Abstract
At the present moment there are no results that have been established on a wider empirical basis on how successful business models should be configured. On the conceptual level, the authors further develop the Business Model Canvas of Osterwalder and Pigneur (Business Model Generation: Ein Handbuch für Visionäre, Spielveränderer und Herausforderer. Campus, Frankfurt am Main, 2011) against the backdrop of a well-founded and practice-oriented understanding of the business model concept. On the empirical level, which is based on the revised Business Model Canvas, the paper examines the relationship between business model configurations and corporate success, using companies in business-to-business markets as examples. The identification of successful business models rests upon the Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA), which can model complex causalities. The results show that there are 14 business model configurations that represent sufficient conditions for the success of a company in terms of sales profitability. Six of these configurations can be interpreted as key paths to corporate success and reflect the value disciplines of Treacy and Wiersema (Harv Bus Rev 71(1):84–93, 1993). Consequences regarding the change of business models can be derived from the empirical results.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
The fact that the sample includes more companies with an above-average sales profitability than companies with an average or below-average sales profitability does not imply biased results, since according to the aim of the study, the csQCA is used exclusively to explain the outcome of an above-average sales profitability.
References
Amenta E, Poulsen J (1994) Where to begin: a survey of five approaches to selecting independent variables for Qualitative Comparative Analysis. Sociol Methods Res 23:22–53
Berg-Schlosser D, De Meur G, Rihoux B, Ragin CC (2009) Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) as an approach. In: Rihoux B, Ragin CC (eds) Configurational comparative methods: Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and related techniques. Sage, Los Angeles, pp 1–18
Bieger T, Reinhold S (2011) Das wertbasierte Geschäftsmodell: Ein aktualisierter Strukturierungsansatz. In: Bieger T, zu Knyphausen-Aufseß D, Krys C (eds) Innovative Geschäftsmodelle. Springer, Berlin, pp 14–70
Björkdahl J (2009) Technology cross-fertilization and the business model: the case of integrating ICTs in mechanical engineering products. Res Policy 38:1468–1477. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2009.07.006
Bortz J, Döring N (2006) Forschungsmethoden und Evaluation für Human- und Sozialwissenschaftler, 4th edn. Springer, Heidelberg
Carroll AB (2004) Managing ethically with global stakeholders: a present and future challenge. Acad Manage Perspect 18(2):114–120. doi:10.5465/ame.2004.13836269
Cheng C-F, Chang M-L, Li C-S (2013) Configural paths to successful product innovation. J Bus Res 66:2561–2573. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2012.10.006
Chesbrough H (2010) Business model innovation: opportunities and barriers. Long Range Plan 43:354–363. doi:10.1016/j.lrp.2009.07.010
DaSilva CM, Trkman P (2014) Business model: what it is and what it is not. Long Range Plan 47:379–389. doi:10.1016/j.lrp.2013.08.004
Fiss PC (2007) A set-theoretic approach to organizational configurations. Acad Manage Rev 32(4):1180–1198. doi:10.5465/AMR.2007.26586092
Gassmann O, Frankenberger K, Csik M (2013) Geschäftsmodelle entwickeln: 55 innovative Konzepte mit dem St. Galler Business Model Navigator. Carl Hanser, München
Goertz G (2006) Assessing the trivialness, relevance, and relative importance of necessary and sufficient conditions in social science. Stud Comp Int Dev 41(2):88–109
Kleinaltenkamp M (1994) Typologien von Business-to-Business-Transaktionen – Kritische Würdigung und Weiterentwicklung. Marketing – ZFP 16(2):77–88
Mitchell D, Coles C (2004) Business model innovation breakthrough moves. J Bus Strategy 25(1):16–26
Morris M, Schindehutte M, Allen J (2005) The entrepreneur’s business model: toward a unified perspective. J Bus Res 58:726–735. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2003.11.001
Ordanini A, Parasuraman A, Rubera G (2014) When the recipe is more important than the ingredients: a Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) of service innovation configurations. J Serv Res 17(2):134–149. doi:10.1177/1094670513513337
