets for business transfers—fostering transparent marketplaces for the transfer of businesses in Europe. http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/policies/sme/files/support_measures/transfer_business/transfer_markets_en.pdf. Retrieved 2010-12-12
  43. Fishbein M, Ajzen I (1975) Belief, attitude, intention, behavior: an introduction to theory and research. Addison-Wesely, ReadingGoogle Scholar
  44. Fishbein M, Ajzen I (2010) Predicting and changing behavior: the reasoned action approach. Psychology Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  45. Gist ME, Mitchell TR (1992) Self-efficacy: a theoretical analysis of its determinants and malleability. Acad Manag Rev 17(2):183–211Google Scholar
  46. Guo S, Hotchkiss ES, Song W (2011) Do buyouts (still) create value? J Finance 66(2):479–517CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Hair JF, Anderson RE, Tatham RL, Black WC (1998) Multivariate data analysis with readings, 5th edn. Englewood Cliffs, Prentice-HallGoogle Scholar
  48. Handler W (1994) Succession in family business: a review of the research. Fam Bus Rev 7(2):133–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Harrison RT, Dibben MR, Mason C (1997) The role of trust in the informal investor’s investment decision. Entrep Theory Pract 24(4):63–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Howorth C, Westhead P, Wright M (2004) Buyouts, information asymmetry and the family management dyad. J Bus Ventur 19(4):509–534CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. IfM (2006) Nachfolgelösungen in deutschen Familienunternehmen. Institut für Mittelstandsforschung, BonnGoogle Scholar
  52. Jensen MC (1986) Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance, and takeovers. Am Econ Rev 76(2):323–329Google Scholar
  53. Jensen MC (1993) The modern industrial revolution, exit and the failure of internal control systems. J Finance 48(3):831–880CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Jones CD, Makri M, Gomez-Mejia LR (2008) Affiliate directors and perceived risk bearing in publicly traded, family-controlled firms: the case of diversification. Entrep Theory Pract 32(6):1007–1026CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Judge GG, Hill RC, Griffiths WG, Lutkepohl H, Lee TC (1988) Introduction to the theory and practice of econometrics, 2nd edn. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  56. Kanuk L, Berenson C (1975) Mail surveys and response rate: a literature review. J Mark Res 22(4):440–453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Kaplan SN, Stein J (1993) The evolution of buyout pricing and financial structure in the 1980s. Q J Econ 108(2):313–358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Kautonen T, van Gelderen M, Fink M (2015) Robustness of the theory of planned behavior in predicting entrepreneurial intentions and actions. Entrep Theory Pract 39(3):655–674CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Kaye K (1996) When the family business is a sickness. Fam Bus Rev 9(4):347–368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Kerlinger FN (1986) Foundations of behavioral research. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College Publishers, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  61. Kets de Vries MFR (1977) The entrepreneurial personality: a person at the crossroads. J Manag Stud 14(1):34–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Kidder LH (1981) Selltiz, Wrightsman and Cook’s research methods in social sciences, 4th edn. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  63. Kolvereid L (1996) Organizational employment versus self-employment: reasons for career choice intentions. Entrep Theory Pract 20(3):21–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Kolvereid L, Isaksen E (2006) New business start-up and subsequent entry into self-employment. J Bus Ventur 21(6):866–885CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Koropp C, Grichnik D, Gygax A (2013) Succession financing in family firms. Small Bus Econ 41(2):315–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Kreer F, Mauer R, Limbach P, Brettel M (2015) Family exit in family firms: how network ties affect the owner’s intention to follow the private equity succession route. Schmalenbach Bus Rev 67(4):454–488CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Krippendorff K (2004) Content analysis: an introduction to its methodology, 2nd edn. Sage Publications, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
  68. Krueger NF, Carsrud AL (1993) Entrepreneurial intentions: Applying the theory of planned behavior. Entrep Reg Dev 5(4):315–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Krueger NF, Reilly MD, Carsrud AL (2000) Competing models of entrepreneurial intentions. J Bus Ventur 15(5/6):411–432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Le Breton-Miller I, Miller D, Steier L (2004) Toward an integrative model of effective FOB succession. Entrep Theory Pract 28(4):305–328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Lee KS, Lim GH, Lim WS (2003) Family business succession: appropriation risk and choice of successor. Acad Manag Rev 28(4):657–666Google Scholar
