Advertisement

Zeitschrift für Betriebswirtschaft

, Volume 82, Supplement 6, pp 5–32 | Cite as

Do contextual factors matter?

An investigation of ethical judgments of corrupt acts
  • Tanja RablEmail author
ZfB-Special Issue 6/2012

Abstract

Drawing on the moral intensity concept and attribution theory, this vignette study investigates the influence of contextual factors on people’s ethical judgments of others’ behavior in corruption situations. It examines differences regarding corruption occurring in a national or international context, in an environment where it is usual or unusual, with high or low bribes, initiatively or reactively, because of private or organizational motives, and in situations of financial sufficiency or deficiency. The results show that corruption in situations where it is usual, motivated by organizational reasons, and initiated because of financial difficulties is judged as significantly less unethical. The paper discusses the findings’ implications for the prevention of corruption in organizations.

Keywords

Context Corruption Ethical judgment Situation Vignette study 

JEL Classification

D73 M14 M19 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The author thanks Ines Greffin for her help with the vignette development and data collection. Previous versions of this paper were presented at the 70th Academy of Management Annual Meeting in Montréal, Canada, 2010, and at the 73rd Annual Conference of the German Academic Association for Business Research in Kaiserslautern, Germany, 2011. The author is grateful to the respective anonymous reviewers, discussants, and conference participants for their constructive comments that helped to improve earlier drafts of this paper. The author also thanks the editors of this special issue and two anonymous reviewers for their useful suggestions.

