Abstract
The activity of the single synapse is the base of information processing and transmission in the brain as well as of important phenomena as the Long Term Potentiation which is the main mechanism for learning and memory. Although usually considered as independent events, the single quantum release gives variable postsynaptic responses which not only depend on the properties of the synapses but can be strongly influenced by the activity of other synapses. In the present paper we show the results of a series of computational experiments where pools of active synapses, in a compatible time window, influence the response of a single synapse of the considered pool. Moreover, our results show that the activity of the pool, by influencing the membrane potential, can be a significant factor in the NMDA unblocking from \(Mg^{2+}\) increasing the contribution of this receptor type to the Excitatory Post Synaptic Current. We consequently suggest that phenomena like the LTP, which depend on NMDA activation, can occur also in subthreshold conditions due to the integration of the dendritic synaptic activity.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allam S, Bouteiller JMC, Hu EY, Ambert N, Greget R, Bischoff S, Baudry M, Berger TW (2015) Synaptic efficacy as a function of ionotropic receptor distribution: a computational study. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0140333
Bourne JN, Harris KM (2011) Coordination of size and number of excitatory and inhibitory synapses results in a balanced structural plasticity along mature hippocampal CA1 dendrites during LTP. Hippocampus 21:354–373
Carfora MF, Pirozzi E (2017) Linked Gauss-diffusion processes for modeling a finite-size neuronal network. Biosystems. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystems.2017.07.009
Clements JD (1996) Transmitter timecourse in the synaptic cleft: its role in central synaptic function. Trends Neurosci 19:163–171
Clements JD, Lester RA, Tong G, Jahr CE, Westbrook GL (1992a) The time course of glutamate in the synaptic cleft. Science 258(5087):1498–1501. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1359647. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1359647%5Cn, http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/doi/10.1126/science.1359647
Clements JD, Lester RA, Tong J, Jahr CE, Westbrook GL (1992b) The time course of glutamate in the synaptic cleft. Science 258:11,498–11,501
Di Maio V (2007) Excitatory synaptic interaction on dendritic tree. In: Mele F, Ramella G, Santillo S, Ventriglia F (eds) Brain, vision and arificial intelligence. Lecture notes in computer science, vol 4729. Springer, Berlin, pp 388–397
Di Maio V (2008) Regulation of information passing by synaptic transmission: a short review. Brain Res 1225:26–38
Di Maio V, Ventriglia F, Santillo S (2015) A model of dopamine modulated glutamatergic synaspe. Biosystems 136:59–65. https://doi.org/10.1002/0470841559.ch1
Di Maio V, Ventriglia F, Santillo S (2016a) A model of cooperative effect of AMPA and NMDA receptors in glutamatergic synapses. Cogn Neurodyn 10:315–325
Di Maio V, Ventriglia F, Santillo S (2016b) A model of dopamine modulation of glutamatergic synapse on medium size spiny neurons. Biosystems 142–143:25–31
Di Maio V, Ventriglia F, Santillo S (2016c) AMPA/NMDA cooperativity and integration during a single synaptic event. J Comput Neurosci 41(2):127–142. http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/journals/jcns/jcns41.html#MaioVS16, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10827-016-0609-5
Di Maio V, Ventriglia F, Santillo S (2017) Stochastic, structural and functional factors influencing AMPA and NMDA synaptic response variability: a review. Neuronal Signal 1:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1042/NS20160051
Dingledine R, Borges K, Bowie D, Traynelis S (1999) The gutamate receptor ion channels. Pharmacol Rev 51:7–61
Forti L, Bossi M, Bergamaschi A, Villa A, Malgaroli A (1997) Loose path recording of single quanta at individual hippocampal synapses. Nature 388:874–878
Glavinovic MI (1999) Monte Carlo simulation of vesicular release, spatiotemporal distribution of glutamate in synaptic cleft and generation of postsynaptic currents. Pflügers Arch Eur J Physiol 437:462–470
Jahr C, Stevens C (1990) Voltage dependence of NMDA-activated macroscopic conductances predicted by single-channel kinetics. J Neurosci 10:3178–3182
Lansky P, Sato S (1999) The stochastic diffusion models of nerve membrane depolarization and interspike interval generation. J Peripher Nerv Syst 4:27–42
Liu G, Choi S, Tsien RW (1999) Variability of neurotransmitter concentration and nonsaturation of postsynaptic AMPA receptors at synapses in hippocampal cultures and slices. Neuron 22:395–409
London M, Häusser M (2005) Dendritic computation. Annu Rev Neurosci 28:503–532. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.neuro.28.061604.135703
Malinow R, Malenka RC (2002) AMPA receptor trafficking and synaptic plasticity. Annu Rev Neurosci 25:103–26. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.neuro.25.112701.142758
Mayer ML (2011) Structure and mechanism of glutamate receptor ion channel assembly, activation and modulation. Curr Opin Neurobiol 21:283–290
