Zusammenfassung
In den letzten Jahren gelingt es Unternehmen zunehmend, durch Öffnung ihrer Informationsressourcen das Wertschöpfungspotenzial externer Ressourcen besser zu nutzen. Sie erhöhen damit den Wert eigener Ressourcen zum Teil erheblich. Derartige Phänomene lassen sich jedoch nicht mit den herkömmlichen ressourcenorientierten Ansätzen erklären. Unser Aufsatz leistet einen Beitrag zur Strukturierung und zum besseren Verständnis dieser Problematik. Hierzu entwickeln wir einen Bezugsrahmen, der Öffnungsphänomene anhand der Dimensionen (1) „Zugriff“ und (2) „Kontrolle“ differenziert. Der Bezugsrahmen motiviert eine erweiterte Sicht des betriebswirtschaftlichen Managements von Informationsressourcen. Diese Sicht wird als „Management unternehmensübergreifender Informationssphären“ konzeptualisiert und verweist auf weiteren Forschungsbedarf im Bereich der überbetrieblichen Wertschöpfung.
Abstract
For some years, companies have successfully harnessed the value-creation potential of external resources by opening up their information resources, thus increasing considerably the value of their own resources. Corresponding phenomena, however, cannot be explained by common resource-based approaches. By providing a structure, our article contributes to a deeper understanding of this issue. We develop a framework, grounded in the Resource-Based View, that differentiates phenomena of opening up information resources between two dimensions: (1) access and (2) control. Our analysis motivates an extended view of information resources management that also accounts for enterprise-external resources. We conceptualize this view as the “management of information spheres,” highlighting the need for further research in the field of value creation related to external resources.
Notes
Anzumerken ist, dass ein breites Spektrum unterschiedlicher Lizenzen für Open Source Software existiert. Sie unterscheiden sich insbesondere dahingehend, inwieweit ein veränderter Quellcode kommerzialisiert werden darf, ohne dass diese Änderung veröffentlicht wird (De Laat 2005, S. 1517–1522). Die verschiedenen Lizenzen haben jedoch gemein, dass ein einmal veröffentlichter Quelltext nicht mehr dem allgemeinen Zugriff entzogen werden kann.
Spezifität wird vorliegend als eine Bindung von Ressourcen untereinander, nicht als eine Bindung einer Ressource zu einem Unternehmen verstanden (ähnlich: Lippman u. Rumelt 2003, S. 1070).
Im Fall von IR mit den Ausprägungen „gemeinsame Kontrolle“ und „allgemeiner Zugriff“ teilt sich ein Unternehmen die Kontrolle über diese Ressource mit einem weiteren oder mehreren Akteuren. Im Extremfall, bei dem die Kontrolle auf die Allgemeinheit übertragen ist, teilen diese IR Eigenschaften öffentlicher Güter. Dies gilt beispielsweise für OSS.
Da das Vertrauen zu einer wichtigen Voraussetzung für diese Strategie wird, bauen Unternehmen bewusst ein positives Image auf. So vereinnahmt z. B. das Unternehmen Google die Phrase „Don’t be evil“, um Vertrauen bei Kunden und externen Wertschöpfungspartnern zu schaffen. Vgl. Google Code of Conduct, abgerufen am 23.03.2010 von http://investor.google.com/conduct.html.
Literatur
Achtenhagen L, Müller-Lietzkow J, Knyphausen-Aufseß D (2003) Das Open Source-Dilemma: Open Source-Software zwischen freier Verfügbarkeit und Kommerzialisierung. Schmalenbachs Z Betriebswirtschaftliche Forsch 55:455–481
Ahuja G (2000) The duality of collaboration: inducements and opportunities in the formation of interfirm linkages. Strateg Manag J 21(3):317–343
Allen RC (1983) Collective invention. J Econ Behav Organ 4(1):1–24
Amit R, Schoemaker PJH (1993) Strategic assets and organizational rent. Strateg Manag J 14(1):33–46
Apple (1999) Mac OS X server embraces open source with launch of Darwin. Pressemitteilung vom 18.03.1999. http://www.apple.com/ca/press/1999/03/darwin.html. Zugegriffen: 1. Juni 2009
Apple (2003) Apple public source license version 2.0 vom 06.08.2003. http://www.opensource.apple.com/license/apsl/. Zugegriffen: 01. Juni 2009
Aral S, Weill P (2007) IT assets, organizational capabilities, and firm performance: How resource allocations and organizational differences explain performance variation. Organ Sci 18(5):763–780
Arrow KJ (1962) Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for invention. In: Nelson RR (Hrsg) The rate and direction of inventive activity: economic and social factors. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, S 609–626
Baldwin CY, Clark KB (1997) Managing in an age of modularity. Harvard Bus Rev 75(5):84–93
Barney JB (1986) Strategic factor markets: expectations, luck, and business strategy. Manage Sci 32(10):1231–1241
Barney J (1991) Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. J Manage 17(3):99–120
Benkler Y (2006) The wealth of networks. How social production transforms markets and freedom. Yale University Press, New Haven, CT
Bessen J (2002) What good is free software. In: Hahn RW (Hrsg) Government policy toward open source software. Brookings Institution Press, Washington, DC, S 12–33
Birchall D, Tovstiga G (2005) Capabilities for strategic advantage. Leading through technological innovation. Palgrave, Basingstoke
Bonaccorsi A, Giannangeli S, Rossi C (2006) Entry strategy under competitive standards: hybrid business models in the open source software industry. Manage Sci 52(7):1085–1098
Bongartz U (1998) Unternehmensspezifische Ressourcen und strategische Gruppen im US-Luftverkehrsmarkt. Z Betriebswirtschaft 68(4):381–407
Borowicz F, Scherm E (2001) Standardisierungsstrategien: Eine erweiterte Betrachtung des Wettbewerbs auf Netzeffektmärkten. Z Betriebswirtschaftliche Forsch 53(4):391–416
Bouncken RB (2000) Dem Kern des Erfolges auf der Spur? State of the Art zur Identifikation von Kernkompetenzen. Z Betriebswirtschaft 70(7–8):865–885
Brockhoff K (1995) Zur Theorie des externen Erwerbs neuen technologischen Wissens. Z Betriebswirtschaft, Ergänzungsheft 1995(1):27–42
Brügge B et al (2004) Open-Source-Software. Eine ökonomische und technische Analyse. Springer, Berlin
Chesbrough HW (2003/2008) Open innovation. The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA
Chesbrough HW, Appleyard MM (2007) Open innovation and strategy. Calif Manage Rev 50(1):67–76
Church J, Gandal N (1992) Network effects, software provision and standardization. J Econ Behav Organ 401(1):85–104
Cohen WM, Levinthal DA (1990) Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation. Adm Sci Q 35(1):128–152
Cusumano MA, Gawer A (2002) The elements of platform leadership. MIT Sloan Manage Rev 43(3):51–58
Dahan E, Hauser JR (2002) The virtual customer. J Prod Innov Manage 19(5):332–353
Dahlander L (2005) Appropriation and appropriability in open source software. Int J Innov Manage 9(3):259–285
Dahlander L, Magnusson MG (2005) Relationships between open source software companies and communities: observations from Nordic firms. Res Pol 34(4):481–493
Davis S (1987) Future perfect. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA
De Laat PB (2005) Copyright or copyleft? An analysis of property regimes for software development. Res Pol 34(10):1511–1532
Dibbern J, Güttler W, Heinzl A (2001) Die Theorie der Unternehmung als Erklärungsansatz für das selektive Outsourcing der Informationsverarbeitung. Entwicklung eines theoretischen Bezugsrahmens. Z Betriebswirtschaft 71(6):675–700
Dierickx I, Cool K (1989) Asset stock accumulation and sustainability of competitive advantage. Manage Sci 35(12):1504–1513
