This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Notes
Petersen’s paper was not commissioned for this symposium—and is not included in Simester and von Hirsch’s response. It was submitted independently, but fitted so well with the themes of the symposium that the decision was made to include it here.
References
Hörnle, T. (2014) Theories of Criminalization: Comments on A.P. Simester & Andreas von Hirsch: Crimes, Harms and Wrongs. Criminal Law and Philosophy.
Kleinig, J. (2014) The Paternalistic Principle. Criminal Law and Philosophy.
Petersen, T. No Offense! On the Offense Principle and some new Challenges. Criminal Law and Philosophy.
Simester, A & von Hirsch, A. (2011) Crimes, Harms and Wrongs: On the Principles of Criminalisation: Hart Publishing.
Simester, A & von Hirsch, A. (2014) On the Legitimate Objectives of Criminalisation. Criminal Law and Philosophy.
Stanton-Ife, J. (2014) What is the Harm Principle For? Criminal Law and Philosophy.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Matravers, M. Symposium on Andrew Simester and Andreas von Hirsch, Crimes, Harms, and Wrongs: On the Principles of Criminalisation . Criminal Law, Philosophy 10, 297–299 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11572-014-9332-3
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11572-014-9332-3