Megías M, Emri Z, Freund TF, Gulyàs AI (2001) Total number and distribution of inhibitory and excitatory synapses on hippocampal CA1 pyramidal cells. Neuroscience 102:527–540
Musilla M, Lansky P (1991) Generalized stein model for anatomically complex neurons. Biosystems 25:179–191
Nakagawa T (2010) The biochemistry, ultrastructure, and subunit assembly mechanism of AMPA receptors. Mol Neurobiol 15:161–184
Nicoll R, Schmitz D (2005) Synaptic plasticity at hippocampal mossy fibre synapses. Nat Rev Neurosci 6:863–876
Pirozzi E (2017) Colored noise and a stochastic fractional model for correlated inputs and adaptation in neuronal firing. Biol Cybern. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00422-017-0731-0. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystems.2017.07.009
Rall W (1962) Electrophysiology of a dendritic neuron model. Biophys J 2:145–167
Rall W, Rinzel J (1973) Branch input resistance and steady attenuation for input to one branch of a dendritic neuron model. Biophys J 13:648–688
Rao VR, Finkbeiner S (2007) NMDA and AMPA receptors: old channels, new tricks. Trends Neurosci 30(6):284–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tins.2007.03.012
Raymond CR (2007) LTP forms 1, 2 and 3: different mechanisms for the “long” in long-term potentiation. Trends Neurosci 30(4):167–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tins.2007.01.007
Reznik RI, Barreto E, Sander E, So P (2016) Effects of polarization induced by non-weak electric fields on the excitability of elongated neurons with active dendrites. J Comput Neurosci 40(1):27–50. http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/journals/jcns/jcns40.html#ReznikBSS16
Schikorski T, Stevens CF (1997) Quantitative ultrastructural analysis of hippocampal excitatory synapses. J Neurosci 17:5858–5867
Spruston N (2010) Dendritic signal integration. Encycl Neurosci 1:445–452. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-008045046-9.01648-X
Takumi Y, Matsubara A, Rinvik E, Ottersen OP (1999) The arrangement of glutamate receptors in excitatory synapses. Ann N Y Acad Sci 868:474–482
Traynelis S, Wollmuth L, CJ M, Menniti F, Vance K, Ogden K, Hansen K, Yuan H, Myers S, Dingledine R (2010) Glutamate receptor ion channels: structure, regulation, and function. Pharmacol Rev 62:405–496
Vargas-Caballero MI, Robinson H (2004) Fast and slow voltage-dependent dynamics of magnesium block in the NMDA receptor: the asymmetric trapping block model. J Neurosci 24:6171–6180
Ventriglia F (2011) Effect of filaments within the synaptic cleft on the response of excitatory synapses simulated by computer experiments. Biosystems 104:14–22
Ventriglia F, Di Maio V (2000a) A Brownian model of glutamate diffusion in excitatory synapses of hippocampus. Biosystems 58:67–74
Ventriglia F, Di Maio V (2000b) A Brownian simulation model of glutamate synaptic diffusion in the femtosecond time scale. Biol Cybern 83:93–109
Ventriglia F, Di Maio V (2002) Stochastic fluctuation of the synaptic function. Biosystems 67:287–294
Ventriglia F, Di Maio V (2003a) Stochastic fluctuation of the quantal EPSC amplitude in computer simulated excitatory synapses of hippocampus. Biosystems 71:195–204
Ventriglia F, Di Maio V (2003b) Synaptic fusion pore structure and AMPA receptors activation according to Brownian simulation of glutamate diffusion. Biol Cybern 88:201–209
Ventriglia F, Di Maio V (2005) Neural code and irregular spike trains, vol 3704. In: Gregorio MD, Di Maio V, Frucci M, Musio C (eds) BVAI, lecture notes in computer science, pp 89–98. Springer. http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/conf/bvai/bvai2005.html#VentrigliaM05, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/11565123_9
Ventriglia F, Di Maio V (2006) Multisynaptic activity in a pyramidal neuron model and neural code. Biosystems 86:18–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystems.2006.02.014. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0303264706000633
Ventriglia F, Di Maio V (2013a) Effects of AMPARs trafficking and glutamate-receptor binding probability on stochastic variability of EPSC. Biosystems 112:298–304
Ventriglia F, Di Maio V (2013b) Glutamate-AMPA interaction in a model of synaptic transmission. Brain Res 1536:168–176
Volianskis A, France G, Jensen MS, Bortolotto ZA, Jane DE, Collingridge GL (2015) Long-term potentiation and the role of N-methyl-d-aspartate receptors. Brain Res 1621:5–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2015.01.016. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S000689931500027X. (Brain and memory: old arguments and new perspectives)
Zuber B, Nikonenko I, Klauser P, Muller D, Dobochet J (2005) The mammallian central nervous synaptic cleft contains a high density of periodically organized complexes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:19,192–19,197
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Di Maio, V., Santillo, S., Sorgente, A. et al. Influence of active synaptic pools on the single synaptic event. Cogn Neurodyn 12, 391–402 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11571-018-9483-3
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11571-018-9483-3