Osterwalder A, Pigneur Y (2011) Business Model Generation: Ein Handbuch für Visionäre, Spielveränderer und Herausforderer. Campus, Frankfurt am Main
Ragin CC (1987) The comparative method: moving beyond qualitative and quantitative strategies. University of California Press, Berkeley
Ragin CC (2000) Fuzzy-set social science. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Ragin CC (2008a) Redesigning social inquiry: fuzzy sets and beyond. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Ragin CC (2008b) User’s guide to fuzzy set/Qualitative Comparative Analysis. University of Arizona, Tucson
Ragin CC, Davey S (2009) fs/QCA [Computer Programme], Version 2.5. University of California, Irvine
Ragin CC, Sonnett J (2004) Between complexity and parsimony: limited diversity, counterfactual cases and comparative analysis. In: Knopp S, Minkenberg M (eds) Vergleichen in der Politikwissenschaft. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden, pp 180–197
Rihoux B, De Meur G (2009) Crisp-set Qualitative Comparative Analysis (csQCA). In: Rihoux B, Ragin CC (eds) Configurational comparative methods: Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and related techniques. Sage, Los Angeles, pp 33–68
Sager F, Andereggen C (2012) Dealing with complex causality in realist synthesis: the promise of Qualitative Comparative Analysis. Am J Eval 33(1):60–78. doi:10.1177/1098214011411574
Schallmo D (2013) Theoretische Grundlagen der Geschäftsmodell-Innoavtion: Definitionen, Ansätze, Beschreibungsraster und Leitfragen. In: Schallmo D (ed) Geschäftsmodell-Innovation: Grundlagen, bestehende Ansätze, methodisches Vorgehen und B2B-Geschäftsmodelle. Springer, Wiesbaden, pp 1–28
Schneider CQ, Wagemann C (2007) Qualitative Comparative Analysis und Fuzzy Sets: Ein Lehrbuch für Anwender und jene, die es werden wollen. Barbara Budrich, Opladen
Schneider CQ, Wagemann C (2010) Standards of good practice in Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and fuzzy-sets. Comp Sociol 9(3):397–418. doi:10.1163/156913210X12493538729793
Schneider CQ, Wagemann C (2012) Set-theoretic methods for the social sciences: a guide to Qualitative Comparative Analysis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Schneider MR, Eggert A (2014) Embracing complex causality with the QCA method: an invitation. J Bus Mark Manag 7(1):312–328. urn: nbn:de:0114-jbm-v7i1.894
Teece D (2010) Business models, business strategy and innovation. Long Range Plan 43:172–194. doi:10.1016/j.lrp.2009.07.003
Tóth Z, Thiesbrummel C, Henneberg SC, Naudé P (2015) Understanding configurations of relational attractiveness of the customer firm using fuzzy set QCA. J Bus Res 68:723–734. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2014.07.010
Treacy M, Wiersema F (1993) Customer intimacy and other value disciplines. Harv Bus Rev 71(1):84–93
Ulaga W, Reinartz WJ (2011) Hybrid offerings: how manufacturing firms combine goods and services successfully. J Mark 75(6):5–23. doi:10.1509/jm.09.0395
Verlagsgruppe NEWS (2014) trend TOP 500! Österreichs erfolgreichste Unternehmen. http://www.trendtop500.at/unternehmen/?info=-nu. Accessed 10 April 2014
Werani T (2012) Business-to-Business-Marketing: Ein wertbasierter Ansatz. Kohlhammer, Stuttgart
Wirtz B (2010) Business Model Management: Design—Instrumente—Erfolgsfaktoren von Geschäftsmodellen. Springer, Wiesbaden
Woodside AG, Zhang M (2012) Identifying X-consumers using causal recipes: “whales” and “jumbo shrimps” casino gamblers. J Gambl Stud 28:13–26. doi:10.1007/s10899-011-9241-5
Zott C, Amit R (2010) Business model design: an activity system perspective. Long Range Plan 43:216–226. doi:10.1016/j.lrp.2009.07.004
Zott C, Amit R, Massa L (2011) The business model: recent developments and future research. J Manag 37:1019–1042. doi:10.1177/0149206311406265
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Werani, T., Freiseisen, B., Martinek-Kuchinka, P. et al. How should successful business models be configured? Results from an empirical study in business-to-business markets and implications for the change of business models. J Bus Econ 86, 579–609 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11573-015-0795-z
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11573-015-0795-z
Keywords
- Business model
- Business model configuration
- Business model innovation
- Business model transformation
- Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA)