Advertisement

Journal of Business Economics

, Volume 88, Issue 3–4, pp 471–501 | Cite as

Building an equity story: the impact of effectuation on business angel investments

  • Sebastian Schmidt
  • David Bendig
  • Malte Brettel
Original Paper
  • 319 Downloads

Abstract

This study investigates the effects of the decision-making style of angel investors on their investee businesses’ valuations with a particular focus on the early post-investment phase. Business angels not only provide new ventures with financial resources. By assuming different value-added roles, they also contribute considerable non-financial value to their investee companies during the post-investment phase. They not only act entrepreneurially through their hands-on involvement, but also often have their own distinct entrepreneurial experience. We hence draw on the emerging entrepreneurial decision-making theory of effectuation to explain their investment outcomes in an environment of uncertainty. This study links angels’ decision-making styles to their ventures’ valuations in the period between their initial investment and the first external follow-up investment in an investee business. Based on a sample of 73 angel investments, this study finds that informal investors experience a significant increase in their investments’ valuation if they emphasize the effectual principle of means-orientation in their decision-making.

Keywords

Entrepreneurship Effectuation Means-orientation Venture capital Business angels Valuation 

JEL Classification

D81 G24 G31 L26 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Aernoudt R (1999) Business angels: Should they fly on their own wings? Ventur Cap 1:187–195. doi: 10.1080/136910699295965 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Akerlof GA (1970) The market for “lemons”: quality uncertainty and the market mechanism. Q J Econ 84:488–500. doi: 10.2307/1879431 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Appelhoff D, Mauer R, Collewaert V, Brettel M (2016) The conflict potential of the entrepreneur’s decision-making style in the entrepreneur-investor relationship. Int Entrep Manag J 12:601–623. doi: 10.1007/s11365-015-0357-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Arend R, Sarooghi H, Burkemper A (2015) Effectuation as ineffectual? Applying the 3E theory-assessment framework to a proposed new theory of entrepreneurship. Acad Manag Rev 40:630–651. doi: 10.5465/amr.2014.0455 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Avdeitchikova S, Landstrom H, Månsson N (2008) What do we mean when we talk about business angels? Some reflections on definitions and sampling. Ventur Cap 10:371–394. doi: 10.1080/13691060802351214 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Baker T, Nelson RE (2005) Creating something from nothing: resource construction through entrepreneurial bricolage. Adm Sci Q 50:329–366. doi: 10.2189/asqu.2005.50.3.329 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Basse-Mama H, Koch N, Bassen A, Bank T (2013) Valuation effects of corporate strategic transactions in the cleantech industry. J Bus Econ 83:605–630. doi: 10.1007/s11573-013-0665-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brettel M (2002) German business angels in international comparison. J Priv Equity 5:53–67. doi: 10.3905/jpe.2002.320008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brettel M (2003) Business angels in Germany: a research note. Ventur Cap 5:251–268. doi: 10.1080/1369106032000122095 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brettel M, Mauer R, Engelen A, Küpper D (2012) Corporate effectuation: entrepreneurial action and its impact on R&D project performance. J Bus Ventur 27:167–184. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2011.01.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brush CG, Edelman LF, Manolova TS (2012) Ready for funding? Entrepreneurial ventures and the pursuit of angel financing. Ventur Cap 14:111–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bygrave W, Timmons J (1992) Venture capital at the crossroads. Harvard Business School, BostonGoogle Scholar
  13. Chandler GN, Hanks SH (1993) Measuring the performance of emerging businesses: a validation study. J Bus Ventur 8:391–408. doi: 10.1016/0883-9026(93)90021-V CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chandler GN, DeTienne DR, McKelvie A, Mumford TV (2011) Causation and effectuation processes: a validation study. J Bus Ventur 26:375–390. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2009.10.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Chemmanur TJ, Chen Z (2002) Angels, venture capitalists, and entrepreneurs: a dynamic model of private equity financing. Bost Coll Unpubl Manuscr 1:54. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.342721 Google Scholar
  16. Collewaert V, Manigart S (2016) Valuation of angel-backed companies: the role of investor human capital. J Small Bus Manag 54:356–372. doi: 10.1111/jsbm.12150 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Collewaert V, Sapienza HJ (2014) How does angel investor-entrepreneur conflict affect venture innovation? It depends. Entrep Theory Pract 40:573–597. doi: 10.1111/etap.12131 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Damodaran A (2016) Price earnings multiples [.xlsx file download]. http://www.stern.nyu.edu/~adamodar/New_Home_Page/data.html. Accessed 07 February 2016
  19. Davidsson P (2008) Interpreting performance in entrepreneurship research. In: Davidsson P (ed) The entrepreneurship research challenge. Elgar, CheltenhamCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. De Clercq D, Fried VH, Lehtonen O, Sapienza HJ (2006) An entrepreneur’s guide to the venture capital galaxy. Acad Manag Perspect 20:90–113. doi: 10.5465/AMP.2006.21903483 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Dew N, Read S, Sarasvathy SD, Wiltbank R (2009) Effectual versus predictive logics in entrepreneurial decision-making: differences between experts and novices. J Bus Ventur 24:287–309. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2008.02.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ehrlich SB, De Noble AF, Moore T, Weaver RR (1994) After the cash arrives: a comparative study of venture capital and private investor involvement in entrepreneurial firms. J Bus Ventur 9:67–82. doi: 10.1016/0883-9026(94)90027-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Fairchild R (2011) An entrepreneur’s choice of venture capitalist or angel-financing: a behavioral game-theoretic approach. J Bus Ventur 26:359–374. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2009.09.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Fisher G (2012) Effectuation, causation, and bricolage: a behavioral comparison of emerging theories in entrepreneurship research. Entrep Theory Pract 36:1019–1051. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6520.2012.00537.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Garbotz C, Engelen A, Niemann P (2010) A social network perspecitve on the deal flow of business angels. In: Academy of Management Annual Meeting Proceedings. pp 1–6Google Scholar
  26. Gaston RJ (1989) Finding private venture capital for your firm: a complete guide. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  27. Gupta AK, Sapienza HJ (1992) Determinants of venture capital firms’ preferences regarding the industry diversity and geographic scope of their investments. J Bus Ventur 7:347–362. doi: 10.1016/0883-9026(92)90012-G CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Haagen F (2008) The role of smart money: what drives venture capital support and interference within biotechnology ventures? Zeitschrift für Betriebswirtschaft 78:397–422. doi: 10.1007/s11573-008-0023-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Harrison RT, Mason CM (1992) International perspectives on the supply of informal venture capital. J Bus Ventur 7:459–475. doi: 10.1016/0883-9026(92)90020-R CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hsu DH (2004) What do entrepreneurs pay for venture capital affiliation? J Finance 59:1805–1844. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.2004.00680.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Jain B (2001) Predictors of performance of venture capitalist-backed organizations. J Bus Res 52:223–233. doi: 10.1016/S0148-2963(99)00112-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Klobucnik J, Sievers S (2013) Valuing high technology growth firms. J Bus Econ 83:947–984. doi: 10.1007/s11573-013-0684-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lahti T (2011) Categorization of angel investments: an explorative analysis of risk reduction strategies in Finland. Ventur Cap 13:49–74. doi: 10.1080/13691066.2010.543322 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Large D, Muegge S (2008) Venture capitalists’ non-financial value-added: an evaluation of the evidence and implications for research. Ventur Cap 10:21–53. doi: 10.1080/13691060701605488 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Mason CM, Harrison RT (1992) The supply of equity finance in the UK: a strategy for closing the equity gap. Entrep Reg Dev 4:357–380. doi: 10.1080/08985629200000020 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Mason CM, Harrison RT (1995) Closing the regional equity capital gap: the role of informal venture capital. Small Bus Econ 7:153–172. doi: 10.1007/BF01108688 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Mason CM, Harrison RT (1996) Informal venture capital: a study of the investment process, the post-investment experience and investment performance. Entrep Reg Dev 8:105–126. doi: 10.1080/08985629600000007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Mason CM, Harrison RT (2002) Is it worth it? The rates of return from informal venture capital investments. J Bus Ventur 17:211–236. doi: 10.1016/S0883-9026(00)00060-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Maxwell AL, Lévesque M (2014) Trustworthiness: a critical ingredient for entrepreneurs seeking investors. Entrep Theory Pract 38:1057–1080. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6520.2011.00475.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Maxwell AL, Jeffrey SA, Lévesque M (2011) Business angel early stage decision making. J Bus Ventur 26:212–225. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2009.09.