Skip to main content

Religious Accommodation and Disproportionate Burden

Abstract

The paper offers a critical engagement with Cécile Laborde’s book, Liberalism’s Religion. It elaborates several objections to Laborde’s account of religious accommodations, and sketches an alternative approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Notes

  1. Laborde (2017: ch. 6). All parenthetical references in the text are to this book.

  2. For a challenge along these lines, see May (2017).

  3. Laborde also says that “if it is a case that is experienced by women as a practice that engages their integrity in ways that a uniform restriction on the practice makes it a particularly severe cost, then it is an obligation-IPC” (223). This formulation begs the key question. The idea that some commitments are experienced as obligatory was supposed to explain why burdens on them were especially severe. One cannot then identify commitments as belonging in the obligation-IPC category, and therefore as particularly severe, on the grounds that burdening them would impose a severe cost.

  4. See Patten (2014: 131–136).

  5. Eisgruber and Sager (2007: 93).

  6. For discussion, see Patten (2014: 137–148).

References

  • Dworkin, Ronald (2013) Religion Without God (Cambridge: Harvard University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisgruber, Christopher and Lawrence Sager (2007) Religious Freedom and the Constitution (Cambridge: Harvard University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, Peter (1994) “Bearing the Consequences of Belief,” Journal of Political Philosophy 2:1, 24–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laborde, Cécile (2017) Liberalism’s Religion (Cambridge: Harvard University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • May, Simon Căbulea (2017) “Exemptions for Conscience,” in Religion in Liberal Political Philosophy, ed. Cécile Laborde and Aurélia Bardon (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, Martha (2008) Liberty of Conscience (New York: Basic Books).

    Google Scholar 

  • Patten, Alan (2014) Equal Recognition: The Moral Foundations of Minority Rights (Princeton: Princeton University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Patten, Alan (2017a) “The Normative Logic of Religious Liberty,” Journal of Political Philosophy, 25:2, 129–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patten, Alan (2017b) “Religious Exemptions and Fairness,” in Religion in Liberal Political Philosophy, ed. Cécile Laborde and Aurélia Bardon (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, John (2005) Political Liberalism (New York: Columbia University Press).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alan Patten.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Patten, A. Religious Accommodation and Disproportionate Burden. Criminal Law, Philosophy 15, 61–74 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11572-019-09522-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11572-019-09522-8

Keywords

  • Religious freedom
  • Liberalism
  • Exemptions