This art-science-interaction article focuses on moral implications of a recent science announcement. Against the background of literary and cultural theories, it compares a YouTube story with narratives employed in fictional stories.
This is a preview of subscription content,to check access.
Access this article
Unless otherwise stated, the statements in quotation marks are quotes from the video. All video statements are marked in italics.
Niccol A (1997) Gattaca. USA [film]
Huxley A (1985) Brave New World. Triad Panther Books, London [orig. 1932]
Langer S (2009) Philosophy in a new key. A study in the symbolism of reason, rite, and art. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 61
Iser W (1972) The reading process: a phenomenological approach. New Lit Hist 3(2):279–299
Leigh J (2016) Avalanche. W.W. Norton & Company, London
Borrmann, I (2015): Every 28 days. Germany [film]
Hui Z (2018) Chinese ‘gene-editing’ scientist raises eyebrows by promoting sperm washing for HIV-positive couples. Global times, http://www.globaltimes.cn/content/1132670.shtml. Accessed 25 Nov 2019
The He Lab (2018) About Lulu and Nana: twin girls born healthy after gene surgery as single-cell embryos. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=th0vnOmFltc. Accessed 25 Nov 2019
Androutsopoulos J (2013) Participatory culture and metalinguistic discourse: performing and negotiating German dialects on youtube. In: Tannen D, Trester AM (eds) Discourse 2.0. Language and new media. Georgetown University Press, Washington, DC, pp 47–71
Both authors thank their departments for supporting their independent research.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Diekämper, J., Hansen, S.L. Hype, Hope, and Help: Situating a Science Announcement in a Web of Stories. Nanoethics 13, 269–272 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11569-019-00358-z