Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Projektportfolio- und Multiprojektplanung: Modellierung, prototypische Implementierung und Einsatz in der Finanzdienstleistungsbranche

Project selection and scheduling: A new model and its implementation for a financial services provider

  • Praxis
  • Published:
Journal of Business Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Der Beitrag entwickelt ein Modell zur simultanen Projektportfolio- und Multiprojektplanung in der Finanzdienstleistungsbranche. Das Modell basiert auf einem mehrperiodigen Knapsack-Problem, bei dem für jedes Projekt (Ablauf-) Varianten mit einem einfachen und den Anforderungen der betrieblichen Praxis genügenden Verfahren erzeugt werden. Die prototypische Implementierung des Modells in einem Entscheidungsunterstützungssystem sowie dessen Anwendung in der betrieblichen Praxis eines international tätigen Finanzdienstleistungsunternehmens werden dargestellt.

Summary

This paper presents a new model for simultaneous project selection and scheduling. The model is based on a multi-period Knapsack problem. For each project different schedules are generated with a method which due to its ease meets the requirements of operational applications. We report on the implementation of the model and its application for a financial service provider.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Literatur

  1. Adler, P.S., A. Mandelbaum, V. Nguyen und E. Schwerer (1995): From project to process management: An empirically-based framework for analyzing product development time. Management Science, 41(3): 458–484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Anavi-Isakov, S. und B. Golany (2003): Managing multi-project environments through constant work-in-process. International Journal of Project Management, 21:9–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Aspvall, B., S.D. Flåm und K.P. Villanger (1995): Selecting among scheduled projects. Operations Research Letters, 17:37–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Badri, M.A., D. Davis und D. Davis (2001): A comprehensive 0–1 goal programming model for project selection. International Journal of Project Management, 19:243–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ballou, D.P. und G.K. Tayi (1996): A decision aid for the selection and scheduling of software maintenance projects. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics — Part A: Systems and Humans, 26(2):203–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bock, D.B. und J.H. Patterson (1990): A comparison of due date setting, resource assingment, and job preemption heuristics for the multi-project scheduling problem. Decision Sciences, 21:387–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Brucker, P., A. Drexl, R. Möhring, K. Neumann und E. Pesch (1999): Resource-constrained project scheduling: Notation, classification, models, and methods. European Journal of Operational Research, 112(1):3–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Chen, V.Y.X. (1994): A 0–1 goal programming model for scheduling multiple maintenance projects at a copper mine. European Journal of Operational Research, 76:176–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Coffin, M.A. und B.W. Taylor (1996): Multiple criteria R&D project selection and scheduling using fuzzy logic. Computers & Operations Research, 23(3):207–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Coffin, M.A. und B.W. Taylor (1996): R&D project selection and scheduling with a filtered beam search approach. IIE Transactions, 28:167–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Cohen, I., Mandelbaum A. und A. Shtub (2004): Multi-Project scheduling and control: A process-based comparative study of the critical chain methodology and some alternatives. Project Management Journal, 35(2):39–50.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Cohen, I., B. Golany und A. Shtub (2005): Managing stochastic, finite capacity, multi-project systems through the cross-entropy methodology. Annals of Operations Research, 183:183–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Deckro, R.F., E.P. Winkofsky, J.E. Hebert und R. Gagnon (1991): A decomposition approach to multi-project scheduling. European Journal of Operational Research, 51:110–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Doerner, K.F., W.L. Gutjahr, R.F. Hartl, C. Strauss und C. Stummer (2004): Pareto ant colony optimization: A metaheuristic approach to multiobjective portfolio selection. Annals of Operations Research, 131:79–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Doerner, K.F., W.L. Gutjahr, R.F. Hartl, C. Strauss und C. Stummer (2006): Pareto ant colony optimization with ILP preprocessing in multiobjective project portfolio selection. European Journal of Operational Research, 171(3):830–841.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Domschke, W., A. Scholl und S. Voss (1997): Produktionsplanung — Ablauforganisatorische Aspekte. Springer, Berlin, 2. Auflage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  17. Drexl, A. (1990): Fließbandaustaktung, Maschinenbelegung und Kapazitätsplanung in Netzwerken: Ein integrierender Ansatz. Zeitschrift für Betriebswirtschaft, 60(1):53–69.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ehrgott, X (2000): Multicriteria Optimization. Springer, Berlin et al.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  19. Escudero, L.F. und J. Salmeron (2005): On a fix-and-relax framework for a class of project scheduling problems. Annals of Operations Research, 140:163–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Fox, G.E., N.R. Baker und J.L. Bryant (1984): Economic models for R and D project selection in the presence of project interactions. Management Science, 30(7):890–902.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Ghasemzadeh, F., N. Archer und P. Iyogun (1999): A zero-one model for project portfolio selection and scheduling. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 50(7):745–755.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Gupta, S.K., J. Kyparisis und C.-M. Ip (1992): Project selection and sequencing to maximize net present value of the total return. Management Science, 38(5):751–752.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Hall, N.G. und M.J. Magazine (1994): Maximizing the value of a space mission. European Journal of Operational Research, 78:224–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Hans, E.W., A.J.R. Gadermann, S.L. van de Velde und W.H.M. Zijm (2002): Resource loading by branch-and-price techniques: models and algorithms. Technischer Bericht, Department of Technology and Management, University of Twente.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Hans, E.W., W. Herroelen, R. Leus und G. Wullink (2007): A hierarchical approach to multi-project planning under uncertainty. OMEGA — The International Journal of Management Science, 35(5):563–577.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Herroelen, W. (2005): Project Scheduling — Theory and Practice. Production and Operations Management, 14(4):413–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Kimms, A. (2001): Mathematical programming and financial objectives for scheduling projects. Kluwer, Boston.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  28. Kira, D.S., M.I. Kusky, D.H. Murray und B.J. Goranson (1990): A specific decision support system (SDSS) to develop an optimal project portfolio mix under uncertainty. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 37(3):213–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Klapka, J. und P. Piňos (2002): Decision support system for multicriterial R&D and information systems projects selection. European Journal of Operational Research, 140:434–446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Kolisch, R. (2001): Make-to-order assembly management. Springer, Berlin.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  31. Kolisch, R. und K. Meyer (2006): Selection and scheduling of pharmaceutical research projects. In: Weglarz, J. und J. Jozefowska (Herausgeber): Topics in modern project scheduling. Kluwer, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Kurtulus, I.S. und E.W. Davis (1982): Multi-project scheduling: Categorization of heuristic rule performance. Management Science, 28(2):161–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Kurtulus, I.S. und S.C. Narula (1985): Multi-project scheduling: Analysis of project performance. IIE Transactions, 17:58–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Kyparisis, G.J., S.K. Gupta und C.-M. Ip (1996): Project selection with discounted returns and multiple constraints. European Journal of Operational Research, 94:87–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Lee, J.W. und S.H. Kim (2001): An integrated approach for interdependent information system project selection. International Journal of Project Management, 19:111–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Loch, C.H., M.T. Pich, C. Terwiesch und M. Urbschat (2001): Selecting R&D projects at BMW: A case study of adopting mathematical programming models. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 48(1):70–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Mandakovic, T. und W.E. Souder (1985): An interactive decomposable heuristic for project selection. Management Science, 31(10):1257–1271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Martello, S. und P. Toth (1990): Knapsack Problems: Algorithms and Computer Implementations. Wiley Interscience Series in Discrete Mathematics and Optimization. Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Mavrotas, G., D. Diakoulaki und Y. Caloghirou (2006): Project prioritization under policy restrictions. A combination of MCDA with 0–1 programming. European Journal of Operational Research, 171(1):296–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. May, G. und R. Chrobok (2001): Priorisierung des unternehmerischen Projektportfolios. Zeitschrift für Organisation, 70(2):108–114.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Mehrez, A. und Z. Sinuany-Stern (1983): Resource allocation to interrelated risky projects using a multi-attributive utility function. Management Science, 29(4):430–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Moder, J.J., C.R. Phillips und E.W. Davis (1983): Project management with CPM, PERT and precedence diagramming. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, 3. Auflage.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Mohanty, R.P. und M.K. Siddiq (1989): Multiple projects — Multiple resource-constrained scheduling: A multi-objective analysis. Engineering Costs and Production Economics, 18:83–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Mohanty, R.P. und M.K. Siddiq (1989): Multiple projects — multiple resource-constrained scheduling: Some studies. International Journal of Production Research, 27(2):261–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Mukherjee, K. und A. Bera (1995): Application of goal programming in project selection decision — A case study from the Indian coal mining industry. European Journal of Operational Research, 82:18–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Pennypacker, J.S. und L.D. Dye (2002): Project portfolio management and managing multiple projects: Two sides of the same coin. In: Pennypacker, J.S. und L.D. Dye (Herausgeber): Managing multiple projects, Seiten 1–10. Marcel Dekker, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Pritsker, A.A.B., L.J. Watters und P.M. Wolfe (1969): Multiproject scheduling with limited resources: A zero-one programming approach. Management Science, 16:93–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Saaty, T.L. (1980): The Analytic Hierarchy Process. McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Salewski, F., A. Schirmer und A. Drexl (1997): Project scheduling under resource and mode identity constraints: Model, complexity, methods, and application. European Journal of Operational Research, 102:88–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Santhanam, R. und G.J. Kyparisis (1996): A decision model for interdependent information systems project selection. European Journal of Operational Research, 89:380–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Schniederjans, M.J. und R. Santhanam (1993): A multi-objective constrained resource information system project selection. European Journal of Operational Research, 70:244–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Stummer, C. und K. Heidenberger (2003): Interactive R&D portfolio analysis with project interdependences and time profiles of multiple objectives. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 50(2):175–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Stummer, C. und M. Sun (2005): New multiobjective metaheuristic solution procedures for capital investment planning. Journal of Heuristics, 11:183–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Sun, H. und T. Ma (2005): A packing-multiple-boxes model for R&D project selection and scheduling. Technovation, 25:1335–1361.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Taylor, B.W., L.J. Moore und E.R. Clayton (1982): R&D project selection and manpower allocation with integer nonlinear goal programming. Management Science, 28(10):1149–1158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Weiss, E.N. (1988): An optimization based heuristic for scheduling parallel project networks with constrained renewable resources. IIE Transactions, 20(2):137–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Wiley, V.D., R.F. Deckro und J.A. Jackson Jr. (1998): Optimization analysis for design and planning of multi-project programs. European Journal of Operational Research, 107(2):492–506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Zimmermann, J., C. Stark und J. Rieck (2006): Projektplanung — Modelle, Methoden, Management. Springer, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Technische Universität München, Arcisstr. 21, 80333, München, Germany

    Rainer Kolisch & Christian Heimerl

  2. Campana & Schott Realisierungsmanagement München GmbH, Oettingenstraße 2, 80538, München, Germany

    Sven Hausen

Authors
  1. Rainer Kolisch
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Christian Heimerl
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Sven Hausen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Rainer Kolisch, Christian Heimerl or Sven Hausen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kolisch, R., Heimerl, C. & Hausen, S. Projektportfolio- und Multiprojektplanung: Modellierung, prototypische Implementierung und Einsatz in der Finanzdienstleistungsbranche. Z. Betriebswirtsch 78, 591–610 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11573-008-0035-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11573-008-0035-x

Keywords

JEL

Search

Navigation