Advertisement

Zeitschrift für Betriebswirtschaft

, Volume 81, Supplement 6, pp 111–136 | Cite as

Employer brand building for start-ups: which job attributes do employees value most?

  • Andranik TumasjanEmail author
  • Maria Strobel
  • Isabell M. Welpe
ZfB-SPECIAL ISSUE 6/2011

Abstract

Although attracting talented personnel is one of the biggest challenges for start-ups, little is known about how nascent ventures can successfully build an employer brand. This study investigates which distinctive job attributes start-ups can use for their employer branding. We identify the unique job attributes distinguishing entrepreneurial firms from large firms and calibrate the relative value of these job attributes from the potential employees’ perspective. Using conjoint analysis we demonstrate that a communal team climate and the early assignment of responsibilities are a start-up’s most attractive job attributes for prospective applicants. We contribute to the entrepreneurial marketing literature by bringing forward the concept of entrepreneurial employer branding, by examining entrepreneurial firms’ unique and attractive job attributes, and by discussing how start-ups can make use of these attributes in their recruiting and employer branding activities.

Keywords

Entrepreneurial marketing Employer branding Start-ups Personnel marketing Job attributes 

JEL-Classification

M13 M31 M51 

References

  1. Ahmadi M, Helms MM (1997) Small firms, big opportunities: the potential of career for business graduates in SMEs. Educ Train 39:52–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Albinger HS, Freeman SJ (2000) Corporate social performance and attractiveness as an employer to different job seeking populations. J Bus Ethics 28:243–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aldrich HE, von Glinow MA (1992) Personal networks and infrastructure development. In: Gibson DV, Kozmetsky G, Smilor RW (eds) The technopolis phenomenon: smart cities, fast systems, global networks. Rowman & Littlefield, Lanham, pp 125–145Google Scholar
  4. Allen DG, Mahto RV, Otondo RF (2007) Web-based recruitment: effects of information, organizational brand, and attitudes toward a web site on applicant attraction. J Appl Psychol 92:1696–1708CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ambler T, Barrow S (1996) The employer brand. J Brand Manag 4:185–206Google Scholar
  6. Atenta (2010) Employer Branding Videos: Ein Vergleich, ein Problem und eine Lösung. http://www.personalberater-blog.de/employer-branding-videos-ein-vergleich-ein-problem-und-eine-losung. Accessed 26 Aug 2010Google Scholar
  7. Backhaus K, Tikoo S (2004) Conceptualizing and researching employer branding. Career Dev Int 9:501–517CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Backhaus K, Erichson B, Plinke W, Weiber R (2006) Multivariate Analysemethoden: Eine anwendungsorientierte Einführung, 11th edn. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  9. Bartram D, Lindley PA, Marshall L, Foster J (1995) The recruitment and selection of young people by small businesses. J Occup Organ Psych 68:339–358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Behrends T (2007) Recruitment practices in small and medium size enterprises. An empirical study among knowledge-intensive professional service firms. Manag Revue 18:55–74Google Scholar
  11. Behrends T, Martin A (2006) Personalarbeit in Klein- und Mittelbetrieben—Empirische Befunde und Ansatzpunkte zu ihrer theoretischen Erklärung. Z KMU Entrep 54:25–49Google Scholar
  12. Belfield CR (1999) The behaviour of graduates in the SME labour market: evidence and perceptions. Small Bus Econ 12:249–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Blatt R (2009) Tough love: how communal schemas and contracting practices build relational capital in entrepreneurial teams. Acad Manag Rev 34:533–551CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Breaugh JA, Starke M (2000) Research on employee recruitment: so many studies, so many remaining questions. J Manag 26:405–434CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Brundin E, Patzelt H, Shepherd DA (2008) Managers’ emotional displays and employees’ willingness to act entrepreneurially. J Bus Ventur 23:221–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cable DM, Judge TA (1996) Person-organization fit, job choice decisions, and organizational entry. Organ Behav Hum Dec 67:294–311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cappelli P (2000) A market-driven approach to retaining talent. Harvard Bus Rev 78:103–111Google Scholar
  18. Cardon MS, Stevens CE (2004) Managing human resources in small organizations: what do we know? Hum Resour Manag R 14:295–323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cardon MS, Tolchinsky P (2006) Models for emerging organizations. In: Tansky JW, Heneman RL (eds) Human resource strategies for the high growth entrepreneurial firm. Information Age Publishing, Charlotte, pp 69–98Google Scholar
  20. Carless SA (2005) Person-job fit versus person-organization fit as predictors of organizational attraction and job acceptance intentions: a longitudinal study. J Occup Organ Psych 78:411–429CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Chapman DS, Uggerslev KL, Carroll SA, Piasentin KA, Jones DA (2005) Applicant attraction to organizations and job choice: a meta-analytic review of the correlates of recruiting outcomes. J Appl Psychol 90:928–944CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Cohen J (1992) A power primer. Psychol Bull 112:155–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Douglas EJ, Shepherd DA (2002) Self-employment as a career choice: attitudes, entrepreneurial intentions, and utility maximization. Entrep Theory Pract 26:81–91Google Scholar
  24. Edwards MR (2010) An integrative review of employer branding and OB theory. Pers Rev 39:5–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Eggers F (2010) Grow with the flow: entrepreneurial marketing and thriving young firms. Int J Entrep Ventur 1:227–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Eggers F, Kraus S, Filser M (2009) Entrepreneurial Marketing—Zum Bedarf eines modifizierten Marketingansatzes für junge wachstumsorientierte Unternehmen. Z KMU Entrep 57:187–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Engelen A, Wolff C, Steffenhagen H, Brettel M (2010) Werbe-Management in jungen Wachstumsunternehmen. Z Betriebswirtsch 80:31–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Flaherty KE, Pappas JM (2004) Job selection among salespeople: a bounded rationality perspective. Ind Mark Manag 33:325–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Freiling J, Kollmann T (2008) Entrepreneurial Marketing: Besonderheiten und Ausgestaltungsmöglichkeiten. In: Freiling J, Kollmann T (eds) Entrepreneurial Marketing. Gabler, Wiesbaden, pp 5–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Green PE, Srinivasan V (1990) Conjoint analysis in marketing: new developments with implications for research and practice. J Mark 54:3–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Greening DW, Turban DB (2000) Corporate social performance as a competitive advantage in attracting a quality workforce. Bus Soc 39:254–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Green PE, Goldberg SM, Montemayor M (1981) A hybrid utility estimation model for conjoint analysis. J Mark 45:33–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Green PE, Krieger AM, Agarwal MK (1991) Adaptive conjoint analysis: some caveats and suggestions. J Mark Res 28:215–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Gruber M (2004a) Marketing in new ventures: theory and empirical evidence. Schmalenbach Bus Rev 2:164–199Google Scholar
  35. Gruber M (2004b) Entrepreneurial Marketing. Betriebswirtschaft 64:78–100Google Scholar
  36. Harms R, Grichnik D (2007) Zur Zukunft der deutschsprachigen Entrepreneurshipforschung—Strategien und thematische Schwerpunkte. Z KMU Entrep 55:266–275Google Scholar
  37. Harold CM, Ployhart RE (2008) What do applicants want? Examining changes in attribute judgments over time. J Occup Organ Psych 81:191–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Heneman HG III, Berkley RA (1999) Applicant attraction practices and outcomes among small businesses. J Small Bus Manag 37:53–74Google Scholar
  39. Herrmann A, Schmidt-Gallas D, Huber F (2003) Adaptive conjoint analysis: understanding the methodology and assessing reliability and validity. In: Gustafsson A, Herrmann A, Huber F (eds) Conjoint measurement. Methods and applications. Springer, Berlin, pp 305–330Google Scholar
  40. Hornsby JS, Kuratko DF (2003) Human resource management in U.S. small businesses: a replication and extension. J Dev Entrep 8:73–92Google Scholar
  41. Iacovou CL, Shirland L, Thompson RL (2004) Job selection preferences of business students. J Appl Bus Res 20:87–98Google Scholar
  42. Johnson RM (1987) Adaptive conjoint analysis. In: Sawtooth Software (ed) Proceedings of the Sawtooth Software conference on perceptual mapping, conjoint analysis, and computer interviewing, No. Sawtooth Software, Ketchum, ID, pp 253–265Google Scholar
  43. Judge TA, Bretz RD (1992) Effects of work values on job choice decisions. J Appl Psychol 77:261–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Judge TA, Cable DM (1997) Applicant personality, organizational culture, and organization attraction. Pers Psychol 50:359–394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Judge TA, Bono JE, Locke EA (2000) Personality and job satisfaction: the mediating role of job characteristics. J Appl Psychol 85:237–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Knyphausen-Aufseß D, Vormann C (2009) Personnel selection criteria in IT ventures: a policy-capturing analysis. Z Betriebswirtsch 79:213–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Kollmann T, Häsel M, Breugst N (2009) Competence of IT professionals in e-business venture teams: the effect of experience and expertise on preference structure. J Manag Inform Syst 25:51–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Kraus