References

  1. Ajzen I (1991) The theory of planned behavior. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 50(2):179–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Albrecht WS, Albrecht CO, Albrecht CC, Zimbelman MF (2011) Fraud examination, 4th edn. South-Western, MasonGoogle Scholar
  3. Alexander CS, Becker HJ (1978) The use of vignettes in survey research. Public Opin Q 42(1):93–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Andvig JC, Fjeldstad O (2001) Corruption: a review of contemporary research. CMI Report R 2001:7. Chr. Michelsen Institute, Bergen. http://cmi.no/publications/publication.cfm?pubid=861. Accessed 11 Nov 2005
  5. Andvig JC, Moene KO (1990) How corruption may corrupt. J Econ Behav Organ 13(1):63–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Argandoña A (2005) Corruption and companies: the use of facilitating payments. J Bus Ethics 60(3):251–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ashforth BE, Anand V (2003) The normalization of corruption in organizations. Res Organ Behav 25:1–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ashforth BE, Gioia DA, Robinson SL, Treviño LK (2008) Re-viewing organizational corruption. Acad Manage Rev 33(3):670–684CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ashforth BE, Kreiner GE (2002) Normalizing emotion in organizations: making the extraordinary seem ordinary. Hum Resour Manage Rev 12(2):215–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bannenberg B (2002) Korruption in Deutschland und ihre strafrechtliche Kontrolle: eine kriminologisch-strafrechtliche Analyse. Luchterhand, NeuwiedGoogle Scholar
  11. Bannenberg B, Schaupensteiner W (2004) Korruption in Deutschland. Beck, MünchenGoogle Scholar
  12. Barnett JH, Karson MJ (1987) Personal values and business decisions: an exploratory investigation. J Bus Ethics 6(5):371–382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Baucus MS, Near JP (1991) Can illegal corporate behavior be predicted? An event history analysis. Acad Manage J 34(1):9–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Beck M, Opp K (2001) Der faktorielle Survey und die Messung von Normen. Kölner Z Soz Sozpsychol 53(2):283–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Borner S, Schwyzer C (1999) Bekämpfung der Bestechung im Lichte der Neuen Politischen Ökonomie. In: Pieth M, Eigen P (eds) Korruption im internationalen Geschäftsverkehr: Bestandsaufnahme, Bekämpfung, Prävention. Luchterhand, Neuwied, pp 17–39Google Scholar
  16. Brief AP, Buttram RT, Dukerich JM (2001) Collective corruption in the corporate world: toward a process model. In: Turner ME (ed) Groups at work: theory and research. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, pp 471–499Google Scholar
  17. Buckley MR, Wiese DS, Harvey MG (1998) Identifying factors which may influence unethical behavior. Teach Bus Ethics 2(1):71–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cadot O (1987) Corruption as a gamble. J Public Econ 33(2):223–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Carlson DS, Kacmar KM, Wadsworth LL (2002) The impact of moral intensity dimensions on ethical decision making: assessing the relevance of orientation. J Managerial Issues 14(1):15–30Google Scholar
  20. Carrillo JD (1999) Corruption in hierarchies. Annales d’Economie et de Statistique 59. www.adres.prd.fr/annales/anciensnumeros/resumes/n59/03.pdf. Assessed 21 Jan 2005Google Scholar
  21. Carrillo JD (2000) Grafts, bribes, and the practice of corruption. J Econ Manage Strategy 9(2):257–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Cherry J (2006) The impact of normative influence and locus of control on ethical judgments and intentions: a cross-cultural comparison. J Bus Ethics 68(2):113–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Clinard MB (1990) Corporate corruption. The abuse of power. Praeger, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  24. Coleman JW (1998) The criminal elite. Understanding white-collar crime, 4th edn. St. Martin’s, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  25. Collier MW (2002) Explaining corruption: an institutional choice approach. Crime Law Soc Change 38(1):1–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Cressey DR (1971) Other people’s money: a study in the social psychology of embezzlement. Wadsworth, BelmontGoogle Scholar
  27. Daboub AJ, Rasheed AMA, Priem RL, Gray DA (1995) Top management team characteristics and corporate illegal activity. Acad Manage Rev 20(1):138–170Google Scholar
  28. Darley JM (2005) The cognitive and social psychology of contagious organizational corruption. Brooklyn Law Rev 70(4):1177–1194Google Scholar
  29. Davis MA, Johnson NB, Ohmer DG (1998) Issue-contingent effects on ethical decision making: a cross-cultural comparison. J Bus Ethics 17(4):373–389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Decker WH (1994) Unethical decisions and attributions: gains, losses, and concentration of effects. Psychol Rep 75(3):1207–1214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Decker WH, Calo TJ (2007) Observers’ impressions of unethical persons and whistleblowers. J Bus Ethics 76(3):309–318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Deflem M (1995) Corruption, law, and justice: a conceptual clarification. J Crim Justice 23(3):243–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. DiMaggio PJ, Powell WW (1983) The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. Am Sociol Rev 48(2):147–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Dubinsky AJ, Loken B (1989) Analyzing ethical decision making in marketing. J Bus Res 19(2):83–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Ferrell OC, Gresham LG (1985) A contingency framework for understanding ethical decision making in marketing. J Marketing 49(3):87–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Ford RC, Richardson WD (1994) Ethical decision making: a review of the empirical literature. J Bus Ethics 13(3):205–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Frese M, Fay D (2001) Personal initiative: an active performance concept for work in the 21st century. Res Organ Behav 23:133–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Fritzsche DJ (2000) Ethical climates and the ethical dimension of decision making. J Bus Ethics 24(2):125–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Gatti R, Paternostro S, Rigolini J (2003) Individual attitudes toward corruption: do social effects matter? World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 3122, World Bank, Washington, DC. http://econ.worldbank.org/files/29354_wp3122.pdf. Accessed 28 Apr 2005
  40. Gaviria A (2002) Assessing the effects of corruption and crime on firm performance: evidence from Latin America. Emerg Markets Rev 3(3):245–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Getz KA, Volkema RJ (2001) Culture, perceived corruption, and economics: a model of predictors and outcomes. Bus Soc 40(1):7–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Goldstein H (2003) Multilevel statistical models, 3rd edn. Arnold, LondonGoogle Scholar
  43. Grieger J (2005) Corruption in organizations: some outlines for research. Working Paper No. 203, Department of Economics and Social Sciences, University of Wuppertal, Wuppertal. http://www.wiwi.uni-wuppertal.de/grieger/wp203.pdf. Accessed 31 Jul 2007
  44. Gundlach MJ, Martinko MJ, Douglas SC (2008) A new approach to examining whistle-blowing: the influence of cognitions and anger. SAM Adv Manage J 73(4):40–50Google Scholar
  45. Hacker F (1981) Sozialpsychologische Bedingungen der Korruption. In: Brünner C (ed) Korruption und Kontrolle. Böhlau, Wien, pp 137–150Google Scholar
  46. Hansen RS (1992) A multidimensional scale for measuring business ethics: a purification and refinement. J Bus Ethics 11(7):523–534CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Hegarty WH, Sims HP (1978) Some determinants of unethical decision behavior: an experiment. J Appl Psychol 63(4):451–457CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Heider F (1958) The psychology of interpersonal relations. Wiley, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Höffling C (2002) Korruption als soziale Beziehung. Leske + Budrich, OpladenGoogle Scholar
  50. Hofmann DA (1997) An overview of the logic and rationale of hierarchical linear models. J Manage 23(6):723–744CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Hotchkiss C (1998) The sleeping dog stirs: new signs of life in efforts to end corruption in international business. J Public Policy Market 17(1):108–115Google Scholar
  52. Hox JJ, Kreft IGG, Hermkens PLJ (1991) The analysis of factorial surveys. Sociol Methods Res 19(4):493–510CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Hunt SD, Vitell SJ (1986) A general theory of marketing ethics. J Macromarketing 6(1):5–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Johns G (2001) In praise of context. J Organ Behav 22(1):31–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Johns G (2006) The essential impact of context on organizational behavior. Acad Manage Rev 31(2):386–408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Johnson S, Kaufmann D, McMillan J, Woodruff C (2000) Why do firms hide? Bribes and unofficial activity after communism. J Public Econ 76:495–520CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Johnston M (2000) The new corruption rankings: implications for analysis and reform. Paper presented at the World Congress of the International Political Science Association. Quebec City, Canada. http://departments.colgate.edu/polisci/papers/mjohnston/originals/JohnstonIPSA2000.pdf. Accessed 21 Jan 2005
  58. Jones EE, Davis KE (1965) A theory of correspondent inferences: from acts to dispositions. In: Berkowitz L (ed) Advances in experimental social psychology, vol 2. Academic, New York, pp 220–266Google Scholar
  59. Jones TM (1991) Ethical decision making by individuals in organizations: an issue-contingent model. Acad Manage Rev 16(2):366–395Google Scholar
  60. Jones TM, Ryan LV (1997) The link between ethical judgment and action in organizations: a moral approbation approach. Organ Sci 8(6):663–680CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Kahneman D, Tversky A (1979) Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47(2):263–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Karren RJ, Barringer MW (2002) A review and analysis of the policy-capturing methodology in organizational research: guidelines for research and practice. Organ Res Methods 5(4):337–361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Kelley HH (1973) The process of causal attribution. Am Psychol 28(2):107–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Kelley HH, Michela JL (1980) Attribution theory and research. Annu Rev Psychol 31:457–501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Killias M, Ribeaud D (1999) Korruption: Neue Erkenntnisse im Lichte quantitativer Untersuchungen. Crimiscope Nr. 4. http://www.unil.ch/webdav/site/esc/shared/Crimiscope/Crimiscope004_1999_D.pdf. Accessed 25 Jan 2006
  66. Kohlberg L (1976) Moral stages and moralization: the cognitive-developmental approach. In: Lickona T (ed) Moral development and behavior: theory, research, and social issues. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York, pp 31–53Google Scholar
  67. Langseth P (2006) Measuring corruption. In: Sampford C, Shacklock A, Connors C, Galtung F (eds) Measuring corruption. Ashgate, Aldershot, pp 7–44Google Scholar
  68. Levine DP (2005) The corrupt organization. Human Relations 58(6):723–740CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Lindgreen A (2004) Corruption and unethical behavior: report on a set of Danish guidelines. J Bus Ethics 51(1):31–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Loe TW, Ferrell L, Mansfield P (2000) A review of empirical studies assessing ethical decision making in business. J Bus Ethics 25(3):185–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Löw A (2002) Multiperspektivische Analyse der Wirtschaftskriminalität -- Konsequenzen für die Gestaltung des Integrierten Risiko-Managements. Institut für Versicherungswirtschaft der Universität St. Gallen, St. GallenGoogle Scholar
  72. Martin KD, Cullen JB, Johnson LL, Parboteeah KP (2007) Deciding to bribe: a cross-level analysis of firm and home country influences on bribery activity. Acad Manage J 50(6):1401–1422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. McMahon J, Harvey R (2007) The effect of moral intensity on ethical judgment. J Bus Ethics 72(4):335–357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Mencl J, May D (2009) The effects of proximity and empathy on ethical decision-making: an exploratory investigation. J Bus Ethics 85(2):201–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Meyer JW, Rowan B (1977) Institutionalized organizations: formal structure as myth and ceremony. Am J Sociol 83(2):340–363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Misangyi VF, Weaver GR, Elms H (2008) Ending corruption: the interplay among institutional logics, resources, and institutional entrepreneurs. Acad Manage Rev 33(3):750–770CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Mitchell WJ, Lewis PV, Reinsch NL Jr (1992) Bank ethics: an exploratory study of ethical behaviors and perceptions in small, local banks. J Bus Ethics 11(3):197–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Mocan HN (2004) What determines corruption? National Bureau of Economic Research, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  79. Morris SA, McDonald RA (1995) The role of moral intensity in moral judgments: an empirical investigation. J Bus Ethics 14(9):715–726CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. O’Fallon MJ, Butterfield KD (2005) A review of the empirical ethical decision-making literature: 1996–2003. J Bus Ethics 59(4):375–413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Park H (2003) Determinants of corruption: a cross-national analysis. Multinat Bus Rev 11(2):29–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Payne SL, Giacalone RA (1990) Social psychological approaches to the perception of ethical dilemmas. Hum Rel 43(7):649–665CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Peterson DK (2002) The relationship between unethical behavior and the dimensions of the Ethical Climate Questionnaire. J Bus Ethics 41(4):313–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Pinto J, Leana CR, Pil FK (2008) Corrupt organizations or organizations of corrupt individuals? Two types of organization-level corruption. Acad Manage Rev 33(3):685–709CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Powpaka S (2002) Factors affecting managers’ decision to bribe: an empirical investigation. J Bus Ethics 40(3):227–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Priddat BP (2004) Verdeckte Geldgeschäfte, illegale Spenden, Bestechungen: “public-private-partnership” der anderen Art. In: Brink A, Karitzki O (eds) Unternehmensethik in turbulenten Zeiten. Wirtschaftsführer über Ethik im Management. Haupt, Bern, pp 113–128Google Scholar
  87. Rabl T (2008) Private corruption and its actors—insights into the subjective decision making processes. Pabst, LengerichGoogle Scholar
  88. Rabl T (2011) The impact of situational influences on corruption in organizations. J Bus Ethics 100(1):85–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Rabl T, Kühlmann TM (2008) Understanding corruption in organizations—development and empirical assessment of an action model. J Bus Ethics 82(2):477–495CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Rabl T, Kühlmann TM (2009) Why or why not? Rationalizing corruption in organizations. Cross Cult Manage Int J 16(3):268–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Raudenbush SW, Bryk AS (2002) Hierarchical linear models: applications and data analysis methods, 2nd edn. Sage, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
  92. Reeder GD, Spores JM (1983) The attribution of morality. J Pers Soc Psychol 44(4):736–745CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Rest JR (1986) Moral development: advances in research and theory. Praeger, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  94. Rose-Ackerman S (2002) “Grand” corruption and the ethics of global business. J Banking Finance 26(9):1889–1918CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Ross M, DiTecco D (1975) An attributional analysis of moral judgments. J Soc Issues 31(3):91–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Rossi PH (1979) Vignette analysis: uncovering the normative structure of complex judgments. In: Merton RK, Coleman JS, Rossi PH (eds) Qualitative and quantitative social research. Free Press, New York, pp 176–186Google Scholar
  97. Rossi PH, Anderson AB (1982) The factorial survey approach: an introduction. In: Rossi PH, Nock SL (eds) Measuring social judgments. The factorial survey approach. Sage, Beverly Hills, pp 15–67Google Scholar
  98. Rousseau DM, Fried Y (2001) Location, location, location: contextualizing organizational research. J Organ Behav 22(1):1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Rudolph U, Roesch SC, Greitemeyer T, Weiner B (2004) A meta-analytic review of help giving and aggression from an attributional perspective: contributions to a general theory of motivation. Cogn Emot 18(6):815–848CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Sanyal RN, Samanta SK (2004) Correlates of bribe giving in international business. Int J Comm Manage 14(2):1–14Google Scholar
  101. Scott WR (2000) Institutions and organizations. Sage, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
  102. Sims RL, Gegez AE (2004) Attitudes towards business ethics: a five nation comparative study. J Bus Ethics 50(3):253–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Snijders TAB, Bosker RJ (1999) Multilevel analysis: an introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling. Sage, LondonGoogle Scholar
  104. Sparks JR, Pan Y (2010) Ethical judgments in business ethics research: definition, and research agenda. J Bus Ethics 91(3):405–418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Steiner PM, Atzmüller C (2006) Experimentelle Vignettendesigns in faktoriellen Surveys. Kölner Z Soz Sozpsychol 58(1):117–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Su Z, Richelieu A (1999) Western managers working in Romania: perception and attitude regarding business ethics. J Bus Ethics 20(2):133–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Sutherland EH (1949) White collar crime. Dryden, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  108. Sutherland EH, Cressey DR, Luckenbill D (1995) The theory of differential association. In: Herman NJ (ed) Deviance: a symbolic interactionist approach. General Hall, Lanham, pp 64–68Google Scholar
  109. Swamy A, Knack S, Lee Y, Azfar O (2001) Gender and corruption. J Devel Econ 64(1):25–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. Tanzi V (1998) Corruption around the world: causes, consequences, scope, and cures. Int Monet Fund Staff Pap 45(4):559–594CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Transparency International (2011a) About Transparency International. http://www.transparency.org/about_us. Accessed 3 Nov 2011
  112. Transparency International (2011b) Anti-corruption conventions and other international instruments. http://www.transparency.org/global_priorities/international_conventions. Accessed 3 Nov 2011
  113. Transparency International (2011c) Corruption Perceptions Index 2011. http://cpi.transparency.org/cpi2011/results. Accessed 14 Sept 2012
  114. Treisman D (2000) The causes of corruption: a cross-national study. J Public Econ 76(3):399–457CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. Treviño LK (1986) Ethical decision making in organizations: a person-situation interactionist model. Acad Manage Rev 11(3):601–617Google Scholar
  116. Treviño LK, Youngblood SA (1990) Bad apples in bad barrels: a causal analysis of ethical decision-making behavior. J Appl Psychol 75(4):378–385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. Treviño LK, Weaver GR, Reynolds SJ (2006) Behavioral ethics in organizations: a review. J Manage 32(6):951–990CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. Tsalikis J, LaTour MS (1995) Bribery and extortion in international business: ethical perceptions of Greeks compared to Americans. J Bus Ethics 14(4):249–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. Vahlenkamp W, Knauß I (1995) Korruption – hinnehmen oder handeln? Bundeskriminalamt, WiesbadenGoogle Scholar
  120. Victor B, Cullen JB (1988) The organizational bases of ethical work climates. Adm Sci Q 33(1):101–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  121. Vitell SJ, Festervand TA (1987) Business ethics: conflicts, practices and beliefs of industrial executives. J Bus Ethics 6(2):111–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  122. Vitell SJ, Grove SJ (1987) Marketing ethics and the techniques of neutralization. J Bus Ethics 6(6):433–438CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  123. Weiner B (1985) An attributional theory of achievement motivation and emotion. Psychol Rev 92(4):548–573CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  124. Weiner B (1995) Judgments of responsibility: a foundation for a theory of social conduct. Guilford, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  125. West BT, Welch KE, Galecki A (2007) Linear mixed models: a practical guide using statistical software. Chapman and Hall, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  126. Wheeler S (1992) The problem of white-collar crime motivation. In: Schlegel K, Weisburd D (eds) White-collar crime reconsidered. Northeastern University Press, Boston, pp 108–123Google Scholar
  127. Williams JW, Beare ME (1999) The business of bribery: globalization, economic liberalization, and the “problem” of corruption. Crime Law Soc Change 32(2):115–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  128. Zedeck S (1977) An information processing model and approach to the study of motivation. Organ Behav Hum Perform 18(1):47–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  129. Zekos GI (2004) Ethics versus corruption in globalization. J Manage Dev 23(7/8):631–647CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Human Resource ManagementUniversity of BayreuthBayreuthGermany

Personalised recommendations