Dietl H (1995) Institutionelle Koordination spezialisierungsbedingter wirtschaftlicher Abhängigkeit. Z Betriebswirtschaft 65(6):569–585
Duschek S (2004) Inter-firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Manage Revue 15(1):53–73
Dyer JH, Singh H (1998) The relational view: cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. Acad Manag Rev 23(4):660–679
Eisenhardt K, Martin JA (2000) Dynamic capabilities: what are they? Strateg Manag J 21(10/11):1105–1121
Eisenhardt KM, Schoonhoven CB (1996) Resource-based view of strategic alliance formation: strategic and social effects in entrepreneurial firms. Organ Sci 7(2):136–150
Enkel E, Gassmann O, Chesbrough H (2009) Open R & D and open innovation: exploring the phenomenon. R & D Manag 39(2):311–316
Facebook (2008) Facebook developers wiki – storable information. http://wiki.developers.facebook.com/index.php/Storable_Information. Zugegriffen: 1. Juni 2009
Farrell J, Gallini NT (1988) Second-sourcing as a commitment: monopoly incentives to attract competition. Quart J Econ 103(4):673–694
Farrell J, Saloner G (1985) Standardization, compatibility, and innovation. RAND J Econ 16(1):70–83
Fauchart E (2003) On knowledge sharing patterns among rival firms: the case of knowledge on safety. DRUID summer conference 2003 on creating, sharing and transfering knowledge. Copenhagen. http://userinnovation.mit.edu/papers/safety3.pdf. Zugegriffen: 10. Apr. 2009
Foray D (2004) Economics of knowledge. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
Ford D, Ryan C (1981) Taking technology to market. Harvard Bus Rev 59(2):117–126
Fosfuri A, Giarratana MS, Luzzi A (2008) The penguin has entered the building: the commercialization of open source software products. Organ Sci 19(2):292–305
Foss K, Foss N (2001) Assets, attributes and ownership. Int J Econ Bus 8(1):19–37
Foss K, Foss NJ (2005) Resources and transaction costs: How property rights economics furthers the resource-based view. Strateg Manag J 26(6):541–553
Foss NJ, Knudsen T (2003) The resource-based tangle: towards a sustainable explanation of competitive advantage. Manag Decis Econ 24(4):291–307
Franck E (2006) Beiträge der Neuen Institutionenökonomik zum Inovationsmanagement – Von der Ausgestaltung der Intellectual Property Rights zur Aneignung von Innovationserträgen. Schmalenbachs Z Betriebswirtschaftliche Forsch, Sonderheft 54:58–85
Franz A (2003) Management von Business Webs. Das Beispiel von Technologieplattformen für mobile Dienste. Deutscher Universitätsverlag, Wiesbaden
Free Software Foundation (2002) GNU free documentation license version 1.2, November 2002. http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/fdl.html
Free Software Foundation (2007) GNU general public license version 3, 29 June 2007. http://www.fsf.org/licensing/licenses/gpl.html. Zugegriffen: 14. Apr. 2008
Funk JL (2003) Standards, dominant designs and preferential acquisition of complementary assets through slight information advantages. Res Pol 32(8):1325–1341
Gaitanides M (1997) Integrierte Belieferung – Eine ressourcenorientierte Erklärung der Entstehung von Systemlieferanten in der Automobilzulieferindustrie. Z Betriebswirtschaft 67(7):737–757
Galende J, Fuente JM de la (2003) Internal factors determining a firm’s innovative behaviour. Res Pol 32(5):715–736
Gawer A, Cusumano MA (2002) Platform leadership. How Intel, Microsoft, and Cisco drive industry innovation. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA
Gawer A, Henderson R (2007) Platform owner entry and innovation in complementary markets: evidence from Intel. J Econ Manag Strateg 16(1):1–34
George C, Chandak N (2006) Issues and challenges in securing interoperability of DRM systems in the digital music market. Intern Rev Law, Comput Technol 20(3):271–285
Ghemawat P (1986) Sustainable advantage. Harvard Bus Rev 64(5):53–58
Giles J (2005) Internet encyclopaedias go head to head. Nature 438(7070):900–901
Grant RM (1991) The resource-based theory of competitive advantage: implications for strategy formulation. Calif Manage Rev 33(3):114–135
Grant RM (1996) Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strateg Manag J 17(winter special issue):109–122
Grossman SJ, Hart OD (1986) The costs and benefits of ownership: a theory of vertical and lateral integration. J Polit Economy 98(6):1119–1158