S, Harms R, Fink M (2010) Entrepreneurial marketing: moving beyond marketing in new ventures. Int J Entrepren Innovat Manag 11:19–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Lanfranchi J, Narcy M, Larguem M (2010) Shedding new light on intrinsic motivation to work: evidence from a discrete choice experiment. Kyklos 63:75–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Leung A, Zhang J, Wong PK, Foo MD (2006) The use of networks in human resource acquisition for entrepreneurial firms: multiple “fit” considerations. J Bus Ventur 21:664–686CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Lievens F, Decaesteker C, Coetsier P, Geirnaert J (2001) Organizational attractiveness for prospective applicants: a person-organisation fit perspective. Appl Psychol-Int Rev 50:30–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Lohrke FT, Holloway BB, Woolley TW (2010) Conjoint analysis in entrepreneurship research a review and research agenda. Organ Res Methods 13:16–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Montgomery DB, Ramus CA (2007) Including corporate social responsibility, environmental sustainaibility, and ethics in calibrating MBA job preferences. Research papers series No. 1981. Stanford Graduate School of BusinessGoogle Scholar
  54. Moy JW, Lee SM (2002) The career choice of business graduates: SMEs or MNCs. Career Dev Int 7:399–347Google Scholar
  55. Orme B (2002) Interpreting conjoint analysis data. Research Paper Series. Sawtooth Software IncGoogle Scholar
  56. Parker SC (2009) Why do small firms produce the entrepreneurs? J Socioecon 38:484–494Google Scholar
  57. Ployhart RE (2006) Staffing in the 21st century: new challenges and strategic opportunities. J Manag 32:868–897CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Porter S, Ayman R (2010) Work flexibility as a mediator of the relationship between work-family conflict and intention to quit. J Manag Organ 16:411–424CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Rößl D, Kraus S, Fink M, Harms R (2009) Entrepreneurial Marketing: Geringer Mitteleinsatz mit hoher Wirkung. Mark Rev St. Gallen 26:18–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Rynes SL, Barber AE (1990) Applicant attraction strategies: an organizational perspective. Acad Manage Rev 15:286–310Google Scholar
  61. Sawtooth Software Inc (2007) The ACA/Web v6.0 technical paper. Sawtooth Software technical paper series. Sequim, Washington, USAGoogle Scholar
  62. Schnabel C, Kohaut S, Brixy U (2009) Employment stability in newly founded firms: a matching approach using linked employer–employee data from Germany. Small Bus Econ 1–16. doi:10.1007/s11187-009-9188-4Google Scholar
  63. Schulte R, Hills GE, Hultman CM, Kraus S (2010) History, theory and evidence of entrepreneurial marketing—an overview. Int J Entrepren Innovat Manag 11:3–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Scott A (2001) Eliciting GPs’ preferences for pecuniary and non-pecuniary job characteristics. J Health Econ 20:329–347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Shane SA (1996) Hybrid organizational arrangements and their implications for firm growth and survival: a study of new franchisors. Acad Manag J 39:216–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Starks GL (2007) The effect of person-job fit on the retention of top college graduates in federal agencies. Rev Pub Pers Admin 27:59–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Tulgan B (2007) Finding roles for social-media tools in HR. Strat HR Rev 6:3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Wagner SH, Parker CP, Christiansen ND (2003) Employees that think and act like owners: effects of ownership beliefs and behaviors on organizational effectiveness. Pers Psychol 56:847–871CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Williamson IO (2000) Employer legitimacy and recruitment success in small businesses. Entrep Theory Pract 25:27–42Google Scholar
  70. Williamson IO, Cable DM, Aldrich HE (2002) Smaller but not necessarily weaker: how small businesses can overcome barriers to recruitment. In: Katz J, Lumpkin T (eds) Managing people in entrepreneurial organizations (Advances in entrepreneurship, firm emergence and growth, vol 5). Emerald Group Publishing Limited, West Yorkshire, pp 83–106Google Scholar
  71. Wiltinger K (1997) Personalmarketing auf Basis von Conjoint-Analysen. Z Betriebswirtsch 67:55–78Google Scholar
  72. Witt P, Rode, V (2005) Corporate brand building in start-ups. J Enterprising Culture 13:271–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Zacharakis AL, Meyer GD (1998) A lack of insight: do venture capitalists really understand their own decision process? J Bus Ventur 13:57–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Gabler Verlag 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Andranik Tumasjan
    • 1
    Email author
  • Maria Strobel
    • 1
  • Isabell M. Welpe
    • 1
  1. 1.Lehrstuhl für BWL—Strategie und OrganisationTechnische Universität MünchenMunichGermany

Personalised recommendations