  72. Lerner J, Sorensen M, Strömberg P (2011) Private equity and long-run investment: the case of innovation. NBER Working PaperGoogle Scholar
  73. Leroy H, Manigart S, Meuleman M (2010) The planned decision to transfer an entrepreneurial company. J Entrep Dev 7(1&2):7–22Google Scholar
  74. Lichtenberg F, Siegel D (1990) The effects of leveraged buyouts on productivity and related aspects of firm behavior. J Financ Econ 27(1):165–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Lindsay NJ (2005) Toward a cultural model of indigenous entrepreneurial attitude. Acad Mark Sci Rev 5:1–17Google Scholar
  76. Malhotra NK, Kim SS, Patil A (2006) Common method variance in is research: a comparison of alternative approaches and a reanalysis of past research. Manag Sci 52(12):1865–1883CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. McConaughy DL, Matthews CH, Fialko AS (2001) Founding family controlled firms: performance, risk, and value. J Small Bus Manag 39(1):31–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. McGee JE, Peterson M, Mueller SL, Sequeira JM (2009) Entrepreneurial self-efficacy: refining the measure. Entrep Theory Pract 33(4):965–988CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Mishra CS, McConaughy DL (1999) Founding family control and capital structure: the risk of loss of control and the aversion to debt. Entrep Theory Pract 23(4):53–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Morandin G, Bergami M, Bagozzi R (2006) The hierarchical cognitive structure of entrepreneur motivation toward private equity financing. Venture Cap 8(3):253–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Niedermeyer C, Jaskiewicz P, Klein S (2010) ‘Can’t get no satisfaction?’ Evaluating the sale of the family business from the family’s perspective and deriving implications for new venture activities. Entrep Reg Dev 22(3/4):293–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Nordqvist M, Wennberg K, Bau M, Hellerstedt K (2013) An entrepreneurial process perspective on succession in family firms. Small Bus Econ 40(4):1087–1122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Nunally JC (1978) Psychometric theory, 2nd edn. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  84. Ofir C, Khuri A (1986) Multicollinearity in marketing models: diagnostics and remedial measures. Int J Res Mark 3(3):181–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Olson JM, Zanna MP (1993) Attitudes and attitude change. Annu Rev Psychol 44(1):117–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Oppenheim AN (1966) Questionnaire design and attitude measurement. Free Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  87. Pistrui D, Welsch HP, Wintermantel O, Liao J, Pohl HJ (2000) Entrepreneurial orientation and family forces in the new Germany: similarities and differences between East and West German entrepreneurs. Fam Bus Rev 13(3):251–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Podsakoff PM, Organ DW (1986) Self-reports in organizational research: problems and prospects. J Manag 12(4):531–544Google Scholar
  89. Podsakoff PM, Mackenzie SB, Lee J-Y, Podsakoff NP (2003) Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J Corp Finance 88(5):879–903Google Scholar
  90. Poutziouris P (2001) The views of family companies on venture capital: empirical evidence from the UK small to medium-size enterprising economy. Fam Bus Rev 14(3):277–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Praet A (2013) Family firms and the divestment decision: an agency perspective. J Fam Bus Strategy 4(1):34–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Rotefoss B, Kolvereid L (2005) Aspiring, nascent and fledgling entrepreneurs: an investigation of the business start-up process. Entrep Reg Dev 17:109–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Salvato C, Chirico F, Sharma P (2010) A farewell to the business: championing exit and continuity in entrepreneurial family firms. Entrep Reg Dev 22(3–4):321–348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Sapienza HJ (1992) When do venture capitalists add value? J Bus Ventur 7(1):9–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Schlaegel C, Koenig M (2014) Determinants of entrepreneurial intent: a meta-analytic test and integration of competing models. Entrep Theory Pract 38(2):291–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Scholes L, Wright M, Westhead P, Burrows A, Bruining H (2007) Information sharing, price negotiation and management buy-outs of private family-owned firms. Small Bus Econ 29(3):329–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Scholes L, Westhead P, Burrows A (2008) Family firm succession: the management buy-out and buy-in routes. J Small Bus Enterp Dev 15(1):8–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Scholes L, Wright M, Westhead P, Bruining H (2010) Strategic changes in family firms post management buyout: ownership and governance issues. Int Small Bus J 25(5):505–521CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Schulze WS, Lubatkin MH, Dino RN (2003) Exploring the agency consequences of ownership dispersion among the directors of private family firms. Acad Manag J 46(2):179–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Seliger F (2009) Private equity—Eigenkapital für den Mittelstand. http://www.bvkap.de/sites/default/files/publication/bvk_mittelstandsleitfaden_0.pdf. Pdf retrieved 2016-04-13