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Meier D, Hiddemann T, Brettel M (2006) Wertsteigerung bei buyouts in der post investment-phase-der beitrag von private equity-firmen zum operativen erfolg ihrer portfoliounternehmen im europäischen vergleich. Zeitschrift für Betriebswirtschaft 76:1035–1066. doi: 10.1007/s11573-006-0050-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Morrissette SG (2007) A profile of angel investors. J Priv Equity 10:52–66. doi: 10.3905/jpe.2007.686430 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Nofsinger JR, Wang W (2011) Determinants of start-up firm external financing worldwide. J Bank Financ 35:2282–2294. doi: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2011.01.024 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Oetker R (2003) Erfahrungen mit innovativen start-ups aus sicht eines business angels. In: Albach H, Pinkwart A (eds) Von der gründung bis zur insolvenz erfahrungen von start-up-unternehmen. Gabler Verlag, Wiesbaden, pp 85–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Paul S, Whittam G, Wyper J (2007) Towards a model of the business angel investment process. Ventur Cap 9:107–125. doi: 10.1080/13691060601185425 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Perry JT, Chandler GN, Markova G (2012) Entrepreneurial Effectuation: a review and suggestions for future research. Entrep Theory Pract 36:837–861. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00435.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Politis D (2008) Business angels and value added: what do we know and where do we go? Ventur Cap 10:127–147. doi: 10.1080/13691060801946147 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Prowse S (1998) Angel investors and the market for angel investments. J Bank Financ 22:785–792. doi: 10.1016/S0378-4266(98)00044-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Read S, Sarasvathy SD (2005) Knowing what to do and doing what you know. J Priv Equity 9:45–62. doi: 10.3905/jpe.2005.605370 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Read S, Song M, Smit W (2009) A meta-analytic review of effectuation and venture performance. J Bus Ventur 24:573–587. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2008.02.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Riding A (2008) Business angels and love money investors: segments of the informal market for risk capital. Ventur Cap 10:355–369. doi: 10.1080/13691060802351222 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Röhm P, Köhn A, Kuckertz A, Dehnen HS (2017) A world of difference? The impact of corporate venture capitalists’ investment motivation on startup valuation. J Bus Econ. doi: 10.1007/s11573-017-0857-5 Google Scholar
  53. Sapienza HJ (1992) When do venture capitalists add value? J Bus Ventur 7:9–27. doi: 10.1016/0883-9026(92)90032-M CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Sarasvathy SD (2001) Causation and effectuation: toward a theoritical shift from economic inevitability to entrepreneurial contingency. Acad Manag Rev 26:243–263. doi: 10.2307/259121 Google Scholar
  55. Schwienbacher A (2013) The entrepreneur’s investor choice: the impact on later-stage firm development. J Bus Ventur 28:528–545. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2012.09.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Shane S, Venkataraman S (2000) The Promise of Entrepreneurship as a Field of Research. Acad Manag Rev 25:217–226. doi: 10.2307/259271 Google Scholar
  57. Shepherd DA, Zacharakis A (2001) The venture capitalist-entrepreneur relationship: control, trust and confidence in co-operative behaviour. Ventur Cap 3:129–149. doi: 10.1080/13691060110042763 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Shepherd DA, Douglas EJ, Shanley M (2000) New venture survival. J Bus Ventur 15:393–410. doi: 10.1016/S0883-9026(98)00032-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Sørheim R (2003) The pre-investment behaviour of business angels: a social capital approach. Ventur Cap 5:337–364. doi: 10.1080/1369106032000152443 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Sørheim R (2005) Business angels as facilitators for further finance: an exploratory study. J Small Bus Enterp Dev 12:178–191. doi: 10.1108/14626000510594593 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Van Osnabrugge M (2000) A comparison of business angel and venture capitalist investment procedures: an agency theory-based analysis. Ventur Cap 2:91–109. doi: 10.1080/136910600295729 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Vanacker T, Collewaert V, Paeleman I (2013) The relationship between slack resources and the performance of entrepreneurial firms: the role of venture capital and angel investors. J Manag Stud 50:1070–1096. doi: 10.1111/joms.12026 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Welter C, Mauer R, Wuebker R (2016) Bridging behavioural models and theoretical concepts: effectuation and bricolage in the opportunity creation framework. Strateg Entrep J 10:5–20. doi: 10.1007/s13398-014-0173-7.2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Wetzel W (1983) Angels and informal risk capital. Sloan Manage Rev 24:23–34Google Scholar
  65. Wiltbank R, Read S, Dew N, Sarasvathy SD (2009) Prediction and control under uncertainty: outcomes in angel investing. J Bus Ventur 24:116–133. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2007.11.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sebastian Schmidt
    • 1
  • David Bendig
    • 1
  • Malte Brettel
    • 1
  1. 1.Innovation and Entrepreneurship Group (WIN), TIME Research AreaRWTH Aachen UniversityAachenGermany

Personalised recommendations