Guth RA, Vara V, Delaney KJ (2007) Microsoft bets on facebook stake and web ad boom. Wall St J vom 25.10.2007, S B1
Hamel G, Doz YL, Prahalad CK (1989) Collaborate with your competitors – and win. Harvard Bus Rev 67(1):133–139
Harhoff D, Henkel J, Hippel E von (2003) Profiting from voluntary information spillovers: How users benefit by freely revealing their innovations. Res Pol 32(10):1753–1769
Hart O (1995) Firms, contracts, and financial structure. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Hart OD, Moore J (1990) Property rights and the nature of the firm. J Polit Economy 98(6):1119–1158
Helfat CE, Peteraf MA (2009) Understanding dynamic capabilities: progress along a developmental path. Strat Organ 7(1):91–102
Helfat CE, Raubitschek RS (2000) Product sequencing: co-evolution of knowledge, capabilities and products. Strateg Manag J 21(10/11):961–979
Heller MA, Eisenberg RS (1998) Can patents deter innovation? The anticommons in biomedical research. Science 280(5364):698–701
Henderson R, Clark KB (1990) Architectural innovation: the reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms. Adm Sci Q 35(1):9–30
Henkel J (2006) Selective revealing in open innovation processes: the case of embedded Linux. Res Pol 35(7):953–969
Henkel J (2007) Offene Innovationsprozesse. Die kommerzielle Entwicklung von Open-Source-Software. Innovation und Entrepreneurship. Deutscher Universitätsverlag, Wiesbaden
Hippel E von (1994) ‚Sticky information‘ and the locus of problem solving: implications for innovation. Manage Sci 40(4):429–439
Hippel E von (1988/1994) The sources of innovation. Oxford University Press, New York
Hippel E von (2005) Democratizing innovation. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
Hippel E von, Krogh G von (2006) Free revealing and the private-collective model for innovation incentives. R & D Manag 36(3):295–306
Hoffmann L (2009) Crowd conrol. Commun ACM 52(3):16–17
Howe J (2006) The rise of crowdsourcing. WIRED Mag 6:176–183
Iansiti M, Clark KB (1994) Integration and dynamic capability: evidence from product development in automobiles and mainframe computers. Ind Corp Change 3(3):557–605
Iansiti M, Levien R (2004) Strategy as ecology. Harvard Bus Rev 82(3):68–78
IBM (2005) IBM statement of non-assertion of named patents against OSS. http://www.ibm.com/ibm/licensing/patents/pledgedpatents.pdf. Zugegriffen: 20. Apr. 2008
Inkpen AC (2000) A note on the dynamics of learning alliances: competition, cooperation, and relative scope. Strateg Manag J 21(7):775–779
Kale P, Singh H (2000) Learning and protection of proprietary assets in strategic alliances: building relational capital. Strateg Manag J 21(3):217–237
Katz ML, Shapiro C (1985) Network externalities, competition, and compatibility. Amer Econ Rev 75(3):424–440
Katz ML, Shapiro C (1992) Product introduction with network externalities. J Ind Econ 40(1):55–83
Katz ML, Shapiro C (1994) Systems competition and network effects. J Econ Perspect 8(2):93–115
Khanna T, Gulati R, Nohria N (1998) The dynamics of learning alliances: competition, cooperation, and relative scope. Strateg Manag J 19(3):193–210
Kim J, Mahoney JT (2005) Property rights theory, transaction costs theory, and agency theory: an organizational economics approach to strategic management. Manag Decis Econ 26(4):223–242
Kogut B, Zander U (1992) Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and replication of technologies. Organ Sci 3(3):383–397
Krogh G von, Hippel E von (2006) The promise of research on open source software. Manage Sci 52(7):975–983
Kubicek H (1977) Heuristische Bezugsrahmen und heuristisch angelegte Forschungsdesigns als Elemente einer Konstruktionsstrategie empirischer Forschung. In: Köhler R (Hrsg) Empirische und handlungstheoretische forschungskonzeptionen in der Betriebswirtschaftslehre. Poeschel, Stuttgart, S 3–36
Lamoreaux NR, Sokoloff KL (2000) The geography of invention in the American glass industry, 1870–1925. J Econ Hist 60(3):700–729
Lavie D (2007) Alliance portfolios and firm performance: a study of value creation and appropriation in the U.S. software industry. Strateg Manag J 28(12):1187–1212
Leimeister JM, Huber M, Bretschneider U, Krcmar H (2009) Leveraging crowdsourcing: activation-supporting compontents for IT-based ideas competition. J Manag Inf Syst 26(1):192–224
Lessig L (2002) The architecture of innovation. Duke Law J 51(6):1783–1801
Levin RC, Klevorick AK, Nelson RR, Winter SG (1987) Appropriating the returns from industrial research and development. Brookings Pap Econ Act 1987(3):783–831
Levitan KB (1982) Information resources as ‚Goods‘ in the life cycle of information production. J Am Soc Inf Sci 33(1):44–54
Li T, Calantone RJ (1998) The impact of market knowledge competence on new product advantage: conceptualization and empirical examination. J Mark 62(4):13–29
Lichtenthaler U (2007) Open for innovation: understanding the determinants of external technology commercialization. Z Betriebswirtschaft, Special Issue 2007(4):21–45
Lichtenthaler U, Ernst H (2007) Developing reputation to overcome the imperfections in the markets for knowledge. Res Pol 36(1):37–55
Liebeskind JP (1996) Knowledge, strategy, and the theory of the firm. Strateg Manag J, Special Issue 17:93–107
Lippman SA, Rumelt RP (2003) A bargaining perspective on resource advantage. Strateg Manag J 24(11):1069–1086
Markides C, Oyon D (2000) Changing the strategy at nespresso: an interview with former CEO Jean-Paul Gaillard. Eur Manag J 18(3):296–301
Meckl R, Kubitschek C (2000) Organisation von Unternehmensnetzwerken – Eine verfügungsrechtstheoretische Analyse. Z Betriebswirtschaft 70(3):289–307
Mockus A, Fielding R, Herbsleb JD (2002) Two case studies of open source software development: Apache and Mozilla. ACM Trans Softw Eng Methodol 11(3):309–346
Moran P, Ghoshal S (1999) Markets, firms, and the process of economic development. Acad Manag Rev 24(3):390–412
Nonaka I, Takeuchi H (1995) The knowledge creating company. How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. Oxford University Press, New York
Nooteboom B (2000) Learning by interaction: absorptive capacity, cognitive distance and governance. Journal of Management und Gov 4(1/2):69–92
Nuvolari A (2004) Collective invention during the British Industrial Revolution: the case of the Cornish pumping engine. Cambridge J Econ 28(3):347–363
Osterloh M, Rota S (2007) Open source software development – just another case of collective invention? Res Pol 36(2):157–171
Pénin J (2007) Open knowledge disclosure: an overview of the evidence and economic motivations. J Econ Surveys 21(2):326–348
Penrose ET (1959/2009) The theory of the growth of the firm, 4. Aufl. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Peteraf MA (1993) The cornerstones of competitive advantage: a resource-based view. Strateg Manag J 14(3):179–191
Peteraf MA, Barney JB (2003) Unraveling the resource-based tangle. Manag Decis Econ 24(4):309–323
Pfeffer J, Salancik GR (2003) The external control of organizations. A resource dependence perspective. Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA
Picot A (1991) Ein neuer Ansatz zur Gestaltung der Leistungstiefe. Schmalenbachs Z Betriebswirtschaftliche Forsch 43(4):336–357
Piller FT (1998) Kundenindividuelle Massenproduktion. Hanser, München
Piller FT, Walcher D (2006) Toolkits for idea competitions: a novel method to integrate users in new product development. R & D Manag 36(3):307–318
Pine JB II (1992/1998) Mass customization. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA
Pisano GP (1990) The R & D boundaries of the firm: an empirical analysis. Adm Sci Q 35(1):153–176
Polanyi M (1958/2004) Personal knowledge. Towards a post-critical philosophy, 16. Aufl. Routledge, London
Porter ME (1991) Towards a dynamic theory of strategy. Strateg Manag J 12(8):95–117
Priem RL, Butler JE (2001) Is the resource-based „view“ a useful perspective for strategic management research? Acad Manag Rev 26(1):22–40
Ramírez R (1999) Value co-production: intellectual origins and implications for practice and research. Strateg Manag J 20(1):49–65
Rasche C, Wolfrum B (1994) Ressourcenorientierte Unternehmensführung. Betriebswirtschaft 54(4):501–517
Reichwald R, Piller F (2009) Interaktive Wertschöpfung. Open Innovation, Individualisierung und neue Formen der Arbeitsteilung, 2. Aufl. Gabler, Wiesbaden
Rose CM (1998) The several futures of property: of cyberspace and folk tales, emission trades and ecosystems. Minnisota Law Rev 83(1):192–182
Rumelt RP (1984) ‚Towards a strategic theory of the firm‘ in competitive strategic management. In: Lamb RB (Hrsg) Competitive strategic management. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ
Samuelson P (2006) IBM’s pragmatic embrace of open source. Commun ACM 49(10):21–25
Schoder D, Madeja N, Vollmann C (2006) Explaining the success of NTT DoCoMo’s I-Mode – the concept of value scope management. In: Shaw MJ (Hrsg) E-commerce and the digital economy. Armonk, London, S 214–225
Schumpeter JA (1934/2008) The theory of economic development, 14. Aufl. Transaction, New Brunswick, NJ
Schwarz A et al (2007) Understanding frameworks and reviews: a commentary to assist us in moving our field forward by analyzing our past. Data Base Adv Inf Syst 38(3):29–50
Selznick P (1957/2007) Leadership in administration. A sociological interpretation. University of California Press, Berkeley, CA
Shapiro C, Varian H (1998) Information rules. A strategic guide to the network economy. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA
Shepard A (1987) Licensing to enhance demand for new technologies. RAND J Econ 18(3):360–368
Specht G, Beckmann C, Amelingmeyer J (2002) F&E-Management. Kompetenz im Innovationsmanagement, 2. Aufl. Schäffer-Poeschel, Stuttgart
Spender J-C (1996) Making knowledge the basis of a dynamic theory of the firm. Strateg Manag J, Special Issue 17:45–62
Stallman R (1999) The GNU operating system and the free software movement. In: DiBona C (Hrsg) Open sources: voices from the open source revolution. O’Reilly, Beijing
Sun Microsystems (2005) Sun grants global open source community access to more than 1,600 patents. http://www.sun.com/smi/Press/sunflash/2005–01/sunflash.20050125.2.xml. Zugegriffen: 20. Apr. 2008
Tapscott D, Williams AD (2006) Wikinomics. How mass collaboration changes everything. Penguin, New York
Teece DJ (1986) Profiting from technological innovation: implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy. Res Pol 15(6):285–305
Teece DJ, Pisano G, Shuen A (1997) Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strateg Manag J 18(7):509–533
Thomke S, Hippel E von (2002) Customers as innovators: a new way to create value. Harvard Bus Rev 80(4):74–81
Ullrich F (2004) Verdünnte Verfügungsrechte. Konzeptualisierung und Operationalisierung der Dienstleistungsqualität auf der Grundlage der Property Rights Theorie. Deutscher Universitätsverlag, Wiesbaden
Verona G (1999) A resource-based view of product development. Acad Manag Rev 24(1):132–142
Wade M, Hulland J (2004) Review: the resource based view and information systems research: review, extension and suggestions for future research. MIS Q 28(1):107–142
Wernerfelt B (1984) A resource-based view of the firm. Strateg Manag J 5(2):171–180
West J (2003) How open is open enough? Melding proprietary and open source platform strategies. Res Pol 32(7):1259–1285
West J, Gallagher S (2006) Challenges of open innovation: the paradox of firm investment in open-source software. R & D Manag 36(3):319–331
Wheeler DA (2007) Why open source software/free software (OSS/FS, FLOSS, or FOSS)? Look at the numbers! – Working paper, version 16.4.2007. http://www.dwheeler.com/oss_fs_why.html. Zugegriffen: 10. Apr. 2008
Wiede T, Knüwer T (2009) Ein Russe zieht ins Silicon Valley. Handelsblatt 2009(101):13, (28.05.2009)
Windrum P (2004) Leveraging technological externalities in complex technologies: Microsoft’s exploitation of standards in the browser wars. Res Pol 33(3):385
Zahra SA, George G (2002) Absorptive capacity: a review, reconceptualization, and extension. Acad Manag Rev 27(2):185–203
Zhang MJ (2007) Assessing the performance impacts of information systems from the resource-based perspective: an empirical test of the indirect effect of IS. J Bus Strateg 24(2):141–164
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Muhle, S., Schoder, D. & Fischbach, K. Wertschöpfungspotenziale und strategische Implikationen einer Öffnung von Informationsressourcen – Phänomenologie und ein Bezugsrahmen. Z Betriebswirtsch 80, 685–711 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11573-010-0370-6
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11573-010-0370-6
Schlüsselwörter
- Unternehmensexterne Ressourcen
- Öffnung
- Informationssphären
- Zugriff und Kontrolle auf Ressourcen
- Resource-Based View