  101. Sequeira J, Mueller SL, McGee JE (2007) The influence of social ties and self-efficacy in forming entrepreneurial intentions and motivating nascent behavior. J Dev Entrep 12(3):275–293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Sharma P, Irving PG (2005) Four bases of family business successor commitment: antecedents and consequences. Entrep Theory Pract 29(1):13–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Sharma P, Manikutty S (2005) Strategic divestments in family firms: role of family structure and community culture. Entrep Theory Pract 29(3):293–311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Sharma P, Chrisman JJ, Chua JH (2003) Succession planning as planned behavior: some empirical results. Fam Bus Rev 16(1):1–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Short JC, Payne GT, Brigham KH, Lumpkin GT, Broberg JC (2009) Family firms and entrepreneurial orientation in publicly traded firms: a comparative analysis of the S&P 500. Fam Bus Rev 22(1):9–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Sitkin SB, Pablo AL (1992) Reconceptualizing the determinants of risk behavior. Acad Manag Rev 17(1):9–38Google Scholar
  107. Sitkin SB, Weingart LR (1995) Determinants of risky decision-making behavior: a test of the mediating role of risk perceptions and propensity. Acad Manag J 38(6):1573–1592CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Spector PE (2006) Method variance in organizational research: truth or urban legend? Organ Res Methods 9(2):221–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Taylor S, Todd P (1995) Decomposition and crossover effects in the theory of planned behavior: a study of consumer adoption intentions. Int J Res Mark 12(2):137–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. Terpstra DE, Olson PD (1993) Entrepreneurial start-up and growth: a classification of problems. Entrep Theory Pract 18(1):5–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Thompson ER (2009) Individual entrepreneurial intent: construct clarification and development of an internationally reliable metric. Entrep Theory Pract 33(3):669–694CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Upton N, Petty W (2000) Venture capital investment and US family business. Venture Cap 2(1):27–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Wennberg K, Wiklund J, DeTienne DR, Cardon MS (2010) Reconceptualizing entrepreneurial exit: divergent exit routes and their drivers. J Bus Ventur 25(4):361–375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. Wennberg K, Wiklund J, Hellerstedt K, Nordqvist M (2011) Implications of intra-family and external ownership transfer of family firms: short-term and long-term performance differences. Strat Entrep J 5(4):352–372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. Westhead P, Storey DJ (1997) Financial constraints on the growth of high technology small firms in the U.K. Appl Financ Econ 7(2):197–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. Wiklund J, Nordqvist M, Hellerstedt K, Bird M (2013) Internal versus external ownership transition in family firms: an embeddedness perspective. Entrep Theory Pract 37(6):1319–1340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. Willard GE, Krueger DA, Feeser HR (1992) In order to grow, must the founder go: a comparison of performance between founder and non-founder managed high growth manufacturing firms. J Bus Ventur 7(3):181–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. Wright M (1994) Management buy-outs. Dartmouth Publishing, AldershotGoogle Scholar
  119. Wright M, Coyne J (1985) Management buy-outs. Croom Helm, BeckenhamGoogle Scholar
  120. Wright M, Thompson S, Robbie K (1992) Venture capital and management-led leveraged buy-outs: a European perspective. J Bus Ventur 7(1):47–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  121. Wright M, Wilson N, Robbie K, Ennew CT (1996) An analysis of management buy-out failure. Manag Decis Econ 17(1):57–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  122. Yeung HWC (2000) Limits to the growth of family-owned business? The case of Chinese transnational corporations from Hong Kong. Fam Bus Rev 13(1):55–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  123. Zellweger T, Astrachan J (2008) On the emotional value of owning a firm. Fam Bus Rev 21(4):347–363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  124. Zellweger T, Sieger P, Halter F (2010) Should I stay or should I go? Career choice intentions of students with family business background. J Bus Ventur 26(5):521–536CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  125. Zellweger T, Kellermanns F, Chrisman J, Chua J (2012) Family control and family firm valuation by family CEOs: the importance of intentions for transgenerational control. Organ Sci 23(3):851–868CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Innovation and Entrepreneurship Group (WIN), TIME Research AreaRWTH Aachen UniversityAachenGermany
  2. 2.Chair of Entrepreneurship and InnovationESCP EuropeBerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations