Abstract
In a field study of 211 employees of a midsized German high-tech company, useful feedback from coworkers was examined as a moderator of the relationship between age and supervisor ratings of radical innovative work behavior. When employees perceived higher levels of useful feedback from their coworkers, the relationship between age and radical innovative work behavior followed an inverted U-shape. This inverted U-shaped relationship was decreasingly manifested as the level of perceived useful feedback from coworkers dropped. Given demographic change and the aging of the workforce of many organizations, this finding broadens the still fragmentary knowledge of the conditions under which aging is likely to have more or less positive effects on innovative work behavior. The authors discuss the theoretical and practical implications of these results on both the individual and the team level of analysis.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Since the option for standardized beta coefficients may not be combined with clustered regression analysis in STATA, we normalized all independent variables before analysis to obtain standardized beta coefficients.
Because this slope was only marginally significant, we also tested the slope at younger age (1.5 SD below the age mean, which corresponds to 22.3 years). At − 1.5 SD, the slope is significantly positive (p < 0.05).
References
Ackerman PL (1996) A theory of adult intellectual development: process, personality, interests, and knowledge. Intelligence 22:229–259
Ackerman PL (2000) Domain-specific knowledge as the “dark matter” of adult intelligence: gf/fc, personality and interest correlates. J Gerontolo Psycholo Sci 55B(2):69–84
Aiken LS, West SG (1991) Multiple regression: testing and interpreting interactions. Sage, Newbury Park
Amabile TM (1983a) The social psychology of creativity. Springer, New York
Amabile TM (1983b) Social psychology of creativity: a componential conceptualization. J Pers Soc Psychol 45:357–377
Amabile TM (1988) A model of creativity and innovation in organizations. In: Staw BM, Cummings LL (eds) Research in organizational behavior. JAI Press, Greenwich, pp 187–209
Amabile TM (1998) How to kill creativity. Harvard Bus Rev 76(5):76–87
Anderson N, De Dreu CKW, Nijstad BA (2004) The routinization of innovation research: a constructively critical review of the state-of-the-science. J Organ Behav 25(2):147–173
Baltes PB, Lindenberger U, Staudinger U (2006) Life span theory in developmental psychology. In: Damon W, Lerner RM (eds) Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 1. Theoretical models of human development, 6th ed. Wiley, New York
Bigoness WJ, Perreault WD Jr (1981) A conceptual paradigm and approach for the study of innovators. Acad Manag J 24(1):68–82
Brislin RW (1980) Translation and content analysis of oral and written material. In Triandis HC, Berry JW (eds) Handbook of cross-cultural psychology, Vol. 2: Methodology. Allyn and Bacon, Boston, pp 349–444
Cattell RB (1971) Abilities: Their structure, growth and action. Houghton Mifflin, Boston
Cattell RB (1987) Intelligence: Its structure, growth, and action. North-Holland
Cleveland JN, Shore LM (1992) Self- and supervisory perspectives on age and work attitudes and performance. J Appl Psychol 77:469–484
Cooper RG (1990) Stage-gate systems: a new tool for managing new products. Bus Horiz 33(3):44
Davenport T, Leibold M, Voelpel S (2006) Strategic management in the innovation economy: strategy approaches and tools for dynamic innovation capabilities. Wiley, New York
Davies DR, Matthews G, Wong CSK (1991) Ageing and work. Int Rev Ind Organ Psycholo 6:149–211
Deci EL, Ryan RM (1985) Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. Plenum, New York
Ebner NC, Freund AM, Baltes PB (2006) Developmental changes in personal goal orientation from young to late adulthood: from striving for gains to maintenance and prevention of losses. Psychol Aging 21(4):664–678
Farr JL, Ford CM (1990) Individual innovation. In: West MA, Farr JL (eds) Innovation and creativity at work. Wiley, New York
Friedman RS, Förster J (2001) The effects of promotion and prevention cues on creativity. J Pers Soc Psychol 81(6):1001–1013
Gemünden HG, Salomo S, Hölzle K (2007) Role models for radical innovation in times of open innovation. Creat Innov Manag 16(4):408–421
George JM (2007) Creativity in organizations. Acad Manag Ann 1(1):439–477
Greller MM, Simpson P (1999) In search of late career: a review of contemporary social science research applicable to the understanding of late career. Hum Resour Manag Rev 9:309–347
Hambrick DC, Mason PA (1984) Upper echelons: the organization as a reflection of its top managers. Acad Manag Rev 9(2):193–206
Hansson RO, DeKoekkoeck PD, Neece WM, Patterson DW (1997) Successful aging at work. Annual review, 1992–1996: The older worker and transitions to retirement. J Vocat Behav 51:202–233
Harrison DA, Klein KJ (2007) What’s the difference? Diversity constructs as separation, variety, or disparity in organizations. Acad Manag Rev 32:1199–1228
Howell JM, Higgins CA (1990) Champions of Technological Innovation. Adm Sci Q 35(2):317–330
Janssen O (2000) Job demands, perceptions of effort-reward fairness and innovative work behaviour. J Occup Organ Psychol 73(3):287–302
Janssen O (2001) Fairness perceptions as a moderator in the curvilinear relationships between job demands, and job performance and job satisfaction. Acad Manag J 44:1039–1050
Janssen O, Van Yperen NW (2004) Employees’ goal orientations, the quality of leader-member exchange, and the outcomes of job performance and job satisfaction. Acad Manag J 47(3):368–384
Janssen O, van de Vliert E, West M (2004) The bright and dark sides of individual and group innovation: a Special Issue introduction. J Organ Behav 25(2):129–145
Jones BF (2005) Age and great invention. Paper presented at NBER working paper series. Cambridge
Kanfer R, Ackerman PL (2004) Aging, adult development, and work motivation. Acad Manag Rev 29(3):440–458
Kanter RM (1988) When a 1000 flowers bloom—structural, collective, and social conditions for innovation in organization. Res Organ Behav 10(1):169–211
Kearney E, Gebert D (2009) Managing diversity and enhancing team outcomes: the promise of transformational leadership. J Appl Psychol 94(1):77–89
Kearney E, Gebert D, Voelpel SC (2009) When and how diversity benefits teams: the importance of team members’ need for cognition. Acad Manag J 52(3):581–598
Kluger AN, DeNisi A (1996) The effects of feedback interventions on performance: historical review, a meta-analysis and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychol Bull 119:254–284
Lawrence BS (1996) Interest in indifference: the role of age in the organizational sciences. Res Pers Hum Resour Manag 14:1–59
Lehman HC (2006) Age and achievement. In: Moody HR (ed) Aging: concepts and controversies, 5th ed. Pine Forge Press, Thousand Oaks
Leibold M, Voelpel S (2006) Managing the aging workforce: challenges and solutions. Wiley, New York
Lubart TI (1999) Componential models. In: Runco MA, Pritsker SR (eds) Encyclopedia of creativity. Academic, New York, pp 295–300
Miron E, Erez M, Naveh E (2004) Do personal characteristics and cultural values that promote innovation, quality, and efficiency compete or complement each other? J Organ Behav 25(2):175–199
Moody HR (2006) Aging: concepts and controversies, 5th ed. Pine Forge Press, Thousand Oaks
Mumford MD (2000) Managing creative people: strategies and tactics for innovation. Hum Resour Manag Rev 10(3):313
Mumford MD, Gustafson SB (1988) Creativity syndrome: integration, application, and innovation. Psychol Bull 103(1):27–43
Ng TWH, Feldman DC (2008) The relationship of age to ten dimensions of job performance. J Appl Psychol 93(2):392–423
Oldham GR, Cummings A (1996) Employee creativity: personal and contextual factors at work. Acad Manag J 39(3):607–634
Posthuma RA, Campion MA (2009) Age stereotypes in the workplace: common stereotypes, moderators, and future research directions. J Manag 35(1):158–188
Redmond MR, Mumford MD, Teach R (1993) Putting creativity to work: effects of leader behavior on subordinate creativity. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 55:120–151
Rice MP, Kelley D, Peters L, O’Connor GC (2001) Radical innovation: triggering initiation of opportunity recognition and evaluation. R&D Manag 31(4):409
Schaie KW (1996) Intellectual development in adulthood: the Seattle longitudinal study. Cambridge University Press, New York
Scott SG, Bruce RA (1994) Determinants of innovative behavior: a path model of individual innovation in the workplace. Acad Manag J 37(3):580–607
Shalley CE, Zhou J, Oldham GR (2004) The effects of personal and contextual characteristics on creativity: where should we go from here? J Manag 30(6):933–958
Sheremata WA (2000) Centrifugal and centripetal forces in radical new product development under time pressure. Acad Manag Rev 25(2):389–408
Spreitzer GM (1995) Psychological empowerment in the workplace: dimensions, measurement, and validation. Acad Manag J 38(5):1442–1465
Sterns HL, Miklos SM (1995) The aging worker in a changing environment: organizational and individual issues. J Vocat Behav 47:248–268
Super DE (1980) A life-span, life-space approach to career development. J Vocat Behav 16:282–298
Thornton WJL, Dumke HA (2005) Age differences in everyday problem-solving and decision-making effectiveness: a meta-analytic review. Psychol Aging 20:85–99
Utman CH (1997) Performance effects of motivational state: a meta-analysis. Personal Soc Psychol Rev 1:170–182
Van de Ven AH (1986) Central problems in the management of innovation. Manag Sci 32(5):590–607
Van Knippenberg D, De Dreu CKW, Homan AC (2004) Work group diversity and group performance: an integrative model and research agenda. J Appl Psychol 89:1008–1022
Van Knippenberg D, Schippers MC (2007) Work group diversity. Annu Rev Psychol 58:515–541
Voelpel S, Leibold M, Früchtenicht J-D (2007) Herausforderung 50 plus: Konzepte zum Management der Aging Workforce: Die Antwort auf das demographische Dilemma. Wiley, Erlangen
Vroom VH (1964) Work and motivation. Wiley, New York
Warr P (1997) Age, work, and mental health, the impact of work on older adults. Springer, New York
Warr P (2001) Age and work behaviour: physical attributes, cognitive abilities, knowledge, personality traits, and motives. Int Rev Ind Organ Psychol 74:165–199
Warr P, Miles A, Platts C (2001) Age and personality in the British population between 16 and 64 years. J Occup Organ Psychol 74:165–199
Wechsler D (1944) The measurement of intelligence. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore
Wegge J, Roth C, Neubach B, Schmidt KH, Kanfer R (2008) Age and gender diversity as determinants of performance and health in a public organization: the role of task complexity and group size. J Appl Psychol 93:1301–1313
West MA, Farr JL (1989) Innovation at work: psychological perspectives. Soc Behav 4(1):15–30
West MA, Farr JL (1990) Innovation at work. In: West MA, Farr JL (eds) Innovation and creativity at work: psychological and organizational strategies. Wiley, Chichester
Williams KY, O’Reilly CA (1998) Demography and diversity in organizations: a review of 40 years o research. In: Staw BM, Cummings LL (eds) Research in organizational behavior. JAI Press, Greenwich, pp 77–140
Woodman RW, Sawyer JE, Griffin RW (1993) Toward a theory of organizational creativity. Acad Manag Rev 18:293–321
Wu CH, Cheng Y, Ip HM, McBridge-Chang C (2005) Age differences in creativity: task structure and knowledge base. Creat Res J 17(4), 321–326
Zhou J (1998) Feedback valence, feedback style, task autonomy, and achievement orientation: interactive effects on creative performance. J Appl Psychol 83:261–276
Zhou J (2003) When the presence of creative coworkers is related to creativity: role of supervisor close monitoring, developmental feedback, and creative personality. J Appl Psychol 88(3):413–422
Zhou J, George JM (2001) When job dissatisfaction leads to creativity: encouraging the expression of voice. Acad Manag J 44(4):682–696
Acknowledgment
We would like to thank Editor Barbara Beham and two anonymous reviewers for their insightful comments and suggestions that greatly improved the quality of this article. We would also like to thank the Volkswagen Foundation for generously supporting our research.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Schaffer, S., Kearney, E., Voelpel, S. et al. Managing demographic change and diversity in organizations: how feedback from coworkers moderates the relationship between age and innovative work behavior. Z Betriebswirtsch 82 (Suppl 2), 45–68 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11573-011-0542-z
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11573-011-0542-z