Decoding the different states of visual attention using functional and effective connectivity features in fMRI data
- 67 Downloads
The present paper concentrates on the impact of visual attention task on structure of the brain functional and effective connectivity networks using coherence and Granger causality methods. Since most studies used correlation method and resting-state functional connectivity, the task-based approach was selected for this experiment to boost our knowledge of spatial and feature-based attention. In the present study, the whole brain was divided into 82 sub-regions based on Brodmann areas. The coherence and Granger causality were applied to construct functional and effective connectivity matrices. These matrices were converted into graphs using a threshold, and the graph theory measures were calculated from it including degree and characteristic path length. Visual attention was found to reveal more information during the spatial-based task. The degree was higher while performing a spatial-based task, whereas characteristic path length was lower in the spatial-based task in both functional and effective connectivity. Primary and secondary visual cortex (17 and 18 Brodmann areas) were highly connected to parietal and prefrontal cortex while doing visual attention task. Whole brain connectivity was also calculated in both functional and effective connectivity. Our results reveal that Brodmann areas of 17, 18, 19, 46, 3 and 4 had a significant role proving that somatosensory, parietal and prefrontal regions along with visual cortex were highly connected to other parts of the cortex during the visual attention task. Characteristic path length results indicated an increase in functional connectivity and more functional integration in spatial-based attention compared with feature-based attention. The results of this work can provide useful information about the mechanism of visual attention at the network level.
KeywordsFunctional connectivity Effective connectivity Visual attention fMRI Brain state decoding
We would like to thank the team (especially Prof. Boyaci) from UMRAM laboratory, Bilkent University, Ankara, Turkey, for providing the infrastructure for this research.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- Behroozi M, Daliri MR (2012) Software tools for the analysis of functional magnetic resonance imaging. Basic Clin Neurosci 3:71–83Google Scholar
- Behroozi M, Daliri MR, Boyaci H (2011) Statistical analysis methods for the fMRI data. Basic Clin Neurosci 2:67–74Google Scholar
- Dimitriadis SI, Salis C, Tarnanas I, Linden DE (2017) Topological filtering of dynamic functional brain networks unfolds informative chronnectomics: a novel data-driven thresholding scheme based on orthogonal minimal spanning trees (OMSTs). Front Neuroinform 11:28CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Kamitani Y, Tong F (2006) Decoding seen and attended motion directions from activity in the human visual cortex. NCBI 16(11):1096–1102Google Scholar
- Kimchi R, Behrmann M, Olson CR (2003) Perceptual organization in vision: behavioral and neural perspectives. Psychology Press, HoveGoogle Scholar
- Posner MI, Petersen SE (1990) The attention system of the human brain. NCBI 13:25–42Google Scholar
- Wiener N (1956) The theory of prediction. In: Beckenbach EF (ed) Modern mathematics for engineers. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar