Advertisement

NanoEthics

, Volume 13, Issue 2, pp 147–150 | Cite as

Responsible Bioentrepreneurs

  • Karsten BolzEmail author
  • Christine Volkmann
Discussion Note
  • 24 Downloads

Abstract

The principles of responsible bioentrepreneurship are a call for multiple stakeholders to engage in a manifold discourse driving a solution-oriented innovation process.

Keywords

Responsible innovation Bioentrepreneur Biotechnology Entrepreneurship Sustainable development 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Dr. Harald König who provided comments, insight, and expertise that greatly improved the manuscript.

References

  1. 1.
    Bioentrepreneur webportal by Nature Biotechnology. https://www.nature.com/bioent/about.html. Accessed 01 May 2018
  2. 2.
    Barton NR, Burgard AP, Burk MJ, Crater JS, Osterhout RE, Pharkya P, Steer BA, Sun J, Trawick JD, van Dien SJ, Yang TH, Yim H (2015) An integrated biotechnology platform for developing sustainable chemical processes. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 42(3):349–360.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10295-014-1541-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Yim H, Haselbeck R, Niu W, Pujol-Baxley C, Burgard A, Boldt J, Khandurina J, Trawick JD, Osterhout RE, Stephen R, Estadilla J, Teisan S, Schreyer HB, Andrae S, Yang TH, Lee SY, Burk MJ, van Dien S (2011) Metabolic engineering of Escherichia coli for direct production of 1,4-butanediol. Nat Chem Biol 7(7):445–452.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nchembio.580 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Check Hayden E (2015) Synthetic biology lures Silicon Valley investors. Nature 527(7576):19.  https://doi.org/10.1038/527019a CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    BCC Research (2017) Synthetic biology: global markets. https://www.bccresearch.com/market-research/biotechnology/synthetic-biology-global-markets.html. Accessed 15 Jul 2019
  6. 6.
    SynBioBeta (2019) Meet the 25 synthetic biology companies that raised $652M this quarter, https://synbiobeta.com/meet-the-25-synthetic-biology-companies-that-raised-652m-this-quarter/. Accessed 02 Jun 2019
  7. 7.
    Check Hayden E (2014) Synthetic-biology firms shift focus. Nature 505(7485):598.  https://doi.org/10.1038/505598a CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Solazyme (2016) Solazyme focuses its breakthrough algae platform to redefine the future of food: company will be changing name to TerraVia™ to reflect focus on food, nutrition and specialty ingredients http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20160311005413/en. Accessed 29 Sep 2016
  9. 9.
    Corbion (2017) Innovative microalgae specialist TerraVia acquired by Corbion. https://www.corbion.com/media/press-releases?newsId=2137800. Accessed 15 Jul 2019
  10. 10.
    Wild Earth (2018). https://www.wildearthpets.com/about. Accessed 09 Apr 2018
  11. 11.
    Memphis Meats Memphis Meats Website. https://www.memphismeats.com/. Accessed 02 Jun 2019
  12. 12.
    Tuomisto HL, de MMJT (2011) Environmental impacts of cultured meat production. Environ Sci Technol 45(14):6117–6123.  https://doi.org/10.1021/es200130u CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Tuomisto HL (2019) The eco-friendly burger: could cultured meat improve the environmental sustainability of meat products? EMBO Rep 20(1):e47395.  https://doi.org/10.15252/embr.201847395 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    von Schomberg R (2013) A vision of responsible research and innovation. In: Owen R, Bessant JR, Heintz M (eds) Responsible innovation: managing the responsible emergence of science and innovation in society, 1st edn. Wiley, Chichester, pp 51–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Evolva (2016) Responsible innovation. http://www.evolva.com/responsible-innovation. Accessed 09 Apr 2017
  16. 16.
    TerraVia (2016) Sustainability principles and commitments. http://terravia.com/Terravia_Sustainability.pdf. Accessed 09 Apr 2018
  17. 17.
    ETC Group, Friends of the Earth GMOs 2.0: synthetic biology: a guide to protecting natural products. http://www.foe.org/projects/food-and-technology/genetic-engineering. Accessed 06 Oct 2016
  18. 18.
    ETC Group, Heinrich Böll Foundation (2015) Outsmarting nature? Synthetic biology and ‘climate smart’ agriculture. https://www.boell.de/sites/default/files/2015-11-outsmarting-nature-synthetic-biology.pdf?dimension1=ds_synthetic_biology_en. Accessed 15 Jul 2019
  19. 19.
    SynBioWatch (2016) A shopper’s guide to synthetic biology: are GMOs 2.0 in your food and cosmetics? http://www.synbiowatch.org/shoppers-guide/. Accessed 06 Oct 2016
  20. 20.
    Jim Thomas (2014) What-syn-a-name? https://www.theguardian.com/science/political-science/2014/jul/08/what-syn-a-name. Accessed 08 Jul 2014
  21. 21.
    Gaskell G (2010) Europeans and biotechnology in 2010: winds of change?: a report to the European Commission’s Directorate-General for Research. EUR, 24537 EN. European Commission, BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Bolz K (2017) Who should be the principal of innovation? J Resp Innov 4(1):78–81.  https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2017.1320645 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Bolz K, König H (2018) Can responsible innovation be a moderator of entrepreneurship? Learnings from the debate on advanced biotechnology. Int J Bus Globalisation 21(3):308–326.  https://doi.org/10.1504/ijbg.2018.095480

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Schumpeter School of Business and EconomicsUniversity of WuppertalWuppertalGermany

Personalised recommendations